RESUMO
Introduction: Fewer than a quarter of people considered to have factors associated with HIV acquisition are prescribed pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the United States. Prior studies demonstrate disparities in provider comfort and knowledge regarding PrEP, suggesting a need for provider capacity building to support widespread PrEP availability. This study examined real-world PrEP clinical questions/cases from providers to a teleconsultation service to identify knowledge gaps and improve PrEP-related training materials and clinical guidelines. Methods: The National Clinician Consultation Center (NCCC) PrEPline provides educational teleconsultation services on clinical decision-making related to PrEP for U.S. health care providers. The NCCC PrEP consultation data collected between 2017 and 2020 were reviewed and systematically categorized by clinical topics, subtopics, and complexity levels (low, moderate, and high). Results: Within the study period, the PrEPline provided 1,754 teleconsultations. More than three quarters came from advanced practice nurses and physicians. The topics of questions commonly focused on medication-based HIV prevention strategies (22.7%), PrEP laboratory ordering/monitoring (17.4%), and side effects and contraindications (14.6%). The majority of teleconsultations (57.9%) involved sharing information that was directly available/addressed in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2017 PrEP Guidelines (i.e., low complexity). Discussion: The low frequency of consultations from nonphysician and non-nurse practitioner providers may suggest a need for increased training and collaborative opportunities for other types of providers. The high percentage of low-complexity inquiries may reveal a desire for capacity-building materials specifically designed for practicing providers (e.g., abridged versions of guidelines). This study may inform future research, best clinical practices, and aid in the development of training materials to increase providers' HIV prevention comfort and knowledge.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV , Infecções por HIV , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Consulta Remota , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em SaúdeRESUMO
Background: There is an alarming shortage of addiction psychiatrists in the United States. To promote interest in addiction psychiatry (ADP), it is essential to maximize resources available through ADP fellowship websites. The aim of this study was to investigate the perceived adequacy and accessibility of content on ADP fellowship websites and discover what further information is considered important among trainees interested in becoming addiction specialists. Methods: Three virtual focus groups were conducted between January and February 2021 among medical students and residents in diverse geographic regions. Participants were asked about the availability of information on ADP fellowship program websites and other material they would like to see available. Focus groups were recorded, with data transcribed and coded using NVivo 11 and Dedoose. A coding scheme was deductively developed based on the core research questions. Results: The majority of participants (N = 27) identified areas of dissatisfaction with the content currently available on ADP websites. The sample was highly representative of racial and ethnic minoritized trainees (n = 12) and genderqueer/non-binary participants (n = 3). Three major themes were identified and durable across all focus groups: lack of emphasis on diversity/health equity, lack of portrayal of everyday life and activities of fellows, and inadequate representation of curricula. Overwhelmingly, participants identified a dedication to health equity (for example, working with minoritized populations) as a key deciding factor in whether to apply to a particular ADP fellowship. Conclusions: ADP fellowship websites are perceived to have considerable variability in the amount and quality of information. Many do not appear to provide the full spectrum of content desired by diverse potential applicants, such as information regarding current fellows and community-centered initiatives. This is concerning, as it suggests ADP fellowships may be interfacing poorly with burgeoning leaders, especially those from race and gender minoritized backgrounds, neglecting potential opportunities to develop future addiction specialists.
Assuntos
Medicina do Vício , Internato e Residência , Humanos , Currículo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Bolsas de Estudo , Internet , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Background: The COVID-19 crisis presents new challenges and opportunities in managing alcohol use disorders, particularly for people unable to shelter in place due to homelessness or other reasons. Requiring abstinence for shelter engagement is impractical for many with severe alcohol use disorders and poses a modifiable barrier to self-isolation orders. Managed alcohol programs (MAPs) have successfully increased housing adherence for those with physical alcohol dependence in Canada, but to our knowledge, they have not been implemented in the United States. To avoid life-threatening alcohol withdrawal syndromes and to support adherence to COVID-19 self-isolation and quarantine orders, MAPs were piloted by the public health departments of San Francisco and Alameda counties. Development of MAPs: We describe implementation of a first-in-the-nation alcohol use disorder intervention of a MAP that emerged at three public health isolation settings within San Francisco and Alameda counties in California. All three interventions utilized a similar process to develop the protocol and implement the MAP that included identification of champions for system-level advocacy and engagement of stakeholders. Implementation of MAPs: We describe the creation and implementation of the distinct protocols. We provide examples of iterative changes to workflow processes and key lessons learned pertaining to protocol development, acceptability by stakeholders, alcohol procurement, documentation, and assessment. We discuss safety considerations, noting that there were no deaths or serious adverse events in any of the patients of the MAP during the 2-month implementation period. Conclusions: MAP pilots have been implemented in the US to aid adherence to isolation and quarantine setting guidelines. Lessons learned provide a foundation for their expansion as a recognized public health intervention for individuals with severe alcohol use disorders who are unable to stabilize within existing care systems. Based on the success of MAP implementation, efforts are under way to investigate alcohol management in homeless populations more broadly.
Assuntos
Alcoolismo/terapia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Redução do Dano , Habitação , Pessoas Mal Alojadas , Quarentena/métodos , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Abstinência de Álcool , California , Depressores do Sistema Nervoso Central/efeitos adversos , Depressores do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Etanol/efeitos adversos , Etanol/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Ciência da Implementação , Projetos Piloto , Saúde Pública , SARS-CoV-2 , São Francisco , Participação dos Interessados , Fluxo de TrabalhoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has exacerbated income inequality, structural racism, and social isolation-issues that drive addiction and have previously manifested in the epidemic of opioid-associated overdose. The co-existence of these epidemics has necessitated care practice changes, including the use of telehealth-based encounters for the diagnosis and management of opioid use disorder (OUD). METHODS: We describe the development of the "Addiction Telehealth Program" (ATP), a telephone-based program to reduce treatment access barriers for people with substance use disorders staying at San Francisco's COVID-19 Isolation and Quarantine (I&Q) sites. Telehealth encounters were documented in the electronic medical record and an internal tracking system for the San Francisco Department of Public Health (SFDPH) COVID-19 Containment Response. Descriptive statistics were collected on a case series of patients initiated on buprenorphine at I&Q sites and indicators of feasibility were measured. RESULTS: Between April 10 and May 25, 2020, ATP consulted on the management of opioid, alcohol, GHB, marijuana, and stimulant use for 59 I&Q site guests. Twelve patients were identified with untreated OUD and newly prescribed buprenorphine. Of these, all were marginally housed, 67% were Black, and 58% had never previously been prescribed medications for OUD. Four self-directed early discharge from I&Q-1 prior to and 3 after initiating buprenorphine. Of the remaining 8 patients, 7 reported continuing to take buprenorphine at the time of I&Q discharge and 1 discontinued. No patients started on buprenorphine sustained significant adverse effects, required emergency care, or experienced overdose. CONCLUSIONS: ATP demonstrates the feasibility of telephone-based management of OUD among a highly marginalized patient population in San Francisco and supports the implementation of similar programs in areas of the U.S. where access to addiction treatment is limited. Legal changes permitting the prescribing of buprenorphine via telehealth without the requirement of an in-person visit should persist beyond the COVID-19 public health emergency.
Assuntos
Alcoolismo/terapia , COVID-19 , Pessoas Mal Alojadas , Abuso de Maconha/terapia , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/métodos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/terapia , Quarentena , Telemedicina/métodos , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Atenção à Saúde , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Saúde Pública , SARS-CoV-2 , São Francisco , Oxibato de Sódio , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Telemedicina/organização & administração , TelefoneRESUMO
Children infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at increased risk of measles morbidity and mortality. We searched abstracts from the PubMed, Embase, and Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information databases for articles published from the earliest date available through September 26, 2017. The primary outcome of interest was serological responses to measles vaccine, stratified by HIV infection status. A total of 2,858 potentially eligible articles were identified, and the final review included 12 studies published between 1992 and 2013, 9 of which reported data on vaccine safety. The studies we included represented 3,573 children, of whom at least 335 were infected with HIV, 788 were HIV-exposed but not infected, and 1,478 were unexposed to HIV. Four of the 12 studies found statistically significant reductions in seropositivity among HIV-infected children compared with HIV-uninfected children within 4 months of vaccination (prevalence ratio range, 0.44-0.70), and forest plots provided visual trends of decreasing immunity over time among HIV-infected children in 2 additional studies. No vaccine-related deaths or serious adverse events were reported. This updated review demonstrated limitations of the existing published literature but supported evidence of reduced immunogenicity of measles vaccine among HIV-infected children, supporting the World Health Organization recommendation to revaccinate HIV-infected children against measles following immune reconstitution with combination antiretroviral therapy.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Criança , Humanos , Vacina contra Sarampo/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and determinants of food insecurity among people living with HIV (PLWH) in Pune, India and its association with biomarkers known to confer increased risks of morbidity and mortality in this population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis assessing food insecurity using the standardized Household Food Insecurity Access Scale. Participants were dichotomized into two groups: food insecure and food secure. Logistic regression models were used to assess associations between socio-economic, demographic, clinical, biochemical factors and food insecurity. SETTING: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) centre of Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals (BJGMC-SGH), Pune, a large publicly funded tertiary and teaching hospital in western India.ParticpantsAdult (≥18 years) PLWH attending the ART centre between September 2015 and May 2016 who had received ART for either ≤7d (ART-naïve) or ≥1 year (ART-experienced). RESULTS: Food insecurity was reported by 40 % of 483 participants. Independent risk factors (adjusted OR; 95 % CI) included monthly family income <INR 5000 (~70 USD; 13·2; CI 5·4, 32·2) and consuming ≥4 non-vegetarian meals per week (4·7; 1·9, 11·9). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) ≥0·33 mg/dl (1·6; 1·04, 2·6) and d-dimer levels 0·19-0·31 µg/ml (1·6; 1·01, 2·6) and ≥0·32 µg/ml (1·9; 1·2, 3·2) were also associated with food insecurity. CONCLUSIONS: More than a third of the study participants were food insecure. Furthermore, higher hs-CRP and d-dimer levels were associated with food insecurity. Prospective studies are required to understand the relationship between food insecurity, hs-CRP and d-dimer better.
Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/análise , Abastecimento de Alimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/sangue , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Long-acting (LA) antiretrovirals may provide meaningful benefit to people who use drugs and people experiencing homelessness (PEH) who face disproportionate structural and psychosocial barriers in adhering to daily oral HIV antiretroviral therapy or pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but their use in these populations has not been studied. SETTING: The Maria X. Martinez Health Resource Center is a low-barrier (eg, no appointment) community-based clinic serving San Francisco PEH. METHODS: A multidisciplinary care model with robust monitoring and outreach support was developed to provide LA antiretroviral therapy (ART) and LA-PrEP to eligible patients experiencing difficulties adhering to oral antiretrovirals. Feasibility was assessed by evaluating the rates of HIV viremia and on-time injections among patients receiving LA antiretrovirals over the first 24 months of program implementation. RESULTS: Between November 2021 and November 2023, 33 patients initiated LA-ART or LA-PrEP (median age, 37 years; 27% transgender/nonbinary; 73% non-White; 27% street homeless; 52% sheltered homeless; 30% with opioid use disorder; 82% with methamphetamine use disorder). Among 18 patients with HIV, 14 initiated LA-ART injections with detectable viremia (median CD4 count, 340 cells/mm 3 ; mean log 10 viral load, 3.53; SD, 1.62), 8 had never previously been virally suppressed, and all but 1 achieved or maintained virologic suppression (mean, 9.67 months; SD, 8.30). Among 15 LA-PrEP patients, all remained HIV negative (mean, 4.73 months; SD, 2.89). Of 224 total injections administered, 8% were delayed >7 days. DISCUSSION: The implementation of LA antiretrovirals is feasible in low-barrier, highly supportive clinical settings serving vulnerable PEH. Expansion of such programs will be critical in ending the HIV epidemic.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV , Infecções por HIV , Pessoas Mal Alojadas , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Humanos , Adulto , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Viabilidade , Viremia/tratamento farmacológico , Antirretrovirais/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
As a proposed mediator between stigma-related stressors and negative mental health outcomes, HIV-related shame has been predictive of increased rates of substance use and difficulties adhering to antiretroviral treatment among people with HIV. These downstream manifestations have ultimately impeded progress toward national goals to End the HIV Epidemic, in part due to limited success of conventional psychotherapies in addressing HIV-related shame. In a pilot clinical trial (N = 12), receipt of psilocybin-assisted group therapy was associated with a large pre-post decrease in HIV-related shame as measured by the HIV and Abuse Related Shame Inventory, with a median (IQR) change of - 5.5 (- 6.5, - 3.5) points from baseline to 3-months follow-up (Z = - 2.6, p = 0.009, r = - 0.75). A paradoxical exacerbation of sexual abuse-related shame experienced by two participants following receipt of psilocybin raises critical questions regarding the use of psilocybin therapy among patients with trauma. These preliminary findings carry potential significance for the future of HIV care.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Psilocibina , Vergonha , Humanos , Psilocibina/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Estigma SocialRESUMO
In recent years, policymakers have proposed and implemented regulatory changes promoting the deprioritization, decriminalization, or state-level legalization of one or more psychedelic substances, usually referencing data from clinical trials as reasons to support liberalizing drug control policies. As psychedelic policies continue to be drafted, personal possession limits may be considered for inclusion in those regulations. If "allowable amount" limits are to be written into law to set personal possession limits, then such amounts should be more consistently related to psychedelic doses found to be safe and efficacious in clinical trials, existing data on moderate-high doses commonly used in various naturalistic settings, and the few studies that estimate psychedelic dose equivalence based on the intensity of subjective effects. In this commentary, we provide an evidence-informed table of typical moderate-high doses for seven commonly used psychedelic substances. These estimates of comparable moderate-high doses can be used to inform "allowable amount" values for psychedelic substances. When such limits are written into legislation, the adoption of evidence-informed comparable limits akin to those presented here would be an important first step toward ensuring greater parity and consistency in drug policy, relative to limits that have little or no scientific basis.
RESUMO
Stimulant use among unstably housed individuals is associated with increased risks of psychiatric co-morbidity, violence, HIV transmission, and overdose. Due to a lack of highly effective treatments, evidence-based policies targeting the prevention of stimulant use disorder are of critical importance. However, little empirical evidence exists on risks associated with initiating or returning to stimulant use among at-risk populations. In a longitudinal cohort of unstably housed women in San Francisco (2016-2019), self-reported data on stimulant use, housing status, and mental health were collected monthly for up to 6 months, and factors associated with initiating stimulants after a period of non-use were identified through logistic regression. Among 245 participants, 42 (17.1%) started using cocaine and 46 (18.8%) started using methamphetamine. In analyses adjusting for demographics and socio-structural exposures over the preceding month, experiencing street homelessness was associated with initiating cocaine use (AOR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.04, 4.25) and sheltered homelessness with initiating methamphetamine use (AOR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.37, 4.79). Other factors-including race, income, unmet subsistence needs, mental health, and treatment adherence-did not reach levels of significance, suggesting the paramount importance of policies directed toward improving access to permanent supportive housing to prevent stimulant use among unstably housed women.
Assuntos
Cocaína , Infecções por HIV , Metanfetamina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Instabilidade Habitacional , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , HabitaçãoRESUMO
Tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death among people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH). The diagnosis of latent TB infection (LTBI) and treatment with TB preventative therapy (TPT) can reduce morbidity and mortality in this population. Historically, isoniazid has been recommended for TPT in PWH due to the absence of drug-drug interactions with most antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, newer rifamycin-based regimens are safer, shorter in duration, associated with improved adherence, and may be as or more effective than isoniazid TPT. Current guidelines have significant heterogeneity in their recommendations for TPT regimens and acceptability of drug interactions with modern ART. In this Infectious Diseases learning unit, we review common questions on diagnosis, treatment, and drug interactions related to the management of LTBI among PWH.
RESUMO
This Viewpoint discusses the use of psychedelics in treatment for substance use disorders.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multiple antiretroviral (ARV) regimens are effective at achieving HIV viral suppression, but differ in pill burden, side effects, barriers to resistance, and impact on comorbidities. Current guidelines advocate for an individualized approach to ARV regimen selection, but synthesizing these modifying factors is complex and time-consuming. METHODS: We describe the development of HIV-ASSIST (https://www.hivassist.com), a free, online decision support tool for ARV selection and HIV education. HIV-ASSIST ranks potential ARV options for any given patient scenario using a composite objective of achieving viral suppression while maximizing tolerability and adherence. We used a multiple-criteria decision analysis framework to construct mathematical algorithms and synthesize various patient-specific (eg, comorbidities and treatment history) and virus-specific (eg, HIV mutations) attributes. We then conducted a validation study to evaluate HIV-ASSIST with prescribing practices of experienced HIV providers at 4 large academic centers. We report on concordance of provider ARV selections with the 5 top-ranked HIV-ASSIST regimens for 10 diverse hypothetical patient-case scenarios. RESULTS: In the validation cohort of 17 experienced HIV providers, we found 99% concordance between HIV-ASSIST recommendations and provider ARV selections for 4 case-scenarios of ARV-naive patients. Among 6 cases of ARV-experienced patients (3 with and 3 without viremia), there was 84% and 88% concordance, respectively. Among 3 cases of ARV-experienced patients with viremia, providers reported 20 different ARV selections, suggesting substantial heterogeneity in ARV preferences in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-ASSIST is a novel patient-centric educational decision support tool that provides ARV recommendations concordant with experienced HIV providers for a diverse set of patient scenarios.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Algoritmos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Internet , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study is to examine whether demand for publicly funded sexually transmitted disease clinics changed after Affordable Care Act implementation. METHODS: The percentages of total incident sexually transmitted infections in Baltimore City that occurred at publicly funded sexually transmitted disease clinics were compared between the 3 years prior to and following the 2014 Medicaid and private insurance expansions. Risk factors associated with diagnosis at sexually transmitted disease clinics were identified using log binomial regression. Statistical analyses were conducted in May 2017. RESULTS: Post-Affordable Care Act, the relative proportion of total sexually transmitted infection diagnoses increased among private and hospital-affiliated clinics, remained unchanged at sexually transmitted disease clinics, and decreased at federally qualified health centers and other publicly funded programs (p<0.001). Multivariable analysis controlling for age, sex, race, and ethnicity showed an overall decline in the risk of diagnosis at sexually transmitted disease clinics post-Affordable Care Act compared with prior (adjusted relative risk=0.92, 95% CI=0.89, 0.96), but the risk among black and Latino men aged <25 years persisted (relative risk=1.03, 95% CI=0.96, 1.10). CONCLUSIONS: The Affordable Care Act increased access to traditional health care, reducing burden on publicly funded programs. However, demand for sexually transmitted disease clinics remains substantial among priority patients. In the healthcare reform era, sexually transmitted disease clinic funding remains critical.
Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Populações Vulneráveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid , Fatores Sexuais , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/etnologia , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Following the 2014 expansions of Medicaid and private health insurance through the Affordable Care Act, municipal sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics-which have historically served predominantly uninsured patients-have been threatened with budget cuts nationwide. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of the insurance expansions on the demand for STD clinic services. METHODS: The proportion of total incident sexually transmitted infections in Baltimore City that were diagnosed at STD clinics was compared between 2013 and 2014, and a multivariate analysis was conducted to determine factors associated with diagnosis at an STD clinic. Analyses were conducted in July 2015. RESULTS: There was no change in the overall proportion of sexually transmitted infection diagnoses made at STD clinics from 2013 to 2014 (relative rate, 1.03; 95% CI=0.95, 1.11). Hispanic ethnicity, black race, male sex, and age >24 years were associated with an increased likelihood of STD clinic utilization (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the Affordable Care Act's insurance expansion measures, the demand for STD clinics remained stable. These safety net clinics serve patients likely to face barriers to accessing traditional health care and their preservation should remain a priority.