Brain or strain? Symptoms alone do not distinguish physiologic concussion from cervical/vestibular injury.

OBJECTIVE: To compare symptoms in patients with physiologic postconcussion disorder (PCD) versus cervicogenic/vestibular PCD. We hypothesized that most symptoms would not be equivalent. In particular, we hypothesized that cognitive symptoms would be more often associated with physiologic PCD. DESIGN: Retrospective review of symptom reports from patients who completed a 22-item symptom questionnaire. SETTING: University-based concussion clinic. PATIENTS: Convenience sample of 128 patients who had symptoms after head injury for more than 3 weeks and who had provocative treadmill exercise testing. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Subjects were classified as either physiologic PCD (abnormal treadmill performance and a normal cervical/vestibular physical examination) or cervicogenic/vestibular PCD (CGV, normal treadmill performance, and an abnormal cervical/vestibular physical examination). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported symptoms. Univariate and multivariate methods, including t tests, tests of equivalence, a logistic regression model, k-nearest neighbor analysis, multidimensional scaling, and principle components analysis were used to see whether symptoms could distinguish PCD from CGV. RESULTS: None of the statistical methods used to analyze self-reported symptoms was able to adequately distinguish patients with PCD from patients with CGV. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms after head injury, including cognitive symptoms, have traditionally been ascribed to brain injury, but they do not reliably discriminate between physiologic PCD and cervicogenic/vestibular PCD. Clinicians should consider specific testing of exercise tolerance and perform a physical examination of the cervical spine and the vestibular/ocular systems to determine the etiology of postconcussion symptoms. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Symptoms after head injury, including cognitive symptoms, do not discriminate between concussion and cervical/vestibular injury.

COVID-19 prevalence and presenting symptoms in a college student population: A retrospective chart review.

Purpose: To describe the clinical presentation and prevalence of COVID-19 in a collegiate population at the time of initial recognition and testing. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of all students tested for COVID-19 at the University of Florida Student Health Care Center between March 9th and April 17th, 2020, comprising the first 6 weeks after spring break. Results: Twenty-five of 296 students (8.4%) tested positive for COVID-19. No significant differences were seen between positive and negative students regarding travel history or known exposures. Students who tested positive more commonly experienced fatigue, congestion, nausea, chest pain, anosmia, ageusia, anorexia, abdominal discomfort, and new problems sleeping over the course of illness. Conclusion: Initial symptoms unreliably clinically distinguish COVID-19 from other viral illnesses amongst college students. Providers should continue to have a low threshold for testing, especially as universities have seen large surges in cases related to students returning to campus.

Physical Activity Compliance to American Cancer Society Recommendations Amongst Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Survivors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine the extent to which hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) survivors adhere to the American Cancer Society recommendations for weekly physical activity and identify potential demographic and transplant characteristics associated with the lack of compliance. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included adults who had undergone HCT and were at least 1 year post transplantation. Physical activity was assessed using the screening tool of the Block 2014. The type of activity, frequency, and intensity were converted into the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) scores (0-499.0 MET min/week, inadequate activity; 500-1000 MET min/week, adequate activity; >1000 MET min/week, highly vigorous activity). RESULTS: Participants (n = 81) reported a median MET score of 153 min/week, and 83% failed to reach the physical activity guideline of >500 MET min/week. Only 17.3% met the ACS recommendations, with three reporting above 1000 MET min/week. Median daily moderate and vigorous physical activity minute totals were 18.0 and 5.9 min/d, with 85.2% and 60.5% of participants involved, respectively. The median total physical activity energy expenditure was 744 kcal/d. Only race was associated with MET score, with Whites reporting higher MET scores. CONCLUSION: Most HCT survivors assessed in this study did not meet the ACS physical activity recommendations. These findings reinforce the need to incorporate screening for physical activity into HCT survivorship care, offer counseling to those who do not meet the recommended levels, and encourage a physically active lifestyle among HCT survivors.