Clinical Utility of Inflammatory and Nutritious Index as Therapeutic Prediction of Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Biomarkers for predicting the outcome of ipilimumab plus nivolumab (Nivo-Ipi) treatment in cancer patients have not been identified. Herein, we investigated the prognostic significance of inflammatory and nutritional markers in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving Nivo-Ipi. METHODS: Our study retrospectively analyzed 101 patients with advanced NSCLC who received Nivo-Ipi at a single institution. Inflammatory and nutritional indices were correlated with patient outcomes and included the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS). RESULTS: The NLR significantly correlated with the PLR, SII, PNI, ALI, and GPS. Regarding therapeutic efficacy, the NLR, SII, and PNI predicted a partial response, and all indices predicted progressive disease. In subgroup analyses, the SII, PNI, and ALI predicted the outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma, whereas only the PNI predicted the outcome of patients with non-adenocarcinoma. The PNI and SII were the most useful indices in patients with a programmed death ligand-1 expression level of <1% and ≥1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The NLR, PLR, SII, PNI, ALI, and GPS were significantly associated with the outcome of Nivo-Ipi treatment in patients with NSCLC. The PNI was the most suitable marker regardless of histological type. The SII and PNI were the most promising markers for patients with and without PD-L1 expression, respectively.

Clinical Issue of Myasthenia Gravis Related to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are pivotal in the management of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across various human neoplasms. While common irAEs are manageable by oncologists, the detailed features of rare complications related to ICI therapy remain elusive. Among these, immune-related myasthenia gravis (irMG) stands out as a life-threatening disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Research articles published in English between 2017 and 2023 were identified using the PubMed database. Forty-six relevant research studies were examined to collate information for this review. The incidence of ICI-induced MG was found to be less than 1.0%, with approximately 20-30% of irMG patients presenting with overlap syndrome involving myocarditis and myositis. The detection of acetylcholine receptor antibodies (AChR-Ab) and elevated creatinine kinase (CK) levels proved useful in identifying 50-70% and 60-80% of cases, respectively. However, the utility of muscle-specific kinase antibodies (MuSK-Ab) in detecting irMG was limited due to a low positivity rate (0-5.3%). Ptosis emerged as the most common initial symptom of irMG, with an approximate positivity rate of 80%. Recommended treatment for irMG involves high-dose steroids in conjunction with plasmapheresis or immunoglobulins to mitigate the increased mortality associated with irMG. Early initiation of immunosuppressive therapy is imperative to prevent the worsening of irMG. Furthermore, facilitating a fulfilling social life post-hospitalization is crucial. This review sheds light on the clinical aspects and management strategies pertaining to irMG.

Clinical significance of antinuclear antibody as prognostic marker for first-line pembrolizumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between antinuclear antibody (ANA) and the efficacy of programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade remains controversial. Here, we investigated the prognostic significance of ANA titer in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy as the first-line treatment, compared with that of platinum-based chemotherapy with PD-1 blockade. METHODS: Our clinical data based on the ANA titer (1:80) were retrospectively reviewed for patients with advanced NSCLC, who were treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy with PD-1 blockade. Immunohistochemical staining for tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes such as CD4, CD8 and Foxp3 was performed. RESULTS: Among 106 patients treated with pembrolizumab, 19 (17.9%) tested high for ANA. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in patients with high ANA than in those with low ANA, and high ANA was identified as an independent prognostic predictor, particularly in the subgroup with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) ≥ 50%. However, no statistically significant difference in PFS and OS based on the ANA titer was observed in 59 patients treated with combinational chemotherapy and immunotherapy. High numbers of intratumoral Foxp3 and stromal CD8 were significantly associated with low ANA. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of preexisting ANA titers was useful to prognose PD-1 blockade as a first-line setting, particularly for the PD-L1 ≥ 50% subgroup, but not in the case of combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of amrubicin monotherapy after atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

This study examined the activity and safety of amrubicin monotherapy among relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients who had previously been treated with atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (AteCE). This retrospective study evaluated patients with relapsed SCLC who were treated with previously AteCE combination therapy followed by amrubicin monotherapy between August 2019 and May 2021. Clinical efficacy and toxicity were analyzed. Overall, 40 patients were included: 12 and 28 patients had sensitive and refractory relapse, respectively. The response rate was 32.5% (25.0% in the sensitive group and 35.7% in the refractory group). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the first amrubicin treatment was 3.4 months (95% CI: 1.9-4.9 months) and 9.9 months (95% CI: 4.5-11.5 months), respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in median PFS (3.6 months vs. 3.2 months, p = 0.42) or median OS (11.2 months vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.78). Grade ≥ 3 hematological adverse events occurred as follows: decreased white blood cells in 52.5% of patients; decreased neutrophil count in 57.5%; and febrile neutropenia in 10.0%. Grade 3 pneumonitis was observed in one patient. There were no treatment-related deaths. Amrubicin is feasible and effective for relapsed SCLC patients previously treated with AteCE therapy. Although immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment (ICI) does not improve the effect of amrubicin, the toxicity is not increased, suggesting that amrubicin remains effective even after ICI administration. Thus, amrubicin after AteCE could be the preferred standard chemotherapeutic choice in patients with relapsed SCLC.

Osimertinib in poor performance status patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after progression of first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI treatments (NEJ032B).

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is effective in patients with T790M mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resistant to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, its effectiveness and safety in patients with poor performance status (PS) are unknown. METHODS: Enrolled patients showed disease progression after treatment with gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib; T790M mutation; stage IIIB, IV, or recurrent disease; and PS of 2-4. Osimertinib was orally administered at a dose of 80 mg/day. The primary endpoint of this phase II study (registration, jRCTs061180018) was response rate and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and safety. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled, of which 69.7% and 24.2% had PS of 2 and 3, respectively. One patient was excluded due to protocol violation; in the remaining 32 patients, the response rate was 53.1%; disease control rate was 75.0%; PFS was 5.1 months; and OS was 10.0 months. The most frequent adverse event of grade 3 or higher severity was lymphopenia (12.1%). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) was observed at all grades and at grades 3-5 in 15.2% (5/33) and 6.1% (2/33) of patients, respectively. Treatment-related death due to ILD occurred in one patient. Patients negative for activating EGFR mutations after osimertinib administration had longer median PFS than those positive for these mutations. CONCLUSION: Osimertinib was sufficiently effective in EGFR-TKI-resistant, poor PS patients with T790M mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. Plasma EGFR mutation clearance after TKI treatment could predict the response to EGFR-TKIs.

Post-Progression Survival Influences Overall Survival among Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the impact of first-line treatment on overall survival (OS) may be influenced by subsequent therapies. Thus, using patient-level data, we assessed the relationships of progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival (PPS) with OS among patients with high-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC. METHODS: We reviewed data from 133 patients with high PD-L1 expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC at 6 Japanese centers between February 2017 and December 2018. The correlations of PFS and PPS with OS were evaluated at the patient level. RESULTS: Linear regression analyses and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient revealed that PPS was strongly correlated with OS (r = 0.76, p < 0.05, R2 = 0.65), while PFS was only moderately correlated with OS (r = 0.71, p < 0.05, and R2 = 0.4). Furthermore, PPS was significantly associated with performance status at the end of pembrolizumab monotherapy, as well as the use of platinum-based combination chemotherapy after pembrolizumab monotherapy (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with high PD-L1 expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC, PPS was more strongly correlated with OS, relative to the relationship between PFS and OS. Therefore, subsequent treatment appears to significantly influence OS in patients with disease progression following first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Programed Death-1 Blockade in Previously Treated Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung is a rare tumor with an aggressive clinical course. However, there is limited knowledge of its treatment strategy. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-programed death-1 (PD-1) blockade monotherapy in previously treated advanced LCNEC. METHODS: Eleven patients with previously treated advanced LCNEC who received immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy between January 2015 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed for efficacy and safety. RESULTS: Of a total of 11 patients (median [range] age, 66 [37-79] years; 8 men [73%] and 3 women [27%]), 8 patients had performance status (PS) 0-1 [73%] and 3 patients had PS 2 [27%]; 9 patients received 1 prior chemotherapy [82%] and 2 patients received 2 prior chemotherapies [18%]. The median follow-up duration was 4.6 months. Although PD-1 blockade was administered at median cycles of 3 (range, 1-12), overall response rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 9.1%, 2.7 months, and 4.6 months, respectively. Any adverse events were observed in 9 patients (82%), including 1 patient with grade 3 pneumonitis as a serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: Anti-PD-1 blockade monotherapy as a subsequent line for previously treated advanced LCNEC exhibited usefulness and tolerability and was identified as a valid treatment option.

Clinical Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with a Poor Performance Status.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard treatments for patients with lung cancer. PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA4 antibodies are chosen as the first-line therapy, contributing to the long-term survival and tolerability. Unlike molecular targeting agents, such as gefitinib, lung cancer patients with a poor performance status (PS) display unsatisfactory clinical improvements after ICI treatment. Several previous reports also demonstrated that the PS is identified as one of the most probable prognostic factors for predicting poor outcomes after ICI treatment. However, first-line pembrolizumab seemed to be effective for lung cancer patients with a PS of 2 if PD-L1 expression was greater than 50%. Currently, the induction of ICIs in patients with lung cancer with a poor PS is controversial. These problems are discussed in this review.

Clinical Outcomes of Second-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Thymic Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 191 Patients from the NEJ023 Study.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the rarity of this tumor, there is limited information about second-line chemotherapy for patients with previously treated advanced thymic carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a multi-institutional, retrospective study named NEJ023 for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. Patients without indications for curative treatment were treated with chemotherapy from 1995 to 2014 at 40 institutions in the North East Japan Study Group. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics, data on treatment methods, and outcomes of second-line chemotherapy were obtained from medical records. RESULTS: In total, 191 patients were enrolled in this study. Second-line chemotherapy included platinum-based doublets in 57.6% of patients, other multidrug chemotherapy (e.g., cisplatin, doxorubicin, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide) in 13.6%, and monotherapy in 28.8%. The median follow-up time was 50.5 months, and the median overall survival (OS) from the start of second-line chemotherapy was 22.4 (95% confidence interval, 17.5-26.7) months. The average response rate (RR) was 20.0% overall; it was 21.6% for patients treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, 13.6% for those treated with other multidrug chemotherapy, and 19.6% for those treated with single agent chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in OS between platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, other multidrug chemotherapy, and monotherapy (the median OS was 22.4, 25.7, and 21.4 months, respectively). CONCLUSION: The median OS was 22.4 months in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma treated with second-line chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in RR and OS between monotherapy and multidrug chemotherapy in this study. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Owing to the rarity of this tumor, there is limited information about second-line chemotherapy for patients with previously treated advanced thymic carcinoma. This is the largest data for those patients treated with second-line chemotherapy. This study suggests there is no significant difference in efficacy between monotherapy and multidrug chemotherapy for previously treated advanced thymic carcinoma. This result can support the adequacy to select monotherapy as treatment of those patients.

A phase II study of daily carboplatin plus irradiation followed by durvalumab for stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients with PS 2 up to 74 years old and patients with PS 0 or 1 from 75 years: NEJ039A (trial in progress).

BACKGROUND: Durvalumab is a standard drug used during maintenance therapy after chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). However, little is known about the clinical benefits of durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in patients with LA-NSCLC with a performance status (PS) of 2 and/or aged > 75 years. As daily carboplatin plus concurrent thoracic radiotherapy is recommended for elderly patients according to guideline, the current phase II study aims to investigate the effect of daily carboplatin plus radiotherapy followed by durvalumab for patients with stage III NSCLC who have a PS of 2 and/or are older. METHODS: Daily carboplatin plus radiotherapy followed by durvalumab is performed for the patients with stage III NSCLC who have a PS of 2 and/or are older. This is a trial in progress manuscript. STUDY TREATMENT: Daily, intravenous, low-dose carboplatin (30 mg/m2 in a 30-min infusion) is administered to patients 1 h before radiotherapy for the first 20 fractions. Radiotherapy for all patients consisted of 60 Gy administered as 30 fractions over 6 weeks. Durvalumab at a dose of 10 mg/kg/body is intravenously administered every 2 weeks for up to 12 months after chemoradiotherapy. EXPLORATORY ASSESSMENT: In the future, an exploratory investigation will be performed to determine whether the combined assessment of T-cell markers, PD-L1 expression, and tumor mutation burden could predict the outcomes of the regimen. DISCUSSION: The results of our study will exhibit the efficacy and tolerability of durvalumab as maintenance therapy after daily carboplatin plus radiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: During the first registration (before induction chemoradiotherapy), 70 patients will be included; then, we include 58 patients during the second registration (before durvalumab treatment after chemoradiotherapy). https://jcrb.niph.go.jp/ . PRIMARY ENDPOINT: The primary endpoint of the current study is the 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate after the initiation of durvalumab. SECONDARY ENDPOINTS: The secondary endpoints are the feasibility, objective response, PFS, overall survival, and adverse events.

Evaluation of a chest rehabilitation project in Nepal using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test.

[Purpose] The incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is rapidly increasing worldwide. In Nepal, it has the highest mortality rate among all noninfectious diseases. Since 2015, we have been involved in a project that aims to facilitate chest rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Nepal. We compared the Nepali version of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire with the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test, the latter of which was translated into Nepali for this project. We also evaluated the extent to which patient quality of life improved after the rehabilitation program. [Participants and Methods] The Nepali St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test were used to assess the health status of patients both before the intervention's initiation and one year after it. Between May and September of 2016, 122 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease participated in this program. [Results] We collected valid responses from 57 patients both before and after the intervention. The scores of both screening tools were significantly lower after the intervention than before and showed a significant correlation with one another. [Conclusion] These results suggest that the Nepali version of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test is a reliable tool for the evaluation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and that the intervention used in the project might be effective for patients afflicted with the disease. However, there are limitations to the research design, such as the limited number of participants used in the study.

[An Elderly Patient with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Responded to Salvage S-1 Monotherapy after Gefitinib Therapy].

S-1 is one of the effective chemotherapy regimens for treating non-small cell lung cancer. We report of an elderly patient with non-small cell lung cancer who responded to S-1 monotherapy following gefitinib therapy. An 83-year-old woman was diagnosed with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lungs (cT3N3M1a, Stage IV). Considering her age, monotherapy with vinorelbine was administered as first-line chemotherapy. Despite the completion of four courses, she was diagnosed with progressive disease. Thereafter, after considering her status as a non-smoking woman, gefitinib was introduced as second-line chemotherapy, which resulted in significant tumor size reduction.Tumor regrowth was identified 16 months later, and gefitinib was switched to erlotinib, but the tumor kept increasing in size.S -1 monotherapy was introduced as fourth-line chemotherapy, and the tumor began to decrease in size again. A partial response was obtained after 10 months, without serious adverse effects. Gefitinib following S-1 monotherapy resulted in long-term tumor size control for a total of 27 months in an elderly patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.S -1 monotherapy might be one of the options for salvage therapy after gefitinib treatment becomes ineffective.

Progression to Lymph Node Metastasis After Spontaneous Regression of Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma Following Biopsy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Spontaneous regression (SR) of cancer, which indicates the natural disappearance of malignant tumors, is rare. Little is known about the mechanisms underlying SR; however, immunological reactions, infections, injuries, and medications have been presumed. Among previously reported cases of SR, lung cancer cases have been extremely limited. CASE REPORT: Here, we present a case of lymph node metastasis exacerbation after SR of a primary adenocarcinoma following a biopsy. After complete disappearance of the primary site tumor, metastatic lymph nodes in the mediastinum gradually increased in size as a single lesion. Local treatment with resection and radiotherapy was effective for this metastasis, without recurrence for >3 years. CONCLUSION: This is an interesting case of SR of pulmonary adenocarcinoma with inconsistent features in the primary and metastatic lesions. When physicians encounter exacerbation of metastatic sites with SR of the primary site in lung cancer, local intervention may be considered as a curative treatment.

Metabolic Tumor Volume as Significant Predictor for Chemotherapy Containing PD-L1 Blocker in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Chemo-immunotherapy, including the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, is an effective treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, no biomarker has been established for the prediction of chemo-immunotherapy. Therefore, we investigated the potential of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) as a predictive marker. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with ES-SCLC who received 18F-FDG-PET immediately before combined platinum-based chemotherapy with PD-L1 blockade as a first-line treatment were eligible, and the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) on 18F-FDG uptake were evaluated. RESULTS: PD-L1 and tumor infiltrative lymphocytes (TILs) were immunohistochemically analyzed in 36 of the 46 patients. A high MTV was significantly associated with poor performance status and low albumin levels, and there was a significant association between low albumin and high TLG. Univariate analysis identified sex, Brinkman index, and MTV as significant predictors of progression-free survival (PFS), and sex, SUVmax, MTV, and TLG as significant factors of overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis revealed that sex, Brinkman index, and MTV were independent prognostic factors for PFS, and sex, SUVmax, MTV, and TLG were significant predictors of OS. SUVmax was significantly higher in patients with positive PD-L1 expression than in those with negative expression but was not significantly different between positive and negative TILs. Moreover, the levels of MTV and TLG were not closely associated with the levels of PD-L1 and TILs. CONCLUSION: MTV or TLG metabolic tumor activity is suitable for the prediction of chemo-immunotherapy outcomes in patients with ES-SCLC.

Clinical Outcome of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Relapse after Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy followed by Durvalumab.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed promising efficacy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The efficacy of the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination regimen in NSCLC patients who relapse after durvalumab consolidation following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has not been determined. Between January 2021 and June 2022, clinical data were retrospectively extracted from the medical records of patients with NSCLC who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab after CCRT and durvalumab consolidation. A total of 30 patients were included in this analysis. The median number of durvalumab treatment cycles was 11. Median PFS and OS with nivolumab plus ipilimumab were 4.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7-7.7) and 18.5 months (95% CI: 3.5-33.5), respectively. The 6-month and 12-month PFS rates were 46.7% (95% CI: 28.8-64.5) and 36.4% (95% CI: 19.0-53.7). In multivariate analysis, a significant correlation was observed between a durvalumab treatment duration of 6 months or more and PFS (p = 0.04) as well as OS (p = 0.001). Grade 3 adverse events, including pneumonitis, dermatitis, and colitis, occurred in 10% of the patients. This study suggests that nivolumab plus ipilimumab is effective, especially in patients who have received durvalumab for 6 months or more, and tolerable for patients who relapsed after durvalumab following CCRT.

Clinical impact of inflammatory and nutrition index based on metabolic tumor activity in non­small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy.

The aim of the present study was to explore the relationship between tumor metabolic glycolysis and inflammatory or nutritional status in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade. A total of 186 patients were registered in the present study. All of patients underwent 18F-FDG PET imaging before initial PD-1 blockade, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were assessed as indicators of 18F-FDG uptake. As inflammatory and nutritional index, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ration (PLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) were evaluated based on previous assessment. 18F-FDG uptake by MTV and TLG significantly correlated with the scores of NLR, PLR, SII, PNI and ALI, in addition to the level of albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes and body mass index. The count of NLR, PLR and SII was significantly higher in patients with <1 year overall survival (OS) compared with in those with ≥1 year OS, and that of PNI and ALI was significantly lower in those with <1 year OS compared with those with ≥1 year OS. High MTV under the high PLR, SII and low ALI were identified as significant factors for predicting the decreased PFS and OS after PD-1 blockade in a first-line setting. In second or more lines, high MTV was identified as a significant prognostic predictor regardless of the levels of PLR, SII, ALI and GPS. In conclusion, metabolic tumor glycolysis determined by MTV was identified as a predictor for the outcome of PD-1 blockade under the high inflammatory and low nutritional conditions, in particular, when treated with a first-line PD-1 blockade. A high MTV under high PLR and SII and low ALI in the first-line setting could be more predictive of ICI treatment than other combinations.

Risk and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disorders receiving immune checkpoint blockade therapy: Survival analysis with inverse probability weighting from a nationwide, multi-institutional, retrospective study (NEJ047).

BACKGROUND: The risk and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with pre-existing autoimmune disorders (AIDs) receiving immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy have not been clearly established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study was conducted in collaboration with 20 centers in Japan. RESULTS: In total, 229 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC and pre-existing AID, with or without ICB treatment from January 2010-February 2020, were included and analyzed. Among 69 patients who received ICB, 2 received two lines of ICBs with a total of 71 ICB treatments; 57 (80.3 %) and 14 (19.7 %) patients received ICB monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. AID flares were observed in 18 patients (25.4 %, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 15.8-37.1 %) receiving ICB. AID exacerbations were more likely when NSCLC was diagnosed less than 1 year after the AID diagnosis (odds ratio 5.26 [95 % CI, 1.40-21.61]; P = 0.016). Immune-related adverse events were observed in 32 patients (45.1 %, 95 % CI, 33.2-57.3 %); 17 had grade 3 or higher. The safety profile of combination immunotherapy was not significantly different from that of the monotherapy. After inverse probability weighting, the use of ICB prolonged survival (hazard ratio 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.26-0.70]; P = 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: These findings revealed a novel risk factor for AID flares following ICB treatment, that is the diagnosis of NSCLC within 1 year of AID diagnosis, and showed that ICBs may improve survival in this population. These results support the utilization of ICB in patients with NSCLC and pre-existing AID.

Clinicopathological impact of VEGFR2 and VEGF-C in patients with EGFR-major mutant NSCLC receiving osimertinib.

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been identified as one of the resistant mechanisms to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, the relationship between the efficacy of osimertinib and protein expression of VEGF family members in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations remains unclear. METHODS: A total of 76 patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR major mutations (del19 or L858R) receiving first-line osimertinib were eligible as the osimertinib (Osi) group, whereas 43 patients receiving first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs were compared with the control group. The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) in the tumor specimens was analyzed using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: VEGFR2 and VEGF-C were highly expressed in 65.8% and 51.3% of patients, respectively, in the Osi group, and 69.7% and 76.7%, respectively, in the control group. High VEGFR2 and VEGF-C levels were significantly associated with poor performance status (PS) and female sex, respectively. In the Osi group, patients with co-high expression of VEGFR2 and VEGF-C showed significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those without co-high expression. In del19, VEGFR2 was a significant predictor of PFS and OS and independent predictor of OS in multivariate analysis. In L858R, co-high expression of VEGFR2 and VEGF-C was identified as a significant predictor of PFS and OS and independent predictor of PFS. CONCLUSION: VEGFR2 and VEGF-C are highly expressed in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells. Increased expression of VEGFR2 was identified as a significant prognostic factor in patients with EGFR del19 mutation who received osimertinib, whereas co-high expression of VEGFR2 and VEGF-C was a significant predictor for those with EGFR L858R mutation.