Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: finding the least complicated surgical approach (A Randomized Clinical Trial).

BACKGROUND: Many approaches have been suggested for management of zygomaticomaxillary fractures. Each approach has its own advantages and limitations. AIM OF THIS STUDY: The study is intended to compare between the subtarsal approach, conventional transconjuctival approach and the Y- modification of the transconjuctival approach in the management of zygomatico-maxillay complex fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with age range of 20-50 years requiring open reduction and fixation of a fractured zygomatic complex were randomly divided into three equal groups. Group A: subtarsal approach group, group B: a conventional transconjunctival approach group and group C: Y- modification of the transconjunctival approach group. Intraoperative and postoperative parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: As for the exposure time, group C had the longest duration. Easy access to the site of fracture was reached in all groups with no statistically significant difference. During the first 24 h, the pain was only statistically significant between groups A and B with higher pain level in group A. After the first week, pain was significantly higher in groups A and C, with respect to group B. The least edema was observed in group B after 24 h, one week and four weeks postoperatively. Regarding ocular complications, wound healing and sensory nerve function, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Scarring was only noticeable in group A patients. CONCLUSION: The transconjunctival approach provides adequate exposure with excellent esthetics and minor complications. The Y-modification also delivers an esthetic access with inconspicuous scar to the frontozygomatic region. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT05695872).

The differential impact of neuropathic, musculoskeletal and neurovascular orofacial pain on psychosocial function.

BACKGROUND: While the psychosocial morbidity of orofacial pain (OFP) is widely recognized, the differential impact of musculoskeletal, neuropathic and neurovascular symptoms on pain and psychosocial function in individuals with and without coexisting OFP conditions is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a comparative cross-sectional study of 350 consecutive patients attending an OFP clinic; 244 completed standardized self-report measures of pain experience, mood, and generic and oral health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The impact of musculoskeletal, neuropathic and neurovascular symptoms on measures was assessed using linear and logistic generalized linear models. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were diagnosed with a neuropathic condition: 125 with musculoskeletal pain and 101 with (neurovascular) headache disorders. 23% of patients presented with multiple OFP conditions; this was more common in patients with neurovascular (62%) than neuropathic (21%) and/or musculoskeletal orofacial symptoms (28%). Patients with neurovascular symptoms experienced significantly higher levels of pain, evidenced less pain self-efficacy and had poorer overall health. Neuropathic OFP was significantly associated with greater psychological and social oral health disability. Multiple OFP symptoms were not linked to pain severity or psychosocial function, although health scores were worse for patients with neurovascular pain and neuropathic/musculoskeletal symptoms compared with patients with only neurovascular symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The profile and degree of psychosocial morbidity in patients with OFP is significantly related to the types of presenting orofacial symptoms. Patients with neurovascular pain present with higher pain levels and have poorer health while those with neuropathic pain have higher oral functional morbidity; both may require more complex multidisciplinary management.

Evaluation of trephine osteotomy technique in direct sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement.

BACKGROUND: Recently, in implant dentistry, trephine drills have been used instead of conventional drills to conserve the bone during osteotomy. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the effectiveness of trephine osteotomy for lateral sinus lifting technique associated with sinus floor augmentation using the autogenous bone resulting from implant drilling using specialized trephine drills. MATERIALS AND METHOD: 12 Patients were included and have been subjected to lateral sinus lifting using trephine osteotomy with simultaneous implant placement with delay loading. A bone graft used in sinus floor augmentation has been prepared using autogenous bone resulting from implant site preparation in addition to ß-tricalcium phosphate. RESULTS: After 6 months, the difference between the primary stability and implant stability was statistically significant p-value ≤ 0.05. After 6 months, the mean vertical bone height reached 11.71 ± 0.72 mm. The mean volume of the newly formed bone of the grafted area recorded after 6 months was 1126.7 ± 82.94 mm3. CONCLUSION: Trephine osteotomy technique in both lateral approach of sinus lifting, and implant site preparation allows preservation of autogenous bone. Moreover, the trephine osteotomy technique in the lateral approach of sinus lifting eliminates the use of an absorbable membrane.

Evaluation of patients' quality of life using novel "Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society" questionnaire in minimally invasive management of obstructive sialadenitis.

OBJECTIVE: The introduction of minimally invasive surgical procedures has significantly reduced the rate of major salivary gland removal. This study aimed to assess these procedures in relieving patients' complaints and their impact on quality of life using the newly introduced Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society questionnaire. STUDY DESIGN: Between January 2021 and October 2021, a case series was treated with minimally invasive surgical procedures. Data such as stone size, number and location, surgical approach, symptoms relief, and improvement of quality of life were collected and analyzed. Thirty-six patients were included (22 males and 14 females); 28 had stones in the submandibular gland and 8 in the parotid gland with largest stone diameter ranging from 0.2 to 2.8 cm. The approach was selected according to stone size and location, so 17 patients were treated with sialendoscopy (alone or using a combined approach), and 19 patients were treated without sialendoscopy using a transoral approach. RESULTS: After a 6-month follow-up, the questionnaire scores showed a statistically significant difference in comparison to preoperative ones. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgical procedures present an excellent option for sialolithotomy, after which the relief of symptoms, restoration of gland function, and a significant improvement in quality of life are achieved.

Comparison of the Neuropathic Pain Symptoms and Psychosocial Impacts of Trigeminal Neuralgia and Painful Posttraumatic Trigeminal Neuropathy.

AIMS: To compare the impacts of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and painful posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathy (PPTTN) on psychologic function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using a comprehensive quantitative assessment. METHODS: This was a comparative cross-sectional study. A total of 97 patients diagnosed with PPTTN and 40 patients diagnosed with TN who sought treatment at an orofacial pain clinic completed standardized self-report measures of pain intensity, neuropathic symptoms, pain self-efficacy, mood, and indicators of general and oral HRQoL. Differences between the PPTTN and TN groups were tested, and associations of each condition with pain severity, psychologic function, and HRQoL were examined. RESULTS: The majority of PPTTN (66%) and TN patients (80%) were affected by orofacial pain. Pain attacks were more frequent in TN (71%) than PPTTN (28%) patients, while numbness was more common in PPTTN (51%) than TN (12%) patients. Pain intensity was higher in TN for intermittent and affective pain dimensions. Both PPTTN and TN had a significant, but comparable, impact on patients' oral HRQoL. The burden of condition on overall health was significantly more pronounced in patients with TN than PPTTN, with evident differences in the mobility and self-care domains. There was a trend showing that more TN (54%) than PPTTN (36%) patients reported signs of depression, but clinically significant anxiety was comparably high in both groups (34% to 39%). Anxiety and pain self-efficacy were closely related to oral and general health statuses in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both TN and PPTTN are associated with significant psychosocial burden and reduced HRQoL, indicating a need to develop effective treatments for neuropathic orofacial pain that target functional restoration.