Trends in Physician Payments for Hand Surgery Consultations and Clinic Visits.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to identify the trends in reimbursement for hand surgeons for new patient visits, outpatient consultations, and inpatient consultations from the years 2010-2018. In addition, we sought to investigate the influence of payer mix and coding level of service on physician reimbursement in these settings. METHODS: The PearlDiver Patients Records Database was used to identify clinical encounters and their respective physician reimbursements for analysis within this study. This database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify relevant clinical encounters for inclusion, filtered for the presence of valid demographic information and by physician specialty for the presence of a hand surgeon, and tracked by primary diagnoses. Cost data were then calculated and analyzed regarding the payer type and level of care. RESULTS: In total, 156,863 patients were included in this study. The mean reimbursement for inpatient consultations, outpatient consultations, and new patient encounters increased by 92.75% ($134.85 to $259.93), 17.80% ($161.33 to $190.04), and 26.78% ($102.58 to $130.05), respectively. When normalized to 2018 dollars to adjust for inflation, the percent increases were 67.38%, 2.24%, and 10.09%, respectively. Commercial insurance reimbursed hand surgeons to a greater degree than any other payer type. Mean physician reimbursement differed depending on the level of service billed, with the level of service V reimbursing 4.41 times more than the level of service I visits for new outpatient visits, 3.66 times more for new outpatient consultations, and 3.04 times more for new inpatient consultations. CONCLUSIONS: This study helps to provide physicians, hospitals, and policymakers with objective information regarding the trends in reimbursement to hand surgeons. Although this study indicates increasing reimbursements for consultations and new patient visits to hand surgeons, the margins shrink when adjusted for inflation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Analysis IV.

Perioperative Opioid Analgesics and Hallux Valgus Correction Surgery: Trends, Risk Factors for Prolonged Use and Complications.

In the setting of an opioid epidemic, this study aims to provide evidence on opioid use trends, risk factors for prolonged use, and complications from perioperative opioid consumption in hallux valgus surgery. A national database was queried for patients who underwent hallux valgus correction. Regression analysis identified: (1) risk factors for prolonged postoperative narcotic use; and (2) association between preoperative/prolonged postoperative narcotic use and postoperative complications. A linear regression analysis was used to determine trends. About 20,749 patients were included, of which 3464 patients were prescribed narcotics preoperatively and 4339 were identified as prolonged postoperative narcotic prescription users. Preoperative prescriptions were identified as risk factors for prolonged use. Perioperative narcotic use was observed to be a risk factor for poor outcomes. About 21% of patients were identified as prolonged postoperative narcotic prescription users. Patients undergoing hallux valgus corrective surgery should be counseled regarding their increased risk of complications when using narcotics.

Associated Morbidity After the Percutaneous Release of the Medial Collateral Ligament for Knee Arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: To summarize available data on the morbidity associated with percutaneous release of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) of the knee during arthroscopy via a "pie-crusting" technique. METHODS: A search of the literature was performed using the MEDLINE and Web of Science databases to identify studies examining the morbidity of percutaneous MCL release during arthroscopy. Only English-language articles were included; technical articles and studies not focused on the use of this technique were omitted. Two independent reviewers performed the literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment. The outcomes analyzed included resultant knee instability, functional outcome scores, visual analog scale pain scores, and saphenous nerve or greater saphenous vein injury. RESULTS: Six studies met the eligibility criteria. The studies included a total of 234 knees undergoing MCL release, with a mean patient age of 41.1 years. This MCL release typically generated grade I MCL laxity, which usually diminished or resolved over time and did not require brace application. The functional outcome scores of patients undergoing MCL release did not differ from those of patients undergoing the same procedure without MCL release. Postoperative pain was not significantly different between patients who underwent MCL release and those who did not. There was a 0% incidence of injury to the saphenous nerve or greater saphenous vein with MCL release in the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous MCL release during knee arthroscopy is a method of increasing the medial tibiofemoral joint space without causing any significant short- or long-term complications including residual valgus instability, pain, loss of function, or damage to surrounding structures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.

Granulocytic Sarcoma: A Rare Cause of Wrist Pain.

Septic, inflammatory, or crystal-induced arthritis are common etiologies of wrist pain without antecedent trauma associated with pain, loss of motion, swelling, redness, and warmth. In this report, we detail the case of granulocytic sarcoma of the wrist that presented as acute wrist pain, swelling, and limitation in motion. Granulocytic sarcoma is an exceedingly rare extramedullary tumor associated with acute myeloblastic leukemia. It may be found in any part of the body; however, upper extremity involvement is uncommon. To our knowledge, this is the first description of granulocytic sarcoma occurring in the wrist joint.

Combined tibial deflexion osteotomy and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improves knee function and stability: A systematic review.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with excessive posterior tibial slope (PTS) may have higher risks of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACL-R) failure, and clinical outcomes after revision of ACL-R procedures are typically poor. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature summarizing the clinical and radiological outcomes of the surgical treatment of ACL insufficiency in the setting of excessive PTS using a tibial deflexion osteotomy combined with ACL-R. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and OVID Medline databases from 1990 to present. Inclusion criteria were studies of outcomes of isolated tibial deflexion osteotomies performed with primary or revision ACL-R in the English language. Data extracted included study demographic information, type of tibial deflexion osteotomy and concomitant procedures, radiological outcomes, patient-reported outcome scores, and postoperative complications. FINDINGS: Six studies, with 133 knees were identified. All included studies were retrospective case series, with a weighted mean follow-up of 3.39 years. In 106 of 133 (79.7%) knees, tibial deflexion osteotomy was performed concomitantly with an ACL-R, whereas in 27 of 133 (20.3%) knees, the procedures were staged. 22, 45, and 66 of 133 knees (16.5%, 33.8%, and 49.6%) underwent primary, first revision, and second or greater revision ACL-R, respectively. Three of 133 (2.25%) knees demonstrated recurrent ACL graft failure at the final follow-up. On average, PTS decreased from 15.2° preoperatively to 7.1° postoperatively. The mean International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, and Tegner scores increased from 42.5, 46.4, and 4.2 preoperatively to 71.8, 89.0, and 6.7 postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review suggest that combined ACL-R and tibial deflexion osteotomy may be effective in decreasing PTS and improving knee function and stability. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review; Level of evidence 4.

Surgery and Rotator Cuff Disease: A Review of the Natural History, Indications, and Outcomes of Nonoperative and Operative Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears.

Rotator cuff tears are common and multifactorial in etiology. Natural history studies suggest that following initiation of a tear, rotator cuff disease may advance along a continuum of tear enlargement and symptom progression, muscular degeneration and fatty infiltration, and glenohumeral arthritis. Patient- and tear-specific features influence both the risk of clinical progression and the potential for tendon healing following a repair. General guidelines regarding management of rotator cuff tears are influenced by a patient's symptoms, risk of clinical progression, and potential for biologic healing.

No Difference Could Be Detected in Clinical Outcomes of 5-Strand and Quadruple Hamstring Autografts of Similar Diameter in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: There are few studies examining the clinical outcomes of 5-strand autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R). Purpose: We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of ACL-R using 5-strand (5HS) and 4-strand (4HS) hamstring autografts of similar graft diameter to study the potential effects of autograft strand number on clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients who underwent ACL-R from 2013 to 2018 at a single academic institution and received a 4HS or 5HS autograft were included. Exclusion criteria were less than 2-year follow-up and any additional ligamentous reconstruction. Revision ACL-R and cyclops lesions were assessed at a minimum 2 years of postoperative follow-up. Objective measures of ability to return to sport were assessed at 6 months. Results: The mean graft diameters for 4HS (n = 51) and 5HS (n = 23) autografts were 8.3 ± 0.7 mm and 8.4 ± 0.7 mm, respectively. The mean follow-up for the 4HS and 5HS cohorts was 3.0 ± 1.5 years and 3.3 ± 1.3 years, respectively. The 4HS and 5HS cohorts had revision ACL-R rates of 15.7% (8/51) and 8.7% (2/23), respectively. Cyclops lesions occurred in 5.9% of 4HS patients and 13.0% of 5HS patients. We found no statistically significant differences between groups on objective measures of ability to return to sport. Conclusion: This retrospective cohort study detected no difference in revision ACL-R rates, frequency of cyclops lesions, or objective measures of ability to return to sport in patients who received 4HS or 5HS autografts of similar diameter for ACL-R. Further comparative study with larger sample sizes is warranted.

Venous Thromboembolic Events are Exceedingly Rare in Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Review of health care record database and determination of population statistics. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the incidence of clinically significant venous thromboembolic (VTE) events in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to identify risk factors for VTE. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: VTE is a serious complication that can cause disability and even death following surgery. Incidence of VTE following AIS surgery has not been well studied; the use of a national database allows the assessment of rare, yet important complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PearlDiver Database was used to identify AIS patients who underwent primary instrumented spinal fusion between 2010 and 2020. Patient records were cross-referenced for documented VTEs within 30 and 90 postoperative days. Patients with nonidiopathic scoliosis were excluded. Logistic regression was used to evaluate risk factors for correlation with VTE events. RESULTS: Thirty-eight of 11,775 (0.323%) patients undergoing surgery for AIS developed a VTE complication within 90 postoperative days. Hypercoagulability [odds ratio (OR)=13.50, P <0.0001], spinal fusion involving 13+ vertebral levels (OR=2.61, P <0.0001), obesity (OR=1.30, P <0.005), and older (15-18 y) compared with younger adolescence (10-14 y) (OR=2.12, P <0.0001) were associated with VTE. Seven of 38 (18.4%) patients with a diagnosed thrombophilia experienced VTE. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of clinically significant VTEs in pediatric patients following spinal fusion surgery for AIS is low with an incidence of 0.323%. Postoperative chemoprophylaxis in the general pediatric population is not indicated. Patients with obesity, those undergoing spinal fusion of 13 or more vertebrae, and adolescents 15-18 years old were found to have higher but still small risk of VTE following surgery. Further prospective studies are needed to validate the risk profile of patients with hypercoagulability and establish clinical guidelines for use of postoperative chemoprophylaxis in this cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Arthrodesis of the First to Second Metacarpal for Definitive Management of Failed Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty: A Case Series.

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty with resection of the trapezium and soft tissue interposition, with or without ligament reconstruction, has historically proven to be an efficacious treatment for thumb CMC arthritis. The incidence of failure following primary thumb CMC arthroplasty is low; however, the evaluation and management of a patient experiencing an unsatisfactory outcome following CMC arthroplasty is challenging. If symptoms are refractory to conservative measures, then revision surgical treatment may be indicated. Clinical decision making becomes even more complicated in cases of failure after an initial revision surgery has already been performed. In patients with a failed CMC arthroplasty revision in whom all soft tissue options have been exhausted, the senior author considers arthrodesis of the first metacarpal base to the second metacarpal base as a salvage procedure. The authors describe this surgical technique and present our experience with 4 cases in 3 patients who underwent this surgical intervention. Successful radiographic fusion was achieved in all 4 cases, with satisfactory clinical outcome in 3 out of 4 cases, supporting this surgical technique as a definitive option for patients who have failed multiple CMC arthroplasty revision surgeries.

Regional Anesthesia for Wrist Fractures and Dislocations: Are We Really Blocking Opioid Prescribing?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of regional anesthesia for the treatment of wrist fractures or dislocation on opioid prescription-filling patterns. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for hand and wrist fractures or dislocations from 2010 to 2018 were identified by using a national insurance claims database. Patients were stratified by procedures conducted with and without regional anesthesia. Preoperative opioids were defined by a filled opioid prescription within 1 month prior to surgery, postoperative within 1 month following the surgery, and prolonged postoperative 3 to 6 months following surgery. Patients' demographic data, comorbidities, additional medications, 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, and hospital readmissions were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 24 598 patients treated with and 115 199 patients treated without a regional nerve block for wrist fractures and dislocations were identified. Regional anesthesia was associated with greater postoperative opioid prescription but fewer prolonged postoperative prescriptions. There was an increased odds of all-cause 30-day ED visits but a decreased odds of 30-day hospital readmissions when patients received a regional nerve block prior to surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, receiving regional anesthesia prior to surgical intervention for wrist fractures or dislocations was associated with increased filling of postoperative opioid prescriptions, but not prolonged postoperative opioid prescriptions. Additional investigation is needed to identify and implement nonnarcotic multimodal analgesia regimens that may help decrease usage of narcotic medications surrounding these procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

An analysis of the incidence, risk factors, and timing of development of cyclops lesions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Cyclops lesions are a known complication following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with a described incidence between 1.9% to 10.9%. The objective of this study was to identify the incidence, timing, and variables that correlated with development of a cyclops lesion, and if objective functional testing differed between patients with and without cyclops lesions. METHODS: 313 consecutive patients who underwent ACLR and participated in Lower-Extremity Assessment Protocol (LEAP) testing at a single, academic institution were analyzed. Retrospective chart review was performed to identify patient demographic factors, medical comorbidities, and potential peri-operative risk factors. Postoperative functional outcome metrics and patient reported outcomes were collected per the institution's LEAP testing protocol. Binary logistic regression was utilized to identify risk factors for cyclops lesions. Objective functional outcomes and patient reported outcomes were compared between patients with and without cyclops lesions. RESULTS: 23/313 (7.35%) patients developed a cyclops lesion following ACLR, of which 17 (73.91%) were found to be symptomatic. Concomitant meniscal repair correlated with an increased likelihood of developing a cyclops lesion (p = 0.040); no other risk factors significantly differed between cohorts. There were no clinically relevant extension deficits or differences in objective functional performance measures at six months post-operatively between study cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant meniscal repair may be associated with the development of cyclops lesions due to restrictive postoperative range of motion protocols; however no other pre- or intra-operative factors demonstrated significant correlation. Presence of a cyclops lesion should be considered with late loss of knee extension after ACLR.

Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Staple Risks Penetration of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Tunnel.

Purpose: To identify the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral tunnel penetration with the use of a staple for lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) graft fixation and to determine whether this varied between 2 different techniques for ACL femoral tunnel drilling. Methods: Twenty paired, fresh-frozen, cadaver knees underwent ACL reconstruction with a LET. Left and right knees were randomized to ACL reconstruction with femoral tunnel creation by use of either a rigid guide pin and reamer through the accessory anteromedial portal or by the use of a flexible guide pin and reamer through the anteromedial portal. Immediately after tunnel creation, the LET was performed and fixated with a small Richard's staple. Fluoroscopy was used to obtain a lateral view of the knee to determine staple position, and visualization of the ACL femoral tunnel was performed with the arthroscope to investigate penetration of the staple into the femoral tunnel. The Fisher exact test was conducted to determine whether there was any difference in tunnel penetration between tunnel creation techniques. Results: The staple was noted to penetrate the ACL femoral tunnel in 8 of 20 (40%) extremities. When stratified by tunnel creation technique, the Richards staple violated 5 of 10 (50%) of the tunnels made via the rigid reaming technique compared with 3 of 10 (30%) of those created with a flexible guide pin and reamer (P = .65). Conclusions: A high incidence of femoral tunnel violation is seen with lateral extra-articular tenodesis staple fixation. Level of Evidence: Level IV, controlled laboratory study. Clinical Relevance: The risk of penetrating the ACL femoral tunnel with a staple for LET graft fixation is not well understood. Yet, the integrity of the femoral tunnel is important for the success of ACL reconstruction. Surgeons can use the information in this study to consider adjustments to operative technique, sequence, or fixation devices used when performing ACL reconstruction with concomitant LET to avoid the potential for disruption of ACL graft fixation.

Arthroscopic Versus Open Treatment of Septic Wrist Arthritis: National Trends in Usage and Impact on Length of Stay, Reoperation, Postoperative Readmissions, and Complications.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to use a national claims database to analyze trends in the usage of arthroscopic versus open irrigation and debridement of septic wrist arthritis and compare complication rates, readmission rates, and reoperation rates between the 2 treatment modalities. Methods: The PearlDiver database was used to identify patients in the United States who underwent open or arthroscopic debridement for suspected septic wrist arthritis from 2010 to 2017. Data on patient demographics and comorbidities were obtained. Pearson's chi-square tests were performed to compare the treatment modality to demographic data and the year of diagnosis. Univariate logistic regressions were used to measure differences in 90-day hospital readmission rates, 90-day complication rates, and 1-year reoperation rates. Results: The database captured 1,145 patients who received treatment for septic arthritis of the wrist during this period. Among these, 212 (18.5%) patients underwent arthroscopic debridement and 933 (81.5%) patients underwent open debridement. Open management was more common in all ages; however, arthroscopic debridement was used more frequently in younger age groups. The proportion of open cases per year seemed to increase over the study period. In limited comparisons, no significant differences were observed in 90-day hospital readmission rates, 90-day complication rates, and 1-year reoperation rates. Conclusions: Open irrigation and debridement was the preferred method for treatment of septic wrist arthritis in all age groups and time points in this study. No univariate differences were found between rates of readmission, complications, and reoperations between arthroscopic and open treatment modalities; however, more robust data and analyses are needed to better understand the differences between these approaches, especially across different patient groups. Level of evidence: Prognostic IV.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Strength, and Functional Performance in Primary Versus Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are not well understood. HYPOTHESIS: Patients undergoing revision ACLR would demonstrate worse patient-reported outcomes and worse limb symmetry compared with a cohort undergoing primary ACLR. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: 672 participants (373 with primary ACLR, 111 with revision ACLR, and 188 uninjured) completed functional testing at a single academic medical center. Descriptive information, operative variables, and patient-reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Tegner Activity Scale score) were assessed for each patient. Quadriceps and hamstring strength tests were conducted using a Biodex System 3 Dynamometer. Single-leg hop for distance, triple hop test, and the 6-m timed hop test were also assessed. Limb symmetry index (LSI) between the ACLR limb and contralateral limb was calculated for strength and hop testing. Normalized peak torque (N·m/kg) was calculated for strength testing. RESULTS: No differences were found in group characteristics, excluding body mass (P < .001), or in patient-reported outcomes. There were no interactions between revision status, graft type, and sex. Knee extension LSI was inferior (P < .001) in participants who had undergone primary (73.0% ± 15.0%) and revision (77.2% ± 19.1%) ACLR compared with healthy, uninjured participants (98.8% ± 10.4%). Knee flexion LSI was inferior (P = .04) in the primary group (97.4% ± 18.4%) compared with the revision group (101.9% ± 18.5%). Difference in knee flexion LSI between the uninjured and primary groups, as well as between the uninjured and revision groups, did not reach statistical significance. Hop LSI outcomes were significantly different across all groups (P < .001). Between-group differences in extension in the involved limb (P < .001) were noted, as the uninjured group exhibited stronger knee extension (2.16 ± 0.46 N·m/kg) than the primary group (1.67 ± 0.47 N·m/kg) and the revision group (1.78 ± 0.48 N·m/kg). As well, differences in flexion in the involved limb (P = .01) were found, as the revision group exhibited stronger knee flexion (1.06 ± 0.25 N·m/kg) than the primary group (0.97 ± 0.29 N·m/kg) and the uninjured group (0.98 ± 0.24 N·m/kg). CONCLUSION: At 7 months postoperatively, patients who had undergone revision ACLR did not demonstrate inferior patient-reported outcomes, limb symmetry, strength, or functional performance compared with patients who had undergone primary ACLR. Patients who had undergone revision ACLR exhibited greater strength and LSI than their counterparts with primary ACLR, but these parameters were still inferior to those of uninjured controls.

No Deficits in Functional Outcomes of the Contralateral Limb Are Seen When the Hamstring Is Harvested for Augmentation of Small Diameter Ipsilateral Hamstring Autograft.

Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes of the contralateral, nonoperative limb in patients undergoing contralateral hamstring (HS) autograft harvest compared with patients undergoing ipsilateral HS autograft harvest alone. Methods: This study included 96 patients who underwent isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using 4-stranded HS autograft (n = 85) or 4-stranded HS autograft augmented with contralateral HS (n = 13) due to inclusion of ipsilateral graft diameter <8 mm. Isokinetic flexion and extension strength and dynamic performance of the ipsilateral and contralateral limbs and limb symmetry index (LSI) were evaluated at 6 months' postoperatively. Rates of contralateral native ACL tear at minimum 2 years also were compared. For all comparisons, P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Normalized isokinetic knee flexion and extension strength of the contralateral limb did not differ between cohorts (P = .34; P = .21, respectively). LSI for knee extension peak torque and knee flexion peak torque did not differ between cohorts (P = .44; P = .67, respectively). No difference in LSI was seen for any dynamic performance testing (single leg hop, P = .97; triple leg hop, P = .14; 6-m timed hop, P = .99). No difference was observed in International Knee Documentation Committee (P = .99) or Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscale measures (P = .39-.86). No difference in rates of contralateral knee native ACL tears were seen between cohorts (HS autograft + contralateral HS augmentation, n = 2, 15.4%; HS autograft, n = 7, 8.4%; P = .26). Conclusions: In this study, at the time of return to sport, we found no differences in contralateral limb functional performance or limb symmetry measurements between patients undergoing contralateral HS autograft harvest for augmentation of smaller (<8 mm) diameter HS autografts harvested from the injured extremity. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

The "N+10 Rule" to Avoid Graft-Tunnel Mismatch in Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone ACL Reconstruction Using Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling.

Background: Graft-tunnel mismatch (GTM) is a common problem in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts. Hypothesis: Application of the "N+10 rule" in endoscopic ACLR with BPTB grafts will result in acceptable tibial tunnel length (TTL), minimizing GTM. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Endoscopic BPTB ACLR was conducted on the paired knees of 10 cadaveric specimens using 2 independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques-accessory anteromedial portal and flexible reamer. The graft bone blocks were trimmed to 10 × 20 mm, and the intertendinous distance (represented by "N") between the bone blocks was measured. The N+10 rule was used to set the angle of the ACL tibial tunnel guide to the appropriate number of degrees for drilling. The amount of excursion or recession of the tibial bone plug in relation to the anterior tibial cortical aperture was measured in both flexion and extension. A GTM threshold of ±7.5 mm was set based on prior studies. Results: The mean BPTB ACL intertendinous distance was 47.5 ± 5.5 mm. The mean measured intra-articular distance was 27.2 ± 3 mm. Using the N+10 rule, the mean total (flexion plus extension) GTM was 4.3 ± 3.2 mm (GTM in flexion, 4.9 ± 3.6 mm; GTM in extension, 3.8 ± 3.5 mm). In 18 of 20 (90%) cadaveric knees, the mean total GTM fell within the ±7.5-mm threshold. When comparing the actual measured TTL to the calculated TTL, there was a mean difference of 5.4 ± 3.9 mm. When comparing femoral tunnel drilling techniques, the total GTM for the accessory anteromedial portal technique was 2.1 ± 3.7 mm, while the total GTM for the flexible reamer technique was 3.6 ± 5.4 mm (P = .5). Conclusion: The N+10 rule resulted in an acceptable mean GTM in both flexion and extension. The mean difference between the measured versus calculated TTL using the N+10 rule was also acceptable. Clinical Relevance: The N+10 rule is a simple and effective intraoperative strategy for achieving desired TTL regardless of patient-specific factors to avoid excessive GTM in endoscopic BPTB ACLR using independent femoral tunnel drilling.

Use of Computed Tomography Angiography to Predict Complications in Tibia Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability of computed tomography angiography identified infrapopliteal vascular injury to predict complications in tibia fractures that do not require vascular surgical intervention. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective review. SETTING: Six Level I trauma centers. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: Two hundred seventy-four patients with tibia fractures (OTA/AO 42 or 43) who underwent computed tomography angiography maintained a clinically perfused foot not requiring vascular surgical intervention and were treated with an intramedullary nail. Patients were grouped by the number of vessels below the trifurcation that were injured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rates of superficial and deep infection, amputation, unplanned reoperation to promote bone healing (nonunion), and any unplanned reoperation. RESULTS: There were 142 fractures in the control (no-injury) group, 87 in the one-vessel injury group, and 45 in the two-vessel injury group. Average follow-up was 2 years. Significantly higher rates of nerve injury and flap coverage after wound breakdown were observed in the two-vessel injury group. The two-vessel injury group had higher rates of deep infection (35.6% vs. 16.9%, P = 0.030) and unplanned reoperation to promote bone healing (44.4% vs. 23.9%, P = 0.019) compared with controls, as well as increased rates of any unplanned reoperation compared with control and one-vessel injury groups (71.1% vs. 39.4% and 51.7%, P < 0.001), respectively. There were no significant differences in rates of superficial infection or amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Tibia fractures with two-vessel injuries were associated with higher rates of deep infection and unplanned reoperation to promote bone healing compared with those without vascular injury, as well as increased rates of any unplanned reoperation compared with controls and fractures with one-vessel injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Role of Host-Cellular Responses in COVID-19 Endothelial Dysfunction.

SARS-CoV2, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, is a novel member of the human coronavirus family that has recently emerged worldwide to cause COVID-19 disease. COVID-19 disease has been declared a worldwide pandemic with over 270 million total cases, and >5 million deaths as of this writing. Although co-morbidities and preexisting conditions have played a significant role in the severity of COVID-19, the hallmark feature of severe disease associated with SARS-CoV2 is respiratory failure. Recent findings have demonstrated a key role for endothelial dysfunction caused by SARS-CoV2 in these clinical outcomes, characterized by endothelial inflammation, the persistence of a pro-coagulative state, and major recruitment of leukocytes and other immune cells to localized areas of endothelial dysfunction. Though it is generally recognized that endothelial impairment is a major contributor to COVID-19 disease, studies to examine the initial cellular events involved in triggering endothelial dysfunction are needed. In this article, we review the general strategy of pathogens to exploit endothelial cells and the endothelium to cause disease. We discuss the role of the endothelium in COVID-19 disease and highlight very recent findings that identify key signaling and cellular events that are associated with the initiation of SARS-CoV2 infection. These studies may reveal specific molecular pathways that can serve as potential means of therapeutic development against COVID-19 disease.

A Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes From Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis and Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Using Cellular Bone Allograft Augmentation.

BACKGROUND: ViviGen is an allogeneic cellular bone matrix product containing lineage-committed bone cells, and can be used as an alternative to autograft bone or other augments to aid in arthrodesis or to enhance bony healing in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) procedures. METHODS: This study included 153 consecutive patients undergoing ankle, midfoot, or hindfoot arthrodesis or ORIF procedures from January 2017 to October 2018, in which an allogeneic cellular bone matrix product was used to aid in bony healing. Retrospective chart review identified patient demographic factors and medical comorbidities and evaluated clinical and radiographic data to determine fusion/union rate and complications. RESULTS: The overall fusion rate for the arthrodesis cohort was 97/113 (85.8%). The overall complication rate in this cohort was 22/113 (19.5%). Smokers had significantly lower rates of fusion compared with nonsmokers (P = .01). The observed bony healing rate for the ORIF cohort was 19/22 (86.4%), with a complication rate of 3/22 (13.6%). CONCLUSION: With satisfactory fusion rates and relatively few complications, our findings suggest that ViviGen is a safe and efficacious alternative to other forms of bone graft augmentation for fusion and ORIF procedures about the foot and ankle. Further study is needed to compare the efficacy of ViviGen with autograft bone and other augments. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: Case series.