Sodium flux during hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration treatment of acute kidney injury: Effects of dialysate and infusate sodium concentration at 140 and 145 mmol/L.

BACKGROUND: A higher sodium (Na) dialysate concentration is recommended during renal replacement therapy (RRT) of acute kidney injury (AKI) to improve intradialytic hemodynamic tolerance, but it may lead to Na loading to the patient. We aimed to evaluate Na flux according to Na dialysate and infusate concentrations at 140 and 145 mmol/L during hemodialysis (HD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF). METHODS: Fourteen AKI patients that underwent consecutive HD or HDF sessions with Na dialysate/infusate at 140 and 145 mmol/L were included. Per-dialytic flux of Na was estimated using mean sodium logarithmic concentration including diffusive and convective influx. We compared the flux of sodium between HD140 and 145, and between HDF140 and 145. RESULTS: Nine HD140, ten HDF140, nine HD145, and 11 HDF145 sessions were analyzed. A Na gradient from the dialysate/replacement fluid to the patient was observed with dialysate/infusate Na at 145 mmol/L in both HD and HDF (p = 0.01). The comparison of HD145 to HD140 showed that higher Na dialysate induced a diffusive Na gradient to the patient (163 mmol vs. -25 mmol, p = 0.004) and that of HDF145 to -140 (211 vs. 36 mmol, p = 0.03) as well. Intradialytic hemodynamic tolerance was similar across all RRT sessions. CONCLUSIONS: During both HD and HDF, a substantial Na loading occurred with a Na dialysate and infusate at 145 mmol/L. This Na loading is smaller in HDF with Na dialysate and infusate concentration at 140 mmol/L and inversed with HD140. Clinical and intradialytic hemodynamic tolerance was fair regardless of Na dialysate and infusate.

Early and late effects of volatile sedation with sevoflurane on respiratory mechanics of critically ill COPD patients.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to compare sevoflurane, a volatile sedation agent with potential bronchodilatory properties, with propofol on respiratory mechanics in critically ill patients with COPD exacerbation. METHODS: Prospective study in an ICU enrolling critically ill intubated patients with severe COPD exacerbation and comparing propofol and sevoflurane after 1:1 randomisation. Respiratory system mechanics (airway resistance, PEEPi, trapped volume, ventilatory ratio and respiratory system compliance), gas exchange, vitals, safety and outcome were measured at inclusion and then until H48. Total airway resistance change from baseline to H48 in both sevoflurane and propofol groups was the main endpoint. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled and were sedated for 126 h(61-228) in the propofol group and 207 h(171-216) in the sevoflurane group. At baseline, airway resistance was 21.6cmH2O/l/s(19.8-21.6) in the propofol group and 20.4cmH2O/l/s(18.6-26.4) in the sevoflurane group, (p = 0.73); trapped volume was 260 ml(176-290) in the propofol group and 73 ml(35-126) in the sevoflurane group, p = 0.02. Intrinsic PEEP was 1.5cmH2O(1-3) in both groups after external PEEP optimization. There was neither early (H4) or late (H48) significant difference in airway resistance and respiratory mechanics parameters between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients intubated with COPD exacerbation, there was no significant difference in respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol from inclusion to H4 and H48.

Simultaneous monitoring of noninvasive hemodynamic profile and capnography for tissue perfusion evaluation.

To study the simultaneous variations of end-tidal CO2 pressure (PetCO2) and aortic blood flow (ABF) during modifications of tissue perfusion, continuous noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring and continuous recording of PetCO2 were performed on 30 patients under general anesthesia and artificial mechanical ventilation. The 30 patients underwent orthopedic surgery on one of the lower limbs using a hemostatic tourniquet. Deflation of the pneumatic tourniquet resulted in a rise of ABF up to 39% (P<0.001), a rise of PetCO2 up to 17% (P<0.001), and a drop of total vascular systemic resistance (TVSR) of 59% (P<0.001). In all cases, the gradient of Paco2-PetCO2 showed mean variations of 1.2±0.5 mmHg. According to these results, the observed variations can not be explained by an alteration of the Ventilation/Perfusion (Vo/Q) ratio alone. It may be suggested that tissue hypoperfusion produced by a tourniquet generates CO2 and other metabolic products accumulation in tissues, which are removed during reperfusion. This would be expected to produce parallel increases in ABF and PetCO2. If the results are confirmed with further studies, rapid variations of PetCO2 during anesthesia may provide a noninvasive means of assessing the quality of global tissue perfusion.