Effects of preprandial versus postprandial nutritional insulin administration in the inpatient setting.

AIMS: Hospitalized patients can have inconsistent nutritional intake due to acute illness, changing diet, or unpredictable meal delivery. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether implementation of a hospital-wide policy shifting nutritional insulin administration from pre-meal to post-meal was associated with changes in glycemic control or length of stay (LOS). METHODS: This retrospective study performed at a community hospital evaluated adult inpatients receiving nutritional insulin across three time periods. pre-intervention, immediate post-intervention, and distant post-intervention. Outcomes included rates of hypoglycemia (glucose ≤ 70 mg/dL), moderate hypoglycemia (< 54 mg/dL), severe hypoglycemia (≤ 40 mg/dL), severe hyperglycemia (≥ 300 mg/dL), daily mean glucose level, and LOS. RESULTS: The number of patient-days analyzed across the cohorts were 1948, 1751, and 3244, respectively. After multivariate adjustment, risk of developing any hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia significantly decreased over time (p = 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively). Daily mean glucose increased over time (194.6 ± 62.5 vs 196.8 ± 65.5 vs 199.3 ± 61.5 mg/dL; p = 0.003), but there were no significant differences among rates of severe hyperglycemia (p = 0.10) or LOS (p = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a hospital-wide shift to postprandial nutritional insulin administration significantly reduced hypoglycemia rates without increasing severe hyperglycemia. This suggests a promising strategy for improving patient safety, but further prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Effects of the COVID-19 booster vaccine on glycemia and insulin resistance in people with type 1 diabetes: A prospective pilot study.

AIMS: Inflammation can trigger hyperglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Vaccines purposefully intend to cause an acute immunogenic response, and booster vaccines may cause even more potent immunologic responses. However, the effects of vaccines on glycemic control and insulin requirements in the days immediately post-vaccination remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to examine the changes in glycemic control and insulin usage immediately preceding and following a COVID-19 booster vaccine among adults with T1D. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study of adults with T1D, participants wore blinded Dexcom G6 Pro continuous glucose monitors for 10 days. After a baseline period, participants received a COVID-19 booster vaccine, and subsequent changes in glycemic indices were evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 21 enrolled participants, 38% received a Moderna and 62% Pfizer-BioNTech booster. Compared to baseline (162.9 ± 44.1 mg/dL), mean glucose was significantly increased at Day 2 (172.8 ± 47.0 mg/dL; p = 0.04) and Day 3 (173.1 ± 45.0 mg/dL; p = 0.02) post-vaccination. Insulin resistance was also increased on Day 2 (p = 0.03). There were no differences in outcome metrics between booster vaccine manufacturers. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that adults with type 1 diabetes may experience transient mild glycemic elevations after receiving a COVID-19 booster vaccination. Studies examining the effects of other vaccines are warranted.

Inpatient Insulin Pen Implementation, Waste, and Potential Cost Savings: A Community Hospital Experience.

BACKGROUND: Insulin pen injectors ("pens") are intended to facilitate a patient's self-administration of insulin and can be used in hospitalized patients as a learning opportunity. Unnecessary or duplicate dispensation of insulin pens is associated with increased healthcare costs. METHODS: Inpatient dispensation of insulin pens in a 240-bed community hospital between July 2018 and July 2019 was analyzed. We calculated the percentage of insulin pens unnecessarily dispensed for patients who had the same type of insulin pen assigned. The estimated cost of insulin pen waste was calculated. A pharmacist-led task force group implemented hospital-wide awareness and collaborated with hospital leadership to define goals and interventions. RESULTS: 9516 insulin pens were dispensed to 3121 patients. Of the pens dispensed, 6451 (68%) were insulin aspart and 3065 (32%) were glargine. Among patients on insulin aspart, an average of 2.2 aspart pens was dispensed per patient, but only an estimated 1.2 pens/patient were deemed necessary. Similarly, for inpatients prescribed glargine, an average of 2.1 pens/patient was dispensed, but only 1.3 pens/patient were necessary. A number of gaps were identified and interventions were undertaken to reduce insulin pen waste, which resulted in a significant decrease in both aspart (p = 0.0002) and glargine (p = 0.0005) pens/patient over time. Reductions in pen waste resulted in an estimated cost savings of $66 261 per year. CONCLUSIONS: In a community hospital setting, identification of causes leading to unnecessary insulin dispensation and implementation of hospital-wide staff education led to change in insulin pen dispensation practice. These changes translated into considerable cost savings and facilitated diabetes self-management education.

Retrospective Quality Improvement Study of Insulin-Induced Hypoglycemia and Implementation of Hospital-Wide Initiatives.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients who are receiving antihyperglycemic agents are at increased risk for hypoglycemia. Inpatient hypoglycemia may lead to increased risk for morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and readmission within 30 days of discharge, which in turn may lead to increased costs. Hospital-wide initiatives targeting hypoglycemia are known to be beneficial; however, their impact on patient care and economic measures in community nonteaching hospitals are unknown. METHODS: This retrospective quality improvement study examined the effects of hospital-wide hypoglycemia initiatives on the rates of insulin-induced hypoglycemia in a community hospital setting from January 1, 2016, until September 30, 2019. The potential cost of care savings has been calculated. RESULTS: Among 49 315 total patient days, 2682 days had an instance of hypoglycemia (5.4%). Mean ± SD hypoglycemic patient days/month was 59.6 ± 16.0. The frequency of hypoglycemia significantly decreased from 7.5% in January 2016 to 3.9% in September 2019 (P = .001). Patients with type 2 diabetes demonstrated a significant decrease in the frequency of hypoglycemia (7.4%-3.8%; P < .0001), while among patients with type 1 diabetes the frequency trended downwards but did not reach statistical significance (18.5%-18.0%; P = 0.08). Based on the reduction of hypoglycemia rates, the hospital had an estimated cost of care savings of $98 635 during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: In a community hospital setting, implementation of hospital-wide initiatives targeting hypoglycemia resulted in a significant and sustainable decrease in the rate of insulin-induced hypoglycemia. These high-leverage risk reduction strategies may be translated into considerable cost savings and could be implemented at other community hospitals.