RESUMO
Background This is a novel study from Sudan aimed at comparing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients and diabetes patients without DFU. Additionally, this study aimed to determine the factors correlating with lower HRQoL. Methodology A descriptive, cross-sectional study with a comparative group was conducted in three diabetes centers in Khartoum, Sudan, in 2020. A total of 120 Sudanese diabetic patients (mean age = 52 years) were divided into two groups, without DFU and with DFU, and interviewed in person. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded. HRQoL was evaluated using the standardized RAND-36 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey) survey for all participants. HRQoL domains and total scores were compared in the two groups using the t-test. Inference against sociodemographic data was determined using Pearson's test and analysis of variance. Results The DFU group (36 males, 24 females) scored significantly lower in five (yet higher in two out of the eight subscales) compared to the non-DFU diabetic group (31 males, 29 females). Energy/fatigue levels remained insignificant. Being a female (p = 0.03), painful ulcers (p = 0.001), insulin use (p = 0.04), and newly developed ulcers (p = 0.005) were associated with lower HRQoL total scores in the DFU group. However, educational levels had a positive correlation (p = 0.02). Conclusions DFU patients have lower HRQoL than diabetic patients without ulcers. They need more support, including disease-specific education, realistic expectations (regarding ulcer's impact, healing, and management), physical rehabilitation, and culturally sensitive assessment tools.
RESUMO
Bariatric surgery is a critical strategy in managing morbid obesity. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have revolutionized perioperative care in this field. This systematic review aims to synthesize current evidence on the impact of ERAS protocols on patient-centered outcomes in bariatric surgery. A comprehensive search across multiple databases was conducted, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies involving adult patients undergoing bariatric surgery and focusing on the implementation and outcomes of ERAS protocols were included. Data extraction and analysis emphasized patient recovery, well-being, and satisfaction. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. The review revealed that ERAS protocols are associated with reduced postoperative recovery times, decreased hospital stays, and enhanced patient satisfaction. Notably, ERAS protocols effectively reduced complications and optimized resource utilization in bariatric surgery. Comparative insights from non-bariatric surgeries highlighted the versatility and adaptability of ERAS protocols across different surgical disciplines. ERAS protocols significantly improve patient-centered outcomes in bariatric surgery. Their adoption facilitates a patient-focused approach, accelerating recovery and enhancing overall patient well-being. The findings advocate for the broader implementation of ERAS protocols in surgical care, emphasizing the need for continuous refinement to meet evolving healthcare demands. This review supports the paradigm shift toward integrating ERAS protocols in bariatric surgery and potentially other surgical fields.
RESUMO
This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of surgical interventions in improving the quality of life for patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP). A thorough literature search, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, identified 11 studies that focused on patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatments, including pancreatic resections, drainage procedures, and duodenum-preserving head resections. The findings indicate that organ-preserving procedures, notably the Frey and Beger operations, significantly enhance pain control and overall quality of life while reducing analgesic dependency. This review provides crucial insights into the long-term efficacy and comparative benefits of different surgical approaches, highlighting the need for personalized surgical strategies in CP management. It emphasizes the necessity for standardized outcome measures and further comparative research to refine CP treatment protocols.