Müllerian precursor lesions in serous ovarian cancer patients: using the SEE-Fim and SEE-End protocol.

Serous ovarian cancer is suggested to develop from epithelium embryologically derived from the Müllerian ducts. The aim of the current study is to thoroughly, analyze the epithelium derived from the Müllerian ducts (cervix, endometrium and fallopian tubes) in serous ovarian cancer patients. Sixty women diagnosed with serous ovarian carcinoma were included in this multicentre, observational study. Tissues were embedded completely for histological assessment, in accordance with the SEE-Fim and SEE-End protocol (Sectioning and Extensively Examining of the Fimbriated end; and-Endometrium), and prevalence of cervical, as well as endometrial and tubal pathology was analyzed. In 31 (52%) cases, a pathologic lesion was identified, and in 16 (27%) of these cases coexistence of pathologic lesions. In 1 case, severe dysplasia was found in the cervix, in 9 (15%) cases endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma, in 19 (32%) cases atypical hyperplasia, and in 23 (43%) cases serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma was seen significantly more often concurrent with endometrial atypical hyperplasia or endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma than with benign endometrium (64 vs 28%; P=0.01). To conclude, histological assessment of epithelium derived from Müllerian ducts of serous ovarian cancer patients resulted in the identification of endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and/or endometrial atypical hyperplasia in more than half of cases. Coexistence of these pathologic lesions was common, and might represent an effect of field carcinogenesis or tumor implantation of migrating cells.

Tubal epithelial lesions in salpingo-oophorectomy specimens of BRCA-mutation carriers and controls.

OBJECTIVE: A precursor lesion for ovarian carcinoma, tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (TIC), has been identified in BRCA-mutation carriers undergoing prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (pBSO). Other lesions were also identified in fallopian tubes, but different terminology, interpretation, and lack of knowledge of normal epithelium, have hampered to unravel their possible role in carcinogenesis. The aim of this study is to classify tubal epithelial lesions in BRCA-mutation carriers and controls to enable comparison of prevalence, area of localization, and possible malignant potential. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-six BRCA1/2-mutation carriers were included; ovaries and fallopian tubes, embedded completely, were reviewed. Controls included 105 women who underwent BSO for non-malignant reasons. Tubal epithelial lesions included the following categories: hyperplasia, minor epithelial atypia, TIC, and invasive carcinoma. RESULTS: Tubal neoplasia was identified in 7.1% (invasive carcinoma, 0.9%; TIC, 6.2%) of BRCA-mutation carriers compared to none in controls (p=0.004, Fisher's exact test). Hyperplasia and minor epithelial atypia were identified in 41.6% BRCA-mutation carriers and compared to 58.1% in controls (p=0.005, Pearson's chi square). Invasive carcinoma and TIC showed preference for the fimbrial ends (p=0.027, Pearson's chi square), while hyperplasia and minor epithelial atypia displayed more variation in localization. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive tubal carcinoma and TIC were limited to BRCA-mutation carriers, whereas hyperplasia and minor epithelial atypia were commonly found in both BRCA-mutation carriers and controls. It is suggested that hyperplasia and minor atypia represent variations of normal tubal epithelium instead of premalignant lesions. Furthermore, total salpingectomy is strongly recommended as most but not all TIC occurred in the fimbriae.

High prevalence of atypical hyperplasia in the endometrium of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to determine the prevalence of endometrial premalignancies in women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: Endometrial and ovarian specimens of 186 patients with EOC were retrospectively selected using the nationwide pathology network and registry, and sections were comprehensively reviewed: 136 (73%) serous, 19 (10%) endometrioid, 15 (8%) mucinous, seven (4%) clear cell, and nine (5%) undifferentiated. Immunohistochemical phenotypes were compared for patients with serous EOC with concurrent endometrial pathology. RESULTS: In 31%, endometrial (pre)malignancy was found: carcinoma in 3%, endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (EIC) in 4%, and atypical hyperplasia in 24%. Atypical hyperplasia was found in 47% of endometrioid EOCs but in 7% to 33% of other subtypes. Body mass index was higher concurrent to atypical hyperplasia (P=.001). Serous EOC and EIC immunophenotypes were comparable, whereas atypical hyperplasia was expressed differently. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from synchronous endometrial carcinoma, endometrial premalignancies should be taken into account when determining optimal treatment for women diagnosed with EOC.

Histopathologic assessment of the entire endometrium in asymptomatic women.

Knowledge on the nature of the endometrium in women without symptoms of endometrial disease is poor. Therefore, the aim of this prospective study was to describe the endometrium of a cohort of asymptomatic women. The entire endometrium of premenopausal and postmenopausal women was embedded for histologic examination. All included patients underwent a hysterectomy on indication of uterovaginal prolapse, from July 2011 to October 2012, in 3 hospitals in the South of the Netherlands. Exclusion criteria were symptoms of postmenopausal vaginal blood loss or premenopausal disordered vaginal bleeding. As a result, 68 women were included in the study, 48 women were postmenopausal and 20 were premenopausal. In the endometrium of 10 women, simple hyperplasia was found (15%); 1, complex hyperplasia (2%); 2, simple atypical hyperplasia (3%); 2, complex atypical hyperplasia (3%); and 2, a small focus of intramucosal endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (3%). In general, the endometrium was heterogeneous, and most lesions were not present in the entire endometrium. In conclusion, after examining the entire endometrium, a remarkable high prevalence of endometrial pathology was found in asymptomatic women. The clinical meaning of these lesions is not yet clear, but endometrial pathology may frequently exist without symptoms.