Multiomics identifies the link between intratumor steatosis and the exhausted tumor immune microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Immunotherapy has become the standard-of-care treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but its efficacy remains limited. To identify immunotherapy-susceptible HCC, we profiled the molecular abnormalities and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of rapidly increasing nonviral HCC. APPROACHES AND RESULTS: We performed RNA-seq of tumor tissues in 113 patients with nonviral HCC and cancer genome sequencing of 69 genes with recurrent genetic alterations reported in HCC. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering classified nonviral HCCs into three molecular classes (Class I, II, III), which stratified patient prognosis. Class I, with the poorest prognosis, was associated with TP53 mutations, whereas class III, with the best prognosis, was associated with cadherin-associated protein beta 1 (CTNNB1) mutations. Thirty-eight percent of nonviral HCC was defined as an immune class characterized by a high frequency of intratumoral steatosis and a low frequency of CTNNB1 mutations. Steatotic HCC, which accounts for 23% of nonviral HCC cases, presented an immune-enriched but immune-exhausted TIME characterized by T cell exhaustion, M2 macrophage and cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) infiltration, high PD-L1 expression, and TGF-ß signaling activation. Spatial transcriptome analysis suggested that M2 macrophages and CAFs may be in close proximity to exhausted CD8+ T cells in steatotic HCC. An in vitro study showed that palmitic acid-induced lipid accumulation in HCC cells upregulated PD-L1 expression and promoted immunosuppressive phenotypes of cocultured macrophages and fibroblasts. Patients with steatotic HCC, confirmed by chemical-shift MR imaging, had significantly longer PFS with combined immunotherapy using anti-PD-L1 and anti-VEGF antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Multiomics stratified nonviral HCCs according to prognosis or TIME. We identified the link between intratumoral steatosis and immune-exhausted immunotherapy-susceptible TIME.

Utilization of the modified Kama scoring system for predicting bail-out cholecystectomy: a valuable tool in the era of rising laparoscopic surgery prevalence.

PURPOSE: Recently, bail-out cholecystectomy (BOC) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy to avoid severe complications, such as vasculobiliary injury, has become widely used and increased in prevalence. However, current predictive factors or scoring systems are insufficient. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to test the validity of existing scoring systems and determine a suitable cutoff value for predicting BOC. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 305 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and divided them into a total cholecystectomy group (n = 265) and a BOC group (n = 40). Preoperative and operative findings were collected, and cutoff values for the existing scoring systems (Kama's and Nassar's) were modified using a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: The BOC rate was 13% with no severe complications. A logistic regression analysis revealed that the Kama's score (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.91-0.96; P < 0.01) was an independent predictor of BOC. A cutoff value of 6.5 points gave an area under the curve of 0.81, with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 67%. CONCLUSIONS: Kama's difficulty scoring system with a modified cutoff value (6.5 points) is effective for predicting BOC.

Role of Intraoperative Assessment of Proximal Bile Duct Margin Status and Additional Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Can Local Clearance Trump Tumor Biology? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical implications of the proximal bile duct margin status in resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). Intraoperative frozen section (IFS) analysis to assess the bile duct margin status is commonly used during PHCC resection. However, the impact of additional resection after obtaining a positive margin on the long-term outcome remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among the 257 patients who underwent PHCC resection, 190 patients with a negative distal margin were included and analyzed. IFS analysis of the proximal bile duct margin was performed in all patients. A positive margin was defined by the presence of either invasive cancer, or carcinoma, in situ. RESULTS: IFS analysis revealed an initial positive margin in 69 (36%) patients. Among 20 patients who underwent re-resection, only 11 patients achieved a negative margin (secondary R0). An initial positive margin was associated with poor long-term outcomes: recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16 and 25 months for patients with an initial positive margin, but 47 and 63 months for patients with an initial negative margin, respectively (p < 0.0001). In contrast, there was no difference in RFS or OS between patients with a secondary R0 margin, and those with a final R1 margin (14 vs. 16 months for RFS, p = 0.98, and 23 versus 25 months for OS, p = 0.63, respectively). CONCLUSION: An IFS-positive proximal hepatic duct margin dictates poor long-term outcomes for patients with resectable PHCC. Additional resection has minimal impact on survival, even when negative margin is achieved.

Prognostic Impact of Tumor Markers (CEA and CA19-9) on Patients with Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Stratified by Tumor Number and Size: Potentially Valuable Biologic Markers for Preoperative Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CLM), a population with good prognosis, have been treated with upfront surgery, some patients have had a poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate biologic prognostic factors in patients with resectable CLMs. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent liver resection for initial CLMs at the Cancer Institute Hospital between 2010 and 2020. The study defined CLMs as resectable (tumor size < 5 cm; < 4 tumors; no extrahepatic metastasis) or borderline resectable (BR). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered to patients with BR CLMs. RESULTS: During the study period, 309 CLMs were classified as resectable without preoperative chemotherapy and 345 as BR with preoperative chemotherapy. For the 309 patients with resectable CLMs, the independent poor prognostic factors associated with overall survival in the multivariable analysis were high tumor marker levels (CEA ≥ 25 ng/mL and/or CA19-9 ≥ 50 U/mL; (hazard ratio [HR], 2.45; p = 0.0007), no adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 1.69; p = 0.043), and age of 75 years or older (HR, 2.09; p = 0.012). The 5-year survival rates for the patients with high tumor marker (TM) levels (CEA ≥25 ng/mL and/or CA19-9 ≥50 U/mL) were significantly worse than for those with low TM levels (CEA < 25 ng/mL and CA19-9 < 50 U/mL) (55.3% vs. 81.1%; p <0.0001) and similar to the rate for those with BR CLMs (52.1%; p = 0.864). Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy had an impact on prognosis only in the high-TM group (HR, 2.65; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: High TM levels have a prognostic impact on patients with resectable CLMs stratified by tumor number and size. Perioperative chemotherapy improves long-term outcomes for patients with CLM and high TM levels.

Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy enhances local control of the disease in patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) was developed to enhance curability in patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer. However, no evidence is available regarding the prognostic superiority of RAMPS compared with conventional distal pancreatectomy (cDP). Here, we aimed to assess the oncological benefit of RAMPS by comparing surgical outcomes between patients who underwent cDP and RAMPS with propensity score (PS) adjustment. METHODS: Clinical data of 174 patients undergoing cDP and RAMPS between 2009 and 2016 at two high-volume centers were analyzed with PS matching. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and local recurrence rates were compared between patients who underwent cDP and RAMPS. RESULTS: The cDP and RAMPS groups were successfully matched with baseline characteristics. No differences were found in the 3-year RFS and OS rates between the two groups (3-year RFS: cDP 46% vs RAMPS 40%, p = 0.451, 3-year OS: cDP 57% vs RAMPS 53%, p = 0.692). However, the 3-year local recurrence rate was lower in the RAMPS (10%) than that in the cDP group (34%) (hazard ratio 0.275, 95% confidence interval 0.090-0.842, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: RAMPS is oncologically superior to conventional procedure in achieving local control of the disease in patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer.

Limited Prognostic Value of KRAS in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: RAS mutation status is considered a powerful prognostic factor in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). However, whether its prognostic power is robust regardless of administration of preoperative chemotherapy or tumor burden remains unclear. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for CLM from April 2010 through March 2017 in two hospitals were included. The prognostic value of KRAS was compared based on whether patients received preoperative chemotherapy and their tumor burden score (TBS). RESULTS: We included 409 patients (median follow-up 38 months). In the preoperative chemotherapy group, patients with mutant KRAS (mt-KRAS) CLM had poorer overall survival (OS) than those with wild KRAS (wt-KRAS; 5-year OS: 37.7% vs 53.8%, p = 0.024), although their OS was not different from patients undergoing upfront surgery. Similarly, patients with mt-KRAS had poorer OS than those with wt-KRAS in TBS of 3-9 (5-year OS: 33.1% vs 63.2%, p = 0.001), although their OS was not different from patients with TBS < 3 or ≥ 9. In multivariate analysis, mt-KRAS was an independent prognostic factor of OS among patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.034-2.491; p = 0.035) and patients with TBS of 3-9 (HR 1.836, 95% CI 1.176-2.866; p = 0.008). However, it was not a prognostic factor in patients who underwent upfront surgery or with TBS > 3 or ≥ 9. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, the prognostic value of KRAS depends on their history of preoperative chemotherapy or tumor burden.

Anatomic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Prognostic Impact Assessed from Recurrence Treatment.

BACKGROUND: The oncologic advantage of anatomic resection (AR) for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical advantages of AR for primary HCC by using propensity score-matching and by assessing treatment strategies for recurrence after surgery. METHODS: The study reviewed data of patients who underwent AR or non-anatomic resection (NAR) for solitary HCC (≤ 5 cm) in two institutions between 2004 and 2017. Surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups in a propensity score-adjusted cohort. The time-to-interventional failure (TIF), defined as the elapsed time from resection to unresectable/unablatable recurrence, also was evaluated. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 250 patients: 77 patients (31%) with AR and 173 patients (69%) with NAR. In the propensity score-matched populations (AR, 67; NAR, 67), the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for AR was better than for NAR (62% vs 35%; P = 0.005). No differences, however, were found in the 5-year overall survival between the two groups (72% vs 78%; P = 0.666). The 5-year TIF rates for the NAR group (60%) also were similar to those for the AR group (66%) (P = 0.413). In the cohort of 67 patients, curative repeat resection or ablation therapy was performed more frequently for the NAR patients (42%) than for the AR patients (10%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For solitary HCC, AR decreases recurrence after the initial hepatectomy. However, aggressive curative-intent interventions for recurrence compensate for the impaired RFS, even for patients undergoing NAR.

Hepatectomy with Perioperative Chemotherapy for Multiple Colorectal Liver Metastases is the Available Option for Prolonged Survival.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection combined with perioperative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with multiple colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). However, the optimal surgical strategy for treating advanced CLMs remains unclear. The role of the two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) strategy in the management of multiple CLMs remains challenging. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of one-step hepatectomy (OSH)-treated and TSH-treated patients with multiple CLMs. METHODS: This single-institution study included 742 consecutive patients who underwent initial liver resection for histologically confirmed CLMs. The study enrolled patients with 10 or more tumors (n = 106). Clinicopathologic characteristics and long-term outcomes were compared between patients who underwent OSH and those who underwent TSH for 10 or more CLMs. RESULTS: The study planned OSH for 67 patients (63%) and TSH for 39 patients (37%). One of the OSH-planned patients and two of the TSH-planned patients underwent a trial laparotomy because of non-curative factors. Five patients (13%) did not progress to the second stage of TSH. In the entire cohort, the cumulative 3-year overall survival rate was 58.4% for the patients who had 10 or more CLMs treated with OSH compared with 61.1% for the patients treated with TSH (P = 0.746). In the curative resection cohort, the cumulative 1-year recurrence-free survival rate was 18.2% for the patients treated with OSH and 17.9% for the patients treated with TSH (P = 0.640). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatectomy with perioperative chemotherapy for advanced CLMs with 10 or more tumors is feasible and effective. To prolong survival, TSH is a promising option when curative resection with OSH is impossible.

Reproduction of modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy in a robotic environment: a simple clipless technique.

BACKGROUND: Although modified Blumgart anastomosis (MBA) in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy has been accepted as a simple and safe procedure that provides non-inferior surgical outcomes compared to open MBA, the details of the standardization of robotic MBAs have never been established. In this report, we detail the technical tips to reproduce MBA in the robotic environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January to December in 2021, 16 patients underwent our novel robotic MBA technique, which included clipless Blumgart suture and duct-to-mucosa anastomosis. To simplify the manipulation of sutures in robotic environment, short double-armed sutures in 15 cm length were created and used for Blumgart suture. Duct-to-mucosa anastomosis were done by 5-0 monofilament of 6 cm length. These tips enabled clipless anastomosis and minimized the burden of the patient-side assistant. Surgical and short-term outcomes were compared between patients with robotic MBA (Robo group) and those who underwent open MBA during 2021 (32 patients, Open group). RESULTS: The median operation time was significantly longer in the Robo group than in the Open group (551 vs. 485.5 min, P = 0.0027). Estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the Robo group than in the open group (95 vs. 355 mL, P < 0.0002). The median duration of clipless MBA in the Robo group was 56 (46-68) min. The incidence of POPF (grade B or C) was not significantly different among the groups (19% vs. 22%, P = 0.71). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the Robo group than in the Open group (18 vs. 24 days, P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Clipless MBA in a robotic environment was safely performed with acceptable short-term outcomes and can be proposed as a standard technique for robotic pancreatojejunostomy.

Repeat Resection for Advanced Colorectal Liver Metastases-Does it have the Potential for Cure?

BACKGROUND: Although surgical resection is the only potential treatment for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM), the actual cure is rare in patients with advanced CLM. Repeat resection (RR) is the most effective treatment in patients with recurrence; however, whether patients with initially advanced CLM achieve cure throughout RR or experience repeated recurrence even after RR remains unclear. In this study, we analyzed whether patients with advanced CLM achieve cure after RR. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent initial hepatectomy with curative intent for CLM from January 1999 to August 2007 were included. Patients who were alive at 10 years from the initial hepatectomy without any evidence of recurrence were defined as cured. Cure rates were compared between patients with Fong's clinical risk score (CRS) of ≥ 3 and those with CRS of ≤ 2. RESULTS: A total of 257 patients were included and followed up. Among them, 93 (36.2%) patients achieved actual cure postoperatively. The cure rate of patients with a CRS of ≥ 3 was 32.4% (33/102), which was not different from that of patients with a CRS of ≤ 2 (38.7% [60/155]; p = 0.299), although former patients had higher recurrence rate after the initial hepatectomy than latter ones (85.3% vs. 72.3%; p = 0.014). The cure rates after the initial, second, and third resections were 23.0% (59/257), 30.0% (24/80), and 22.5% (7/31), respectively. In multivariate analysis, RR was determined as an independent favorable factor of achieving cure. CONCLUSIONS: RR had a potential to cure patients with advanced CLM, and one-third of them achieved cure.

Long-Term Outcome of Patients with Postoperative Refractory Diarrhea After Tailored Nerve Plexus Dissection Around the Major Visceral Arteries During Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: For pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) surgery, extended dissection of the nerve plexus (pl) around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or celiac artery (CA) is sometimes necessary. This consequently results in postoperative refractory diarrhea. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of extended nerve plexus dissection around major arteries on postoperative diarrhea. METHODS: Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC between January 2013 and December 2016 were included. The frequency of diarrhea (defined as a condition requiring opioid antidiarrheal drug for at least 6 months after surgery) and its short- and long-term outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Of 200 consecutive patients who underwent PD, 78 (39.0%) developed postoperative refractory diarrhea (diarrhea group), and 73 of them (93.6%) underwent hemi-circumferential or more nerve dissection for SMA or CA; both plSMA and plCA dissection were associated with diarrhea. Borderline resectable artery (BR-A) PDAC was included more in the diarrhea group (32.0% vs. 13.1%, P = 0.001); however, the local recurrence rate in the diarrhea group was significantly lower than that in the non-diarrhea group (14.1% vs. 26.2%, P = 0.036). The completion of adjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival were comparable between the two groups. The pre-albumin level improved in 2 years, and 61.3% of patients with diarrhea could stop opioid antidiarrheal drugs within 3 years of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Although the frequency of diarrhea increased following nerve plexus dissection around arteries, diarrhea was controllable and resulted in a reduced local recurrence rate. Aggressive dissection of the nerve plexus may be justified for local disease control in BR-A PDAC.

Segmental resection with partial mesopancreatic and mesojejunal excision (pMME) for duodenal carcinoma of the third or fourth portion.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatoduodenectomy is the standard procedure for duodenal carcinoma of the third or fourth portion. As an alternative option, we developed a novel segmental resection (SR) with partial mesopancreatic and mesojejunal excision (pMME) that enhances radicality. In this report, the surgical technique with video and outcomes are described. METHOD: We performed SR with pMME on seven consecutive patients with third or fourth duodenal carcinoma between 2009 and 2021. We divided the procedure into four sections, including (1) wide Kocher's maneuver, (2) supracolic anterior artery-first approach, (3) dissection of the mesopancreas and mesojejunum, and (4) devascularization of the uncinate process and dissection of duodenum. RESULT: Median operative time was 348 min (range, 222-391 min), and median blood loss was 100 mL (range, 30-580 mL). Major complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade 3a or more occurred in one patient. All patients achieved R0 resections with 10 mm or more proximal margin. Six cases (85%) were alive without recurrence. CONCLUSION: We developed a radical and safe procedure of SR with pMME as an alternative and less invasive approach for duodenal carcinoma of the third or fourth portion.

Parachute technique for portal vein reconstruction during pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection in patients with pancreatic head cancer.

BACKGROUND: The most appropriate venous reconstruction method remains debatable when a long section of portal vein (PV) and/or superior mesenteric vein (SMV) must be resected in patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of the present study was to describe the technical details of the parachute technique, a modified end-to-end anastomotic maneuver that can be used in the above-mentioned circumstances, and to investigate its safety and feasibility. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent venous reconstruction using the parachute technique after receiving a PD with PV resection for pancreatic cancer between January 2014 and March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. For the parachute technique, the posterior wall was sutured in a continuous fashion while the stitches were left untightened. The stitches were then tightened from both sides after the running suture of the posterior wall had been completed, thereby dispersing the tension applied to the stitched venous wall when the venous ends were brought together and solving any problems that would otherwise have been caused by over-tension. The postoperative outcomes and PV patency were then investigated. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were identified. The median length of the resected PV/SMV measured in vivo was 5 cm (range, 3-6 cm). The splenic vein was resected in all the patients and was reconstructed in 13 patients (87%). The overall postoperative complication rate (≥ Clavien-Dindo grade I) was 60%, while a major complication (≥ Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa) occurred in 1 patient (7%). No postoperative deaths occurred in this series. The PV patency at 1 year was 87%. CONCLUSION: The parachute technique is both safe and feasible and is a simple venous reconstruction procedure suitable for use in cases undergoing PD when the distance between the resected PV and SMV is relatively long.

A randomized controlled trial of surgery and postoperative modified FOLFOX6 versus surgery and perioperative modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type resectable colorectal liver metastases: EXPERT study.

PURPOSE: To clarify the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for the patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM), we conducted a multicenter randomized phase III trial to compare surgery followed by postoperative FOLFOX regimen with perioperative FOLFOX regimen plus cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type resectable CLM. METHODS: Patients who had KRAS wild-type resectable CLM having one to eight liver nodules without extrahepatic disease were randomly assigned to the postoperative chemotherapy group, wherein up-front hepatectomy was performed followed by 12 cycles of postoperative modified FOLFOX6, and the perioperative chemotherapy group (experimental), wherein six cycles of preoperative modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab were performed followed by hepatectomy and six cycles of postoperative modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: There were 37 patients in postoperative chemotherapy group and 40 patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group who were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups. The PFS and overall survival (OS) showed no significant difference (PFS, hazard ratio 1.18 [95% confidence interval 0.69-2.01], P = 0.539: OS, 1.03 [0.46-2.29], P = 0.950). In the postoperative chemotherapy group, 35.1% had a 3-year PFS, and 86.5% had a 3-year OS. Meanwhile, in the perioperative chemotherapy group, 30.0% had a 3-year PFS, and 74.4% had a 3-year OS. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in survival found between the group of the perioperative chemotherapy plus cetuximab and that of the postoperative chemotherapy in the cohort of our study. The study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000007787).

A multicenter phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for R0 surgical resection in advanced colorectal liver metastases harboring mutant-type KRAS: NEXTO-mt trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 on downsizing of liver metastases for curative resection has not been well assessed for patients with advanced colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). This multicenter phase II trial aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for advanced CRLMs harboring mutant-type KRAS. METHODS: Patients with advanced CRLMs (tumor number of ≥5 and/or technically unresectable) harboring mutant-type KRAS were included. Surgical indication was evaluated every 4 cycles of bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6. Liver resection was planned if the CRLMs were resectable. The primary endpoint was R0 resection rate. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, and safety. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2017, 29 patients from six centers were registered. The rates of complete and partial responses were 0% and 62.1%, respectively. R0 and R1 resections were performed in 19 and 1 patient, respectively (R0 resection rate: 65.5%). No mortality occurred. During the median follow-up of 30.7 months, the 3-year OS rate for all the patients was 64.4% with the median survival of 49.1 months. CONCLUSION: For advanced CRLMs harboring mutant-type KRAS, bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 achieved a high R0 resection rate, leading to favorable survival.

Details and Outcomes of Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection Preserving the Left Gastric Arterial Flow.

BACKGROUND: To describe the technical details and efficacy of distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) and left gastric artery (LGA) flow preservation for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHOD: This single-center, retrospective analysis investigated short- and long-term outcomes of DP-CAR performed on 55 patients with PDAC from 2011 to 2019. Our method included LGA reconstruction after total resection of the CA (rDP-CAR group; 24 patients) or LGA preservation if the tumor invasion was away from its root (pDP-CAR group; 31 patients), a CA-first approach to reduce blood loss during dissection, and conservative drain management with or without jejunal serosal patching at the pancreatic stump. RESULTS: Among the study patients, 23 had locally advanced PDAC and 22 had borderline resectable PDAC. Median operation duration was 443 min (248-810), estimated blood loss was 600 mL (150-2280), and incidence of transfusion was 2%. Ischemic complications occurred exclusively in the rDP-CAR group, including two patients with ischemic gastropathy (8%) and three patients with findings of liver ischemia on computed tomography (13%). One patient underwent relaparotomy for stomach perforations, and 19 patients (35%) had pancreatic fistula, including 8 patients who underwent conservative drain placement for more than 3 weeks without specific symptoms. There were no Clavien-Dindo grade 4 or higher postoperative complications. Preoperative therapy showed improved 3-year overall survival rates than without (54% vs. 37%, p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Using the standardized technique, DP-CAR was safely performed with no mortality and acceptable long-term survival.

High CA19-9 level in resectable pancreatic cancer is a potential indication of neoadjuvant treatment.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic cancer (PC) included patients with heterogenous preoperative states; however, the definition of resectability for PC has evolved. We aimed to investigate the prognostic factors for PC other than anatomical resectability in those who underwent upfront resection and discuss the optimal treatment strategy for PC. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 431 patients who underwent upfront surgery with curative intent between 2007 and 2014. The association between clinical characteristics and survival outcomes was assessed by stratifying patients according to risk factors. The patients were categorized into four groups based on anatomical (resectable [R]/BR) and biological features (CA19-9 ≤500/>500 U/mL): anatomical R with CA19-9 ≤500 U/mL (favorable-R); anatomical BR with CA19-9 ≤500 U/mL (favorable-BR); anatomical R with CA19-9 >500 U/mL (risky-R); and anatomical BR with CA19-9 >500 U/mL (risky-BR). RESULTS: Overall, 320 and 111 patients had anatomical R- and BR-PC, respectively. A modified Glasgow prognostic score = 2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.73), NLR>5 (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.54), CA19-9 >500 U/mL (HR: 1.86), and anatomical BR (HR: 1.38) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. The risky-R group had likely worse prognosis (16 months vs. 19 months, P = 0.0605) and a significantly higher early recurrence rate (36% vs 18%, P = 0.0231) than the favorable-BR group. CONCLUSIONS: It is essential to stratify and distinguish PC patients at a high risk of worse prognosis. Risky-R was an unfavorable prognostic factor and should thus be considered in the decision-making for treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in addition to anatomical BR-PC.

Accuracy of Modern Clinical Risk Score Including RAS Status Changes Based on Whether Patients Received Perioperative Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: A modified Fong clinical score (m-Fong CS) that includes the RAS mutation status has recently been proposed and offered an improved survival stratification of patients who undergo surgery and systemic chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The aim of this study is to assess whether a CS that includes RAS status is influenced by whether patients receive perioperative chemotherapy. METHODS: We created a new CS using multivariate analysis of data of patients who underwent hepatectomy for CLM for the first time between 2010 and 2016 at a single hospital (n = 341, 79% received perioperative chemotherapy). The resulting CS and m-Fong CS were then validated in the patient cohort at three other hospitals (n = 309). Furthermore, the applicability of the two CS in the total cohort (n = 650) was tested according to whether the patients received perioperative chemotherapy. RESULTS: The new CS comprised mutant RAS status, ≥4 CLMs, and a CA19-9 level ≥100 U/mL (1 point per factor). Both the new CS and m-Fong CS failed to stratify the survival of the 309 patients in the validation cohort, including those who did not receive perioperative chemotherapy (29%). Both of the CS accurately stratified the survival of patients who underwent perioperative chemotherapy but not of those who underwent surgery alone. CONCLUSION: A CS that includes the RAS mutation status can stratify the survival of patients who undergo hepatectomy combined with perioperative chemotherapy, but it has limited value for patients who undergo surgery alone.

The role of stent placement above the papilla (inside-stent) as a bridging therapy for perihilar biliary malignancy: an initial experience.

PURPOSE: Although endoscopic naso-biliary drainage (ENBD) is a popular preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) method for patients with perihilar biliary malignancy (PHBM), patient discomfort caused by the nasal tube remains a problem. This study aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of PBD with the placement of a plastic stent above the papilla [inside-stent (IS)] as a bridging therapy. METHODS: The outcomes of 78 patients with potentially resectable PHBM, of whom 29 underwent IS placement and 49 underwent ENBD were evaluated. RESULTS: The stent-associated complication rates were not different between the two groups (7% in the IS group and 10% in the ENBD group, P = 0.621). Catheter dislocation occurred less frequently (0% vs. 22%, P = 0.016), and the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction was longer (not reached vs. 32 days, P = 0.039) in the IS group than in the ENBD group. Among the patients who underwent resection, their postoperative severe complication rates were not substantially different (26% vs. 25%, P = 0.923). CONCLUSION: IS placement is a possible alternative to ENBD as a bridge to a definitive operation for patients with resectable PHBM and a prospective trial to prove its feasibility and safety is therefore warranted.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic trans-papillary gallbladder stenting for acute cholecystitis: a pilot study of surgical feasibility.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) is indicated for patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) who are not indicated for urgent surgery, but external tubes reduce quality of life (QOL) while waiting for elective surgery. The objective of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic trans-papillary gallbladder stenting (ETGBS) comparing with after PTGBD. METHODS: Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of patients with ETGBS and PTGBD were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: Eighteen ETGBS and ten PTGBD patients were compared. Differences in the duration of ETGBS and PTGBD [median 209 min (range 107-357) and median 161 min (range 130-273), respectively, P = 0.10], median blood loss [ETGBS 2 (range 2-180 ml) and PTGBD 24 (range 2-100 ml), P = 0.89], switch to laparotomy (ETGBS 11% and PTGBD 20%, P = 0.52), and median postoperative hospital stay [ETGBS 8 (range 4-24 days) and ETGBS 8 (range 4-16 days), P = 0.99]. Thickening of the cystic duct that occurred in 60% of the ETGBS patients and none of the PTGBD patients (P = 0.005) interfered with closure of the duct by clipping. No obstruction occurred in ETGBS patients. CONCLUSION: ETGBS did not make laparoscopic cholecystectomy less feasible than after PTGBD. This is a pilot study, and further investigations are needed to validate the results of the present study.