RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Heterotopic pancreas is defined as pancreatic tissue located outside the pancreatic parenchyma that lacks an anatomic or vascular connection to the normal pancreas. Symptomatic gastric heterotopic pancreas is a rare condition that can manifest as acute or chronic pancreatitis. Asymptomatic heterotopic pancreas does not require treatment, while symptomatic lesions should be resected. The modality of final resection of heterotopic pancreas depends on its size and the depth of gastric wall involvement. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 36-year-old woman was admitted for recurrent epigastralgia. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed that an abscess had formed in the gastric antrum. After multidisciplinary discussion we decided for conservative treatment with intravenous antibiotics and further detailed endoscopic diagnostic. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a submucosal mass with a central fistula and intermittent pus secretion in the prepyloric region of the gastric antrum, which was subsequently drained with a double pigtail stent under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and fluoroscopy. The possibility of pancreatic fluid collection in the case of heterotopic pancreas was suggested during the EUS examination, and histology subsequently confirmed heterotopic pancreatic tissue. The patient was in good condition and without any abdominal pain. According to a control CT scan after 10 weeks, the fluid collection was completely resolved. Due to the possible recurrence of pancreatitis, resection of heterotopic pancreas was proposed to the patient. Since the lesion involved the muscularis propria of the gastric wall, surgical resection of the mass was indicated. CONCLUSION: Fluid collections after acute pancreatitis in heterotopic pancreas in the gastric antrum can be successfully managed by endoscopy.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colonoscopy with polypectomy are associated with a reduction in the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as mortality, secondary to CRC. Because of the variation in physicians' performance and the risk of interval CRC after a colonoscopy, several quality indicators have been established. ADR (adenoma detection rate) is a generally accepted quality indicator. But it is also a target of possible gaming and achieving an adequate number of colonoscopies only from screening may be a problem for some practices. The aim of this study was to compare ADR for colonoscopies done for various indications and to look for correlations between the ADR of screening and all examinations. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the quality indicators of all colonoscopies performed in a nonuniversity hospital, Frydek-Mistek, from January 2013 to December 2017. We calculated the ADR for all colonoscopies in patients over 50 years of age (subdivided into screening, surveillance, diagnostic) and separately only for screening colonoscopies. Correlations were made using the Pearson's correlation coeficient. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 6925 patients over 50 years of age (3620 men, 3305 women, mean age 66.2 years). The ADRs for screening and surveillance were higher than for diagnostic colonoscopies for all of the endoscopists, and the ADRs for all colonoscopies were lower than for screening, but sufficiently over 25%. There was a positive correlation between the ADR of screening and all colonoscopies (r=0.906, P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The calculation of ADR for all colonoscopies was possible in our endoscopic department, and there was a positive correlation with ADR for screening colonoscopies. ADR for all colonoscopies is a good tool for calculating real ADR from large sample sizes without gaming. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03730441).