Analysis of care and gender stereotypes in nursing scientific research: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To map evidence about care and gender stereotypes in nursing scientific research. METHOD: A scoping review developed under the JBI framework with analysis of gender perspective in care approaches. The searches were carried out on January 31, 2023 in SciELO, Scopus, CINAHL, PubMed, BDENF. RESULTS: Of the 3,743 studies located, 25 were included. Evidence was grouped into categories: essentially female care (n = 9; 36%); calling and service of love (n = 3; 12%); erasure of gender inequalities (n = 2; 8%); "inadequate and harmful" care (n = 5; 20%); neutralization of gender and bodies (n = 3; 12%); and reporting oppression in care work (n = 3; 12%). CONCLUSION: Most scientific research on care reproduces gender stereotypes that reinforce the oppression of women in nursing. In contrast, resistance denounces naturalization of care as "inadequate and harmful", for perpetuating gender oppression in care work.

Validation of Ludic-Quest to the playfulness of health games: gameplay and emotions on the field.

OBJECTIVE: to validate Ludic-quest construct and reliability to assess game playfulness, through latent factors in gameplay, perception of learning and emotions in the game. METHODS: a cross-sectional study to validate the instrument's psychometric properties. 247 people responded to the questionnaire after a match in the game Violetas. Exploratory Factor Analysis, using KMO (>0.7), Bertlett (p=0.005), Varimax and factor loading (>0.6). Reliability by Cronbach's alpha (>0.6). RESULTS: in gameplay/learning, KMO=0.859, Bertlett significant. The eigenvalue indicated four factors (reflections; immersion; challenges; aesthetics), 10 retained variables. In the factor analysis of emotions: KMO=0.817; Bartlett p=0.000. Extraction of four factors (pleasure; ostraenie; tension; fun), 10 retained variables. The 20 validated variables contain reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.716). CONCLUSIONS: the eight validated factors centralize playfulness in health game production, composing a reliable playfulness assessment instrument for use in research.

Validation of Ludic-Quest to the playfulness of health games: gameplay and emotions on the field / Validación de Ludic-Quest a la ludicidad de los juegos de salud: jugabilidad y emociones en el campo / Validação do Ludic-Quest à ludicidade de jogos na saúde: jogabilidade e emoções em campo

ABSTRACT Objective: to validate Ludic-quest construct and reliability to assess game playfulness, through latent factors in gameplay, perception of learning and emotions in the game. Methods: a cross-sectional study to validate the instrument's psychometric properties. 247 people responded to the questionnaire after a match in the game Violetas. Exploratory Factor Analysis, using KMO (>0.7), Bertlett (p=0.005), Varimax and factor loading (>0.6). Reliability by Cronbach's alpha (>0.6). Results: in gameplay/learning, KMO=0.859, Bertlett significant. The eigenvalue indicated four factors (reflections; immersion; challenges; aesthetics), 10 retained variables. In the factor analysis of emotions: KMO=0.817; Bartlett p=0.000. Extraction of four factors (pleasure; ostraenie; tension; fun), 10 retained variables. The 20 validated variables contain reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.716). Conclusions: the eight validated factors centralize playfulness in health game production, composing a reliable playfulness assessment instrument for use in research.

RESUMEN Objetivo: validar el constructo y la confiabilidad del instrumento Ludic-Quest para evaluar la lúdica de los juegos, a través de factores latentes en la jugabilidad, percepción del aprendizaje y emociones en el juego. Métodos: estudio transversal para validar las propiedades psicométricas del instrumento. 247 personas contestaron el cuestionario después de un partido de Violetas. Análisis Factorial Exploratorio, utilizando KMO (>0,7), Bertlett (p=0,005), Varimax y carga factorial (>0,6). Confiabilidad por Alfa de Cronbach (>0.6). Resultados: en jugabilidad/aprendizaje, KMO=0,859, Bertlett significativo. El valor propio indicó cuatro factores (reflexiones; inmersión; desafíos; estética) y 10 variables retenidas. En el análisis factorial de las emociones: KMO=0,817; Bartlett p=0,000. Extracción de cuatro factores (placer; ostraenie; tensión; diversión) y 10 variables retenidas. Las 20 variables validadas contienen confiabilidad (Alfa de Cronbach=0,716). Conclusiones: los ocho factores validados centralizan la ludicidad en la producción de juegos de salud, componiendo un instrumento de evaluación de la ludicidad confiable para uso en investigación.

RESUMO Objetivo: validar o constructo e a confiabilidade do instrumento Ludic-Quest para avaliação da ludicidade de jogos, por meio de fatores latentes à jogabilidade, percepção da aprendizagem e às emoções na partida. Métodos: estudo transversal de validação das propriedades psicométricas do instrumento. 247 pessoas responderam ao questionário após uma partida do jogo Violetas. Análise Fatorial Exploratória, com uso do KMO (>0,7), Bertlett (p=0,005), Varimax e carga fatorial (>0,6). Confiabilidade pelo Alfa de Cronbach (>0,6). Resultados: na jogabilidade/aprendizagem, KMO=0,859, Bertlett significativo. O autovalor indicou quatro fatores (reflexões; imersão; desafios; estética) e 10 variáveis retidas. Na análise fatorial das emoções: KMO=0,817; Bartlett p=0,000. Extração de quatro fatores (prazer; ostranênie; tensão; diversão) e 10 variáveis retidas. As 20 variáveis validadas contêm confiabilidade (Alfa de Cronbach=0,716). Conclusões: os oito fatores validados centralizam o lúdico na produção de jogos na saúde, compondo um instrumento de avaliação da ludicidade confiável à utilização em pesquisas.