RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the feasibility of managing hyponatremia patients under outpatient observation status in an academic medical center, and compare outcomes based on the use of an emergency department observation unit (EDOU). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of emergency department hyponatremic patients managed in four hospitals within a large urban academic medical center over 27 months. All patients had an admit-to-observation order, ICD-10 codes for hyponatremia, and mild (130-135 mmol/L) to moderate (121-129 mmol/L) hyponatremia. Observation settings were divided into two groups: EDOU and Non-Observation Unit (NOU) inpatient beds. Severe hyponatremia (≤120 mmol/L) was excluded. Primary clinical outcomes were inpatient admit rate, length of stay (LOS), total direct cost, the rate of adverse events and 30-day recidivism. RESULTS: 188 patients were managed as an observation patient, with 64 managed in an EDOU setting (age 74.0 yr, 70.3% female) and 124 managed in a NOU setting (age 71.5 yr, 64.5% female). Patient subgroups were similar in terms of presenting complaints, comorbidities, and medication histories. Initial and final sodium levels were similar between settings: EDOU (125.1 to 132.6 mmol/L) vs NOU (123.5 to 132.0 mmol/L). However, outcomes differed by setting for observation to inpatient admit rate (EDOU 28.1% vs NOU 37.9%, adjusted effect 0.70), overall length of stay (EDOU 19.2 h vs NOU 31.9 h; adjusted effect -10.5 h and total direct cost ($1230 vs $1531; adjusted effect -$167). EDOU sodium correction rates were faster (EDOU 0.44 mmol/L/h vs 0.24 mmol/L/h; adjusted effect 0.15 mmol/L/h) and 30-day recidivism rate was similar (EDOU 13% vs NOU 15%). There were no index visit deaths or intensive care unit admissions. CONCLUSION: Management of selected hyponatremia patients under observation status is feasible, with the EDOU setting demonstrating lower admit rates, shorter length of stay, and lower total direct costs with similar clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Unidades de Observação Clínica , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Estudos de Viabilidade , Hiponatremia , Tempo de Internação , Humanos , Hiponatremia/terapia , Feminino , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Observação Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
The opioid public health crisis continues to burden individuals, communities, and economies. Public health opinion has emphasized the need for increased access to harm reduction services, but there is a dearth of information on the views and experiences of people who use opioids. Our study aimed to investigate the prevalence of naloxone use, attitudes, and experiences with naloxone among an online community of people who use drugs. We performed a cross-sectional survey looking at experiences with and attitudes towards take-home naloxone. Data is presented descriptively, with analysis of the differences between people who do and do not use opioids using the χ2 and Fisher's exact tests. There were 1,143 respondents, of whom 70% were from the United States. Only 38% of participants who use opioids had received naloxone training, but 56% of these individuals said that they felt comfortable using a naloxone kit. Nearly all respondents (95%) said they would be willing to use naloxone on someone who had overdosed and approximately 90% would want naloxone used on them in case of an overdose. Regarding harm reduction, 24% of respondents said they had access to safe use programs, and 33% said they had access to clean needle exchange programs. A majority of the participants who use opioids were in favor of having naloxone with them when using drugs and believed naloxone should be freely available. This study demonstrates the receptiveness of take-home naloxone and highlights the need for better implementation of naloxone within communities that use opioids.
Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Naloxona/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Overdose de Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Naloxone is a life-saving, yet underprescribed, medication that is recommended to be provided to patients at high risk of opioid overdose. OBJECTIVE: We set out to evaluate the changes in prescriber practices due to the use of an electronic health record (EHR) advisory that prompted opioid prescribers to co-prescribe naloxone when prescribing a high-dose opioid. It also provided prescribers with guidance on decreasing opioid doses for safety. DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart abstraction study looking at all opioid prescriptions and all naloxone prescriptions written as emergency department (ED) discharge, inpatient hospital discharge, or outpatient medications, between July 1, 2018, and February 1, 2020. The EHR advisory went live on June 1, 2019. SUBJECTS: Included in the analysis were all adult patients seen in the abovementioned settings at a large county hospital and associated outpatient clinics. MAIN MEASURES: We performed an interrupted time series analysis looking at naloxone prescriptions and daily opioid dosing in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), before and after initiation of the EHR advisory. KEY RESULTS: The EHR advisory was associated with changes in prescribers' behavior, leading to increased naloxone prescriptions and decreased prescribed opioid doses. CONCLUSIONS: EHR advisories are an effective systems-level intervention to enhance the safety of prescribed opioids and increase rates of naloxone prescribing.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Naloxona , Adulto , Humanos , Naloxona/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prescrições , Padrões de Prática MédicaRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE(S): We report the impact of telemedicine virtual rounding in emergency department observation units (EDOU) on the effectiveness, safety, and cost relative to traditional observation care. METHODS: In this retrospective diff-in-diff study, we compared observation visit outcomes from 2 EDOUs before (pre) and after (post) full adoption of telemedicine rounding tele-observation (tele-obs) with usual care in control EDOU and care in a hospital bed in an integrated health system without tele-obs. Tele-obs physicians did not work at the control hospital. Outcomes were the length of stay, total direct costs, admission status, and adverse events (ICU and death). Difference-in-differences modeling evaluated outcomes with covariates including age, sex, payer type, and clinical classification software diagnostic category. Data from a system data warehouse and a cost accounting database were used. RESULTS: Of the 20,861 EDOU visits, 15,630 (74.9%) were seen in the preperiod and 6,657 (31.9%) in control EDOU. Of 23,055 non-EDOU inpatient visits assigned to observation status (nonobservation unit), 76% were seen in the preperiod. Adjusted length of stay was not significantly different for tele-obs and control EDOUs (26.4 hours versus 23.5 hours), which remained lower than in hospital settings (37.9 hours). The pre-post diff-in-diff was not significant (P=.78). Inpatient admission status was similar for tele-obs and control EDOUs (20.9% versus 22.4.%) and lower than in hospital settings (30.3%). Prepost odds ratios for inpatient admission and adverse outcomes did not change significantly for all study groups. Adjusted costs increased over time for all settings; however, the prepost median cost change was not significantly different between tele-obs EDOUs and control EDOUs ($162.5 versus $235) and was lower than the change for control hospital settings ($783). Median tele-obs EDOU cost over both periods ($1,541) remained significantly lower than hospital costs ($2,413). CONCLUSION: Using tele-obs to manage observation patients in an ED observation unit was not associated with significant differences in length of stay, admission status, measured adverse events, or total direct cost.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hospitalização , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Unidades de Observação Clínica , Custos HospitalaresRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nitroglycerin (NTG) is commonly used for the management of pulmonary edema in acute heart failure presentations. Although commonly initiated at low infusion rates, higher infusion rates have favorable pharmacodynamic properties and may improve outcomes in the management of acute pulmonary edema. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the clinical outcomes including the time to resolution of severe hypertension when using an initial low dose (<100 µg/min) versus high-dose (≥100 µg/min) strategy. METHODS: This was a retrospective study performed at a single, tertiary academic emergency department in Atlanta, GA. We describe the blood pressure effects and key safety outcomes (intubation, hypotension, intensive care unit admissions) during the first hour of treatment of acute pulmonary edema. RESULTS: 41 patients were included in the final sample. 27 (66%) received low dose NTG and 14 (34%) received high dose NTG. The high dose group reached their blood pressure faster on average (hazard ratio = 3.5, 95% CI: 1.2-10.1). 8/14 (57%) of patients in the high dose group reached their BP target within the first hour of treatment, compared to 6/27 (22%) in the low dose group. Observed incidence of safety outcomes were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Higher initial NTG doses may be an effective way to decrease times to achieve blood pressure targets and should be the focus of future trials.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Edema Pulmonar , Humanos , Nitroglicerina , Edema Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pressão Sanguínea , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and healthcare utilization patterns of children seen in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs). STUDY DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study, caregivers of patients who presented to 2 urban PEDs completed a survey regarding their children's ACEs, health care utilization patterns, and acceptance of PED-based ACEs screening and resources. Inclusion criteria were English-speaking caregivers of patients 0-17 years of age not requiring acute stabilization. Prevalence estimates were compared with national and state data from the National Survey of Children's Health by calculating risk differences and 95% CIs. The association of cumulative ACEs with caregiver-reported health care utilization patterns was evaluated using ORs. RESULTS: Among 1000 participants, 28.1% (95% CI 25.3-30.9) had 1 ACE; 17.8% (95% CI15.4-20.2) had ≥2 ACEs. Notably, children with higher cumulative ACEs were seen in the PED more frequently (0, 1, ≥2 visits) (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.06-1.30, P = .002) and more likely to seek care in PEDs for sick visits (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.30, P = .01). About 9% of children exposed to ACEs did not have a primary care provider. Over 85% of caregivers reported never discussing ACEs with their primary care provider. Most caregivers felt comfortable addressing ACEs in PEDs (84.4%) and would use referral resources (90.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Given higher PED utilization in children with more ACEs and caregiver acceptance of PED-based screening and intervention, PEDs may represent a strategic and opportune setting to both assess and respond to ACEs among vulnerable populations.
Assuntos
Experiências Adversas da Infância/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Experiências Adversas da Infância/prevenção & controle , Cuidadores/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: People with pre-existing medical conditions, who spend a large proportion of their time indoors, are at risk of emergent morbidities from elevated indoor heat exposures. In this study, indoor heat of structures wherein exposed people received Grady Emergency Services based care in Atlanta, GA, U.S., was measured from May to September 2016. METHOD: ology: In this case-control study, analyses were conducted to investigate the effect of indoor heat on the odds of 9-1-1 calls for diabetic (n = 90 cases) and separately, for respiratory (n = 126 cases), conditions versus heat-insensitive emergencies (n = 698 controls). Generalized Additive Models considered both linear and non-linear indoor heat and health outcome associations using thin-plate regression splines. RESULTS: Hotter and more humid indoor conditions were non-linearly associated with an increasing likelihood of receiving emergency care for complications of diabetes and severe respiratory distress. Higher heat indices were associated with increased odds of a diabetes (odds ratio for change from 30 to 31 °C: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08-1.16) or respiratory 9-1-1 medical call versus control (odds ratio for change from 34 to 35 °C: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.09-1.28) call. Both diabetic and respiratory distress patients were more likely to be African-American and/or have comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the statistical association of indoor heat exposure with emergency morbidities (diabetic, respiratory) was demonstrated. The study also showcased the value and utility of data gathered by emergency medical dispatch and services from inaccessible private indoor sources (i.e., domiciles) for environmental health.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Despacho de Emergência Médica , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/etiologia , Documentação , Temperatura Alta , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine regional differences in rehabilitation outcomes among adult patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) who received care at an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF). DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of a large, multi-center dataset from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. SETTING: More than 70% of all IRFs in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Adult TBI patients (N=175,358) aged 18 years or older who were admitted and discharged from an IRF in the United States between 2004 and 2014. Qualifying etiology included traumatic brain dysfunction Impairment Group codes 02.21 (traumatic, open injury) and 02.22 (traumatic, closed injury). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Discharge functional status (total, cognitive, motor), length of stay, and discharge to home. RESULTS: Patient and clinical characteristics varied significantly by geographic location, as did median functional status, length of stay, and percentage of patients discharged home. The region where IRF care was received, race and ethnicity, age, occurrence of 1 or more falls during the IRF stay, case mix group, and insurance status were associated with discharge functional status, length of stay, and discharge to home. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide evidence of geographic differences in outcomes and potential disparities in care of TBI patients who received IRF care. More research is needed to identify TBI patients at risk for poor discharge outcomes to inform development and testing of interventions to reduce disparities in outcomes for these patients.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/reabilitação , Centros de Reabilitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Protocol driven ED observation units (EDOU) have been shown to improve outcomes for patients and payers, however their impact on an entire health system is unknown. Two thirds of US hospitals do not have such units. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of a protocol-driven EDOU on health system length of stay, cost, and resource utilization. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study of observation patients managed over 25 consecutive months in a four-hospital academic health system. Patients were identified using the "admit to observation" order and limited to adult, emergent / urgent, non-obstetric patients. Data was retrieved from a cost accounting database. The primary study exposure was the setting for observation care which was broken into three discrete groups: EDOUs (n = 3), hospital medicine observation units (HMSOU, n = 2), and a non-observation unit (NOU) bed located anywhere in the hospital. Outcomes included observation-to-inpatient admission rate, length of stay (LoS), total direct cost, and inpatient bed days saved. Unadjusted outcomes were compared, and outcomes were adjusted using multiple study variables. LoS and cost were compared using quantile regressions. Inpatient admit rate was compared using logistic regressions. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 48,145 patients who were 57.4% female, 48% Black, 46% White, median age of 58, with some variation in most common diagnoses and payer groups. The median unadjusted outcomes favored EDOU over NOU settings for admission rate (13.1% vs 37.1%), LoS [17.9 vs 35.6 h), and cost ($1279 vs $2022). The adjusted outcomes favored EDOU over NOU settings for admission rates [12.3% (95% CI 9.7-15.3) vs 26.4% (CI 21.3-32.3)], LoS differences [11.1 h (CI 10.6-11.5 h)] and cost differences [$127.5 (CI $105.4 - $149.5)]. Adjusted differences were similar and favored EDOU over HMSOU settings. For the health system, the total adjusted annualized savings of the EDOUs was 10,399 bed days and $1,329,443 in total direct cost per year. CONCLUSION: Within an academic medical center, EDOUs were associated with improved resource utilization and reduced cost. This represents a significant opportunity for hospitals to improve efficiency and contain costs.
Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Unidades de Observação Clínica/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Sistemas Multi-Institucionais , Adulto , Idoso , Unidades de Observação Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Annually, the CDC reports that 2.5 million Emergency Department (ED) visits occur due to Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBI) with nearly 75% classified as mild TBI (mTBI). Generally, these injuries are thought to be under recognized. This study was done to determine the proportion of patients, who were considered high risk for an mTBI, that had documentation of an mTBI evaluation. METHODS: A prospective cross-section of patients was identified using a 3-question screen at the time of triage: did an injury occur; was the mechanism consistent with mTBI; and was there a period of altered mental status. Chart review was completed for these patients who were thought to meet a minimum threshold warranting an evaluation for mTBI. RESULTS: 38,621 patients were screened over 16â¯weeks, of whom 441 (1.14%) were identified as being high risk for having an mTBI and met inclusion criteria. Recommended portions of an mTBI evaluation occurred in fewer than 50% of patients. In total, 98 subjects were diagnosed with an mTBI, and 49 received mTBI discharge instructions. The odds ratio for the subgroup of patients who had documented criteria sufficient for diagnosis revealed that an isolated head injury increased a patient's odds of a documented diagnosis by 2.1 times (95%, 1.3-3.4). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with a possible mTBI did not have significant portions of an mTBI evaluation documented, and roughly half of the patients with a documented mTBI diagnosis did not receive discharge education. Changes in clinicians' approach to mTBI must occur to ensure patients receive appropriate evaluations, management, and education.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/diagnóstico , Documentação , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Prontuários Médicos , Adulto , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/etiologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Exame Neurológico , Sumários de Alta do Paciente Hospitalar , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , TriagemRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Emergency physicians are often the initial-and only-clinical providers for patients who have sustained a mild traumatic brain injury. This prospective observational study seeks to examine the practice patterns of clinicians in an academic Level I trauma center as they relate to the evaluation of patients who were presumed to be at high risk for mild traumatic brain injury. Specifically, we describe the frequency of a documented mild traumatic brain injury evaluation, diagnosis, and discharge education. METHODS: This pilot study took place in a single academic Level I trauma and emergency care center during a 4-week period. Patients were identified by triage nurses, who determined whether they responded affirmatively to 2 questions that indicated a potential risk for mild traumatic brain injury. Data were abstracted from emergency department clinician documentation on identified patients to describe the frequency of a documented mild traumatic brain injury evaluation (history and physical examination), diagnosis, and discharge education among those who were identified to be at risk for a mild traumatic brain injury. RESULTS: Ninety-eight subjects were included in the present study. Documentation of a mild traumatic brain injury evaluation was present for less than 50% of patients, a final diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury was included for 36 (37%; 95% confidence interval 27.8% to 46.7%), and discharge education was provided to 15 (15%; 95% confidence interval 9.2% to 21.4%). Of the 36 patients who received a documented mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis, 15 (41.5%; 95% confidence interval 26.7% to 57.9%) received mild traumatic brain injury-specific discharge education. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the majority of patients at high risk for mild traumatic brain injury have no documentation of an evaluation for one. Also, patients with a mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis were unlikely to receive appropriate discharge education about it. Education and standardization are needed to ensure that patients at risk for mild traumatic brain injury receive appropriate evaluation and care.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/diagnóstico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Adulto , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/terapia , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Anamnese , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/educação , Sumários de Alta do Paciente Hospitalar , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , TriagemRESUMO
The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with an increased exposure to arsenic-contaminated soil in a Kentucky neighborhood as part of collaborative public health response. An exposure assessment survey was administered to residents and toenail clippings and soil samples analyzed for arsenic concentration. The associations between exposure variables and arsenic concentrations were evaluated using a multivariate-generalized estimating equation. An ecological assessment of cancer incidence in the community was also conducted using standardized incidence ratio maps. Median toenail arsenic was 0.48 micrograms/gram (µg/g), twice the expected regional level of 0.2 µg/g. Mean residence surface soil arsenic level was 64.8 ppm. An increase of 1 ppm of residence concentration was significantly associated with a 0.003 µg/g rise in toenail levels. Concentrations for respondents who engaged in digging were 0.68 µg/g significantly higher compared to individuals who did not. No significantly elevated rates of lung or bladder cancer were observed in the affected ZIP codes. Living in areas with high soil arsenic contamination might lead to (1) increased exposure; (2) elevated residence soil arsenic concentrations and (3) the action of digging in the soil was associated with elevated toenail arsenic levels. Based upon elevated soil levels identified, residents were recommended to move from the contaminated environment until remediation was complete. Additional recommendations included regular health-care follow-up.
Assuntos
Arsênio/química , Monitoramento Ambiental , Poluentes do Solo/química , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Kentucky , Unhas/química , Características de Residência , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Emergency departments (EDs) are important providers for homeless individuals, providing vital health care and meeting the subsistence needs of many homeless patients (eg, food, water, shelter). Studies that have examined the proportion of patients in the ED setting who experience homelessness have been conducted primarily in the northeastern United States. We hypothesized that findings from prior studies, conducted primarily in the Northeast, would not generalize to other regions of the United States. We conducted a direct patient survey to describe the proportion and demographics of ED patients who have experienced homelessness within the past 12 months in an urban safety net hospital in Atlanta, Georgia. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of patients presenting to the ED from September to December 2016. A team of trained research assistants administered a structured survey instrument to patients who were 18 years old, English speakers, not incarcerated, and able to provide informed consent. Questions were based on the US Department of Health and Human Services definition of homelessness. RESULTS: A total of 923 ED patients (55.1% male; median age 44 years) completed the survey. Of the ED patients surveyed, 51.5% reported some measure of homelessness in the past 12 months: lived with others but did not pay rent (n = 279, 30.2%), skipped mortgage or rent payment (n = 111, 12%), experienced eviction (n = 74, 8%), lived in a hotel or motel (n = 196, 21.2%), lived in a place not meant for human habitation (n = 76, 8.2%), slept in a shelter (n = 131, 14.2%), and slept on the street (n = 115, 12.5%). Men (odds ratio [OR] 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-2.09), patients who completed some school (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.72-4.71), and patients who completed high school (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.53-3.52) were more likely to have experienced homelessness in the 12 months preceding their ED visit. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of patients experiencing homelessness at our hospital is substantially greater than those reported in prior surveys of ED patients. More research is needed on homelessness and its implications for ED patients.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas Mal Alojadas/estatística & dados numéricos , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/métodos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Georgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Emergency Department (ED) frequently treats patients with drug overdoses and is an important resource for individuals with opioid use disorder who are seeking treatment. Initiating medication-assisted treatment (MAT) in the ED seems to be an effective way to link patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) to treatment programs. There is ongoing discussion on the best approach to MAT in the ED setting. OBJECTIVE: Describe a new model for managing OUD in the ED. METHOD: Information was obtained retrospectively from the electronic medical records of patients seen in a large county tertiary care center's Clinical Decision Unit (CDU) for OUD between September 1, 2017 and February 6, 2018. Data were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: There were 18 different patients placed in the CDU during the study period. Ninety-five percent were induced with buprenorphine-naloxone in the CDU. The median initial Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale score at the time of induction was 10. The median total dose of buprenorphine-naloxone that was administered was 8/2 mg. The median amount of time spent in the CDU and ED combined was 23 h. Approximately (12/19) 63% of subjects went to their initial follow-up appointment in clinic. Nine were still active in clinic at 30 days and 4 were active at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective chart review shows promising preliminary data for managing OUD in an ED CDU. Such strategies have the potential to increase access to care in a vulnerable patient population.
Assuntos
Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/normas , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Medicina de Emergência/métodos , Medicina de Emergência/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/métodos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/complicações , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Anxiety is reliably associated with an attentional bias favoring threatening information which is thought to be a key mechanism in the etiology and maintenance of anxious pathology. However, whether and how anxiety is related to attentional capture at a more basic level (i.e., in the absence of threat) is less well understood. To address this gap in the literature, we examined the association between anxiety and attentional capture in the context of visually salient, yet affectively neutral, stimuli. Specifically, we used a visual search task in which participants were required to locate a target while ignoring a salient distractor stimulus. A total of 122 undergraduates-half of whom were assigned to a state-anxiety induction-completed this task while event-related potentials were recorded and also completed self-report measures of trait and state anxiety. The results revealed that trait anxiety, but not state anxiety, was associated with impaired attentional control in the presence of a salient distractor. That is, behavioral slowing and the N2pc event-related potential-a neural measure of attentional selection-were enhanced for trait-anxious participants when the distractor was proximate to the target and required controlled attention in order to inhibit it. These findings extend previous work by providing evidence from multiple levels of analysis that attentional aberrations in anxiety reflect broad deficits in inhibiting distracting stimuli and are not limited to threat-relevant contexts.
Assuntos
Ansiedade/fisiopatologia , Atenção/fisiologia , Percepção de Cores/fisiologia , Potenciais Evocados/fisiologia , Percepção Espacial/fisiologia , Adulto , Eletroencefalografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Patients living with substance use disorder (SUD) have complex pain management needs, which may be mismanaged during hospital admission. Ineffectively managed pain following orthopaedic trauma, influenced by clinician biases related to race or SUD diagnosis, may subject patients to worse pain outcomes and subsequent emergency department (ED) encounters. This study examined ED encounters and opioid prescribing for pain-related complaints following orthopaedic trauma, among patients with SUD who identify as Black or African American relative to White patients. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 1089 patients with a SUD diagnosis discharged from a Level I trauma center, following hospitalization for orthopaedic injuries, between 2016 and 2021. Multivariable regressions assessed the associations among race, opioid prescribing, and ED encounters within 90 days for pain-related care. RESULTS: Among the 1089 patients included in the sample, the proportion of individuals with an ED encounter within 90 days for pain-related care was 12.4 % and 4.5 % for Black and White patients, respectively (odds ratio [OR] = 3.0, p < .001). When adjusting for injury severity and demographics, the difference in ED encounters between Black and White patients remained significant (OR = 2.8, p = .002). Opioid prescription doses did not statistically differ by race. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in ED encounters between Black and White patients with SUDs following orthopaedic trauma may indicate a need to optimize pain management prior to initial discharge and improve post-injury care.
RESUMO
Background: Training programs for advanced practice providers (APP) often have significant variability in their curriculum, including electrocardiogram (ECG) education. Despite limitations in formal ECG training, APPs in the emergency department (ED) may be the first practitioner to interpret an ECG. Foundations of Emergency Medicine (FoEM) offers free, open-access curricula that are widely used for resident education. We sought to improve APP ECG interpretation skills by implementing the FoEM ECG I course. Methods: This was a single-site, pre- and post-intervention study of 23 APPs at our high-acuity, urban ED. In the fall of 2020, APP learners enrolled in a FoEM ECG I course led by faculty and senior resident instructors. The course consisted of six virtual, small-group, active-learning ECG workshops. Participants completed a 15-question multiple-choice test before, immediately after, and six months post-intervention to quantify knowledge acquisition. Additionally, a pre- and post-intervention knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey was administered on ECG interpretation skills and to evaluate the course. We evaluated change in ECG knowledge scores using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Changes in self-assessed knowledge were evaluated using an ordinal logistic mixed-effects regression. Results: A total of 23 APPs enrolled in the course. Knowledge assessments showed APPs improved from the pre-test (median 9/15, interquartile range [IQR] 7-11) to the post-test (median 12/15, IQR 10-13; P = 0.001). Test scores did not significantly change from the post-test to the delayed post-test (median 12/15, IQR 12-13; P = 0.30). Respondents' subjective rating of their skill did not significantly change (P = 0.06). Respondents reported no change in their likelihood of approaching an attending when uncertain of the correct interpretation of an ECG (P = 0.16). Overall, 91% were satisfied with the course and 96% agreed that the course difficulty was appropriate. Conclusion: The FoEM ECG course provided a standardized curriculum that improved APP knowledge for interpreting ECGs. Despite this, the course did not alter APPs' willingness to approach physicians for guidance with interpretation of abnormal ECGs. These findings may inform expansion of this concept for other programs who desire formalized APP ECG education.
Assuntos
Currículo , Eletrocardiografia , Humanos , Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas , Competência ClínicaRESUMO
Heightened sensitivity to failure and negative information is thought to be an important maintenance mechanism for symptoms of depression. However, the specific neural and behavioral correlates of the abnormal reactions to errors associated with depression are not yet well understood. The present study was designed to shed new light on this issue by examining how depressive symptoms relate to error monitoring in the context of different task demands. We used a modified flanker task in which the stimulus-response (S-R) mappings were reversed between blocks, differentiating relatively easy nonreversal blocks from the more-demanding S-R reversal blocks. Undergraduates performed this task and then completed a self-report measure of anhedonic depression. The results revealed that depressive symptoms were related to poorer posterror accuracy in the more-difficult S-R reversal blocks, but not in the easier nonreversal blocks. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) within a subsample of these participants further indicated that depressive symptoms were associated with reduced error positivity (Pe) amplitudes in both block types, suggesting that depressive symptoms were related to reduced attention allocation to errors across the easy and hard blocks. Finally, brain-behavior correlations indicated that highly depressed individuals failed to display a relationship between Pe amplitude and posterror accuracy in the S-R reversal blocks, a relationship that was intact in the low-depression group. Together, these results suggest that task demands play a critical role in the emergence of error-monitoring abnormalities in depression.
Assuntos
Atenção/fisiologia , Conscientização/fisiologia , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/fisiopatologia , Análise de Variância , Mapeamento Encefálico , Córtex Cerebral/irrigação sanguínea , Córtex Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Eletroencefalografia , Potenciais Evocados/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Oxigênio/sangue , Estimulação Luminosa , Tempo de Reação/fisiologia , Autorrelato , EstudantesRESUMO
Background: Hydrofluoric acid (HF) is associated with systemic toxicity, particularly with high-concentration formulations. However, most existing data describe dermal exposures; there is a paucity of data related to outcomes after ingestions. Objective: To determine the morbidity and mortality associated with HF ingestions as reported to the National Poison Data System (NPDS). A secondary objective is to assess for clinical criteria that are associated with serious outcomes after HF ingestion. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of HF ingestions reported to the NPDS from 2007 to 2017. Data including patient demographics, exposure and caller sites, electrolyte abnormalities, treatments, and serious (moderate or major effect or death as documented in NPDS) and non-serious outcomes were abstracted from case narratives. Cases meeting the criteria for a qualifiable HF ingestion were included in the study. Results: During the study period, there were 653 HF ingestions reported to NPDS, of which 142 were included in the final data analysis. Most HF exposures occurred in men (68.3%), and the most common exposure site was at the exposed individual's own residence (78.2%). Nearly half of all exposures (46.5%) were due to transfer into a non-labeled secondary storage container. Total of 45.8% of the cases resulted in a serious outcome. Electrolyte disturbances were associated with an increased risk of a serious outcome. Hypocalcemia was the most frequently reported electrolyte abnormality, occurring in 24.6% of cases. Nine (6.3%) individuals died. Conclusions: Mortality after HF ingestion is low. However, a large cohort of exposures occurred after the transfer of HF to secondary containers. Targeted interventions to reduce this practice are necessary to decrease hazardous chemical exposures.
RESUMO
AIMS: Individuals with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) represent a growing percentage of the U.S. population yet face inequities in health outcomes and barriers to routine care. Despite these disparities, LEP populations are often excluded from clinical research studies. The aim of this study was to assess for the inclusion of LEP populations in published acute care stroke research in the U.S. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of publications from three databases using acute care and stroke specific Medical Subject Heading key terms. The primary outcome was whether language was used as inclusion or exclusion criteria for study participation and the secondary outcome was whether the study explored outcomes by language. RESULTS: A total of 167 studies were included. Twenty-two studies (13.2%) indicated the use of language as inclusion/exclusion criteria within the manuscript or dataset/registry and only 17 studies (10.2%) explicitly included LEP patients either in the study or dataset/registry. Only four papers (2%) include language as a primary variable. CONCLUSIONS: As LEP populations are not routinely incorporated in acute care stroke research, it is critical that researchers engage in language-inclusive research practices to ensure all patients are equitably represented in research studies and ultimately evidence-based practices.