A phase II study of gemcitabine in combination with radiation therapy in patients with localized, unresectable, pancreatic cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVE: A Phase II study was conducted at Indiana University to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined weekly Gemcitabine (GEM) with external beam radiotherapy (RT) in unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: Eligible patients had biopsy-proven LAPC without evidence of metastatic disease. In part A of the treatment plan, patients received GEM 600 mg/m(2) IV weekly, with concurrent RT (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, 1.8 Gy/d, 5 days per week). Part B of the treatment plan began approximately 4 weeks after completing part A: patients without disease progression received weekly GEM 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle for 6 cycles or until disease progression. RESULTS: From April 2001 to June 2003, of 28 patients evaluated, 24 (86%) completed part A. About 22 patients had grade 3 toxicities, primarily hematologic (43%) and gastrointestinal (36%). Three patients (11%) had grade 4 toxicities (one each for hyperbilirubinemia, infection, and dyspnea). The median follow-up was 10 months (1-63 months) for all enrolled patients. Six patients (21%) had a radiologic partial response, 16 (57%) had stable disease, 5 (18%) had progressive disease, and 1 patient (4%) had an unevaluable response at last follow-up. Four patients (14%) underwent surgical resection (2 with R0 resection). Median time to progression was 6 months (0-36 months). Median survival time was 10.3 months (95% confidence interval, 7.9-14.6 months). The 1- and 2-year actuarial survival rates were 30% and 11%. At last analysis, all but 2 patients died. CONCLUSION: The activity and toxicity profile of combination GEM and RT indicates that this can be safely administered for patients with LAPC.

The importance of angiogenesis markers in the outcome of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a retrospective study of 97 patients.

PURPOSE: The role of angiogenesis has been extensively evaluated in solid tumors and more recently in hematologic malignancies. Several surrogate markers of angiogenesis including tumor VEGF, VEGF receptors, and microvessel density have correlated with outcome in some lymphoma studies. This is a single institution retrospective study evaluating the role of angiogenesis markers in the clinical outcome of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 97 patients with DLBCL diagnosed and managed at Indiana University between 1993 and 2001 were included. Archived tumor samples were stained for VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-R1, and CD31 and graded as negative or positive (1+, 2+, 3+). The relationship between the expression of these markers and the international prognostic variables as well as the progression free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) was evaluated. RESULTS: VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-R1 were expressed in 77, 98, and 18% of tumors, respectively. VEGF-A negative patients had an improved OS compared to VEGF-A (1+) (P = 0.0502). VEGF-C correlated with both LDH (r = 0.28, P = 0.0502) and IPI score (r = 0.25, P = 0.013). VEGF-R1 negative patients had a superior survival compared to those with VEGF-R1 (2+) (P = 0.0154). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of tumor associated angiogenesis may alter the outcome of patients with DLBCL and could be a prognostic factor. Further clinical studies are needed to correlate the degree of angiogenesis with response to anti-angiogenesis agents.