Effects of briakinumab treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis on health-related quality of life and work productivity and activity impairment: results from a randomized phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is known to have a significant negative impact on a patient's health-related quality of life, including social, recreational and work activities. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of briakinumab on quality of life and work productivity measures in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. METHODS: Patients received either briakinumab (n = 981) or placebo (n = 484) during the 12-week induction phase of trial M06-890. At week 12, patients with a Physician's Global Assessment score of 'Clear' or 'Minimal' entered the 40-week maintenance phase and were to receive briakinumab every 4 weeks, briakinumab every 12 weeks, or placebo. At weeks 12 and 52, treatment groups were compared using mean change from baseline in health-related quality of life and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire scores and the percentage of patients with minimum clinically important differences. RESULTS: At week 12, more than half of the briakinumab-treated patients achieved improvements meeting or exceeding minimum clinically important differences for Dermatology Life Quality Index (75.9%), and psoriasis- (64.8%), and psoriatic arthritis-related (54.1%) pain scores; 48.4% achieved improvements for activity impairment. Although improvements in quality of life and work productivity measures were maintained at week 52 for both briakinumab regimens, responder rates were consistently greater in the every-4-week group than in the every-12-week group. CONCLUSION: Briakinumab treatment resulted in clinically significant improvements in quality of life and work productivity in adults with moderate to severe psoriasis. Maintenance therapy was associated with a more pronounced benefit for the every-4-week briakinumab regimen.

Efficacy, safety and medication cost implications of adalimumab 40 mg weekly dosing in patients with psoriasis with suboptimal response to 40 mg every other week dosing: results from an open-label study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of increasing to weekly adalimumab therapy in patients with psoriasis with inadequate response to every other week (eow) dosing is unknown. OBJECTIVES: (i) To determine the effectiveness of escalating adalimumab dosage from 40 mg eow to 40 mg weekly in patients with < PASI 50 response following ≥ 24 weeks treatment. (ii) To identify retrospectively characteristics of patients likely to benefit from dose escalation using classification and regression tree analysis. (iii) To assess cost implications for allowing dose escalation from the private payers' perspective. METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who had received blinded adalimumab 40 mg eow or placebo in antecedent phase II/III studies could enrol in an open-label extension (OLE) and initially receive open-label adalimumab 40 mg eow (EOW population). On/after week 24 (OLE), patients with < PASI 50 response relative to baseline of antecedent study could increase to 40 mg weekly. The dosage escalation population continued on weekly dosing until achieving PASI 75 response, then resumed eow dosing. Study visits were 6/12 weeks after dosage escalation, and every 12 weeks thereafter. The percentage of patients who achieved PASI 75 response following dosage escalation was determined (missing PASI scores imputed as nonresponse). Safety was assessed for the dosage escalation population and for all adalimumab exposure that did not follow dosage escalation in the EOW set. RESULTS: In total, 349/1256 (27·8%) patients underwent dosage escalation (OLE). At 12/24 weeks after dosage escalation, 93/349 (26·6%)/133/349 (38·1%) were PASI 75 responders or resumed eow dosing. Secondary nonresponders, patients weighing ≤ 102 kg, and those with disease duration < 8·3 years were most likely to benefit from dose escalation. Rates of serious/serious infectious/malignant (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers or lymphoma) adverse events were 6·8/0·9/1·4 events per 100 patient-years (dosage escalation population); comparable rates in the EOW set were 6·5/1·2/0·5 events per 100 patient-years. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients did not require dose escalation. By 12 weeks after dose escalation, one-quarter achieved substantial clinical improvement. Safety results were similar between patients who dosage-escalated and those who did not.

Sleep quality and other patient-reported outcomes improve after patients with psoriasis with suboptimal response to other systemic therapies are switched to adalimumab: results from PROGRESS, an open-label Phase IIIB trial.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is associated with poor health-related quality of life, including sleep impairment. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of sleep impairment, the effect of adalimumab on sleep and other patient-reported outcomes, and correlations between changes in these outcomes and sleep quality in patients with psoriasis. METHODS: Patients in the 16-week, open-label, Phase IIIb PROGRESS trial had chronic plaque psoriasis and suboptimal response to prior therapy (etanercept, methotrexate or narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy). Adalimumab was self-injected subcutaneously (80 mg at week 0, then 40 mg every other week from week 1). The focus for this analysis was the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale. Other patient-reported outcomes included the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Physician's Global Assessment, a visual analogue scale for psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (PsA) pain, and the Work Productivity and Activity Index Questionnaire-Specific Health Problems. RESULTS: Patients with psoriasis had impaired sleep at baseline. The degree of sleep impairment was significantly associated with the extent of work productivity for all sleep measures and, for some sleep measures, was associated with DLQI impairment, clinical severity measured by PASI, the presence of PsA, and depression. Adalimumab treatment significantly improved sleep quality by 15% from baseline, as well as DLQI score, pain and work productivity. The improvement in sleep was partially explained (R(2 ) = 0·16, P < 0·001) by improvements in the objectively measured psoriasis signs in PASI. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab treatment improved sleep outcomes and other patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life, work productivity, daily activity and disease-related pain.

Economic burden of comorbidities in patients with psoriasis is substantial.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is frequently associated with comorbidities. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental economic burden associated with comorbidities in patients with psoriasis, accounting for psoriasis severity. METHODS: Patients continuously enrolled ≥6 months after a randomly selected psoriasis diagnosis date were selected from the Ingenix Impact National Managed Care Database (1999-2004). Comorbidities identified during the 6-month study included: psoriatic arthritis, cardiovascular disease, depression, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, obesity, cerebrovascular diseases and peripheral vascular disease. Resource utilization and costs during the 6-month follow-up period were compared for patients with ≥1 comorbidity vs. those without and for patients with a specific comorbidity vs. those without. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were estimated for resource utilization using negative binomial and logistic regression models, respectively. Adjusted incremental costs associated with comorbidities were reported using general linear models with log-link and gamma distributions or two-part models. Models controlled for age, sex and psoriasis severity. RESULTS: A total of 114,512 patients were included; 51% had ≥1 comorbidity. Hyperlipidemia (27%) and hypertension (25%) were most prevalent. Patients with comorbidities were more likely to experience urgent care [OR (95% confidence interval (CI))=1.58 (1.51-1.65)] than patients without comorbidities. They also had significantly greater hospitalization rates [IRR (95% CI)=2.27 (2.13-2.42)] and outpatient visits [IRR (95% CI)=1.53 (1.52-1.55)]. Compared with patients who did not have comorbidities, patients with comorbidities incurred $2184 (P<0.001) greater total costs. CONCLUSION: Comorbidities present a significant economic burden in patients with psoriasis.

Systematic review: the costs of ulcerative colitis in Western countries.

BACKGROUND: Early onset and complications such as hospitalization and surgery contribute to the economic burden of ulcerative colitis. AIM: To review systematically the literature on costs of ulcerative colitis in Western countries. METHODS: Studies estimating costs of ulcerative colitis in Western countries were identified using Medline, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science and were rated based on relevance and reliability of estimates. All costs were adjusted to 2008 currency values. A parallel review focused on the impact of disease severity on costs, hospitalizations and surgeries. RESULTS: Estimated annual per-patient direct medical costs of ulcerative colitis ranged from $6217 to $11,477 in the United States and from euro8949 to euro10,395 in Europe. Hospitalizations accounted for 41-55% of direct medical costs. Indirect costs accounted for approximately one-third of total costs in the United States and 54-68% in Europe. Total economic burden of ulcerative colitis was estimated at $8.1-14.9 billion annually in the United States and at euro12.5-29.1 billion in Europe; total direct costs were $3.4-8.6 billion in the United States and euro5.4-12.6 billion in Europe. Direct costs, hospitalizations and surgeries increased with worsening disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Ulcerative colitis is a costly disease. Hospitalizations contribute significantly to direct medical costs, and indirect costs are considerable, having previously been substantially underestimated.

Adalimumab sustains clinical remission and overall clinical benefit after 2 years of therapy for Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled CHARM trial, adalimumab was more effective than placebo in maintaining clinical remission for patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD) through 56 weeks. AIM: To substantiate the long-term safety and clinical benefits of adalimumab through 2 years of therapy in CHARM and its open-label extension (ADHERE). METHODS: Patients entering ADHERE on blinded therapy received adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow). Patients who had already moved to open-label adalimumab eow or weekly in CHARM continued their regimens. Data were analysed by originally randomized treatment group at CHARM baseline (adalimumab 40 mg eow, adalimumab 40 mg weekly, or placebo), regardless of whether patients entered ADHERE or received open-label adalimumab (eow or weekly). RESULTS: After up to 2 years of therapy, 37.6%, 41.9% and 49.8% of patients originally randomized to placebo, adalimumab eow and adalimumab weekly, respectively, were in clinical remission. All groups experienced sustained improvements on the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire. Decreasing hazard rates for both all-cause and CD-related hospitalizations were observed over time. Over a 2-year period, the rates of serious adverse events and malignancies (33.3 and 1.1 events/100-patient-years respectively) were similar to those observed during the overall adalimumab CD clinical development programme. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab demonstrated sustained maintenance of clinical remission, improvements in quality of life and reductions in hospitalization during long-term treatment for CD, with no new safety concerns identified.

The CHOICE trial: adalimumab demonstrates safety, fistula healing, improved quality of life and increased work productivity in patients with Crohn's disease who failed prior infliximab therapy.

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab induces and maintains remission in adults with Crohn's disease. AIM: To evaluate safety, fistula healing, quality of life and work productivity in adalimumab-treated patients who failed infliximab, including primary nonresponders. METHODS: After a ≥8-week infliximab washout, patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease received open-label adalimumab as induction (160/80 mg at weeks 0/2) and maintenance (40 mg every other week) therapies. At/after 8 weeks, patients with flare/nonresponse could receive weekly therapy. Minimum study duration was 8 weeks, continuing until the commercial availability of adalimumab for Crohn's disease. RESULTS: Of 673 patients enrolled, 17% were infliximab primary nonresponders and 83% were initial responders. Three percent of patients had serious infections (mainly abscesses). Complete fistula healing was achieved by 34/88 (39%) patients with baseline fistulas. Improvements in quality of life and work productivity were sustained from week 4 to week 24 for all patients, as well as the subgroup of primary nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Blinded clinical trials have shown adalimumab to be both an effective first-line therapy for anti-TNF-naïve patients and an important treatment option for infliximab-refractory or -intolerant patients. This trial presents open-label experience to support further the safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in patients who failed infliximab therapy, including primary nonresponders (NCT00338650).