Use of a Cybex NORM dynamometer to assess muscle function in patients with thoracic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The cachexia-anorexia syndrome impacts on patients' physical independence and quality of life. New treatments are required and need to be evaluated using acceptable and reliable outcome measures, e.g. the assessment of muscle function. The aims of this study were to: (i) examine the acceptability and reliability of the Cybex NORM dynamometer to assess muscle function in people with non-small cell lung cancer or mesothelioma; (ii) compare muscle function in this group with healthy volunteers and; (iii) explore changes in muscle function over one month. METHODS: The test consisted of 25 repetitions of isokinetic knee flexion and extension at maximal effort while seated on a Cybex NORM dynamometer. Strength and endurance for the quadriceps and hamstrings were assessed as peak torque and total work and an endurance ratio respectively. Thirteen patients and 26 volunteers completed the test on three separate visits. Acceptability was assessed by questionnaire, reliability by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and tests of difference compared outcomes between and within groups. RESULTS: All subjects found the test acceptable. Peak torque and work done were reliable measures (ICC >0.80), but the endurance ratio was not. Muscle function did not differ significantly between the patient and a matched volunteer group or in either group when repeated after one month. CONCLUSION: For patients with non-small cell lung cancer or mesothelioma, the Cybex NORM dynamometer provides an acceptable and reliable method of assessing muscle strength and work done. Muscle function appears to be relatively well preserved in this group and it appears feasible to explore interventions which aim to maintain or even improve this.

The effect of a single haemodialysis session on functional mobility in older adults: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To undertake balance and functional mobility assessments in older maintenance haemodialysis patients before and after haemodialysis as a pilot study in order to gain initial data and to assess the feasibility and acceptability of this type of study. DESIGN: Postural sway, three-metre timed "up and go" test (TGUGT), and dynamic single leg extensor power (LEP) were measured before and after a haemodialysis session. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Male and female maintenance haemodialysis patients aged over 60 years attending the Nottingham City Hospital. MAIN MEASURES: Objective outcome measures were postural sway number and sway path (mm) by balance performance monitor, timed three-metre "up and go" test (s), and leg extensor power (W). Blood pressure and weight reductions were also measured. Subjective assessments of practicality and acceptability were made. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients enrolled. Complete data sets were collected for 14 subjects (11 male, three female). Results were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test for nonparametric data. There was no significant difference before and after dialysis in postural sway, timed "up and go" or leg extensor power. Eight patients did not complete the study and the reasons are examined. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant single-session effect. Results suggest that haemodialysis patients may be weaker and have reduced postural stability when compared to historical data on comparable undialysed patients. The study was logistically complex and would be difficult to expand using these methods, but the issues merit further consideration.

Evidence-based clinical guidelines: a new system to better determine true strength of recommendation.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Clinical practice guidelines often grade the 'strength' of their recommendations according to the robustness of the supporting research evidence. The existing methodology does not allow the strength of recommendation (SOR) to be upgraded for recommendations for which randomized controlled trials are impractical or unethical. The purpose of this study was to develop a new method of determining SOR, incorporating both research evidence and expert opinion. METHODS: A Delphi technique was employed to produce 10 recommendations for the role of exercise therapy in the management of osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. The SOR for each recommendation was determined by the traditional method, closely linked to the category of research evidence found on a systematic literature search, and on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Recommendations were grouped A-D according to the traditional SOR allocated and the mean VAS calculated. Difference across the groups was assessed by one-way ANOVA variance analysis. RESULTS: Mean VAS scores for the traditional SOR groups A-D and one proposition which was 'not recommended' showed significant linearity on one-way ANOVA. However, certain recommendations which, for practical reasons, could not assessed in randomized controlled trials and therefore could not be recommended strongly by the traditional methodology, were allocated a strong recommendation by VAS. CONCLUSIONS: This new system of grading strength of SOR is less constrained than the traditional methodology and offers the advantage of allowing SOR for procedures which cannot be assessed in RCTs for practical or ethical reasons to be upgraded according to expert opinion.

Reliability of measurements obtained with the modified Ashworth scale in the lower extremities of people with stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abnormal muscle tone is a common motor disorder following stroke, which may require rehabilitation. The Modified Ashworth Scale is a 6-point rating scale that is used to measure muscle tone. The interrater and intrarater reliability of measurements obtained with the scale remain equivocal. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of measurements obtained with the scale in the lower limb of patients with stroke. SUBJECTS: Twenty patients were tested 2 weeks after their stroke, and 12 patients were tested 12 weeks after their stroke. METHODS: Gastrocnemius, soleus, and quadriceps femoris muscles on the hemiplegic side were tested. RESULTS: Interrater reliability for 2 raters was poor, with a Kendall tau-b correlation for the combined muscle group of.062 (P=.461). For intrarater reliability, the Kendall tau-b correlation was.567 (P<.001). The agreement within one rater occurred mostly on the grade of 0. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The Modified Ashworth Scale yielded reliable measurements in the lower limb for a single examiner, and agreement was best on the grade of 0. The reliability between examiners was not good, which may bring into question the validity of measurements obtained with the scale.

Is exercise an acceptable and practical therapy for people with or cured of cancer? A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic exercise, although potentially beneficial, does not appear acceptable to many cancer patients. A greater understanding of the reasons for this is required. We have systematically reviewed the use of exercise in this group, identifying rates of uptake, adherence and completion along with factors influencing acceptability. METHODS: Searches were completed using relevant key words. Data on study design, patient group, exercise intervention, patient flow data and reasons for declining or withdrawing from a programme were independently extracted by two researchers. Rates of study uptake, completion and adherence were compared according to dichotomised patient or programme characteristics using Mann Whitney U test (p=0.05). Reasons provided when declining or withdrawing from a study were categorised. RESULTS: Sixty five studies were included. The majority contained groups made up entirely or predominantly of patients with breast cancer offered an aerobic or resistance exercise programme. The median [IQR] rates of uptake, adherence and completion were 63 [33-80]%, 84 [72-93]% and 87 [80-96]%, respectively. No characteristic influenced the proportion of patients taking up or completing a programme. The main reasons for refusal were disinterest or the impracticality of undertaking the programme and for withdrawal, medical complication or deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: The invitation to undertake a programme of therapeutic exercise is accepted by about two-thirds of patients. Rates of adherence and completion are relatively high, but overall, only about half of patients offered a programme complete one. There is a need to modify exercise programmes if they are to be acceptable for the majority of patients.