Selecting Household Water Treatment Options on the Basis of World Health Organization Performance Testing Protocols.

The World Health Organization's International Scheme to Evaluate Household Water Treatment Technologies serves to benchmark microbiological performance of existing and novel technologies and processes for small-scale drinking water treatment according to a tiered system. There is widespread uncertainty around which tiers of performance are most appropriate for technology selection and recommendation in humanitarian response or for routine safe water programming. We used quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) to evaluate attributable reductions in diarrheal disease burden associated with water treatment technologies meeting the three tiers of performance under this Scheme, across a range of conditions. According to mean estimates and under most modeling conditions, potential health gains attributable to microbiologically improved drinking water are realized at the middle tier of performance: "comprehensive protection: high pathogen removal (★★)" for each reference pathogen. The highest tier of performance may yield additional marginal health gains where untreated water is especially contaminated and where adherence is 100%. Our results highlight that health gains from improved efficacy of household water treatment technology remain marginal when adherence is less than 90%. While selection of water treatment technologies that meet minimum WHO efficacy recommendations for comprehensive protection against waterborne pathogens is critical, additional criteria for technology choice and recommendation should focus on potential for correct, consistent, and sustained use.

Improving water, sanitation and hygiene in health-care facilities, Liberia.

PROBLEM: The lack of proper water and sanitation infrastructures and poor hygiene practices in health-care facilities reduces facilities' preparedness and response to disease outbreaks and decreases the communities' trust in the health services provided. APPROACH: To improve water and sanitation infrastructures and hygiene practices, the Liberian health ministry held multistakeholder meetings to develop a national water, sanitation and hygiene and environmental health package. A national train-the-trainer course was held for county environmental health technicians, which included infection prevention and control focal persons; the focal persons acted as change agents. LOCAL SETTING: In Liberia, only 45% of 701 surveyed health-care facilities had an improved water source in 2015, and only 27% of these health-care facilities had proper disposal for infectious waste. RELEVANT CHANGES: Local ownership, through engagement of local health workers, was introduced to ensure development and refinement of the package. In-county collaborations between health-care facilities, along with multisectoral collaboration, informed national level direction, which led to increased focus on water and sanitation infrastructures and uptake of hygiene practices to improve the overall quality of service delivery. LESSONS LEARNT: National level leadership was important to identify a vision and create an enabling environment for changing the perception of water, sanitation and hygiene in health-care provision. The involvement of health workers was central to address basic infrastructure and hygiene practices in health-care facilities and they also worked as stimulators for sustainable change. Further, developing a long-term implementation plan for national level initiatives is important to ensure sustainability.

Recommendations for dealing with waste contaminated with Ebola virus: a Hazard Analysis of Critical Control Points approach.

OBJECTIVE: To assess, within communities experiencing Ebola virus outbreaks, the risks associated with the disposal of human waste and to generate recommendations for mitigating such risks. METHODS: A team with expertise in the Hazard Analysis of Critical Control Points framework identified waste products from the care of individuals with Ebola virus disease and constructed, tested and confirmed flow diagrams showing the creation of such products. After listing potential hazards associated with each step in each flow diagram, the team conducted a hazard analysis, determined critical control points and made recommendations to mitigate the transmission risks at each control point. FINDINGS: The collection, transportation, cleaning and shared use of blood-soiled fomites and the shared use of latrines contaminated with blood or bloodied faeces appeared to be associated with particularly high levels of risk of Ebola virus transmission. More moderate levels of risk were associated with the collection and transportation of material contaminated with bodily fluids other than blood, shared use of latrines soiled with such fluids, the cleaning and shared use of fomites soiled with such fluids, and the contamination of the environment during the collection and transportation of blood-contaminated waste. CONCLUSION: The risk of the waste-related transmission of Ebola virus could be reduced by the use of full personal protective equipment, appropriate hand hygiene and an appropriate disinfectant after careful cleaning. Use of the Hazard Analysis of Critical Control Points framework could facilitate rapid responses to outbreaks of emerging infectious disease.

Daclatasvir (Daklinza): A Treatment Option for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection.

Daclatasvir (Daklinza) for chronic hepatitis C infection.

Why "improved" water sources are not always safe.

Existing and proposed metrics for household drinking-water services are intended to measure the availability, safety and accessibility of water sources. However, these attributes can be highly variable over time and space and this variation complicates the task of creating and implementing simple and scalable metrics. In this paper, we highlight those factors - especially those that relate to so-called improved water sources - that contribute to variability in water safety but may not be generally recognized as important by non-experts. Problems in the provision of water in adequate quantities and of adequate quality - interrelated problems that are often influenced by human behaviour - may contribute to an increased risk of poor health. Such risk may be masked by global water metrics that indicate that we are on the way to meeting the world's drinking-water needs. Given the complexity of the topic and current knowledge gaps, international metrics for access to drinking water should be interpreted with great caution. We need further targeted research on the health impacts associated with improvements in drinking-water supplies.

Les indicateurs existants et proposés pour la distribution de l'eau potable des ménages visent à mesurer la disponibilité, la salubrité et l'accessibilité des sources d'eau. Cependant, ces caractéristiques peuvent être très variables dans le temps et l'espace, et ces variations compliquent la tâche de création et de mise en œuvre d'indicateurs simples et extensibles. Dans le présent article, nous mettons l'accent sur ces facteurs ­ en particulier, sur ceux qui concernent les sources d'eau soi-disant améliorées ­ qui contribuent à la variabilité de la salubrité de l'eau, mais qui peuvent ne pas être perçus généralement comme importants par les non-spécialistes. Les problèmes d'approvisionnement en eau, en quantité suffisante et en qualité satisfaisante ­ ces problèmes interdépendants sont souvent influencés par le comportement des hommes ­ peuvent contribuer à un risque accru d'être en mauvaise santé. Ce risque peut être masqué par les indicateurs globaux de l'eau qui indiquent que nous sommes en bonne voie de répondre aux besoins en eau potable de la planète. Compte tenu de la complexité du sujet et des lacunes des connaissances actuelles, les indicateurs internationaux pour l'accès à l'eau portable doivent être interprétés avec une grande prudence. Nous avons besoin de recherches ciblées et plus approfondies sur les effets sanitaires des améliorations dans le domaine de l'approvisionnement en eau potable.

Las mediciones existentes y propuestas para los servicios de agua potable de los hogares pretenden considerar la disponibilidad, seguridad y accesibilidad de las fuentes de agua. No obstante, estas características pueden variar mucho a lo largo del tiempo y del espacio, lo que complica la tarea de crear y poner en práctica mediciones sencillas y ampliables. En este documento destacamos los factores, en particular los relacionados con las llamadas fuentes de agua mejoradas, que contribuyen a la variabilidad de la seguridad del agua pero que, por lo general, los legos no identifican como importantes. Los problemas en el suministro de agua en cantidad y calidad suficientes, problemas interrelacionados en los que el comportamiento humano influye a menudo, pueden contribuir a un mayor riesgo de problemas sanitarios. Ese riesgo puede quedar oculto por mediciones de agua globales que indican que vamos camino de satisfacer las necesidades de agua potable en el mundo. Dada la complejidad del tema y las lagunas de conocimiento actuales, las mediciones internacionales sobre el acceso al agua potable deberían interpretarse con mucha cautela. Necesitamos más investigaciones específicas sobre el impacto sanitario asociado a las mejoras de los suministros de agua potable.

Estimating the cost of achieving basic water, sanitation, hygiene, and waste management services in public health-care facilities in the 46 UN designated least-developed countries: a modelling study.

BACKGROUND: An alarming number of public health-care facilities in low-income and middle-income countries lack basic water, sanitation, hygiene (WASH), and waste management services. This study estimates the costs of achieving full coverage of basic WASH and waste services in existing public health facilities in the 46 UN designated least-developed countries (LDCs). METHODS: In this modelling study, in-need facilities were quantified by combining published counts of public facilities with estimated basic WASH and waste service coverage. Country-specific per-facility capital and recurrent costs to deliver basic services were collected via survey of country WASH experts and officials between Sept 24 and Dec 24, 2020. Baseline cost estimates were modelled and discounted by 5% per year. Key assumptions were adjusted to produce lower and upper estimates, including adjusting the discount rate to 8% and 3% per year, respectively. FINDINGS: An estimated US$6·5 billion to $9·6 billion from 2021 to 2030 is needed to achieve full coverage of basic WASH and waste services in public health facilities in LDCs. Capital costs are $2·9 billion to $4·8 billion and recurrent costs are $3·6 billion to $4·8 billion over this time period. A mean of $0·24-0·40 per capita in capital investment is needed each year, and annual operations and maintenance costs are expected to increase from $0·10 in 2021 to $0·39-0·60 in 2030. Waste management accounts for the greatest share of costs, requiring $3·7 billion (46·6% of the total) in the baseline estimates, followed by $1·8 billion (23·1%) for sanitation, $1·5 billion (19·5%) for water, and $845 million (10·7%) for hygiene. Needs are greatest for non-hospital facilities ($7·4 billion [94%] of $7·9 billion) and for facilities in rural areas ($5·3 billion [68%]). INTERPRETATION: Investment will need to increase to reach full coverage of basic WASH and waste services in public health facilities. Financial needs are modest compared with current overall health and WASH spending, and better service coverage will yield substantial health benefits. To sustain services and prevent degradation and early replacement, countries will need to routinely budget for operations and maintenance of WASH and waste management assets. FUNDING: WHO (including underlying grants from the governments of Japan, the Netherlands, and the UK), World Bank (including an underlying grant from the Global Water Security and Sanitation Partnership), and UNICEF. TRANSLATIONS: For the Arabic, French and Portuguese translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Costs of hand hygiene for all in household settings: estimating the price tag for the 46 least developed countries.

INTRODUCTION: Domestic hand hygiene could prevent over 500 000 attributable deaths per year, but 6 in 10 people in least developed countries (LDCs) do not have a handwashing facility (HWF) with soap and water available at home. We estimated the economic costs of universal access to basic hand hygiene services in household settings in 46 LDCs. METHODS: Our model combines quantities of households with no HWF and prices of promotion campaigns, HWFs, soap and water. For quantities, we used estimates from the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme. For prices, we collated data from recent impact evaluations and electronic searches. Accounting for inflation and purchasing power, we calculated costs over 2021-2030, and estimated total cost probabilistically using Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: An estimated US$12.2-US$15.3 billion over 10 years is needed for universal hand hygiene in household settings in 46 LDCs. The average annual cost of hand hygiene promotion is US$334 million (24% of annual total), with a further US$233 million for 'top-up' promotion (17%). Together, these promotion costs represent US$0.47 annually per head of LDC population. The annual cost of HWFs, a purpose-built drum with tap and stand, is US$174 million (13%). The annual cost of soap is US$497 million (36%) and water US$127 million (9%). CONCLUSION: The annual cost of behavioural change promotion to those with no HWF represents 4.7% of median government health expenditure in LDCs, and 1% of their annual aid receipts. These costs could be covered by mobilising resources from across government and partners, and could be reduced by harnessing economies of scale and integrating hand hygiene with other behavioural change campaigns where appropriate. Innovation is required to make soap more affordable and available for the poorest households.

Interventions to improve water supply and quality, sanitation and handwashing facilities in healthcare facilities, and their effect on healthcare-associated infections in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and supplementary scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) are the most frequent adverse event compromising patient safety globally. Patients in healthcare facilities (HCFs) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) are most at risk. Although water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions are likely important for the prevention of HCAIs, there have been no systematic reviews to date. METHODS: As per our prepublished protocol, we systematically searched academic databases, trial registers, WHO databases, grey literature resources and conference abstracts to identify studies assessing the impact of HCF WASH services and practices on HCAIs in LMICs. In parallel, we undertook a supplementary scoping review including less rigorous study designs to develop a conceptual framework for how WASH can impact HCAIs and to identify key literature gaps. RESULTS: Only three studies were included in the systematic review. All assessed hygiene interventions and included: a cluster-randomised controlled trial, a cohort study, and a matched case-control study. All reported a reduction in HCAIs, but all were considered at medium-high risk of bias. The additional 27 before-after studies included in our scoping review all focused on hygiene interventions, none assessed improvements to water quantity, quality or sanitation facilities. 26 of the studies reported a reduction in at least one HCAI. Our scoping review identified multiple mechanisms by which WASH can influence HCAI and highlighted a number of important research gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a dearth of evidence for the effect of WASH in HCFs, the studies of hygiene interventions were consistently protective against HCAIs in LMICs. Additional and higher quality research is urgently needed to fill this gap to understand how WASH services in HCFs can support broader efforts to reduce HCAIs in LMICs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017080943.

Possible Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole-Induced Hemolytic Anemia: A Case Report.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of hemolytic anemia in a patient who received trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for a urinary tract infection (UTI). SUMMARY: A 47-year-old woman recently diagnosed with uncomplicated UTI received 3 doses of TMP-SMX. She developed yellowing of the skin and eyes, lethargy, mild abdominal pain, and dry mucous membranes. Laboratory testing demonstrated significant anemia with red blood cells (RBCs) of 1.99, hemoglobin (Hgb) of 6.3 g/dL, and hematocrit (Hct) of 18.1%. TMP-SMX was immediately discontinued. The patient was given methylprednisolone 60 mg intravenously (IV) followed by oral steroids and infused with 3 units of packed RBCs over the course of a 10-day inpatient admission. On discharge, the patient continued oral steroids. Outpatient follow-up indicated Hgb of 11.0 g/dL and Hct of 32.7%, 41 days after hospital discharge. Utilizing the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale, there is a probable association between the patient's hemolytic anemia and TMP-SMX. CONCLUSION: We report a case of hemolytic anemia resulting from the use of TMP-SMX. Although this is a rare adverse effect, clinicians should be aware of the signs and symptoms of hemolytic anemia, and so appropriate treatment can be administered should it occur.

Relationship between distance to social gathering facilities and risk of trachoma for households in rural Tanzanian communities.

Few studies have examined the physical isolation of households with trachoma cases. Thus, in this study, we sought to examine the association between household isolation, as measured by distance to social gathering facilities, and risk of trachoma. We hypothesized that households located closer to such facilities would have a decreased risk of trachoma, due to a variety of social, economic, and cultural reasons. To test this hypothesis we conducted a case-control study of 668 households (93 cases, 575 controls) in eight villages in Kongwa District, Tanzania, in 2007. Case households were defined as having a child aged 1-5 years with clinical signs of trachoma. Distance of household's place of residence to three main social gathering facilities - bars/cafés, religious establishments, and commercial/government center - was measured with a portable geographic positioning system. Multiple logistic regression analyses, which controlled for potential confounders and accounted for clustering, demonstrated increased risk of trachoma with increasing distance to social gathering facilities. Compared with distances of ≤700 m, odds of trachoma were approximately two-fold higher for households living >1400 m from bars/cafés and from religious establishments, suggesting increased risk of trachoma for households at the fringes of communities. Targeting these isolated households with special programming along with dissemination through trusted social gathering facilities may improve effectiveness of current prevention efforts.

Understanding household behavioral risk factors for diarrheal disease in Dar es Salaam: a photovoice community assessment.

Whereas Tanzania has seen considerable improvements in water and sanitation infrastructure over the past 20 years, the country still faces high rates of childhood morbidity from diarrheal diseases. This study utilized a qualitative, cross-sectional, modified Photovoice method to capture daily activities of Dar es Salaam mothers. A total of 127 photographs from 13 households were examined, and 13 interviews were conducted with household mothers. The photographs and interviews revealed insufficient hand washing procedures, unsafe disposal of wastewater, uncovered household drinking water containers, a lack of water treatment prior to consumption, and inappropriate toilets for use by small children. The interviews revealed that mothers were aware and knowledgeable of the risks of certain household practices and understood safer alternatives, yet were restricted by the perceived impracticality and financial constraints to make changes. The results draw attention to the real economic and behavioral challenges faced in reducing the spread of disease.

Assessment of latrine use and quality and association with risk of trachoma in rural Tanzania.

The existing evidence regarding latrines and trachoma is inconclusive. Using more precise sanitation measures we examine the association between use and quality of latrines and risk of trachoma. We conducted a case-control study of 678 households (95 cases, 583 controls) in eight villages in Kongwa District, Tanzania. Case households were defined as having a sentinel child with clinical signs of trachoma. A latrine quality score was calculated based on seven indicators and case and control households were compared with respect to use and quality of latrines. Logistic regression analyses controlled for potential confounders. Latrine use was significantly greater in control households than in case households (90.4 vs. 76.8%, P=0.03). The protective effect of latrine use persisted even after controlling for household characteristics significant at P <0.20 (adjusted OR=0.56 [95% CI: 0.32-0.98]). Contrary to expectation, we did not find an inverse association between increasing latrine quality and decreasing odds of trachoma. Although latrine use in the communities was high, latrines, regardless of quality, were significantly associated with decreased risk of trachoma. These findings underscore the importance of achieving 100% latrine use in communities.

Comparing the effectiveness of shared versus private latrines in preventing trachoma in rural Tanzania.

Sharing latrines is common in sub-Saharan Africa with anecdotal accounts suggesting a link between water-, sanitation-, and hygiene-related disease and poorly maintained communal latrines. This study examines this link by assessing the association between shared latrines compared with private latrines and risk of trachoma. In 2007, as part of a larger case-control study, we conducted a sub-study on latrine sharing in 594 households (92 cases, 502 controls) in seven rural Tanzanian communities. Case households were defined by having a child with clinical signs of trachoma. Latrine use was associated with a decreased risk of trachoma and there was no difference in risk between households using shared compared with private latrines (adjusted odds ratio = 0.95 [95% confidence interval = 0.55-1.67]). This study emphasizes the need to promote latrine use, which can be facilitated through latrine sharing in resource scarce areas, for prevention of trachoma.

Norovirus removal and particle association in a waste stabilization pond.

The presence of norovirus (NoV) genogroup I (GI) and II (GII) was evaluated using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) in the influent, two midtreatment locations, and final effluent of a three-pond serial waste stabilization pond system from December 2005 through June 2006. Additionally, influent and effluent samples were filtered through a cascade of three membrane filters with sequentially smaller pores to determine the size range of particles with which GI and GII were associated. NoV GI and GII removal occurs primarily in the third pond. Viruses were found on large settleable particles (retained on a 180 microm filter), on smaller suspended particles (retained on a 0.45 microm filter), on colloidal particles (retained on a positively charged 0.45 microm filter), and in the final filtrate. Both GI and GII in influent samples were found to be dominantly associated with particles smaller than 180 microm, thereby suggesting that particle settling is not the main virus removal mechanism in the waste stabilization pond system. On average, NoV detected in filtered effluent samples were associated with particles between 0.45 and 180 microm in diameter (47 and 67% of detected GI and GII, respectively). The presence of NoV GI and GII in the final filtrate of influent and effluent samples shows that positively charged membrane filters often used for viral concentration methods are not capable of trapping all viruses present in wastewater samples.