Discovery and Development of HDAC Inhibitors: Approaches for the Treatment of Cancer a Mini-review.

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have emerged as promising cancer therapeutics due to their ability to induce differentiation, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis in cancer cells. In the present review, we have described the systemic discovery and development of HDAC inhibitors. Researchers across the globe have identified various small molecules like benzo[d][1,3]dioxol derivatives, belinostat analogs, pyrazine derivatives, quinazolin-4-one-based derivatives, 2,4-imidazolinedione derivatives, acridine hydroxamic acid derivatives, coumarin derivatives, tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives, thiazole-5-carboxamide, salicylamide derivatives, ß-peptoid-capped HDAC inhibitors, quinazoline derivatives, benzimidazole and benzothiazole derivatives, and ß- elemene scaffold containing HDAC inhibitors. Most of the scaffolds have shown attractive IC50 (µM) in various cell lines like HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC6, PI3K, HeLa, MDA-MB-231, MCF-10A, MCF-7, U937, K562 and Bcr-Abl cell lines.

Activation of Cell-Intrinsic Signaling in CAR-T Cells via a Chimeric IL7R Domain.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can effectively treat leukemias, but sustained antitumor responses can be hindered by a lack of CAR T-cell persistence. Cytotoxic effector T cells are short-lived, and establishment of CAR-T cells with memory to ensure immune surveillance is important. Memory T cells depend on cytokine support, with IL7 activation of the IL7 receptor (IL7R) being critical. However, IL7R surface expression is negatively regulated by exposure to IL7. We aimed to support CAR T-cell persistence by equipping CAR-T cells with a sustained IL7Rα signal. We engineered T cells to constitutively secrete IL7 or to express an anti-acute myeloid leukemia-targeted IL7Rα-chimeric cytokine receptor (CCR) and characterized the phenotype of these cell types. Canonical downstream signaling was activated in CCR-T cells with IL7R activation. When coexpressed with a cytotoxic CAR, functionality of both the CCR and CAR was maintained. We designed hybrid CAR-CCR and noted membrane proximity of the intracellular domains as vital for signaling. These data show cell-intrinsic cytokine support with canonical signaling, and functionality can be provided via expression of an IL7Rα domain whether independently expressed or incorporated into a cytotoxic CAR for use in anticancer therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: To improve the phenotype of tumor-directed T-cell therapy, we show that provision of cell-intrinsic IL7R-mediated signaling is preferable to activation of cells with exogenous IL7. We engineer this signaling via independent receptor engineering and incorporation into a CAR and validate maintained antigen-specific cytotoxic activity.

Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating Palbociclib in Addition to Letrozole as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer: PALLET Trial.

PURPOSE: CDK4/6 inhibitors are used to treat estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer (BC) in combination with endocrine therapy. PALLET is a phase II randomized trial that evaluated the effects of combination palbociclib plus letrozole as neoadjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with ER-positive primary BC and tumors greater than or equal to 2.0 cm were randomly assigned 3:2:2:2 to letrozole (2.5 mg/d) for 14 weeks (A); letrozole for 2 weeks, then palbociclib plus letrozole to 14 weeks (B); palbociclib for 2 weeks, then palbociclib plus letrozole to 14 weeks (C); or palbociclib plus letrozole for 14 weeks. Palbociclib 125 mg/d was administered orally on a 21-days-on, 7-days-off schedule. Core-cut biopsies were taken at baseline and 2 and 14 weeks. Coprimary end points for letrozole versus palbociclib plus letrozole groups (A v B + C + D) were change in Ki-67 (protein encoded by the  MKI67 gene; immunohistochemistry) between baseline and 14 weeks and clinical response (ordinal and ultrasound) after 14 weeks. Complete cell-cycle arrest was defined as Ki-67 less than or equal to 2.7%. Apoptosis was characterized by cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase. RESULTS: Three hundred seven patients were recruited. Clinical response was not significantly different between palbociclib plus letrozole and letrozole groups ( P = .20; complete response + partial response, 54.3% v 49.5%), and progressive disease was 3.2% versus 5.4%, respectively. Median log-fold change in Ki-67 was greater with palbociclib plus letrozole compared with letrozole (-4.1 v -2.2; P < .001) in the 190 evaluable patients (61.9%), corresponding to a geometric mean change of -97.4% versus -88.5%. More patients on palbociclib plus letrozole achieved complete cell-cycle arrest (90% v 59%; P < .001). Median log-fold change (suppression) of cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase was greater with palbociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole (-0.80 v -0.42; P < .001). More patients had grade 3 or greater toxicity on palbociclib plus letrozole (49.8% v 17.0%; P < .001) mainly because of asymptomatic neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Adding palbociclib to letrozole significantly enhanced the suppression of malignant cell proliferation (Ki-67) in primary ER-positive BC, but did not increase the clinical response rate over 14 weeks, which was possibly related to a concurrent reduction in apoptosis.