Viruses in bronchiectasis: a pilot study to explore the presence of community acquired respiratory viruses in stable patients and during acute exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: Bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory condition. Persistent bacterial colonisation in the stable state with increased and sometimes altered bacterial burden during exacerbations are accepted as key features in the pathophysiology. The extent to which respiratory viruses are present during stable periods and in exacerbations is less well understood. METHODS: This study aimed to determine the incidence of respiratory viruses within a cohort of bronchiectasis patients with acute exacerbations at a teaching hospital and, separately, in a group of patients with stable bronchiectasis. In the group of stable patients, a panel of respiratory viruses were assayed for using real time quantitative PCR in respiratory secretions and exhaled breath. The Impact of virus detection on exacerbation rates and development of symptomatic infection was evaluated. RESULTS: Routine hospital-based viral PCR testing was only requested in 28% of admissions for an exacerbation. In our cohort of stable bronchiectasis patients, viruses were detected in 92% of patients during the winter season, and 33% of patients during the summer season. In the 2-month follow up period, 2 of 27 patients presented with an exacerbation. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated that respiratory viruses are commonly detected in patients with stable bronchiectasis. They are frequently detected during asymptomatic viral periods, and multiple viruses are often present concurrently.

Transplanting the pulmonary virome: Dynamics of transient populations.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation provides a unique opportunity to investigate the dynamics of the human pulmonary virome that is transplanted within the donor lungs. The pulmonary virome comprises both "resident" and "transient" viruses. In this study we aimed to analyze the dynamics of the "transient" members. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective, longitudinal investigation of community-acquired respiratory viruses detected in nasopharyngeal swabs, swabs of explanted and donor lungs, and serial bronchoalveolar lavages post-transplant. RESULTS: Fifty-two consecutive lung transplant recipients were recruited (bilateral:heart‒lung:bilateral lung-liver = 48:2:2) (age [mean ± SD] 48 ± 15 years, range 20 to 63 years; 27 males and 25 females). Follow-up was 344 ± 120 (range 186 to 534) days. Seventeen of 45 explanted lungs were positive for influenza A and/or B (A = 14, B = 2, A+B = 1), despite recipient vaccination and negative nasal swabs, and 4 of 45 had human rhinovirus and 2 of 45 parainfluenza. Donor swabs showed influenza (A = 1, B = 1) and rhinovirus (n = 3). Day 1 lavage showed influenza A (n = 28), rhinovirus (n = 9), and parainfluenza (n = 1). Forty-seven of 52 recipients had a positive lavage for virus (38 of 47 on multiple lavages). Influenza persisted for 59 ± 38 (range 4 to 147) days in 27 of 52, and 14 had a single isolate. Rhinovirus persisted for 95 ± 84 (range 22 to 174) days in 13 of 52, and 13 had a single isolate. Analysis of 118 paired transbronchial biopsies and lavage demonstrated no association between viruses and acute cellular rejection (Fisher's exact test, 2 tailed, p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Using a sensitive uniplex polymerase chain reaction we found that the transplanted pulmonary virome often includes community-acquired respiratory viruses, including influenza, which are variably persistent but not associated with acute rejection.

Spirometry filters can be used to detect exhaled respiratory viruses.

Respiratory viruses are very common in the community and contribute to the burden of illness for patients with chronic respiratory diseases, including acute exacerbations. Traditional sampling methods are invasive and problematic to repeat. Accordingly, we explored whether respiratory viruses could be isolated from disposable spirometry filters and whether detection of viruses in this context represented presence in the upper or lower respiratory tract. Discovery (n = 53) and validation (n = 49) cohorts were recruited from a hospital outpatient department during two different time periods. Spirometry mouthpiece filters were collected from all participants. Respiratory secretions were sampled from the upper and lower respiratory tract by nasal washing (NW), sputum, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). All samples were examined using RT-PCR to identify a panel of respiratory viruses (rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, influenza A, influenza B, parainfluenza virus 1, 2 & 3, and human metapneumovirus). Rhinovirus was quantified using qPCR. Paired filter-NW samples (n = 29), filter-sputum samples (n = 24), filter-BAL samples (n = 39) and filter-NW-BAL samples (n = 10) provided a range of comparisons. At least one virus was detected in any sample in 85% of participants in the discovery cohort versus 45% in the validation cohort. Overall, 72% of viruses identified in the paired comparator method matched those detected in spirometry filters. There was a high correlation between viruses identified in spirometry filters compared with viruses identified in both the upper and lower respiratory tract using traditional sampling methods. Our results suggest that examination of spirometry filters may be a novel and inexpensive sampling method for the presence of respiratory viruses in exhaled breath.