A value-based healthcare approach: Health-related quality of life and psychosocial functioning in women with Turner syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: As part of the value-based healthcare programme in our hospital, a set of patient-reported outcome measures was developed together with patients and implemented in the dedicated Turner Syndrome (TS) outpatient clinic. This study aims to investigate different aspects of health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and psychosocial functioning in women with TS in order to establish new possible targets for therapy. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: A comprehensive set of questionnaires (EQ-5D, PSS-10, CIS-20, Ferti-QoL, FSFI) was developed and used to capture different aspects of HR-QoL and psychosocial functioning in a large cohort of adult women with Turner syndrome. All consecutive women, ≥18 years, who visited the outpatient clinic of our tertiary centre were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Of the eligible 201 women who were invited to participate, 177 women (age 34 ± 12 years, mean ± SD) completed at least one of the validated questionnaires (88%). Women with TS reported a lower health-related quality of life (EQ-5D: 0.857 vs 0.892, P = .003), perceived more stress (PSS-10:14.7 vs 13.3; P = .012) and experienced increased fatigue (CIS-20: P < .001) compared to the general Dutch population. A relationship between noncardiac comorbidities (eg diabetes, orthopaedic complaints) and HR-QoL was found (R = .508). CONCLUSIONS: We showed that TS women suffer from impaired HR-QoL, more perceived stress and increased fatigue compared to healthy controls. A relationship between noncardiac comorbidities and HR-QoL was found. Especially perceived stress and increased fatigue can be considered targets for improvement of HR-QoL in TS women.

Optimal timing for prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted in order to determine the optimal timing of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer. METHODS: Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who planned to undergo nCRT followed by surgery were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients underwent six DW-MRI scans: one baseline scan before the start of nCRT and weekly scans during 5 weeks of nCRT. Relative changes in mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between the baseline scans and the scans during nCRT (ΔADC(%)) were compared between pathologic complete responders (pCR) and non-pCR (tumor regression grades 2-5). The discriminative ability of ΔADC(%) was determined based on the c-statistic. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients with 142 DW-MRI scans were included. pCR was observed in seven patients (29%). ΔADC(%) from baseline to week 2 was significantly higher in patients with pCR versus non-pCR (median [IQR], 36% [30%, 41%] for pCR versus 16% [14%, 29%] for non-pCR, p = 0.004). The ΔADC(%) of the second week in combination with histology resulted in the highest c-statistic for the prediction of pCR versus non-pCR (0.87). The c-statistic of this model increased to 0.97 after additional exclusion of patients with a small tumor volume (< 7 mL, n = 3) and tumor histology of the resection specimen other than adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma (n = 1). CONCLUSION: The relative change in tumor ADC (ΔADC(%)) during the first 2 weeks of nCRT is the most predictive for pathologic complete response to nCRT in esophageal cancer patients. KEY POINTS: • DW-MRI during the second week of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is most predictive for pathologic complete response in esophageal cancer. • A model including ΔADCweek 2was able to discriminate between pathologic complete responders and non-pathologic complete responders in 87%. • Improvements in future MRI studies for esophageal cancer may be obtained by incorporating motion management techniques.

Tumor volume regression during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a prospective study with weekly MRI.

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer causes tumor regression during treatment. Tumor regression can induce changes in the thoracic anatomy, with smaller target volumes and displacement of organs at risk (OARs) surrounding the tumor as a result. Adaptation of the radiotherapy treatment plan according to volumetric changes during treatment might reduce radiation dose to the OARs, while maintaining adequate target coverage. Data on the magnitude of the volumetric changes and its impact on the thoracic anatomy is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the volumetric changes in the primary tumor during nCRT for esophageal cancer based on weekly MRI scans.Material and methods: In this prospective study, patients with adeno- or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus treated with neoajduvant chemoradiotherapy according to the CROSS regimen (carboplatin + paclitaxel + 23 × 1.8 Gy) were included. Of each patient, six sequential MRI scans were acquired: one prior to nCRT, and five in each subsequent week during nCRT. Tumor volumes were delineated on the transversal T2 weighted images by two radiation oncologists. Volumetric changes were analyzed using linear mixed effects models.Results: A total of 170 MRI scans from 29 individual patients were included. The mean (± standard deviation (SD)) tumor volume at baseline was 45 cm3 (± 23). Tumor volume regression started after the first week of nCRT with a significant decrease in tumor volumes every subsequent week. A decrease to 42 cm3 (91% of initial volume), 38 cm3 (81%), 35 cm3 (77%), and 32 cm3 (72%) was observed in the second, third, fourth and fifth week of nCRT, respectively.Conclusion: Based on weekly MRI scanning during nCRT for esophageal cancer, a considerable decrease in tumor volume was observed during treatment. Volume regression and consequential anatomical changes suggest the possible benefit of adaptive radiotherapy.

Anti-HER2 CD4+ T-Helper Type 1 Immune Response is Superior to Breast MRI for Assessing Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In human epidermal growth factor 2-positive breast cancer (HER2+BC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-HER2-targeted therapy (nCT) achieves a complete pathologic response (pCR) in 40-67% of patients. Posttreatment magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) is considered the gold standard, with high specificity but lower sensitivity for assessing response. The authors previously determined that anti-HER2Th1 immune response is associated with pathologic response after nCT in HER2+BC patients. This study contrasted pMRI with anti-HER2Th1 response for assessing pCR in HER2+BC. METHODS: A retrospective review of HER2+BC patients at the authors' institution was performed. Original pMRI reports were collected, and images were reviewed by a breast radiologist blinded to pCR and immune response. The post-nCT imaging-based tumor response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The anti-HER2Th1 response was determined by ex vivo stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with six major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class 2-derived HER2 peptides via enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT). Posttreatment MRI and anti-HER2Th1 responses were cross-tabulated with pCR. Standard diagnostic metrics were computed. RESULTS: For 30 patients, pMRI and anti-HER2Th1 immune response were measured, with 13 patients (43.3%) achieving pCR. The mean anti-HER2Th1 response in pCR was 167 (range 53-418), and

Intrafraction motion analysis in online adaptive radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Intrafraction motion during magnetic resonance (MR)-guided dose delivery of esophageal cancer tumors was retrospectively analyzed. Deformable image registration of cine-MR series resulted in gross tumor volume motion profiles in all directions, which were subsequently filtered to isolate respiratory and drift motion. A large variability in intrafraction motion patterns was observed between patients. Median 95% peak-to-peak motion was 7.7 (3.7 - 18.3) mm, 2.1 (0.7 - 5.7) mm and 2.4 (0.5 - 5.6) mm in cranio-caudal, left-right and anterior-posterior directions, relatively. Furthermore, intrafraction drift was generally modest (<5mm). A patient specific approach could lead to very small margins (<3mm) for most patients.

Planning target volume margin assessment for online adaptive MR-guided dose-escalation in rectal cancer on a 1.5 T MR-Linac.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the margins needed to cover tumor intrafraction motion during an MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) dose-escalation strategy in intermediate risk rectal cancer. METHODS: Fifteen patients with rectal cancer were treated with neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy, 5x5 Gy, according to an online adaptive workflow on a 1.5 T MR-linac. Per patient, 26 3D T2 weighted MRIs were made; one reference scan preceding treatment and five scans per treatment fraction. The primary tumor was delineated on each scan as gross tumor volume (GTV). Target coverage margins were assessed by isotropically expanding the reference GTV until more than 95% of the voxels of the sequential GTVs were covered. A margin with a coverage probability threshold of 90% was defined as adequate. Intra- and interfraction margins to cope with the movement of the GTV in the period between scans were calculated to indicate the target volume margins. Furthermore, the margin needed to cover GTV movement was calculated for different time intervals. RESULTS: The required margins to cover inter- and intrafraction GTV motion were 17 mm and 6 mm, respectively. Analysis based on time intervals between scans showed smaller margins were needed for adequate GTV coverage as time intervals became shorter, with a 4 mm margin required for a procedure of 15 min or less. CONCLUSION: The shorter the treatment time, the smaller the margins needed to cover for the GTV movement during an online adaptive MRgRT dose-escalation strategy for intermediate risk rectal cancer. When time intervals between replanning and the end of dose delivery could be reduced to 15 min, a 4 mm margin would allow adequate target coverage.

Systematic review of the impact of appropriate versus inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy on outcomes of patients with severe bacterial infections.

We investigated the impact of appropriate versus inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy on the clinical outcomes of patients with severe bacterial infections as part of a systematic review and meta-analyses assessing the impact of delay in appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Literature searches of MEDLINE and Embase, conducted on 24 July 2018, identified studies published after 2007 reporting the impact of delay in appropriate antibiotic therapy for hospitalised adult patients with bacterial infections. Results were statistically pooled for outcomes including mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS) and treatment failure. Subgroup analyses were explored by site of infection where data permitted. Inclusion criteria were met by 145 studies, of which 114 reported data on the impact of appropriate versus inappropriate initial therapy. In the pooled analysis, rates of mortality were significantly in favour of appropriate therapy [odds ratio (OR) = 0.44, 95% CI 0.38-0.50]. Across eight studies, LOS was shorter with appropriate therapy compared with inappropriate therapy [mean difference (MD) -2.54 days (95% CI -5.30 to 0.23)], but not significantly so. The incidence of treatment failure was significantly lower in patients who received appropriate therapy compared with patients who received inappropriate therapy (six studies: OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.66) as was mean hospital costs (four studies: MD -7.38 thousand US$ or Euros, 95% CI -14.14 to -0.62). Initiation of appropriate versus inappropriate antibiotics can reduce mortality, reduce treatment failure and decrease LOS, highlighting the importance of broad­spectrum empirical therapy and rapid diagnostics for early identification of the causative pathogen. [Study registration: PROSPERO: CRD42018104669].

A Systematic Review of the Effect of Delayed Appropriate Antibiotic Treatment on the Outcomes of Patients With Severe Bacterial Infections.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe bacterial infections often experience delay in receiving appropriate treatment. Consolidated evidence of the impact of delayed appropriate treatment is needed to guide treatment and improve outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the impact of delayed appropriate antibacterial therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with severe bacterial infections? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Literature searches of MEDLINE and Embase, conducted on July 24, 2018, identified studies published after 2007 reporting the impact of delayed appropriate therapy on clinical outcomes for hospitalized adult patients with bacterial infections. Where appropriate, results were pooled and analyzed with delayed therapy modeled three ways: delay vs no delay in receiving appropriate therapy; duration of delay; and inappropriate vs appropriate initial therapy. This article reports meta-analyses on the effect of delay and duration of delay. RESULTS: The eligibility criteria were met by 145 studies, of which 37 contributed data to analyses of effect of delay. Mortality was significantly lower in patients receiving appropriate therapy without delay compared with those experiencing delay (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45-0.72). Mortality was also lower in the no-delay group compared with the delay group in subgroups of studies reporting mortality at 20 to 30 days, during ICU stay, or in patients with bacteremia (OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.43-0.76]; OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.27-0.80]; and OR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.40-0.75], respectively). No difference was found in time to appropriate therapy between those who died and those who survived (P = .09), but heterogeneity between studies was high. INTERPRETATION: Avoiding delayed appropriate therapy is essential to reduce mortality in patients with severe bacterial infections. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO; No.: CRD42018104669; URL: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Modeling interpatient pharmacodynamic variability of etoposide.

This report describes approaches to modeling interpatient pharmacodynamic variability of etoposide effect as measured by white blood cell count nadir. Such models may be utilized in adaptive control dosing to individualize the dose administered to a patient with the aim of lessening the risk of severe myelosuppression. We have successfully employed adaptive control dosing of etoposide administered by 72-hour continuous infusion based on our prior pharmacodynamic model for white blood cell count nadir. Data from our most recent series of 41 patients were used to investigate new linear and nonlinear pharmacodynamic models. We then cross-validated our best models on data from an independent series of 27 similarly treated patients. We identified an unbiased model that exhibited high precision in both data sets (root mean square errors of 1.11 x 10(3) and 1.20 x 10(3) cells/microL, respectively). The optimal model was a nonlinear Hill model defined by 24-hour etoposide concentration, pretreatment white blood cell count, and pretreatment serum albumin level. The level of albumin was found to be both a component of kinetic (protein binding) and dynamic (patient health) variability. Patients with lower pretreatment albumin levels are at higher risk of severe myelosuppression during etoposide therapy.

Model-guided determination of maximum tolerated dose in phase I clinical trials: evidence for increased precision.

BACKGROUND: A widely used phase I design in clinical trials of chemotherapy for cancer and for AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) allows for dose escalation in cohorts of three to six patients. Escalation continues until a predefined percentage of patients experience unacceptable toxic effects at a given dose level. A safe and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for phase II study is then determined. This standard phase I study design has serious inadequacies. MTD is not a model-based estimate of the true dose that would yield the targeted dose-limiting toxicity rate. Moreover, this simplistic study design allows some patients in the phase I study to be treated at doses unlikely to have therapeutic efficacy. PURPOSE: We constructed a novel quantitative assessment design that repetitively evaluates accumulating dose-toxicity data by repeatedly fitting and updating a pharmacodynamic model after small cohorts of patients are treated. The goal was to more accurately estimate the MTD. METHODS: One hundred phase I studies were simulated by both the standard and quantitative assessment phase I designs. We compared determination of MTD, frequency of grade 0 leukopenia (no toxicity), and study size in the studies simulated using the standard design with those in the studies simulated using the quantitative assessment design. RESULTS: The median MTD determined from the 100 studies was nearly identical for the two designs: 100 and 95 mg/m2 per day for standard and quantitative assessment designs, respectively. However, the interstudy variation in the MTD was decreased in the quantitative assessment design. Moreover, the study size was significantly reduced (P < .0001), and the median percentage of patients treated at subtoxic doses (no leukopenia) was significantly lower for the quantitative assessment design (44% versus 48%; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Our results show clear evidence that a phase I study design using dose and toxicity data in a repetitive and quantitative manner can identify the MTD with more accuracy than the standard design. IMPLICATIONS: New approaches must be explored to improve our ability to identify the optimal dose for phase II studies of chemotherapy for cancer and for AIDS. There is evidence that the quantitative assessment design will identify the MTD with fewer patients, more precision, and fewer patients exposed to suboptimal doses.

Physician-determined patient risk of toxic effects: impact on enrollment and decision making in phase I cancer trials.

BACKGROUND: The conventional phase I trial design yields an estimate of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a new drug defined from treatment toxic effects observed in a small heterogeneous cohort of patients. The MTD is specific for those patients treated in the study and may not be reproducible in another patient series, a limitation known as cohort dependency. PURPOSE: We conducted an opinion survey of phase I investigators in an attempt to characterize physician attitudes and clinical practices regarding assessment of risk of toxic effects in patients. METHODS: A physician opinion survey of scaled multiple choice and open-ended questions was distributed to oncologists (faculty and fellows) at National Cancer Institute (NCI)-funded phase I contract institutions. The target sample was narrowed to these specific institutions because of their experience in conducting various phase I trials. Each NCI-funded phase I contractor received an instruction sheet and 25 surveys and envelopes that were made available to oncologists enrolling patients in phase I trials. RESULTS: Of the 75 surveys distributed, 67 (89%) were returned. Most respondents agreed that unexplained variability in toxicity exists in phase I trials. However, opinion varied considerably among five participating institutions (two-sided P = .001). Informal scoring of patients for toxicity risk prior to treatment was a common practice (85% overall), although the prevalence of this practice varied somewhat among the institutions (two-sided P = .01). Physicians' opinions were mixed regarding the practice of becoming increasingly selective in enrolling patients as the MTD was approached, with strong disagreement noted among institutions (two-sided P = .001). Given background on a hypothetical phase I trial, respondents were asked to rank the usefulness of 27 patient factors for predicting the risk of dose-limiting leukopenia. Eight factors were perceived as strongly informative: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or worse, recent weight loss of more than 10%, multiple bone marrow metastases, two or more prior chemotherapy regimens, history of treatment toxic effects, and prior treatment with carboplatin, mitomycin, or nitrosoureas. CONCLUSIONS: Informal assessment of the risk of toxic effects in a patient was found to be common practice among oncologists who enroll patients on phase I trials, and there was strong agreement on the usefulness of several key patient factors for such assessments. Interestingly, interinstitutional variation in opinions and practices were noted, specifically regarding patient-selection bias. Follow-up studies are required to establish if physician-determined assessments of patient risk are consistent and accurate.

Favorable long-term survival following induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin and concomitant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with head and neck cancer die of locoregional recurrence of disease following surgery and/or radiotherapy. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to administer induction chemotherapy, perform surgery, and administer concomitant chemoradiotherapy in rapid sequence and to evaluate their impact on locoregional and distant tumor control. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with previously untreated, locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer received two cycles of cisplatin, bleomycin, and methotrexate (PBM) (33 patients) or cisplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (PFL) (31 patients). PFL was given to patients who were unable to receive bleomycin. Local therapy consisted of surgery and/or concomitant chemoradiotherapy with 5-FU, hydroxyurea, leucovorin, and radiotherapy (FHX-L), all administered every other week. RESULTS: Complete and overall induction response rates were 21% and 79%, respectively, for PBM and 29% and 81%, respectively, for PFL. At completion of local therapy, 81% of the patients were disease-free. With a median follow-up of 35 months, the median survival and time to progression are 22 and 17 months, respectively, for PBM and have not been reached for PFL. Locoregional recurrence of disease is 30% for PBM and 26% for PFL. Distant disease progression is 24% for PBM and only 3% for PFL. CONCLUSIONS: The sequencing of induction chemotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy is feasible and results in a high local control rate and in an encouraging survival rate with PFL. The high distant failure (i.e., outside the head and neck area) rate of PBM suggests insufficient systemic activity for that regimen. IMPLICATIONS: Concomitant FHX-L chemoradiotherapy may improve regional control rates of advanced head and neck cancer. Effective systemic therapy may be needed to control systemic micrometastases. PFL, but not PBM, appears to be suitable to accomplish that goal.

Thymidylate synthase expression and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Thymidylate synthase (TS), an essential enzyme in DNA synthesis, is a target for the fluoropyrimidines, an important group of antineoplastic agents used widely in the treatment of head and neck cancer. PURPOSE: We evaluated relationships between the level and/or pattern of tumor TS expression and response to fluorouracil (5-FU)-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. METHODS: Tumor specimens from 86 patients were available for this retrospective analysis. The patients were enrolled in four consecutive phase II studies that tested combinations of 5-FU, leucovorin, and cisplatin with or without added methotrexate plus piritrexim or interferon alfa-2b (IFN alpha-2b). TS protein expression in the tumors was assessed by use of the TS 106 monoclonal antibody and standard immunohistochemical staining techniques. TS immunostaining was classified according to its level of intensity (TS 0-1 = low, TS 2 = intermediate, and TS 3 = high) and according to its extent (focal pattern = less than 25% of tumor cells positive; diffuse pattern = greater than or equal to 25% of tumor cells positive). Data from 79 patients were available for an analysis of tumor TS expression and patient/tumor characteristics; 70 patients were assessable for their response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant association between the level of tumor TS expression and the degree of tumor differentiation; a higher proportion of patients whose tumors exhibited TS 0-1 immunostaining had undifferentiated or poorly differentiated tumors than patients whose tumors exhibited TS 2 or TS 3 immunostaining (P = .04, Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test). Among the 70 patients who were assessable for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, TS 3 tumor immunostaining was associated with a lower rate of complete response (i.e., complete disappearance of clinically detectable disease for a minimum of 4 weeks from time of initial determination) than was TS 2 or TS 0-1 immunostaining, but this association was not statistically significant (P = .09, exact trend test); among the 39 patients who were treated with regimens that included 5-FU, leucovorin, cisplatin, and IFN alpha-2b, this inverse association between TS immunostaining intensity and response was statistically significant (P = .02, exact trend test). Tumor TS immunostaining intensity and overall survival were not found to be associated. Patients with tumors exhibiting a focal pattern of TS immunostaining have experienced significantly longer survival than patients with tumors exhibiting a diffuse pattern; for the 53 patients with diffuse tumor TS immunostaining, the median survival was 24.7 months, whereas the median survival has not yet been reached for the 22 patients with focal tumor TS immunostaining (P = .04, two-tailed logrank test). However, the survival advantage for the focal versus diffuse TS immunostaining pattern was limited to patients whose tumors also exhibited a TS 3 level of immunostaining intensity. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Characterization of tumor TS expression may be of value in identifying patients with advanced head and neck cancer who would benefit from fluoropyrimidine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Metabolic fate of irinotecan in humans: correlation of glucuronidation with diarrhea.

Irinotecan (7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxy-camptotheci n (CPT-11) is hydrolyzed by the enzyme carboxyl esterase to 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), which further undergoes glucuronic acid conjugation to form the corresponding SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G). SN-38 is believed to be the cause of treatment-related diarrhea, a dose-limiting toxicity of CPT-11 observed in phase I clinical trials. This study investigated the effect of glucuronidation on the concentrations of SN-38 following CPT-11 infusion in 21 patients undergoing a phase I trial. To assess the relationship between gastrointestinal toxicity and pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and its metabolites, we defined a "biliary index" of SN-38 which was the product of the relative area ratio of SN-38 to SN-38G and the total CPT-11 area under the plasma concentration-time curve. Nine patients with grade 3-4 diarrhea had higher biliary indexes than 12 patients with grade 0-2 diarrhea (median 2228 versus 5499, P = 0.0004). The relatively higher index values, suggestive of higher biliary concentrations of SN-38, were possibly due to low glucuronidation rates. Hence, modulation of glucuronidation may be effective in increasing the therapeutic index of CPT-11.

Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of iododeoxyuridine and bleomycin in patients with advanced cancer.

Studies previously performed in our laboratory demonstrated synergistic cytotoxicity and DNA strand break formation in human tumor cells following exposure to a combination of bromodeoxyuridine and bleomycin. Synergy was evident when bromodeoxyuridine was administered prior to or simultaneously with bleomycin and occurred over a wide range of concentration ratios. We therefore undertook a phase I clinical trial of the combination of iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd) and bleomycin to determine the maximally tolerated dose of IdUrd that could be administered with a standard dose of bleomycin and to determine the toxicities of the combination. Eligible patients were those with advanced cancer refractory to standard therapy who had a performance status of 0-2, measurable or evaluable disease, and adequate organ function. IdUrd was administered as a 5-day continuous i.v. infusion beginning at a dose of 250 mg/m2/day with escalation in cohorts of 3-6 patients according to a modified Fibonacci scheme. Bleomycin was administered at a dose of 15 mg/m2/day as a continuous i.v. infusion during the last 3 days of the IdUrd infusion. Cycles of therapy were repeated every 28 days. Plasma levels of IdUrd and iodouracil were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Thirty patients received a total of 79 cycles of IdUrd/bleomycin. Dose-limiting toxicity was bone marrow suppression. At the maximally tolerated IdUrd dose of 2780 mg/m2/day, the median neutrophil nadir after the first cycle of therapy was 805/microliters and the median platelet nadir was 48,000/microliters. Other toxic effects included mucositis, fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, fever, and skin toxicity. Plasma steady-state concentrations of IdUrd increased proportionally to administered IdUrd dose. IdUrd clearance varied from 0.253 liters/min/m2 to 0.503 liters/min/m2 and did not correlate with IdUrd dose. IdUrd dose and concentration correlated significantly with granulocyte and platelet nadirs, and a pharmacodynamic model for white blood cell count nadir could be defined by pretreatment white blood cell count, IdUrd dose, and gender. The recommended IdUrd dose for phase II testing of this combination is 2140 mg/m2/day. Phase II studies will be of particular interest in those diseases, such as carcinomas of the head, neck, and esophagus, where bleomycin has documented activity as a single agent.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a new antineoplastic agent: pyrazine diazohydroxide (NSC 361456).

Pyrazine diazohydroxide (PZDH) is a novel antineoplastic agent that appears to form DNA adducts via the reactive pyrazine diazonium ion and produces substantial antitumor activity in preclinical models. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximally tolerated dose of PZDH that could be administered as a 5-min i.v. bolus for 5 consecutive days repeated every 28 days. Thirty-one patients with advanced cancer refractory to standard therapy received a total of 65 cycles of therapy at 7 sequential PZDH dose levels: 18, 36, 45, 56, 75, 100, and 133 mg/m2/day. At the maximally tolerated dose (133 mg/m2/day x 5), all 4 patients experienced grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia, and 3 of 4 had grade 3-4 neutropenia. At the recommended phase II dose (100 mg/m2/day x 5), the median WBC nadir following the first cycle was 2.5 x 10(3)/microliters (range, 0.6-7.6) occurring on day 36, and the median platelet nadir was 87 x 10(3)/microliters (range, 9-155) occurring on day 26. Nausea and vomiting occurred at all dose levels, but were well controlled with ondansetron. No evidence of hepatic, renal, pulmonary, cardiac, venous, dermatological, or neurological toxicity was observed. Pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed on 28 of the 31 patients using an analytical method including derivatization of the parent drug to 2-chloropyrazine. We report the total 2-chloropyrazine, which represents PZDH converted per method plus PZDH converted in vivo. Although the assay quantitation limit is 10 ng/ml, PZDH could only be detected at the first dose level for 30-90 min after the i.v. bolus. Compartmental modeling of the first 4 dose levels was most consistent with a 2-compartment model. Subsequent dose levels revealed a third phase to the plasma decay curve. The area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve increased proportionally with dose; there was no evidence for dose-dependent pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetic parameters for 12 patients analyzed by the 3-compartment model revealed an alpha-half-life (t1/2 alpha) of 2.83 +/- 1.57 (mean +/- SD), a t1/2 beta of 11.9 +/- 4.42, and a t1/2 gamma of 161 +/- 47.1 min, with a mean clearance of 1.86 +/- 0.91 liters/min. At the 100- and 133-mg/m2 dose levels, the mean areas under the plasma drug concentration-time curve were 105 and 169 micrograms min/ml, respectively. There was a moderate correlation between body surface area and clearance (r = 0.45, P = 0.015) but a better correlation between weight and clearance (r = 0.53, P = 0.004).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Phase I study of amonafide dosing based on acetylator phenotype.

Amonafide is extensively metabolized, including N-acetylation to an active metabolite. Prior studies have demonstrated that patients who are fast acetylators of amonafide (and other drugs) have increased toxicity at standard doses of amonafide. The primary objective of this study was to define the recommended phase II dose of amonafide separately for slow and fast acetylators. Twenty-six patients with advanced cancer underwent acetylator phenotyping with caffeine and were assigned to a dose level. Slow acetylators were treated at 375 mg/m2 (daily for 5 days) and had a median WBC nadir of 1600/microliters. Fast acetylators were treated at both 200 and 250 mg/m2, resulting in median WBC nadirs of 5300 and 2000/microliter, respectively. Two patients were not typeable, and two patients appear to have been misphenotyped, one in each phenotype category. Pharmacodynamic analysis yielded a model for nadir WBC including acetylator phenotype, 24-h N-acetyl-amonafide plasma concentration, gender, and pretreatment WBC. We recommend doses of 250 and 375 mg/m2 (for 5 days) for further phase II testing of amonafide in fast and slow acetylators, respectively.

Occurrence of p53 gene deletions and human papilloma virus infection in human head and neck cancer.

Little is known regarding the molecular genetic events in head and neck carcinoma. Epidemiological evidence suggests that both alcohol and tobacco use are related to the development of these neoplasms, and viral infections have also been postulated to play a role in some tumors. Loss of p53 tumor suppressor gene function has been found in many malignancies and can occur through either gene mutation or by interaction with the E6 protein of oncogenic human papilloma viruses (HPV). Because the mucosal surfaces of the head and neck are exposed to mutagens and HPVs, we studied DNA derived from 30 stage I-IV squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (9 primary tumors and 21 early passage cell lines) for p53 gene mutations as well as for the presence of oncogenic HPV DNA. Exons 2 through 11 of the p53 gene were examined using single strand conformation polymorphism analysis followed by direct genomic sequencing of all variants. HPV detection was done using polymerase chain reaction amplification with HPV E6 region type specific primers as well as L1 region degenerate ("consensus") primers; HPV type was determined by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the amplified fragment as well as by Southern blotting of genomic DNA. Sixteen of 30 tumors (53%) had p53 mutations and oncogenic HPV DNA was detected in 3 of 30 (10%) tumors, none of which had p53 mutations. The p53 mutational spectrum observed was characterized by equal frequencies of transversions (6 of 16), transitions (5 of 16), and deletions (5 of 16). This distribution of mutations differs from the spectrum of p53 mutation reported in esophageal (P = 0.05) and lung (P = 0.02) cancers, two other tobacco associated neoplasms. A previously undescribed clustering of 3 mutations at codon 205 was also observed. A trend toward a shorter time to tumor recurrence after treatment was noted for those patients with tumors exhibiting p53 gene mutations, and no relationship between p53 mutations and tumor stage or node status was noted. Alteration in p53 gene function appears common in head and neck cancer, and the mutational spectrum observed may reflect the role of different mutagens or mutagenic processes than those responsible for the p53 mutations in lung and esophageal neoplasms.

Pentostatin in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a phase II trial of Cancer and Leukemia group B.

We conducted a phase II trial of deoxycoformycin (pentostatin [DCF]) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Eligibility criteria included age greater than 18 years, Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) performance status 0 to 2, lymphocyte count greater than or equal to 15,000 cells/microL, international stage B or C disease (multiple lymph nodes involved and/or hemoglobin [Hgb] less than 11 g and/or platelets less than 100,000/microL) and no more than one prior treatment regimen. DCF dose was 4 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) weekly for 3 weeks and then every 2 weeks. There were 39 eligible patients (35 men and four women; median age, 63 years; median time from diagnosis to study entry, 3 years). Of these 39 patients, 31% were stage B and 33% had no prior treatment. Median laboratory values at entry were Hgb 10.5 g, WBC 96,100/microL, and platelets 93,500/microL. Nodal involvement was present in 90%, splenomegaly in 81%, and hepatomegaly in 47%. Patients received a median of nine DCF injections, with a range of four to 26. Three patients were not evaluable for response. Overall, 3% achieved a complete response (CR), 23% a partial response (PR), 28% showed clinical improvement (CI), and 38% had stable disease (SD). Associated toxicities (grade 2 or worse) observed were infections (52%), worsening of thrombocytopenia (26%) or anemia (33%), nausea and vomiting (31%), rash or pruritus (20%), and stomatitis (8%). We conclude that DCF is an active agent in CLL with acceptable toxicity.