Proton-Pump Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Adverse Events: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Some observational studies suggest a cardiovascular risk from proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment, but observational data may be subject to bias. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial data on cardiovascular events during PPI treatment. METHODS: Manufacturers of PPIs provided data from their PPI clinical trial programs. We included randomized trials with at least 100 subjects, treatment duration >30 days, and a non-PPI comparator (active or placebo). We obtained person-time of exposure per trial, to calculate summary incidence rate ratios (primary analysis) and incident rate differences (secondary analysis). Our primary composite outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events-plus (MACE+), which included nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, fatal cardiovascular adverse events, hospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization; events were adjudicated blindly. RESULTS: Cardiovascular outcomes were infrequent in randomized trials of PPIs, and our primary analysis found no overall association (summary incident rate ratio, MACE+ events, PPI:placebo, 0.72) (95% confidence interval 0.42-1.26). There was some heterogeneity by indication category, and by the incidence rate difference metric, gastroesophageal reflux disorder trials had 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.58-1.50) excess MACE+ events per 100 person-years of treatment vs placebo. Comparisons with active controls generally showed positive incidence rate differences with PPI treatment. DISCUSSION: Overall, we found no association of cardiovascular events with PPI treatment. Cardiovascular events appeared more frequent with PPI treatment in gastroesophageal reflux disorder trials, but results from this subgroup should be interpreted with the limitations of the analysis in mind, including sparse outcome counts and lack of individual patient data.

Predicting risk of suicidal behavior from insurance claims data vs. linked data from insurance claims and electronic health records.

PURPOSE: Observational studies assessing effects of medical products on suicidal behavior often rely on health record data to account for pre-existing risk. We assess whether high-dimensional models predicting suicide risk using data derived from insurance claims and electronic health records (EHRs) are superior to models using data from insurance claims alone. METHODS: Data were from seven large health systems identified outpatient mental health visits by patients aged 11 or older between 1/1/2009 and 9/30/2017. Data for the 5 years prior to each visit identified potential predictors of suicidal behavior typically available from insurance claims (e.g., mental health diagnoses, procedure codes, medication dispensings) and additional potential predictors available from EHRs (self-reported race and ethnicity, responses to Patient Health Questionnaire or PHQ-9 depression questionnaires). Nonfatal self-harm events following each visit were identified from insurance claims data and fatal self-harm events were identified by linkage to state mortality records. Random forest models predicting nonfatal or fatal self-harm over 90 days following each visit were developed in a 70% random sample of visits and validated in a held-out sample of 30%. Performance of models using linked claims and EHR data was compared to models using claims data only. RESULTS: Among 15 845 047 encounters by 1 574 612 patients, 99 098 (0.6%) were followed by a self-harm event within 90 days. Overall classification performance did not differ between the best-fitting model using all data (area under the receiver operating curve or AUC = 0.846, 95% CI 0.839-0.854) and the best-fitting model limited to data available from insurance claims (AUC = 0.846, 95% CI 0.838-0.853). Competing models showed similar classification performance across a range of cut-points and similar calibration performance across a range of risk strata. Results were similar when the sample was limited to health systems and time periods where PHQ-9 depression questionnaires were recorded more frequently. CONCLUSION: Investigators using health record data to account for pre-existing risk in observational studies of suicidal behavior need not limit that research to databases including linked EHR data.

Comparing the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) enrollment data death dates to the National Death Index (NDI).

PURPOSE: In the United States, the National Death Index (NDI) is the most complete source of death information, while epidemiologic studies with mortality outcomes often rely on U.S. Medicare data for outcome ascertainment. The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement of death information between the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare enrolment data and NDI. METHODS: Using Medicare and NDI data from 1999 through 2016, we identified Medicare beneficiaries who were reported dead in the CMS Medicare enrolment database (EDB) and Common Medicare Environment (CME), linked these beneficiaries to the NDI using CMS Health Insurance Claim number, and compared death dates between the two data sources. To assess agreement between our data sources, we calculated kappa scores; where a kappa of 1 indicates perfect agreement and a kappa of 0 indicates agreement equivalent to chance. We also examined CMS to NDI linkage and death date matching for stability over time. RESULTS: Of the 36 785 640, Medicare beneficiaries reported dead in CMS enrollment data from 1999 to 2016, 97.5% were linked to the NDI. A kappa score of 0.98 showed a near perfect agreement between NDI and CMS reported deaths. The percentage of linked cases exactly matching on death dates increased from 94.8% in 1999 to 99.4% in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest strong concordance between death dates as recorded by CMS enrollment data and the NDI in the entire Medicare population.

Systematic review of risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity of COVID-19 with therapies approved to treat multiple sclerosis.

There is growing concern that multiple sclerosis (MS) patients on certain therapies may be at higher risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a systematic literature review to examine the available data on U.S. therapies approved to treat MS and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe COVID-19 outcomes. We conducted searches in PubMed, Embase, and the WHO COVID-19 database through May 2, 2021, and retrieved articles describing clinical data on therapies approved to treat MS and the risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 or the effects of such therapies on clinical outcomes of COVID-19. The literature search identified a total of 411 articles: 97 in PubMed, 227 in Embase, and 87 in the WHO database. After excluding duplicates and screening, we identified 15 articles of interest. We identified an additional article through a broader secondary weekly search in PubMed. Thus, ultimately, we reviewed 16 observational studies. Available data, which suggest that MS patients treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies may be at increased risk for severe COVID-19, are subject to relevant limitations. Generally, studies did not identify increased risk for COVID-19 worsening with other therapies approved to treat MS. Based on observational data, biological plausibility, novelty of the drug-event association, and public health implications in a subpopulation with potential impaired response to the COVID-19 vaccines, this safety signal merits further monitoring.

Long-Term Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, and Death With Outpatient Use of Clarithromycin: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

In a retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink during 2000-2013, we evaluated long-term risks of death, stroke, and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in adults prescribed clarithromycin. Patients were outpatients aged 40-85 years, who were prescribed clarithromycin (n = 287,748), doxycycline (n = 267,729), or erythromycin (n = 442,999), or Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and either clarithromycin (n = 27,639) or metronidazole (n = 14,863). We analyzed time to death, stroke, or AMI with Cox proportional hazards regression. The long-term hazard ratio for death following 1 clarithromycin versus 1 doxycycline prescription was 1.29 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.21, 1.25), increasing to 1.62 (95% CI: 1.43, 1.84) for ≥5 prescriptions of clarithromycin versus ≥5 prescriptions for doxycycline. Erythromycin showed smaller risks in comparison with doxycycline. Stroke and AMI incidences were also increased after clarithromycin but with smaller hazard ratios than for mortality. For H. pylori eradication, the hazard ratio for mortality following clarithromycin versus metronidazole regimens was 1.09 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.18) overall, and it was higher (hazard ratio = 1.65, 95% CI: 0.88, 3.08) following ≥2 prescriptions in subjects not on statins at baseline. Outpatient clarithromycin use was associated with long-term mortality increases, with evidence for a similar, smaller increase with erythromycin.

Incidence of Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathy Following Initiation of Medications for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Descriptive Study.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Stimulant abuse is associated with cardiomyopathy, but cardiomyopathy rates with therapeutic use of stimulants for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are poorly characterized. Labels for methylphenidate, amphetamine, and atomoxetine caution against use in patients with cardiovascular disease. We sought to assess the incidence of new-onset heart failure or cardiomyopathy among initiators of these medications. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Using the Sentinel distributed database, we analyzed new-onset heart failure or cardiomyopathy among initiators of selected ADHD medications (amphetamine products including lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate, and atomoxetine), by duration of use (0-90, 91-180, 181-270, 271-365, 366-730, and 731-1095 days) and age group (<22, 22-44, 45-64, and ≥65 years). FINDINGS/RESULTS: In our sample of 2,012,948 initiators of ADHD medications, 44.6% were female, and 54.1% were younger than 22 years. Heart failure/cardiomyopathy rates in the age groups younger than 22 and 22 to 44 years old were less than 50 per 10,000 person-years, without clear trends by duration of use. The highest rates occurred soon after treatment initiation in the age group 65 years or older, with 1 case per 10.5 person-years of follow-up, or 950 cases per 10,000 person-years, for days 0-90. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure/cardiomyopathy rates were not higher over 3 years of ADHD medication use compared with shorter-term treatment. In older age groups, lower rates later in treatment could reflect depletion of patients predisposed to the outcome if they develop it soon after starting treatment.

Overall and cause-specific mortality in the Sentinel system: A power analysis.

PURPOSE: Mortality data within the Sentinel Death Tables remain generally uncharacterized. Assessment of mortality data within Sentinel will help inform its utility for medical product safety studies. METHODS: To determine if Sentinel contains sufficient all-cause and cause-specific mortality events to power postmarketing safety studies. We calculated crude rates of all-cause mortality and suicide and proportional mortality from suicide from 2004 to 2012 in seven Sentinel data partners. Results were stratified by data partner, sex, age group, and calendar year and compared with national estimates from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research. We performed sample size estimations for all-cause mortality and 10 leading causes of death. RESULTS: We observed 479 694 deaths, including 5811 suicides, during 68 million person-years of follow-up. Pooled mean death and suicide rates in the data partners were 710 and 8.6 per 100 000 person-years, respectively (vs 810 and 11.8 nationally). The mean proportional mortality from suicide among the data partners was 1.2%, compared with 1.5% nationally. National trends of decreasing overall mortality and increasing proportional mortality for suicide were reflected within Sentinel. We estimated that detecting hazard ratios of 1.25 and 3 would require 16 442 and 460 exposed patients, respectively, for overall mortality, and 1.3 million and 37 411, respectively, for suicide. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study to investigate mortality data in the Sentinel death tables. We found that all-cause mortality appeared well powered for use as a safety outcome and cause-specific mortality outcomes may be adequately powered in certain circumstances. Further investigation into the quality of the Sentinel death data is needed.

Stability of Suicide Risk Prediction Models During Changes in Health Care Delivery.

OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to use health records data to examine how the accuracy of statistical models predicting self-harm or suicide changed between 2015 and 2019, as health systems implemented suicide prevention programs. METHODS: Data from four large health systems were used to identify specialty mental health visits by patients ages ≥11 years, assess 311 potential predictors of self-harm (including demographic characteristics, historical risk factors, and index visit characteristics), and ascertain fatal or nonfatal self-harm events over 90 days after each visit. New prediction models were developed with logistic regression with LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) in random samples of visits (65%) from each calendar year and were validated in the remaining portion of the sample (35%). RESULTS: A model developed for visits from 2009 to mid-2015 showed similar classification performance and calibration accuracy in a new sample of about 13.1 million visits from late 2015 to 2019. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) ranged from 0.840 to 0.849 in the new sample, compared with 0.851 in the original sample. New models developed for each year for 2015-2019 had classification performance (AUC range 0.790-0.853), sensitivity, and positive predictive value similar to those of the previously developed model. Models selected similar predictors from 2015 to 2019, except for more frequent selection of depression questionnaire data in later years, when questionnaires were more frequently recorded. CONCLUSIONS: A self-harm prediction model developed with 2009-2015 visit data performed similarly when applied to 2015-2019 visits. New models did not yield superior performance or identify different predictors.

Suicide and Intentional Self-harm Among Older Men Treated With 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitor or Alpha-blockers for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of intentional self-harm (ISH) and suicide in older men using 5-α reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) and alpha-blockers for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Observational research of older men with BPH suggested an increase in ISH with 5-ARI use compared with nonuse; we aimed to address potential confounding by indication with an active comparator reference group. METHODS: Using Medicare data linked to the National Death Index (NDI) from 2007-2016, we implemented a retrospective cohort design in males aged ≥65 years who initiated 5-ARI or alpha-blocker use for BPH. ISH was identified using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes. Suicides were identified through cause-of-death information from the NDI. We used inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards regression to compare time-to-event between treatment groups, with robust variance estimation. RESULTS: The event rates for ISH and suicide, respectively, were 0.314 and 0.308 per 1000 person-years (PY) among 5-ARI users (n = 181,675), and 0.364 and 0.382 per 1000PY among alpha-blocker users (n = 850,476). For 5-ARI use relative to alpha-blocker use, hazard ratios (HRs) for ISH and suicide, respectively, were 0.88 (95% CI:0.62-1.25) and 0.82 (95% CI:0.54-1.24); for the composite outcome (non-fatal ISH or suicide), the HR was 0.88 (95% CI:0.66-1.16). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses supported these results. CONCLUSION: 5-ARI use was not associated with an increased risk for ISH or suicide compared to alpha-blocker use in older men with BPH. Study limitations included low event rates and potentially low sensitivity for ISH events.

Use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of severe COVID-19: A case-control study in United States Medicare beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised regarding proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Observational studies have yielded heterogeneous results and were subject to important methodological limitations. AIMS: To examine the association between the receipt of PPIs and risk of COVID-19 hospitalizations and severe in-hospital outcomes or death. METHODS: Case-control study among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 66+ years old with gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD). Within this population, we identified cases by an incident hospital discharge diagnosis of COVID-19 from April 1 to December 11, 2020, using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) U07.1, and randomly selected up to 10 controls per case, matched on date and neighborhood. We defined PPI use as a prescription providing ≥15 days of supply in the 30 days before admission, with H2-receptor antagonist (H2RA) use as the reference to account for indication. We analyzed uncomplicated hospitalizations and hospitalizations with severe outcomes (intensive/coronary care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, or death), estimating odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with multinomial conditional logistic regression adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, chronic medications, and health care utilization. RESULTS: We matched 25,867 uncomplicated and 12,954 severe hospitalized COVID-19 cases to 146,972 and 73,104 controls, respectively. Cases tended to be older and have more comorbidities. Relative to H2RA use, we found no association of PPI use with uncomplicated COVID-19 hospitalization (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93-1.06) or severe COVID-19 hospitalization (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.91-1.10). CONCLUSIONS: Relative to H2RA use, PPI use was not associated with uncomplicated or severe COVID-19 hospitalizations among Medicare beneficiaries with GERD.

Bleeding events following concurrent use of warfarin and oseltamivir by Medicare beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: During the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency received case reports suggesting a potentiation of warfarin anticoagulation by the antiviral drug oseltamivir. We evaluated this putative interaction using Medicare data. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of bleeding following addition of oseltamivir or comparator drugs among Medicare beneficiaries taking warfarin. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort evaluation using Medicare nationwide data. Cohort members were Medicare Parts A, B, and D beneficiaries from June 30, 2006 to October 31, 2010 receiving warfarin for at least 1 month prior to a concomitant drug of interest (oseltamivir, ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors). Bleeding within 14 days of new prescriptions for oseltamivir or comparators was identified using inpatient or emergency department ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision) discharge diagnosis codes for gastrointestinal hemorrhage, epistaxis, hematuria, and intracranial bleeding. Patients with bleeding within 30 days preceding the prescription concomitant to warfarin were excluded. RESULTS: With concomitant ACE inhibitors as reference, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for any bleeding events within 14 days were 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-1.88), 1.24 (95% CI = 0.97-1.57), and 2.74 (95% CI = 2.53-3.03), for warfarin plus ampicillin, oseltamivir, and TMP-SMX, respectively. In a sensitivity analysis, adjusted ORs over a 7-day period were 1.89 (95% CI = 1.29-2.59), 1.47 (95% CI = 1.06-2.02), and 3.07 (95% CI = 2.76-3.49) for warfarin plus ampicillin, oseltamivir, and TMP-SMX, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding with oseltamivir plus warfarin was not significantly increased over a 14-day observation period; a sensitivity analysis showed a statistically significant increase over a 7-day period; in contrast, the data consistently showed the known tendency of TMP-SMX to potentiate the effects of warfarin. The results should be interpreted with the limitations of this approach in mind, including the inability to control for unmeasured confounders.

The use of analgesics for intentional self-poisoning: Trends in U.S. poison center data.

In the U.S., intentional self-poisonings with analgesics that are available without a prescription increased from 2000 to 2018. Given concerns regarding mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic, we examined and compared trends in pediatric and adult intentional self-poisoning with acetaminophen, aspirin, ibuprofen, and naproxen from 2016 to 2021 using the National Poison Data System (NPDS) to see if these trends have continued. We extracted annual case counts of all suspected suicide attempts from intentional poisoning, and of suspected suicide attempts resulting in major effects or death, from the NPDS for non-prescription single ingredient adult formulation acetaminophen, non-prescription single ingredient adult formulation aspirin, single ingredient formulation ibuprofen, and single ingredient formulation naproxen. We enumerated the cases by year, age, and gender. Most cases of intentional self-poisoning within the review period involved acetaminophen and ibuprofen and the 13-19-year-olds constituted the highest proportion of intentional self-poisoning cases across age groups for all four analgesics. Cases involving females predominated cases involving males by 3:1 or greater. The 13-19-year-old age group also represented the largest proportion of cases that resulted in major clinical effects or deaths. An increasing trend in suicide poisoning cases with acetaminophen and ibuprofen was observed in the 6-19-years age group and this trend appeared to exacerbate from 2020 to 2021 corresponding with the start of the COVID-19 pandemic period.

Risk of Severe COVID-19 in Prevalent Users of Alpha-1 Adrenergic Receptor Antagonists: A National Case-Control Study of Medicare Beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonists prevent cytokine storm in mouse sepsis models. This led to the hypothesis that alpha-1 blockers may prevent severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is characterized by hypercytokinemia and progressive respiratory failure. METHODS: We performed an observational case-control study in male Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older, with or without benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and treated with alpha-1 receptor blockers or 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for outcomes of uncomplicated and severe COVID-19 hospitalization (intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, or death). RESULTS: There were 20,963 cases of hospitalized COVID-19 matched to 101,161 controls on calendar date and neighborhood of residence. In the primary analysis (males with BPH), there was no difference in risk of uncomplicated COVID-19 hospitalization (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.996-1.17) or hospitalization with severe complications (aOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.88-1.08). In the secondary analysis (males with or without BPH), the corresponding aORs were 1.02 (95% CI, 0.96-1.09) (uncomplicated) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.91-1.07) (complicated), respectively. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Of note, there was no difference in risk of severe COVID-19 hospitalization when comparing non-selective vs selective alpha-1 blocker use (aOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.10), higher- vs lower-dose alpha-1 blocker use (aOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86-1.08), or current vs remote alpha-1 blocker use (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 0.91-1.18). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalent use of alpha-1 receptor blockers was not associated with a protective or harmful effect on risk of uncomplicated or severe hospitalized COVID-19.

Risk of hospitalized depression and intentional self-harm with brand and authorized generic sertraline.

BACKGROUND: Recent suggestions of therapeutic inequivalence of brand and generic sertraline have raised concerns about disproportionately higher adverse events among generic users. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of confounding in a comparison of the risks of worsening depression and intentional self-harm (ISH) between users of brand name sertraline and its pharmaceutically equivalent authorized generic (AG). METHODS: Using a retrospective new-user cohort design, we identified patients with a diagnosis code for depression aged ≥12 years who were continuously enrolled in a Sentinel Data Partner health plan for ≥180 days before their first sertraline dispensing between June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2015. New use was defined as no evidence of sertraline dispensing in the 180 days before index date. We matched each brand name user to up to 10 AG users using propensity scores (PS) and conducted case-centered logistic regression to assess the risks of hospitalized depression and ISH. RESULTS: Before PS matching, brand name users were significantly less likely to be hospitalized for depression [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-0.94)]. However, in the matched analysis, we observed no statistical difference between brand and AG users [HR = 0.84 (95% CI: 0.59-1.21)]. The risk of ISH did not significantly differ between the exposure groups in unmatched (HR = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.60-1.62) and matched analyses [HR = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.49-1.70). CONCLUSION: In depressed patients receiving brand versus AG sertraline, patient characteristics confounded the association with hospitalization. Baseline differences were ameliorated by PS matching resulting in no statistical difference between brand and AG sertraline users.

Mortality Among Parkinson's Disease Patients Treated With Pimavanserin or Atypical Antipsychotics: An Observational Study in Medicare Beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: Pimavanserin, a serotonin 5-HT2 antagonist, is indicated for treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis. In premarketing trials in patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis, 11% of patients died during open-label pimavanserin treatment. Antipsychotics, which are used off-label in Parkinson's disease psychosis, increase mortality in dementia patients. The authors compared mortality with pimavanserin and atypical antipsychotics in a large database. METHODS: This was a retrospective new-user cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with Parkinson's disease initiating pimavanserin (N=3,227) or atypical antipsychotics (N=18,442) from April 2016 to March 2019. All-cause mortality hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated for pimavanserin compared with atypical antipsychotics, using segmented proportional hazards regression over 1-180 and 181+ days of treatment. Potential confounding was addressed through inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: Pimavanserin users had a mean age of approximately 78 years, and 45% were female. Before IPTW, some comorbidities were more prevalent in atypical antipsychotic users; after IPTW, comorbidities were well balanced between groups. In the first 180 days of treatment, mortality was approximately 35% lower with pimavanserin than with atypical antipsychotics (hazard ratio=0.65, 95% CI=0.53, 0.79), with approximately one excess death per 30 atypical antipsychotic-treated patients; however, during treatment beyond 180 days, there was no additional mortality advantage with pimavanserin (hazard ratio=1.05, 95% CI=0.82, 1.33). Pimavanserin showed no mortality advantage in nursing home patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pimavanserin use was associated with lower mortality than atypical antipsychotic use during the first 180 days of treatment, but only in community-dwelling patients, not nursing home residents.

Accuracy of ICD-10-CM encounter diagnoses from health records for identifying self-harm events.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the accuracy of ICD-10-CM coding of self-harm injuries and poisonings to identify self-harm events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 7 integrated health systems, records data identified patients reporting frequent suicidal ideation. Records then identified subsequent ICD-10-CM injury and poisoning codes indicating self-harm as well as selected codes in 3 categories where uncoded self-harm events might be found: injuries and poisonings coded as undetermined intent, those coded accidental, and injuries with no coding of intent. For injury and poisoning encounters with diagnoses in those 4 groups, relevant clinical text was extracted from records and assessed by a blinded panel regarding documentation of self-harm intent. RESULTS: Diagnostic codes selected for review include all codes for self-harm, 43 codes for undetermined intent, 26 codes for accidental intent, and 46 codes for injuries without coding of intent. Clinical text was available for review for 285 events originally coded as self-harm, 85 coded as undetermined intent, 302 coded as accidents, and 438 injury events with no coding of intent. Blinded review of full-text clinical records found documentation of self-harm intent in 254 (89.1%) of those originally coded as self-harm, 24 (28.2%) of those coded as undetermined, 24 (7.9%) of those coded as accidental, and 48 (11.0%) of those without coding of intent. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients at high risk, nearly 90% of injuries and poisonings with ICD-10-CM coding of self-harm have documentation of self-harm intent. Reliance on ICD-10-CM coding of intent to identify self-harm would fail to include a small proportion of true self-harm events.

Changes in US antidepressant and antipsychotic prescription patterns during a period of FDA actions.

PURPOSE: To determine if paroxetine versus non-paroxetine selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) prescribing changed after the June 2003 FDA Paroxetine Public Health Advisory (PPHA) and if antidepressant and antipsychotic prescribing changed after the February 2004 FDA Advisory Committee Meeting (FDACM). METHODS: Ecologic analysis using estimates of patients dispensed antidepressants and antipsychotics, census data, and promotional spending data. Data sources were SDI: Vector One(R), US Census, and IMS Health(R). Measures were monthly use levels (number of patients dispensed antidepressants, antipsychotics, paroxetine, and non-paroxetine SSRIs prescriptions by age group per population count). Percent changes pre- to post-PPHA were used to assess changes in paroxetine versus non-paroxetine SSRIs prescribing. Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis was performed to examine use level changes post-FDACM by drug groups (all antidepressants and all antipsychotics). RESULTS: Post-PPHA mean paroxetine use levels decreased for all age groups (range: 5.5-34.1%). Mean non-paroxetine SSRIs use levels increased (range: 4.6-17.1%). Post-PPHA changes were greatest for 6-12 and 13-17 year olds. Decreased mean antidepressant drug use levels from pre- to post-FDACM were observed in all groups under 25 years old. A statistically significant decrease in the slopes from pre- to post-FDACM was observed for persons aged 13-17 and 18-24 years. The difference between the forecasted mean use level and the observed mean use level (in 12-month intervals) was statistically significant for all ages combined (-107.26; 95% CI: -166.32, -48.20) and 1-5 (-3.1; 95% CI: -4.62, -1.58), 6-12 (-36.02; 95% CI: -62.92, -9.12) and 25 years, and older groups (-83.17; 95% CI: -153.95, -12.39). For all age groups, decreases in the slopes of antipsychotic drugs use from pre- to post-FDACM were observed, although these slope changes were not statistically significant. The difference between the forecasted mean antipsychotic drugs use level and the observed mean use level (in 12-month intervals) was statistically significantly lower for all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant use changed post-PPHA and -FDACM, with a differential pattern by age. There was no evidence of increased antipsychotic use post-FDACM. Ecologic data cannot determine if changes were due to depression not treated with medications or the prescribing of fewer antidepressants for other conditions.

Spectrum of central anticholinergic adverse effects associated with oxybutynin: comparison of pediatric and adult cases.

We reviewed Food and Drug Administration postmarketing reports of central nervous system (CNS) anticholinergic effects in association with oxybutynin. Taking domestic usage by age group into account, there is a disproportionately higher number of CNS adverse event cases reported in pediatric patients as compared with adult patients. CNS stimulation was prominent in the pediatric cases.