RESUMO
Nystagmus induced by applying an intense vibratory stimulus to the skull (SVIN) indicates vestibular functional asymmetry. In unilateral vestibular loss, a 100 Hz bone-conducted vibration given to either mastoid immediately causes a primarily horizontal nystagmus. The test is performed in darkness to avoid visual fixation (VF) but there are no data about how much VF affects the often-intense SVIN. The aim is to analyze the amount of reduction in SVIN when VF is allowed during testing. Thus, all patients seen in a tertiary hospital for vertigo or dizziness with positive SVIN were included. SVIN was recorded for 10 s for each condition: without VF (aSVINwo) and with VF (aSVINw). We obtained an aSVINwo and an aSVINw as average slow-phase velocities (SPV) without and with VF. VF index (FISVIN) was calculated as the ratio of SPV. Among the 124 patients included, spontaneous nystagmus (SN) was found in 25% and the median slow phase velocity (mSPV) (without VF) of SN was 2.6 ± 2.4°/s. Mean FISVIN was 0.27 ± 0.29. FISVIN was 0 in 42 patients, and FISVIN between 0 and 1 was found in 82 (mean FISVIN 0.39 ± 0.02). Fixation suppression was found in all patients with SVIN in cases of peripheral vestibulopathy. FISVIN clearly delineates two populations of patients: with or without a complete visual reduction in nystagmus.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To examine the prevalence of adherence to hearing aids and determine their rejection causes. METHODS: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting terms for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed an electronic search using PubMed, BVS, and Embase. RESULTS: 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. They analyzed a total of 12,696 individuals. We observed that the most common causes for positive adherence to hearing aid use included having a higher degree of hearing loss, patients being aware of their condition, and requiring the device in their daily life. The most common causes for rejection were the lack of perceived benefits or discomfort with the use of the device. The results from the meta-analysis show a prevalence of patients who used their hearing aid of 0.623 (95% CI 0.531, 0.714). Both groups are highly heterogeneous (I2 = 99.31% in each group, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients (38%) do not use their hearing aid devices. Homogeneous multicenter studies using the same methodology are needed to analyze the causes of rejection of hearing aids.
RESUMO
To analyze the influence of age and cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) in the evolution of vestibular neuritis (VN). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. VN-diagnosed patients were included and divided into two groups: those with and without CVRFs. We analyzed the mean vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) gain, measured through the video head impulse test (vHIT) at the diagnosis and one-year follow-up. We conducted a factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) to evaluate the effect of age, sex, and CVRFs in the mean VOR gain. RESULTS: Sixty-three VN-diagnosed patients were included. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean VOR gain between both groups. However, in the subgroup analysis, there were statistically significant differences when comparing the mean VOR gain at the one-year follow-up between the group over 55 years of age 0.77 ± 0.20 and the group under 55 years 0.87 ± 0.15 (p = 0.036). Additionally, the factorial ANOVA demonstrated a significant main effect of age group on the mean VOR gain at the one-year follow-up (p = 0.018), and it also found a significant interaction between the factors of gender, age group, HTN (p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: CVRFs do not independently affect the mean VOR gain in VN patients' follow-ups. However, age significantly impacts VOR gain in VN and could be modulated by gender and hypertension.
RESUMO
Introducción y objetivo: El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue demostrar las diferencias clínicas entre el vértigo posicional paroxístico benigno (VPPB) idiopático y secundario a síndrome vestibular agudo periférico (SVA). Método: Estudio de casos y controles, retrospectivo. La recolección de datos fue tomada de historias clínicas de nuestro hospital. Datos demográficos y clínicos de pacientes con diagnóstico de VPPB idiopático y secundario a SVA, fueron recogidos para el análisis. Además, en el grupo de los casos, se realizó una correlación entre el déficit vestibular periférico, medido a través del video head impulse test (vHIT), y el número de maniobras y tiempo hasta la resolución del VPPB. Resultados: Se incluyeron 72 pacientes, 64% mujeres. En el grupo control se incluyeron 50 pacientes con VPPB idiopático y 22 con VPPB secundario a SVA en el grupo de los casos. En el VPPB secundario, el canal semicircular posterior estuvo afectado en el 100% (OR: 1.2; IC 95% [1,088 - 1,436]). Ambos grupos mostraron una resolución del vértigo del 90% y 89%, respectivamente. El grupo de VPPB secundario tuvo 4 veces más riesgo de recurrencia (OR: 4.18; IC 95% [1.410 - 12.406]); necesitaron más maniobras (3.32 ± 2.2 vs. 1.7 ± 1.3, p = 0.004) y tiempo (61.9 días ± 73.1 vs. 12.9 días ± 9.6, p = 0.007) para la resolución del VPPB. Se encontraron correlaciones significativas entre la diferencia de ganancia media del reflejo vestíbulo-ocular (RVO) y el número de maniobras (r = 0.462, p = 0.030) y el tiempo hasta la resolución (r = 0.577, p = 0.008). Discusión: Existen diferencias clínicas entre el VPPB idiopático y secundario a SVA, principalmente en términos de canal semicircular afecto, mayor número de maniobras y tiempo en días hasta la resolución del VPPB. Además, de determinar que a mayor déficit vestibular en un paciente con VPPB secundario a SVA, necesitará un mayor número de maniobras y un tiempo prolongado hasta la resolución del VPPB. Conclusiones: ... (AU)
Introduction and Objective: The aim of our study was to demonstrate the clinical differences between idiopathic benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) and BPPV secondary to acute peripheral vestibular syndrome (APVS). Method: Retrospective case-control study. Data collection was obtained from medical records at our hospital. Demographic and clinical data of patients diagnosed with idiopathic BPPV and BPPV secondary to APVS were collected for analysis. Additionally, in the case group, a correlation was performed between peripheral vestibular deficit, measured through the video head impulse test (vHIT), and the number of maneuvers and time until resolution of BPPV. Results: Seventy-two patients were included, with 64% being women. The control group included 50 patients with idiopathic BPPV and 22 with BPPV secondary to APVS in the case group. In secondary BPPV, the posterior semicircular canal was affected in 100% of cases (OR: 1.2; 95% CI [1.088 - 1.436]). Both groups showed a vertigo resolution rate of 90% and 89%, respectively. The secondary BPPV group had a 4-fold higher recurrence risk (OR: 4.18; 95% CI [1.410 - 12.406]); they required more maneuvers (3.32 ± 2.2 vs. 1.7 ± 1.3, p = 0.004) and more time (61.9 days ± 73.1 vs. 12.9 days ± 9.6, p = 0.007) for BPPV resolution. Significant correlations were found between the difference in mean gain of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and the number of maneuvers (r = 0.462, p = 0.030) and the time until resolution (r = 0.577, p = 0.008). Discussion: Clinical differences exist between idiopathic BPPV and BPPV secondary to APVS, primarily in terms of the affected semicircular canal, a higher number of maneuvers, and a longer time in days until BPPV resolution. Furthermore, it was determined that a greater vestibular deficit in a patient with secondary BPPV to APVS requires a higher number of maneuvers and an extended time until BPPV resolution. Conclusions: ... (AU)