Results of the interim analysis of a prospective, multicenter, observational study of small subepithelial lesions in the stomach.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term outcomes of gastric subepithelial lesions have not been elucidated. To reveal the natural history, we initiated a prospective, 10-year follow-up of patients with small (≤20 mm) gastric subepithelial lesions in September 2014. Here, we report the results of an interim analysis of a prospective observational study. METHODS: In total, 567 patients with 610 lesions were prospectively registered between September 2014 and August 2016. The location, size, morphology, and number of subepithelial lesions were recorded on a web-based case report form. This study has been conducted as an Academic Committee Working Group of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. RESULTS: The endoscopic follow-up period was 4.60 ± 1.73 years (mean ± standard deviation), and survival data were investigated for 5.28 ± 1.68 years. This interim analysis revealed that the estimated cumulative incidence of a size increase ≥5 mm, after accounting for patients' death and resection of the tumor as competing risk events, was 4.5% at 5 years. In addition, the estimated cumulative incidence of lesion size increase ≥5 mm or resection of lesions was 7.9% at 5 years, and that of size increase ≥10 mm or resection of lesions was 4.5% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that approximately one in 13 patients with small (≤20 mm) gastric subepithelial lesions may require resection or further investigation for increased tumor size (≥5 mm) within 5 years.

Advances in the development of a reliable assay for the measurement of stool decay-accelerating factor in the detection of colorectal cancer.

We have previously shown that stool concentrations of decay-accelerating factor (DAF; CD55), a membrane-bound complement-regulatory protein, are significantly elevated in patients with colorectal cancer and that the measurement of stool DAF may be a valuable test for the detection of colorectal cancer. Accordingly, we are working to develop a clinically useful immunoassay for fecal DAF. A requirement for such assay is a plentiful and reliable supply of anti-DAF antibodies. We developed a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for DAF in stool specimens, using two monoclonal anti-DAF antibodies recognizing different epitopes on the DAF molecule. When we first used a biotin-labeled antibody and enzyme-linked streptavidin method, we often observed stool interference, probably due to the presence of a substance(s) with biotin activity which non-specifically bound to the Fc portion of IgG of the first anti-DAF antibody on the ELISA wells. By the use of inorganic salts in the sample-dilution buffer and HRP-labeled anti-DAF as second antibody, we circumvented the stool interference and established that the new ELISA system could reliably measure DAF at low concentrations in stool specimens. Because the new assay system uses only monoclonal antibodies, we can now consistently supply ample amounts of antibodies for routine measurement of stool DAF.

Testing of multiple samples increases the sensitivity of stool decay-accelerating factor test for the detection of colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We previously reported that the measurements of stool decay-accelerating factor (DAF), a membrane-bound, complement regulatory protein, may be valuable for the detection of colorectal cancer. Recently we have refined the immunoassay for stool DAF. In the present study, using the refined assay, we measured stool DAF concentrations in multiple samples from patients with colorectal cancer and in healthy controls to determine whether testing of multiple samples would increase the sensitivity of the stool DAF test. METHODS: DAF was measured in three spontaneously passed stool samples from each of 100 patients with colorectal cancer and 100 control subjects without apparent colorectal disease. RESULTS: The stool DAF concentrations in the patients with colorectal cancer (median 11.1 ng/g stool; interquartile range 2.9-32.7 ng/g) were significantly higher than concentrations in the subjects without colorectal diseases (median 1.6 ng/g stool; interquartile range 0.4-3.4 ng/g) (p<0.0001). Testing of two samples from each patient significantly increased the sensitivity (72%) of the stool DAF test without significantly decreasing its specificity (92%). The stool DAF test was positive in more than one half of patients with colorectal cancer at a relatively early TNM stage or with negative fecal occult blood test. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that stool DAF is a marker of colorectal cancer independent of fecal occult blood and testing of two samples increases the sensitivity of the stool DAF test. Measurement of stool DAF now seems worthy of further consideration as a noninvasive method for the detection of colorectal cancer.