Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 273: 44-53, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35462213

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in women presenting with suspected implant complications following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective single-centre cohort study in a designated tertiary referral centre. All women with vaginally and/or abdominally placed implants for POP or SUI who were referred with suspected mesh complications, and investigated with an MRI scan, between January 2018-October 2020 were included in the study. RESULTS: 97 women were identified over this time-period with a total of 123 implants, a median age of 55 years (Range: 34-79) and an average insertion to presentation time of 84 months (Range: 2-300). 78% (74) had one implant in situ, with the remainder having at least 2 in situ. Transobturator tapes (TVT-O/TOT) were the most common implants [35% (43)]. Chronic Pelvic or abdominal pain was the most common clinical symptom [73.2% (71/112 primary complaints)] with provoked tenderness on examination being the most common clinical finding [27.8% (32/115 clinical findings)]. MRI was more likely to detect abdominally placed implants [100% (all 30)] and Retropubic Tapes [89% (16/18)] when compared to Transvaginal POP implants [87.5% (28/32)] and TVT-O/TOT [67% (29/43)]. MRI identified both cases of Sacrocolpopexy mesh rupture as well as all 11 cases of infection (100%). In 91% (10/11) of these cases, MRI revealed the infection to be more widespread than clinical findings initially suspected. Cohen's Kappa demonstrated excellent correlation between MRI and surgical findings in cases with implant related infection, rupture and normal findings (κ = 1; z = 4.58; p = 0.00000459). CONCLUSION(S): MRI can be a useful tool in assessment and management of patients with complications from implants. MRI can detect infection that may be more extensive that is initially clinically apparent in the outpatient setting. Abdominal implants appear to be easier to detect than transvaginal meshes and trans obturator tapes.


Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Slings Suburetrais , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/complicações , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/diagnóstico por imagem , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Slings Suburetrais/efeitos adversos , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/complicações , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/diagnóstico por imagem , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA