Human Genetic and Immunological Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces pneumonia and acute respiratory failure in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with inborn errors of immunity to type I interferon (IFN-I). The impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection varies widely, ranging from mild respiratory symptoms to life-threatening illness and organ failure, with a higher incidence in men than in women. Approximately 3 to 5% of critical COVID-19 patients under 60 and a smaller percentage of elderly patients exhibit genetic defects in IFN-I production, including X-chromosome-linked TLR7 and autosomal TLR3 deficiencies. Around 15 to 20% of cases over 70 years old, and a smaller percentage of younger patients, present with preexisting autoantibodies neutralizing type I interferons. Additionally, innate errors affecting the control of the response to type I interferon have been associated with pediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C). Several studies have described rare errors of immunity, such as XIAP deficiency, CYBB, SOCS1, OAS1/2, and RNASEL, as underlying factors in MIS-C susceptibility. However, further investigations in expanded patient cohorts are needed to validate these findings and pave the way for new genetic approaches to MIS-C. This review aims to present recent evidence from the scientific literature on genetic and immunological abnormalities predisposing individuals to critical SARS-CoV-2 infection through IFN-I. We will also discuss multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Understanding the immunological mechanisms and pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 may inform personalized patient care and population protection strategies against future serious viral infections.

Genetic Diagnosis of Inborn Errors of Immunity in an Emerging Country: a Retrospective Study of 216 Moroccan Patients.

PURPOSE: Genetic testing provides great support to validate the clinical diagnosis of inborn errors of immunity (IEI). However, the high cost and advanced technology make these tests inaccessible to a large proportion of patients in low-income countries. In the present study, we aim to evaluate the Moroccan experience in genetic testing and to report the main molecular features and difficulties encountered in genetic diagnosis. METHODS: We performed a multi-center retrospective analysis of all patients with a molecular diagnosis and registered in the national registry between 2010 and 2022. To estimate the impact of the newly identified mutations, we calculated the Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) score and the mutation significance cutoff (MSC) for each variant. RESULTS: A total of 216 (29%) patients received a genetic diagnosis out of 742 patients with IEI included in the registry. All genetic tests were performed in the context of thesis projects (40%) or international collaborations (60%). A set of 55 genetic defects were identified, including 7 newly reported: SNORA31, TBX21, SPPL2A, TYK2, RLTPR, ZNF341, and STAT2 GOF. Genetic diagnoses were more frequent in the defects of innate and intrinsic immunity with a percentage of 78%, while antibody deficiencies had a lower frequency with a percentage of 17.5%. Only one genetic diagnosis has been made in the complement deficiency group. The most commonly used molecular techniques were Sanger sequencing (37%) followed by targeted gene sequencing (31%). CONCLUSION: The thesis projects and collaborations were beneficial as they allowed us to provide a definitive genetic diagnosis to 29% of the patients and to contribute to the identification of new genetic defects and mutations. These results offer insight into the progress made in genetic diagnoses of IEI in Morocco, which would provide a baseline for improving the clinical management of patients with IEI.

The 2022 Update of IUIS Phenotypical Classification for Human Inborn Errors of Immunity.

The International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS) expert committee (EC) on Inborn Errors of Immunity (IEI) reports here the 2022 updated phenotypic classification, which accompanies and complements the most-recent genotypic classification. This phenotypic classification is aimed for clinicians at the bedside and focuses on clinical features and laboratory phenotypes of specific IEI. In this classification, 485 IEI underlying phenotypes as diverse as infection, malignancy, allergy, auto-immunity and auto-inflammation are described, including 55 novel monogenic defects and 1 autoimmune phenocopy. Therefore, all 485 diseases of the genetic classification are presented in this paper in the form of colored tables with essential clinical or immunological phenotype entries.

Insights into the genetic theory of infectious diseases.

Over the past century, classical approaches from microbiology and immunology have produced spectacular results in the control of infectious diseases. However, the recent SARS-COV-2 pandemic has highlighted our continued failure to control some infections. Other microorganisms still pose a threat to humanity such as HIV, Ebola, and influenza viruses. It seems that conventional approaches are not able to solve all the current problems caused by infectious diseases. Human genetics has shown that infections have a strong genetic determinism that can lead to a predisposition or resistance to infections. This explains much of the clinical variability observed in individuals infected with the same pathogen. The identification of the genetic etiology allows a better understanding of the pathogenesis of infectious diseases and, consequently, the consideration of appropriate preventive and therapeutic strategies. This review provides insights into the genetic theory and the concrete evidence to support it. We highlight the role of primary immunodeficiencies in the discovery of Mendelian and monogenic susceptibility to infections, then we show how genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, redundancy, and resistance to infection manifest in the context of this genetic determinism. To effectively combat the constant threat of microbes, it is essential to integrate human genetics with microbiology to examine the interactions between pathogens and our immune system.

Effectiveness of natural immune protection against COVID-19 reinfection: systematic review with meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The future of the COVID-19 pandemic depends on the evolution of the virus and immune protection stimulated by vaccination or upon exposure to natural infection. While most research focuses on vaccine efficacy, data remain unclear on the efficacy and duration of natural immune protection against infection. AIM: In this article, we aim to determine the efficacy of natural immune protection against reinfection with COVID-19 or severe COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of available studies in electronic databases followed by a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of natural immune protection against COVID-19 reinfection and severe infection. RESULTS: Of the 414 studies identified for the full review, 8 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The total number of individuals participating in the 8 studies included 19,837,147 people. Individuals with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection (1,9% [0,6%-3,1%]) had a lower rate of infection than individuals without a history of infection (7,1% [3,9%-10,1%]). The mean efficacy of natural immune protection against reinfection was 84,7% [78,5%-90,9%], while the mean efficacy of natural immune protection against severe COVID-19 infection was 96,9% [94%-99,6%]. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that natural immune protection against reinfection is high, particularly against severe COVID-19. However, further research is needed to determine the duration of natural immune protection and the impact of different variants of SARS-CoV-2.