Predicting outcome in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients treated with azacitidine.

5-Azacitidine (5-AZA) is widely used for the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. However, response and survival rates vary considerably, while indicated treatment duration remains undefined. For these reasons, factors determining response and survival are of major importance. Clinical, morphological, flow cytometry, cytogenetic and molecular factors are discussed in this review. Biomarkers predictive of response and prognosis, as well as their link to the mode of action of 5-AZA are also addressed, shifting the focus from clinical practice to investigational research. Their use could further improve prognostic classification of 5-AZA treated higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in the near future.

Lay abstract Myelodysplastic syndrome is a disorder in which patients have dysfunctional blood cells. The only chance of curing patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) is allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, most HR-MDS patients are not young or fit enough to receive such a toxic treatment. For these patients, hypomethylating drugs such as 5-azacitidine (5-AZA) and decitabine are preferable treatments. These drugs work by reducing the number of molecules known as methyl groups that are attached to DNA, which can lead to cell death. About half of patients respond to it, and those who do respond, survive longer than those who do not. In addition, 5-AZA delays disease progression from HR-MDS to acute myeloid leukemia, a type of blood cancer, and may help patients who do not improve to live longer. However, 5-AZA has side effects that can be hard to bear, such as an increased need for red blood cells and/or platelet transfusions. For this reason, it would be good to predict the clinical and biological factors associated with either response or final outcome following treatment. In this manuscript, we attempt to summarize current knowledge on this topic.

Synergistic inhibitory effects of low-dose decitabine in combination with bortezomib in the AML cell line Kasumi-1.

In the present study, the ability of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (BZ), an oxidative stress-inducing agent, to sensitize acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells to decitabine (Dacogen®, DAC; a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor), in terms of cell viability and differentiation, was investigated. Kasumi-1 AML (M2) cells were treated with low-dose DAC (10, 50, 100, 200 or 400 nΜ), with or without BZ (10 nM). Apoptosis and the cell cycle were evaluated after 24 h of treatment through fluorescence-assisted cell sorting (FACS) with Annexin V/propidium iodide and DAPI staining, respectively. The expression levels of CD193, CD11b, CD13, CD14, CD15, CD16 and CD117 surface differentiation markers were evaluated by FACS after 6 days of treatment. The results indicated significant alterations in cell death and cell cycle phases in Kasumi-1 cells following DAC and BZ combination treatment compared to untreated cells and cells with single treatments. Low-dose DAC/BZ combinations significantly enhanced apoptosis and decreased the population of live Kasumi-1 cells, with 100 and 200 nM of DAC and 10 nM BZ appearing to have the most potent synergistic effect according to a combination index. Furthermore, cell cycle profiling revealed that DAC/BZ treatment synergistically led to G0/G1- and G2/M-phase arrest. By contrast, DAC appeared to promote monocytic and granulocytic differentiation of Kasumi-1 cells more effectively alone than in combination with BZ. BZ acted synergistically with low-dose DAC in vitro, leading to enhanced apoptosis and G0/G1- and G2/M-phase arrest in AML cells, hence prohibiting either DNA synthesis or mitosis. Although further in vivo investigation is necessary, these results provide a strong rationale for the implementation of a combination treatment with DAC and bortezomib in AML therapy, followed by DAC alone, which may achieve better clinical responses and possibly partially overcome the frequently encountered DAC resistance of patients with AML.

Apoptosis Induction and Gene Expression Profile Alterations of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Cells following Their Exposure to Bortezomib and Methotrexate.

Mycosis fungoides (MF) and its leukemic variant Sézary syndrome (SS) comprise the majority of CTCL, a heterogenous group of non-Hodgkins lymphomas involving the skin. The CTCL's resistance to chemotherapy and the lack of full understanding of their pathogenesis request further investigation. With the view of a more targeted therapy, we evaluated in vitro the effectiveness of bortezomib and methotrexate, as well as their combination in CTCL cell lines, regarding apoptosis induction. Our data are of clinical value and indicate that the bortezomib/methotrexate combinational therapy has an inferior impact on the apoptosis of CTCL compared to monotherapy, with bortezomib presenting as the most efficient treatment option for SS and methotrexate for MF. Using PCR arrays technology, we also investigated the alterations in the expression profile of genes related to DNA repair pathways in CTCL cell lines after treatment with bortezomib or methotrexate. We found that both agents, but mostly bortezomib, significantly deregulate a large number of genes in SS and MF cell lines, suggesting another pathway through which these agents could induce apoptosis in CTCL. Finally, we show that SS and MF respond differently to treatment, verifying their distinct nature and further emphasizing the need for discrete treatment approaches.

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of regulatory T cells in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Accumulated data indicate a significant role of T cell dysfunction in the pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In CLL, regulatory T cells are significantly higher and show lower apoptotic levels compared to healthy donors. We demonstrate that CLL derived CD4+CD25-CD127- and CD4+CD25lowCD127- subpopulations share a common immunophenotypic profile with conventional Tregs and are associated with advanced stage disease. We further provide evidence that the increased number of Tregs contributes indirectly to the proliferation of the CLL clone, by suppressing the proliferation of Teffs which in turn suppress CLL cells. These data are further supported by our observations that CLL derived Tregs appear rather incapable of inducing apoptosis of both normal B cells and CLL cells, in contrast to normal Tregs, suggesting an immunoediting effect of CLL cells on Tregs which negatively affects the functionality of the latter and contributes to the failure of Tregs in CLL to efficiently eliminate the abnormal clone.