Pregnancy outcome at term in low-risk population: study at a tertiary obstetric hospital.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of perinatal death and peripartum morbidity at term amongst the models of care at a single tertiary hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a 10-year population study of singleton births at term at the Mercy Hospital for Women comparing the mixed-risk models of care (private obstetrician and a conventional collaborative model of obstetricians and midwives) with the low-risk models (team midwifery and family birth center). Outcome measures included rates of perinatal death, low Apgar scores and obstetric procedures. RESULTS: Data on 44 557 normal term singletons were available for study. Overall, the hospital has a substantially lower term singleton perinatal mortality (1.3/1000) than the reported rate from the state of Victoria over an overlapping period (2.4/1000). The perinatal mortality amongst women selected for low obstetric risk (2.3/1000) was significantly higher than the perinatal mortality in other patients (1.2/1000; P = 0.03). Low Apgar scores at 5 min were also significantly more likely in women selected for low obstetric risk (9.0 vs 6.7/1000; P = 0.03). The differences could not be attributed to socioeconomic status, as this was higher in the low obstetric risk group. Obstetric procedures (induction of labor, cesarean section and instrumental birth) were substantially less common in the low-risk-care patients, as is expected for a low-risk population. CONCLUSION: Women selected for low-risk under midwife-led models of care do not appear to have better outcomes than women with all levels of perinatal risk cared for under traditional obstetrician-led models of care.

News Stories of Intimate Partner Violence: An Experimental Examination of Media Framing and Perpetrator Sex in LGBTQ Versus Heterosexual Relationships.

This study experimentally examines the effects of perpetrator sex (male or female), relationship context (heterosexual or homosexual), and the type of media framing (episodic or thematic) on endorsement for public health perspectives about intimate partner violence (IPV) and punishment preferences for IPV perpetrators. Participants (N = 750) were randomly assigned to a condition, exposed to a composite news story, and then completed a survey. Manipulation check responses demonstrated a pattern suggesting that participants had difficulty attending to details of IPV in stories where the perpetrator was a woman, or where the violence occurred in a homosexual relationship. Results revealed significant interaction effects for the endorsement of public health perspectives and for perpetrator punishment preferences. Results for the endorsement of public health perspectives showed that thematic framing caused stronger support only when the perpetrator was a heterosexual man. Results for perpetrator punishment preferences revealed a pattern where participants preferred stronger punishments for heterosexual male perpetrators over any other group. Participants did not distinguish in their punishment preferences for male or female homosexual perpetrators, but these were still stronger than their punishment preferences for heterosexual female perpetrators. Theoretical implications are presented with attention to extending research about media portrayals of IPV, and discussion is offered concerning practical considerations for public health support services that address IPV.