Impact of gut microbiota on liver transplantation.

The gut microbiota has been gaining attention due to its interactions with the human body and its role in pathophysiological processes. One of the main interactions is the "gut-liver axis," in which disruption of the gut mucosal barrier seen in portal hypertension and liver disease can influence liver allograft function over time. For example, in patients who are undergoing liver transplantation, preexisting dysbiosis, perioperative antibiotic use, surgical stress, and immunosuppressive use have each been associated with alterations in gut microbiota, potentially impacting overall morbidity and mortality. In this review, studies exploring gut microbiota changes in patients undergoing liver transplantation are reviewed, including both human and experimental animal studies. Common themes include an increase in Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcaceae species and a decrease in Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Bacteriodes, while a decrease in the overall diversity of gut microbiota after liver transplantation.

Comparative analysis of whole vs. split liver transplantation in infants.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) in infants can be challenging due to their small size and small vasculature. Although both whole LT (WLT) and split LT (SLT) have been described in infants, the head-to-head comparison of these techniques in this population is sparse. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of all patients with age ≤1 year at Indiana University between 2016 and 2022. All SLT were left lateral segment grafts split in situ. RESULTS: A total of 24 infants were transplanted, with 11 SLT and 13 WLT. The median follow-up time was 52.1 months. Donor and recipient characteristics were comparable except for donor age (19 years vs. 2 years; p < .01) and weight (64 kg vs. 14.2 kg; p < .01). Early allograft dysfunction, primary nonfunction, and hepatic artery thrombosis developed more frequently in the WLT group. There were no biliary complications. There were two early deaths (2 and 4 days) in the WLT group. One-year graft survival (100% vs. 77%; p = .10) and patient survival (100% vs. 85%; p = .18) were numerically higher in the SLT group. CONCLUSIONS: SLT with LLS offers a safe and viable option for liver transplantation in infants and is associated with a trend toward superior outcomes. SLT should be considered as a strategy to reduce waitlist times for infants in the absence of small, deceased donors for WLT.

Donor-recipient body size mismatch has no impact on outcomes after deceased donor whole liver transplantation: Role of donor liver size measurement.

The role of donor-recipient body size mismatch (DRSM) on outcomes after whole liver transplantation (LT) is not clearly defined. At our center, in presence of considerable DRSM, objective assessment of the donor liver by a radiology or intraoperative evaluation by procuring surgeon was incorporated. To evaluate the impact of DRSM on graft outcomes with this approach, adult deceased donor whole liver transplants between July 2001 and December 2017 at our center were studied. DRSM was considered when the donor-recipient body surface area (BSA) ratio (DR-BSAr) was either <0.69 or >1.25. There were 54 (3.2%) transplants with DR-BSAr <0.69 and 61 (3.6%) with DR-BSAr >1.25. One-year graft survival was 85% vs. 89% vs. 89%; (p = .64) for transplants with DR-BSArs of <0.69, 0.69-1.25, and >1.25, respectively. Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) (28% vs. 27% vs. 37%; p = .07), post-transplant coagulopathy, bilirubinemia, and renal function were also comparable. In conclusion, with the actual measurement of the donor liver and recipient abdominal cavity, significant DRSM did not have a negative impact on early and long-term outcomes. Routine measurement of donor liver size by radiology may be incorporated in liver allocation to improve utilization.

Oncologic indications of liver transplantation and deceased donor liver allocation in the United States.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Liver transplantation is a standard therapy for certain liver cancers. The majority of liver transplantation in the United States is through deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). A significant disparity between the demand of livers and patients awaiting liver transplantation still remains, relying on United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to make policies to determine priority amongst recipients, including for patients with liver cancer. We review the scope of liver transplantation in patients with liver cancer with a focus on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), and unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) with respect to current liver allocation policy. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently, liver allocation changed in the United States. Under the current allocation policy, select patients with HCC and hilar CCA (hCCA) receive priority with an exception score of median MELD score at transplant (MMAT)-3. There is scope for other liver cancers, such as iCCA and CRLM to be considered, as reasonable outcomes have been achieved in these patients outside of the United States through DDLT and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). SUMMARY: With the growing experience of liver transplantation for nonconventional oncologic indications, the current policy for prioritization of liver cancer within deceased donor liver allocation may need to be re-evaluated.

Impact of donor preprocurement cardiac arrest on clinical outcomes in pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation.

PPCA has historically been considered detrimental to donor quality in LT, but transplantation of grafts from this group of donors is now routine. Our study aims to evaluate the outcomes associated with use of donors with a history of PPCA in the pediatric population. This study is a single-center retrospective analysis of all pediatric LTs performed over an 18-year period. Donors and recipients were stratified by the presence and length of donor PPCA time. Preprocurement donor and post-transplant recipient laboratory values were collected to assess the degree of ischemic liver injury associated with each donor group. Cox regression analysis was used to compare survival. The records for 130 deceased pediatric LT donors and corresponding recipients were reviewed. There were 73 (56%) non-PPCA donors and 57 (44%) PPCA donors. Donors that experienced a PPCA event demonstrated a higher median, pretransplant peak alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level (P < .001). When comparing post-transplant recipient median ALT levels, donors with any PPCA had lower median peak ALT (P = .15) and day 3 ALT (P = .43) levels than the non-PPCA group. Rates of early graft loss did not differ. The PPCA group with >40 minutes of ischemia had markedly lower survival at 10 years, but this finding did not reach statistical significance. Liver grafts from donors with or without PPCA demonstrated no statistically significant differences in function or survival. A history of donor PPCA alone should not be used as an exclusionary criterion in pediatric liver transplantation.

Expanding the Donor Pool With the Use of Extended Criteria Donation After Circulatory Death Livers.

Use of donation after circulatory death (DCD) donor livers for transplantation has remained cautious in the United States. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the expansion of a DCD liver transplantation (LT) program with the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) DCD livers. After institutional review board approval, 135 consecutive DCD LTs were retrospectively studied. ECD DCD livers were defined as those with 1 of the following factors: donor age >50 years, donor body mass index >35 kg/m2 , donor functional warm ischemia time >30 minutes, and donor liver macrosteatosis >30%. An optimization protocol was introduced in July 2011 to improve outcomes of DCD LT, which included thrombolytic donor flush and efforts to minimize ischemia times. The impact of this protocol on outcomes was evaluated in terms of graft loss, ischemic cholangiopathy (IC), and change in DCD LT volume. Of 135 consecutive DCD LTs, 62 were ECD DCDs. In total, 24 ECD DCD LTs were performed before (era 1) and 38 after the institution of optimization protocol (era 2), accounting for an increase in the use of ECD DCD livers from 39% to 52%. Overall outcomes of ECD DCD LT improved in era 2, with a significantly lower incidence of IC (5% versus 17% in era 1; P = 0.03) and better 1-year graft survival (93% versus 75% in era 1; P = 0.07). Survival outcomes for ECD DCD LT in era 2 were comparable to matched deceased donor LT. With the expansion of the DCD donor pool, the number of DCD LTs performed at our center gradually increased in era 2 to account for >20% of the center's LT volume. In conclusion, with the optimization of perioperative conditions, ECD DCD livers can be successfully transplanted to expand the donor pool for LT.

Class II Human Leukocyte Antigen Epitope Mismatch Predicts De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody Formation After Liver Transplantation.

Formation of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dn-DSAs) has been associated with longterm immunologic complications after liver transplantation (LT). We hypothesized that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) epitope/eplet mismatch (MM) is a marker of immunogenicity and a risk factor for dn-DSA formation. Sera from 80 LT recipients were prospectively screened for dn-DSA by a Luminex single-antigen test (One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA) at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after LT. HLA typing of the recipients and donors was performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-SSP and PCR-SSOP Luminex low-resolution methods (One Lambda, Inc.). The HLAMatchmaker computer algorithm was used for identification of MM eplets at HLA-DRB1 and -DQA1/B1 loci. Luminex single-antigen bead solid phase assay was used for antibody analysis. Standard immunosuppression included thymoglobulin-rituximab induction and tacrolimus maintenance. There were 27 (34%) patients who developed dn-DSA. There were no episodes of antibody-mediated rejection, and 9 (11%) developed acute cellular rejection (ACR). A positive crossmatch status and a higher number of HLA-A, -B, -DR, and -ABDR MMs were not associated with dn-DSA formation. Patients developing dn-DSA had a significantly higher number of total (38 ± 2.7 versus 28 ± 2.3; P = 0.01) and antibody-verified (AbVer; 14 ± 1.1 versus 10 ± 1; P = 0.015) class II MM eplets. By a multivariate regression analysis, the number of class II MM eplets was strongly associated with risk of class II dn-DSA formation (odds ratio [OR], 1.2; P < 0.01). Patients with ACR had a significantly higher number of total (20.2 ± 1.3 versus 13.9 ± 0.9; P < 0.01) as well as AbVer (10.7 ± 1.1 versus 7.5 ± 0.6; P = 0.03) class I MM eplets. In conclusion, donor-recipient HLA epitope MM is associated with a risk of dn-DSA formation and rejection after LT. However, further studies are required to evaluate the clinical utility of epitope matching in LT.

Recurrence of Hyperoxaluria and Kidney Disease after Combined Intestine-Kidney Transplantation for Enteric Hyperoxaluria.

BACKGROUND: Enteric hyperoxaluria (EH) occurs with a rate of 5-24% in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, ileal resection and modern bariatric surgery. The excessive absorption of calcium oxalate causes chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with EH. In the literature, a single experience was reported in combined intestine-kidney transplantation (CIKTx) in patients with CKD due to EH. METHODS: After a report of 2 successful cases of CIKTx in patients with EH and CKD, one was performed at our center in a 59-year-old Caucasian female who developed intestinal failure with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) dependence after a complication post-bariatric surgery. Before CIKTx, she underwent kidney transplantation alone (KTA) twice, which failed due to oxalate nephropathy. RESULTS: In July 2014, the patient underwent CIKTx and bilateral allograft nephrectomy to avoid EH and oxalate stone burden. The postoperative course was complicated with acute tubular necrosis due to the use of high pressors related to perioperative bleeding. The patient was discharged 79 days after CIKTx with a serum creatinine (sCr) of 1.2 mg/dl and free of TPN. Her sCr increased at 7 months and a renal biopsy showed oxalate nephropathy. SLC26A6 (oxalate transporter) staining was significantly diminished in native duodenum/rectum as well as in intestinal allograft compared to control. CONCLUSIONS: KTA in patients with CKD secondary to EH should not be recommended due to high risk of recurrence. Although other centers showed good long-term outcomes in CIKTx, our patient experienced recurrence of EH due to oxalate transporter defect, early kidney allograft dysfunction and prolonged antibiotic use.

Survival after Liver Transplant: Influence of Progression of Disease and of Restoration of the "Milan" Criteria in Patients with Hepato-cellular Carcinoma undergoing Down-staging Procedures.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Selection of patients with hepa- to-cellular carcinoma for liver transplantation is gen- erally performed according to the so-called Milan cri- teria. The aim of this study was to learn whether, after down-staging loco-regional therapies, patients origi- nally non-fulfilling the MC (Milan-OUT) meet these criteria (Milan-IN). METHODOLOGY: Between January 2000 and December 2008, 172 patients with HCC re- ceived LT at our Department. Of these, 142 were sub- jected to DS before LT. RESULTS: Of the 142 patients who received DS, 115 (81%) were Milan-IN and 27 (19%) were Milan-OUT at the time of their enrollment in the waiting list for LT. After a median follow-up of 50 months, overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival and dis- ease recurrence-free survival were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Milan-OUT HCC can be successfully subjected to LT when they fulfill the MC after being subjected to DS. Imaging progres- sion while on the waiting list is a strong predictor of high rates of HCC recurrence even in patients meet- ing the MC. Lack of imaging progression seems to be a strong predictor of positive LT outcome and should be added to the eligibility criteria for the assessment of LT candidates with HCC.

Successful Sequential Liver and Isolated Intestine Transplantation for Mitochondrial Neurogastrointestinal Encephalopathy Syndrome: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND Mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalopathy syndrome (MNGIE) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by thymidine phosphorylase deficiency leading to progressive gastrointestinal dysmotility, cachexia, ptosis, ophthalmoparesis, peripheral neuropathy and leukoencephalopathy. Although liver transplantation corrects thymidine phosphorylase deficiency, intestinal deficiency of the enzyme persists. Retrospective chart review was carried out to obtain clinical, biochemical, and pathological details. CASE REPORT We present a case of liver and subsequent intestine transplant in a 28-year-old man with MNGIE syndrome with gastrointestinal dysmotility, inability to walk, leukoencephalopathy, ptosis, cachexia, and elevated serum thymidine. To halt progression of neurologic deficit, he first received a left-lobe partial liver transplantation. Although his motor deficit improved, gastrointestinal dysmotility persisted, requiring total parenteral nutrition. After exhaustive intestinal rehabilitation, he was listed for intestine transplantation. Two-and-half years after liver transplantation, he received an intestine transplant. At 4 years after LT and 20 months after the intestine transplant, he remains off parenteral nutrition and is slowly gaining weight. CONCLUSIONS This is the first reported case of mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy to undergo successful sequential liver and intestine transplantation.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver resection: why deny this chance of cure?

INTRODUCTION: Liver transplantation (LT) after liver resection (LR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence may be associated with poor patient long-term results and higher perioperative patient morbidity and mortality. This study focused on short-term and long-term outcomes of LT recipients due to HCC recurrence after LR in a single-institution cohort, and in highly comparable case-matched subgroups. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2009, 570 consecutive patients with documented HCC underwent LR (n=355, 62.2%) or LT (n=215, 37.8%) at our Institute. The case-matched analysis was between 2 groups: group A1, LT recipients who had already undergone LR (n=26); group B1, LT recipients who had not already undergone LR (n=26). RESULTS: Patient morbidity was higher in the A1 group in terms of packed red blood cell units transfused, fresh frozen plasma units transfused, median operative time, postoperative bleeding, and postoperative reoperations. No differences were detected in terms of patient mortality, patient survival, and patient recurrence-free survival at the univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although LT among patients who have already undergone LR is associated with higher risk of patient morbidity, patient long-term survival and recurrence-free survival is not impaired. Therefore, there do not seem to be any valid reasons to deny the chance of LT to patients who have already undergone LR.

Deceased Donor Flush Volume Similar for Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate and University of Wisconsin at a Single US Organ Procurement Organization: Adult and Pediatric Data.

BACKGROUND: Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) and University of Wisconsin (UW) solutions are the two primary solid-organ preservation solutions used in the United States (>95%), but flush volumes vary markedly by region and center. This study analyzes data from a single organ procurement organization (OPO) to determine the actual clinical flush volumes used for HTK and UW for liver and pancreas grafts. METHODS: All procurements at Indiana Donor Network were analyzed (2016-2020), and data were extracted from the on-site records. Variables included procuring center, solution, volumes, and vessels flushed. Brand and generic versions were considered equivalent. No clinical transplant outcomes were available. RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 875 liver and 192 pancreas procurements by over 70 U.S. centers representing 10 of 11 UNOS regions. The large majority of liver grafts were preserved with HTK (n=810, 93%; UW n=93, 7%). All liver donors received an aortic flush (100%), while portal vein flush was 14% in-situ and 88% back table. For liver grafts, the median volume of infused solution was less for HTK when compared to UW (4225mL vs 5500mL, p=0.04). For pancreas procurement, 100% received aortic flush of the graft, with median HTK and UW volumes being equivalent (3000mL; p=0.85). Pediatric organs were flushed with markedly higher weight-based volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Flush volumes for HTK and UW are similar at one midwestern OPO, with data comprised of procurements performed by centers from across the U.S. These data demonstrate that low-volume HTK flush is commonly used, and this practice may be considered as a cost-saving measure.

Pleural Effusion and Malnutrition Are Associated With Worse Early Outcomes After Liver Transplant.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary complications after liver transplantation (LT) have previously been associated with longer hospital stays and ventilator time, and higher mortality. This study reports the outcomes for a specific pulmonary complication, pleural effusion, in LT recipients. METHODS: Records from a single transplant center were analyzed retrospectively for all adult LT patients. Patients with documented pleural effusion by radiographic imaging within 30 days pre- or post-transplant were considered as cases. Outcomes included length of hospital stay, discharge disposition, hospital readmission, discharge with home oxygen, and 1-year survival. RESULTS: During the 4-year study period, 512 LTs were performed, with 107 patients (21%) developing a peri-transplant pleural effusion. In total, 49 patients (10%) had a pre-transplant effusion, 91 (18%) had a post-transplant effusion, and 32 (6%) had both. Characteristics associated with the presence of any pleural effusion included an increasing model for end-stage liver disease score, re-transplantation, diagnosis of alcoholic liver disease, low protein levels, and sarcopenia. Effusion patients had longer hospital stays (17 vs 9 days, P < .001) and higher likelihood of discharge to a care facility (48% vs 21%, P < .001). Ninety-day readmission occurred in 69% of effusion patients (vs 44%, P < .001). One-year patient survival with any effusion was 86% (vs 94%, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 21% of recipients developed a clinically significant peri-transplant pleural effusion. Pleural effusion was associated with worse outcomes for all clinical measures. Risk factors for the development of pleural effusion included higher MELD score (>20), re-transplantation, alcoholic liver disease, and poor nutrition status, including poor muscle mass.

Beyond the Milan criteria: what risks for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma progression before liver transplantation?

BACKGROUND: To date the selection of the best candidates for liver transplantation (LT) owing to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been mainly based on tumor morphological characteristics (nodule diameter and number), which have resulted to be independent risk factors for short long-term survival and a high rate of tumor recurrence. METHODS: The study cohort included 118 patients among the 166 with HCC transplanted at our unit from January 2000 to December 2007. Patients were classified according to response to locoregional treatments before LT: progressive Group A; complete Group B; partial Group C; stable Group D. RESULTS: The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 65.5% and 48.9% for Group A versus 84.8% and 74.6% for Group BCD (P = 0.01). The 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 74% and 74% for Group A and 95.7% and 93% for Group BCD (P = 0.007). HCC progression was the only independent risk factor according to Cox regression P = 0.014--odds ratio 4.4 (1.35-14.3). CONCLUSION: After aggressive HCC treatment before LT, imaging progression while on the waiting list was a strong predictor of high HCC recurrence rate also in patients who met the Milan criteria. Lack of imaging progression can contribute toward the selection of good transplant candidates for HCC together with the Milan criteria.

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the impact of neo-adjuvant treatments on the long term results.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: LDLT may represent a valid therapeutic option allowing several advantages for patients affected by HCC and waiting for liver transplantation (LT). However, some reports show a worse long term survival and disease free survival among patients treated by LDLT for HCC than deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients. METHODOLOGY: Among 1145 LT patients, 63 received LDLT. From January 2000 to December 2008, 179 patients underwent LT due to HCC, 30 (16.7%) received LDLT and 154 (86.0%) received DDLT. Patients were selected based on the Milan criteria. TACE, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous alcoholization, or liver resection were applied as downstaging procedures, while on the waiting list. RESULTS: Overall 3- and 5-year survival rate was 77.3% and 68.7% vs. 82.8% and 76.7%, respectively for LDLT and DDLT recipient with not significant differences. Moreover, 3- and 5- years of recurrence free survival rate was 95.5% (LDLT) vs. 90.5% and 89.4% (DDLT) and resulted not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: LDLT guarantees same long term results than DDLT if the selection criteria of candidates are analogues. Milan criteria remains a valid candidate selection tool to obtain optimal long term results in LDLT. An aggressive downstaging policy seems to improve the long-term results in LDLT, thus LRT may be considered useful to prevent tumor progression waiting for transplantation as well as a neoadjuvant therapy for HCC. A literature detailed meta-analysis could definitely clarify if LDLT is an independent risk factor for HCC recurrence.

Adenovirus-Related Fulminant Liver Failure After Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND Human adenovirus is a well-known pathogen that can potentially lead to severe infection in immunocompromised patients. Adenovirus infections in solid-organ transplant recipients can range from asymptomatic to severe, prolonged, disseminated disease, and have a significant impact on morbidity, mortality, and graft survival. The clinical manifestations vary from asymptomatic and flu-like illness to severe life-threatening viremia with multi-organ failure. Post-transplant adenovirus infection is well described in kidney recipients, but in adult liver transplant recipients the impact of the virus is not well described. In this report, a case of disseminated adenovirus infection with subsequent fatal acute liver failure in a post-kidney transplant patient is presented. CASE REPORT A 51-year-old man underwent a deceased kidney transplantation for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Shortly after the kidney transplantation, he received multiple plasmapheresis with additional steroid treatments for cellular rejection and reoccurrence of his primary kidney disease. Three weeks after the kidney transplant, he developed a disseminated adenovirus infection with subsequent acute liver failure. Despite the early diagnosis and aggressive treatment, the patient died. CONCLUSIONS Patients with organ transplantation with autoimmune background etiology are usually over-immunosuppressed to avoid early rejection. In this population, opportunistic infections are not rare. Fever, general malaise, and transplant organ dysfunction are the first signs of bacterial or viral infection. Early infectious diseases work-up, including tissue biopsy, is fundamental to establish a diagnosis. Broad antibiotic and possible antiviral aggressive treatment are mandatory.

Clinical Aspect of Cytokines and Chemokines in Liver Transplant.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this prospective observational study was to determine whether a transplanted liver graft releases proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines on reperfusion and to determine the relationship between these molecules and subsequent ischemic reperfusion injury and acute kidney injury. METHODS: Blood samples from 66 consecutive patients undergoing liver transplant were analyzed for cyto- and chemokines at different time frames before and after liver transplant. Ischemic reperfusion injury was defined based on the peak levels of arginine transaminase and divided into 3 groups: mild, moderate, and severe. Acute kidney injury was defined according to the latest Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes classification. RESULTS: For more than 40 different cyto/chemokines and growth factors, a certain pattern of expression was observed in all patients with ischemic reperfusion injury. G-SCF, IP10, and HSP90a were significantly elevated in all patients with ischemic reperfusion injury. On the other hand, eotaxin and MCP1 levels were markedly elevated in patients without ischemic reperfusion, suggesting a possible cytoprotective effect. We identified cold ischemia, macrosteatosis > 30%, postreperfusion syndrome, and postoperative use of 2 or more vasoactive agents as independent risk factors for ischemic reperfusion injury. CONCLUSIONS: Ischemia reperfusion injury is accompanied by distinct innate and adaptive immune cytokine signatures before and after transplant. It can be used for therapeutic intervention with goal to improve post-transplant graft outcomes.

Liver Transplantation in Recipients With Class III Obesity: Posttransplant Outcomes and Weight Gain.

BACKGROUND: There has been a dramatic increase in obesity in the United States. Several studies have reported conflicting results for the impact of obesity on outcomes of liver transplantation (LT). This study aims to assess the impact of obesity on LT and changes in body mass index (BMI) after transplantation. METHODS: All adult LTs performed at Indiana University between 2001 and 2018 were reviewed. BMIs of recipients were subdivided into 6 categories. Survival outcomes were compared across the subgroup. BMI was followed up in a cohort of patients from 2008 to 2018. RESULTS: Among 2024 patients, 25% were in class I obesity, 9.3% were in class II obesity, and 1.1% were in class III obesity. There was no significant difference in patient and graft survival at 10-y follow-up with respect to BMI. Among 1004 patients in the subgroup, BMI of all groups except the underweight group declined in the first 3 mo postoperatively; however, the BMI of all groups except the class III obesity group returned to the pre-LT level by 2 y and reached a plateau by 5 y. In the class III obesity group, there was a significant increase in body weight at 5 y. CONCLUSIONS: Class III obesity was not associated with higher mortality in our cohort. Because our cohort is small, it may be underpowered to detect a smaller difference in outcome. From our observation, obesity should not be considered a contraindication for LT. Post-LT interventions are required to prevent significant weight gain for the class III obesity group.