Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(5): 786-794, 2022 09 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34996113

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: GSK3640254 (GSK'254) is a next-generation human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) maturation inhibitor with pharmacokinetics (PK) supporting once-daily therapy. METHODS: This phase IIa double-blind (sponsor-unblinded), randomized, placebo-controlled, adaptive study evaluated antiviral effect, safety, tolerability, and PK of once-daily GSK'254 monotherapy administered with food (moderate-fat meal) in HIV-1-positive, treatment-naive adults. In part 1, participants received GSK'254 10 or 200 mg for 10 days. In part 2, participants received GSK'254 40, 80, or 140 mg for 7 days, modified from 10 days by a protocol amendment to decrease potential for resistance-associated mutations (RAMs). The primary endpoint was maximum change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA. RESULTS: Maximum changes in HIV-1 RNA of -0.4, -1.2, -1.0, -1.5, and -2.0 log10 occurred with GSK'254 10, 40, 80, 140, and 200 mg, respectively. Regardless of dosing duration, doses ≥40 mg resulted in ≥1-log10 declines in HIV-1 RNA. Plasma PK was generally dose proportional to 140 mg but non-proportional between 140 and 200 mg. Four participants in the 200-mg group developed RAMs on day 11 in part 1, 1 with phenotypic resistance. No RAMs occurred in part 2. Adverse events (AEs) were reported by 22 (65%) participants; headache was the most common (n = 4). Two non-drug-related serious AEs occurred. All AEs were of mild-to-moderate intensity, except for 2 grade 3 non-drug-related AEs in 1 participant. CONCLUSIONS: This monotherapy study established a dose-antiviral response relationship for GSK'254. No safety or tolerability concerns were noted. These results supported dose selection for the ongoing phase IIb study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04493216). CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03784079.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , HIV-1 , Adulto , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , HIV-1/genética , Humanos , RNA/farmacologia , RNA/uso terapêutico
2.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 69(4): 425-430, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31181017

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted based on a request from the European Medicines Agency to generate robust data on domperidone efficacy in children in the relief of symptoms of nausea and vomiting by assessing the effect of a low-dose and short treatment duration. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, children ages 6 months to 12 years with acute gastroenteritis randomly (1:1) received oral domperidone 0.25 mg/kg with oral rehydration therapy (ORT) or matching placebo thrice daily for 2 to 7 days. The proportion of patients with no vomiting episodes (primary endpoint) and patients ages ≥4 years with no nausea episodes (key secondary endpoint) within 48 hours of first treatment administration were evaluated. RESULTS: The study was terminated early following futility analysis. At early termination, 292 patients randomly received domperidone (n = 147) or placebo (n = 145). The proportion of patients with no vomiting episodes within 48-hours of first treatment administration was similar between domperidone (32.0%) and placebo groups (33.8%). Similarly, there was no significant difference in proportion of patients ages ≥4 years with no nausea episodes within 48 hours of first treatment administration between domperidone (35.7%) and placebo (38.6%). Total 13 patients (domperidone, 3.4% [5/147] vs placebo, 5.5% [8/145]) reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events. No deaths or adverse events of special interest (extrapyramidal symptoms and QT prolongation) were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose of domperidone with ORT did not significantly differ from placebo in reducing vomiting and nausea episodes in pediatric patients with acute gastroenteritis (AG), and the safety profile was similar between both groups.


Assuntos
Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Domperidona/uso terapêutico , Gastroenterite/complicações , Náusea/tratamento farmacológico , Vômito/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Administração Oral , Antieméticos/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Domperidona/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Náusea/complicações , Federação Russa , África do Sul , Resultado do Tratamento , Vômito/complicações
3.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 27(1): 55-61, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26267219

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recommendations in current guidelines for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in infants and children are mostly based on extrapolation of data obtained in adults. This study reports the efficacy and safety of rupatadine, a modern H1 and PAF antagonist recently authorized in Europe for children with allergic rhinitis and CSU. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre, placebo-controlled compared study to desloratadine was carried out in children aged 2-11 years with CSU, with or without angio-oedema. Patients received either rupatadine (1 mg/ml), or desloratadine (0.5 mg/ml) or placebo once daily over 6 weeks. A modified 7-day cumulative Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) was employed as the primary end-point. RESULTS: The absolute change of UAS7 at 42 days showed statistically significant differences between active treatments vs. placebo (-5.5 ± 7.5 placebo, -11.8 ± 8.7 rupatadine and -10.6 ± 9.6 desloratadine; p < 0.001) and without differences between antihistamines compounds. There was a 55.8% decrease for rupatadine followed by desloratadine (-48.4%) and placebo (-30.3%). Rupatadine but not desloratadine was statistically superior to placebo in reduction of pruritus (-57%). Active treatments also showed a statistically better improvement in children's quality of life compared to placebo. Adverse events were uncommon and non-serious in both active groups. CONCLUSION: Rupatadine is effective and well tolerated in the relief of urticaria symptoms, improving quality of life over 6 weeks in children with CSU. This is the first study using a modified UAS to assess severity and efficacy outcome in CSU in children.


Assuntos
Ciproeptadina/análogos & derivados , Antagonistas não Sedativos dos Receptores H1 da Histamina/uso terapêutico , Loratadina/análogos & derivados , Urticária/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Etários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doença Crônica , Ciproeptadina/efeitos adversos , Ciproeptadina/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Antagonistas não Sedativos dos Receptores H1 da Histamina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hungria , Loratadina/efeitos adversos , Loratadina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Indução de Remissão , África do Sul , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Urticária/diagnóstico
4.
Infect Dis Ther ; 13(4): 699-714, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38489117

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Rare myocarditis and pericarditis cases have occurred in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine recipients. Troponin levels, a potential marker of myocardial injury, were assessed in healthy participants before and after BNT162b2 vaccination. METHODS: Vaccine-experienced 12- to 30-year-olds in phase 3 crossover C4591031 Substudy B (NCT04955626) who had two or three prior BNT162b2 30-µg doses were randomized to receive BNT162b2 30 µg followed by placebo, or placebo followed by BNT162b2 30 µg, 1 month apart. A participant subset, previously unvaccinated against COVID-19, in the phase 3 C4591007 study (NCT04816643) received up to three vaccinations (BNT162b2 10 µg or placebo [5- to 11-year-olds]) or open-label BNT162b2 30 µg (12- to 15-year-olds). Blood samples collected pre-vaccination, 4 days post-vaccination, and 1-month post-vaccination (C4591031 Substudy B only) were analyzed. Frequencies of elevated troponin I levels (male, > 35 ng/l; female, > 17 ng/l) were assessed. RESULTS: Percentages of 12- to 30-year-olds (n = 1485) in C4591031 Substudy B with elevated troponin levels following BNT162b2 or placebo receipt were 0.5% and 0.8% before vaccination, 0.7% and 1.0% at day 4, and 0.7% and 0.5% at 1 month, respectively. In Study C4591007 (n = 1265), elevated troponin I levels were observed in 0.2, 0.4, and 0.2% of 5- to 11-year-old BNT162b2 recipients at baseline and 4 days post-dose 2 and 3, respectively; corresponding values in 12- to 15-year-olds were 0.4, 0.4, and 0.7%. No 5- to 11-year-old placebo recipients had elevated troponin levels. No myocarditis or pericarditis cases or deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Among 5- to < 30-year-olds in both studies, troponin levels were rarely elevated (≤ 1.0%) and similar before and post-vaccination; troponin levels were also similar between BNT162b2 and placebo in 12- to 30-year-old and 5- to 11-year-old recipients in the respective studies. No myocarditis or pericarditis cases were reported. These findings did not provide evidence that BNT162b2 causes troponin elevations. No utility of routine measurement of troponin levels in asymptomatic BNT162b2 recipients was identified.

5.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 52(7): 1285-92, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23485476

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of IL-1 inhibitor rilonacept (IL-1 Trap) for gout flare (GF) prevention during initiation of uric acid-lowering therapy (ULT) with allopurinol in a multiregional phase 3 clinical trial. METHODS: Hyperuricaemic adults (n = 248) from South Africa, Germany and Asia with gout and two or more GFs within the past year were initiated on allopurinol and randomized 1:1:1 to once-weekly s.c. treatment with placebo (PBO), rilonacept 80 mg (R80) or rilonacept 160 mg (R160) for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was the number of GFs per patient through week 16. RESULTS: The population was predominantly male and racially diverse (white, 53.2%; Asian, 33.1%; black, 13.7%). Across treatments, most patients completed the study (87.8-92.9%). At 16 weeks the mean number of GFs per patient was reduced by 71.3% with R80 (0.35) and by 72.6% with R160 (0.34) relative to PBO (1.23; both P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients without GFs was higher with R80 (74.4%) and R160 (79.5%) than with PBO (43.9%; both P ≤ 0.0001), and the proportions of patients on rilonacept with multiple GFs were significantly lower (P < 0.001). Overall, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between PBO (61.0%) and rilonacept (65.1%). Injection site reactions, generally mild, were the most frequent AE with rilonacept (1.2% PBO, 12.2% R80 and 17.9% R160); none of these injection site reactions led to withdrawal. There were no study drug-related serious AEs or deaths. CONCLUSION: Rilonacept significantly reduced the occurrence of GFs associated with initiation of ULT, with >70% of patients having no flares, and demonstrated an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT00958438.


Assuntos
Alopurinol/uso terapêutico , Supressores da Gota/uso terapêutico , Gota/prevenção & controle , Hiperuricemia/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Gota/sangue , Humanos , Hiperuricemia/sangue , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptores Tipo I de Interleucina-1/antagonistas & inibidores , Resultado do Tratamento , Ácido Úrico/sangue
6.
AIDS ; 36(2): 185-194, 2022 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34261093

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: ATLAS (NCT02951052), a phase 3, multicenter, open-label study, demonstrated that switching to injectable cabotegravir (CAB) with rilpivirine (RPV) long-acting dosed every 4 weeks was noninferior at week (W) 48 to continuing three-drug daily oral current antiretroviral therapy (CAR). Results from the W 96 analysis are presented. METHODS AND DESIGN: Participants completing W 52 of ATLAS were given the option to withdraw, transition to ATLAS-2M (NCT03299049), or enter an Extension Phase to continue long-acting therapy (Long-acting arm) or switch from CAR to long-acting therapy (Switch arm). Endpoints assessed at W 96 included proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml, incidence of confirmed virologic failure (CVF; two consecutive HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/ml), safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Most participants completing the Maintenance Phase transitioned to ATLAS-2M (88%, n = 502/572). Overall, 52 participants were included in the W 96 analysis of ATLAS; of these, 100% (n = 23/23) and 97% (n = 28/29) in the Long-acting and Switch arms had plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml at W 96, respectively. One participant had plasma HIV-1 RNA 50 copies/ml or higher in the Switch arm (173 copies/ml). No participants met the CVF criterion during the Extension Phase. No new safety signals were identified. All Switch arm participants surveyed preferred long-acting therapy to their previous daily oral regimen (100%, n = 27/27). CONCLUSION: In this subgroup of ATLAS, 98% (n = 51/52) of participants at the Extension Phase W 96 analysis maintained virologic suppression with long-acting therapy. Safety, efficacy, and participant preference results support the therapeutic potential of long-acting CAB+RPV treatment for virologically suppressed people living with HIV-1.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV , Infecções por HIV , HIV-1 , Dicetopiperazinas , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , HIV-1/genética , Humanos , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Rilpivirina/uso terapêutico , Carga Viral
7.
Infect Dis Ther ; 8(4): 613-626, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31667696

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Immunocompromised patients infected with influenza exhibit prolonged viral shedding and higher risk of resistance. Optimized treatment strategies are needed to reduce the risk of antiviral resistance. This phase IIIb, randomized, double-blind study (NCT00545532) evaluated conventional-dose or double-dose oseltamivir for the treatment of influenza in immunocompromised patients. METHODS: Patients with primary or secondary immunodeficiency and influenza infection were randomized 1:1 to receive conventional-dose oseltamivir (75 mg adolescents/adults [≥ 13 years]; 30-75 mg by body weight in children [1-12 years]) or double-dose oseltamivir (150 or 60-150 mg, respectively), twice daily for an extended period of 10 days. Nasal/throat swabs were taken for virology assessments at all study visits. Co-primary endpoints were safety/tolerability and viral resistance. Secondary endpoints included time to symptom alleviation (TTSA) and time to cessation of viral shedding (TTCVS). RESULTS: Of 228 patients enrolled between February 2008 and May 2017, 215 (199 adults) were evaluable for safety, 167 (151 adults) for efficacy, and 152 (138 adults) for resistance. Fewer patients experienced an adverse event (AE) in the conventional-dose group (50.5%) versus the double-dose group (59.1%). The most frequently reported AEs were nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, and headache. Fifteen patients had post-baseline resistance, more commonly in the conventional-dose group (n = 12) than in the double-dose group (n = 3). In adults, median TTSA was similar between arms, while median TTCVS was longer with conventional dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Oseltamivir was well tolerated, with a trend toward better safety/tolerability for conventional dosing versus double dosing. Resistance rates were higher with conventional dosing in this immunocompromised patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00545532. FUNDING: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

8.
Antivir Ther ; 20(7): 709-19, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25318121

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current influenza treatment options include oral or inhaled antiviral agents. There is an unmet need for parenteral antiviral treatments. METHODS: Peramivir, a parenteral influenza neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI), was administered by single-dose intramuscular (IM) injection in two placebo-controlled studies in adult outpatients with acute, uncomplicated influenza during two consecutive influenza seasons. RESULTS: In a Phase II study, peramivir treatment significantly shortened duration of fever and reduced viral load in nasopharyngeal secretions. A subsequent Phase III study was not fully enrolled; however, in both studies, the magnitude of the treatment effect favouring peramivir was consistent with that reported for other NAIs. A post-hoc analysis was conducted by integrating efficacy and safety results of 427 subjects from both studies. The median time to alleviation of symptoms (TTAS) in subjects receiving peramivir 300 mg (113.2 h) was shorter than for placebo (134.8 h; P=0.161 adjusted for smoking behaviour, influenza season and virus type; unadjusted P=0.047). The median time to resolution of fever was reduced by 24 h after treatment with peramivir 300 mg compared with placebo (P=0.004). The proportion of subjects shedding influenza virus was significantly decreased over 48 h following peramivir treatment (P=0.009). Detection of post-treatment viruses with decreased susceptibility to NAIs was uncommon. Peramivir was generally safe and well-tolerated with types and rates of adverse event similar to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The results of these studies are consistent with previous reports of peramivir administered by intravenous infusion, and demonstrate a positive risk-benefit profile for peramivir in patients with acute uncomplicated influenza.


Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Ciclopentanos/administração & dosagem , Guanidinas/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Ácidos Carbocíclicos , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados como Assunto , Ciclopentanos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Guanidinas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A/classificação , Vírus da Influenza A/efeitos dos fármacos , Influenza Humana/virologia , Concentração Inibidora 50 , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Estações do Ano , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga Viral , Adulto Jovem
9.
Vaccine ; 32(46): 6146-56, 2014 Oct 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25223266

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Non-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccines show only modest efficacy in young children. This study compared the immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of the MF59-adjuvanted trivalent subunit vaccine (aTIV) with two non-adjuvanted trivalent vaccines, TIV-1, the non-adjuvanted version of aTIV, and TIV-2, a split virion vaccine. METHODS: 6078 children received two doses of aTIV (n=3125), TIV-1 (n=1479), or TIV-2 (n=1474) four weeks apart (Days 1 and 29). Children aged 6 to <36 months and 36 to <72 months received 0.25 mL and 0.50 mL doses, respectively. Immunogenicity was assessed by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay (n=2435) on Days 1, 29, 50 and 209. Safety was assessed up to Day 394. RESULTS: After the second vaccination (Day 50), the aTIV group showed significantly higher geometric mean HI titers and seroconversion rates than the TIV-1 or TIV-2 groups against all homologous and heterologous strains. The difference was enhanced at HI titers ≥110. aTIV elicited a faster, more persistent antibody response, with significantly higher titers in the aTIV group after one vaccination (Day 29) and after six months (Day 209) than in either TIV group. aTIV was more reactogenic than were TIV-1 and TIV-2 but rates of severe adverse events were very low for all three vaccines. CONCLUSION: In infants and young children, the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine induced substantially faster (after one dose), higher, persistent HI titers than the non-adjuvanted vaccines, with consistently higher seroprotection rates at increased threshold HI titers. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01346592.


Assuntos
Formação de Anticorpos , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Humanos , Lactente , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2 , Vírus da Influenza B , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Polissorbatos/administração & dosagem , Método Simples-Cego , Esqualeno/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/uso terapêutico
10.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 26(3): 653-61, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20070143

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are no known racial differences in genital herpes disease pathogenesis or response to therapy. Despite high herpes simplex virus (HSV) seroprevalence in Black persons, clinical trials investigating the treatment of recurrent genital herpes (RGH) have typically enrolled a small proportion of Black patients. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of patient-initiated, 1-day famciclovir 1000 mg twice-daily in immunocompetent Black adults (USA and South Africa) with RGH. Eligible patients were randomized (2:1) to famciclovir or placebo. The primary endpoint was time to healing of non-aborted genital herpes lesions (i.e., lesions that progressed beyond papule stage). Secondary endpoints included proportion of patients with aborted genital herpes lesions, time to resolution of associated symptoms, and safety. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov ; trial identifier NCT00477334. RESULTS: A total of 299 patients with RGH (66% female, median age = 37 years) received either 1-day famciclovir 1000 mg twice-daily (n = 201) or placebo (n = 98). In the modified intent-to-treat population, the estimated median time to healing of non-aborted genital herpes lesions was 5.38 days for famciclovir and 4.79 days for placebo (median of treatment differences = 0.26 days; 95% CI [-0.40, 0.98]; p = 0.416). Consistent findings were reported in the completer and per-protocol populations. No significant differences were reported for all secondary analyses. Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the established safety profile of famciclovir: 18 (6%) patients had drug-related AEs (16 [8%] famciclovir; 2 [2%] placebo), none of which were serious or led to discontinuation or dose adjustment/interruption. There are some limitations of this research: many study sites either lacked prior experience in conducting clinical studies in patients with HSV infection or enrolled small numbers of patients, which may have compromised efficacy outcomes. Also, HIV antibody testing was not mandated at enrollment. CONCLUSION: This study showed similar efficacy and tolerability of 1-day treatment with famciclovir 1000 mg twice-daily compared to placebo in immunocompetent Black adults with RGH. Famciclovir has proven efficacy and safety in the overall RGH population. Further understanding of the efficacy of antiherpes therapy in Black patients with recurrent genital herpes may be warranted.


Assuntos
2-Aminopurina/análogos & derivados , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , População Negra , Herpes Genital/tratamento farmacológico , 2-Aminopurina/administração & dosagem , 2-Aminopurina/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Famciclovir , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , África do Sul , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA