A retrospective database analysis of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent treatment patterns and associated healthcare resource use in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease-related anaemia in Japan.

AIM: This study was conducted to evaluate clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and healthcare resource use (HCRU) for patients in Japan with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) and anaemia. METHODS: This retrospective, longitudinal, epidemiological database extraction study used the JMDC Claims Database, comprising ~9.4 million unique beneficiaries. The observation period for anaemia and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)/iron treatment was 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2018, and for HCRU and costs was 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2018. The non-dialysis-dependent CKD anaemia population, and the ESA treatment, iron treatment, and no-treatment cohorts were evaluated. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were summarised descriptively. RESULTS: The non-dialysis-dependent CKD anaemia population included 5908 patients (7.9%), with 464 patients in the ESA treatment cohort, 809 patients (13.7%) in the iron treatment cohort (13.7%), and 4405 (74.6%) patients in the no-treatment cohort. The prevalence of patients prescribed an antihypertensive, antidiabetic, and/or antihyperlipidaemic medication generally increased with increasing baseline CKD stage. Proportions of no treatment for anaemia decreased while ESA treatment increased with increasing CKD stage; ESA treatment increased with decreasing baseline haemoglobin levels. Patients in the ESA treatment cohort generally had more frequent events associated with HCRU and higher costs from HCRU-associated activities (e.g., inpatient and outpatient care, pharmacy). CONCLUSION: As CKD severity increased, anaemia management changed from iron use or no treatment to ESA use; however, anaemia may be undertreated across all CKD stages. ESA-treated patients incurred greater HCRU-associated costs relative to other patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD anaemia in Japan.

Improvement in prescriptions while maintaining overall health outcomes: a prospective observational study conducted in Japanese facilities for older people.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in the use of polypharmacy or potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) may reduce medication costs in Japan. We aimed to evaluate the impact of improvement in prescription on both overall health outcomes and medication costs in Japanese facilities for older people. METHODS: Residents in Japanese facilities for older people between March 2019 and March 2020 were included in this study. The following five indices were used to evaluate overall health outcomes: EuroQoL-5D-5L, Barthel Index, Mini Mental State Examination, Dementia Behaviour Disturbance Scale, and Vitality Index. The team, which consisted of one physician and several pharmacists, suggested improved prescriptions for the attending physicians of the participants. The impact of improvement in prescriptions on the health outcomes score, medication costs, and the number of medications were evaluated through two comparison groups: those whose number of medications decreased (decrement group, DG) and those whose medications did not (not decrement group, NDG); those prescribed PIMs in March 2019 and those not prescribed PIMs in March 2020 (improvement group, IG) and those prescribed PIMs both in March 2019 and March 2020 (not improvement group, NIG). In both comparison groups, propensity score matching was performed to balance demographics, and all health outcome scores, medication costs, and the number of medications in March 2020 were assessed using a t-test. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of < 0.05. RESULTS: Eight-hundred-and-ninety-one participants (75.5% women, 86.2 ± 7.9 years old) were enrolled. After matching, in the comparison between the DG (N = 232, 77.2%, 85.7 ± 8.5) and NDG (N = 232, 78.5%, 86.0 ± 3.1), changes in the health outcomes score were nonsignificant. However, the medication costs and the number of medications significantly decreased. After matching, in the comparison between IG (N = 141, 75.2%, 86.7 ± 8.1) and NIG (N = 273, 74.2%, 86.2 ± 8.3), changes in health outcome scores and medication costs were not significant. However, the number of medications significantly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in prescriptions did not adversely affect the overall health outcomes. However, it impacted medication costs and the number of medications. Improvement in prescriptions could decrease medication costs while maintaining overall health outcomes.

Suboptimal Anticoagulant Management in Japanese Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Warfarin for Stroke Prevention.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, with increasing prevalence in Japan. Although prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) targets for monitoring warfarin therapy in patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF) are well defined, real-world patient characteristics and PT-INR levels remain unknown among Japanese patients with NVAF who initiate and continue warfarin (warfarin maintainers) versus those who switch from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; warfarin switchers). METHODS: Patients with NVAF receiving oral anticoagulants between February 2013 and June 2015 were identified using a nationwide electronic medical record (EMR) database from 69 hospitals in Japan. Demographics and characteristics of patients, PT-INR, time in therapeutic range (TTR), and frequency in range (FIR) of PT-INR between warfarin maintainers and warfarin switchers were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1705 patients met inclusion criteria and were examined (1501 warfarin maintainers versus 204 warfarin switchers). CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores were comparable between groups. However, these scores were significantly higher among warfarin switchers at the time of switching than at the time of warfarin initiation. Furthermore, TTR and FIR of PT-INR were lower in warfarin switchers than in maintainers. Nevertheless, TTR and FIR were below 50% (PT-INR, 1.6-2.6) in both patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this EMR-based clinical study, patients who switched to DOACs had both poor or inadequate PT-INR control and higher risk factors of stroke. Many patients receiving warfarin did not achieve sufficient PT-INR therapeutic range. DOACs could be recommended in Japanese patients with NVAF with inadequate PT-INR control and increased risk of stroke.

Re-challenge of Platinum-based Chemotherapy for Platinum-refractory Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: Claims Data Analysis in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The role of platinum rechallenge in head and neck cancer (HNC) has not yet been fully evaluated. OBJECTIVES: It is our goal to assess the real-world treatment patterns and usefulness of platinum rechallenge in patients with platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic HNC receiving platinum rechallenge. METHODS: This is a retrospective study using data from a Japanese hospital claims database stored in electronic hospital information systems. Patients with HNC or undefined histology with an HNC diagnosis using the disease code, between January 1, 2013 and September 30, 2016, were included. Patients diagnosed with other malignancies on or before the initial diagnosis of HNC and those without cancer stage information in the database were excluded from the study. RESULTS: A total of 43 994 patients were identified from the database as HNC patients. Of those, in patients who had cancer progression within 6 months after platinum-based chemotherapy administered for primary or recurrent disease (N=842), the median treatment duration of platinum rechallenge for platinum refractory patients was only 1 cycle. The second-line treatment continuation rate at 6 months was 20.1% for patients who received platinum rechallenges and 32.8% for those who received non-platinum-based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study of data from routine clinical practice suggest that the benefit of platinum rechallenge in a platinum-refractory setting would be limited.

Assessing the Budget Impact and Economic Outcomes of the Introduction of Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir and Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The advent of highly efficacious, well-tolerated, all-oral direct-acting antiviral regimens has revolutionized the standard of care for patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus. As efficacy and safety rates converge, prescribers and payers need to consider value for money. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the health economic value of daclatasvir + asunaprevir versus sofosbuvir/ledipasvir via a cost-effectiveness analysis, and determine the optimal treatment considering both costs and health outcomes in Japan. METHODS: A previously published Markov model was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of daclatasvir + asunaprevir compared with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir on the basis of a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of pivotal trials and modeling inputs specific to the Japanese setting. A de novo budget impact model was developed and used to predict the cost implications of differing treatment sequences. RESULTS: Cost-effectiveness results demonstrated minimal difference in terms of benefit (0.037 fewer QALYs and 0.014 fewer life-years with daclatasvir + asunaprevir); nevertheless, a significant difference in cost was predicted (estimated ¥2,299,700 [US $21,695] reduction with daclatasvir + asunaprevir). The budget impact analysis estimated that treatment with daclatasvir + asunaprevir is expected to be less expensive than treatment with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (as the proportion of patients initially treated with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir increased from 0% to 100%, total costs increased from ¥206 to ¥403 billion [US $1.94 billion to US $3.80 billion]). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of results from an established cost-effectiveness model and a conventional budget impact analysis, treatment with daclatasvir + asunaprevir is expected to be cost-saving compared with treatment with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir in Japan with similar health outcomes, regardless of treatment sequence.

Systemic Treatment Patterns With Advanced or Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Japan: A Retrospective Hospital Administrative Database Study.

PURPOSE: Data on the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real-world clinical practice in Japan are limited. This large-scale, retrospective cohort study examined data on patients' characteristics and systemic therapies for advanced or recurrent NSCLC in routine practice in Japan. METHODS: This study used an electronic health records-based database of health claims and Diagnosis Procedure Combination data from 215 consenting hospitals in Japan. Records from April 2008 to September 2015 were analyzed. Regimens were examined by histology, age, sex, and therapeutic line. Logistic regression analysis was performed to predict which clinical and demographic factors affected patients' probability of receiving first- or second-line therapy or completing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. FINDINGS: Among 16,413 patients, 67.9%, 39.2%, and 22.3% received first-, second-, and third-line systemic treatment, respectively. Treatment was more common in patients aged <75 versus ≥75 years (76.0% vs 51.6%), in female versus male patients (71.6% vs 65.4%), and in patients with nonsquamous versus squamous disease (75.6% vs 61.9%). More than 30 systemic regimens were administered. The most common first-line therapy was platinum-based chemotherapy (nonsquamous, 53.6%; squamous, 73.7%). Non-platinum-based chemotherapy use increased in the second-line setting, but platinum-based chemotherapy use remained high (nonsquamous, 33.9%; squamous, 38.6%). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors were used in 32.0% and 29.4% of patients with nonsquamous NSCLC in the first- and second-line settings, respectively. Switches from first- to second-line platinum-based chemotherapy and from first- to second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors occurred. Forty-two percent of the patients died during hospitalization. In the logistic regression analysis, factors associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving first-line therapy were male sex, squamous histology, age >75 years, treatment at a general (vs cancer-specific) hospital, worse scores on certain activities of daily living, presence of chronic pulmonary disease, worse Hugh-Jones classification, and positive smoking status. The likelihood of completing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy was increased with greater body mass index, better activities of daily living scores, absence of chronic pulmonary disease, and better Hugh-Jones classification. The likelihood of continuing with second-line therapy was decreased with older age and recurrence of NSCLC. IMPLICATIONS: Systemic treatment patterns for advanced or recurrent NSCLC in Japan were varied. Nearly 30% of all patients and approximately half of elderly patients did not receive systemic treatment. Treatment rates declined with subsequent therapeutic lines. Generally, guidelines were followed with first-line treatment administration, but not with second-line administration. These results underscore the need for better guideline adherence and more optimal treatment in and elderly patients and in those receiving later-line treatment in Japan.