Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 12(10): 725-30, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15235901

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia (FN) remains a major dose-limiting complication among patients treated with chemotherapy. Haematopoietic colony stimulating factors (G-CSF and GM-CSF) made possible a significant improvement in the management of FN, both in the therapeutic and in the prophylactic approach. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis also permits a definite reduction of severe infections during neutropenia. Nevertheless, the possible role of these two interventions for secondary prevention of FN is still unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomised trial by comparing the efficacy of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and the association of G-CSF with oral antibiotics in the secondary prevention of FN. We included in our study those patients who, after an episode of FN, continued to be treated with the same chemotherapy without reduction of dose intensity. They were randomised into two groups: the first received G-CSF (group G; filgrastim, 5 microg/kg day), and the second was treated with an association of G-CSF and amoxicillin/clavulanate plus ciprofloxacin (group G/ACC). RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were randomised (group G: n=23 and group G/ACC: n=25). There was no recurrence of FN among the patients receiving G-CSF and only one episode in the combined therapy group (p=1). With regard to the side effects, there was no significant difference in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of G-CSF for the secondary prevention of FN is extremely effective and allows the maintenance of chemotherapy dose intensity. Our study showed that the addition of antibiotics does not seem to be required.


Assuntos
Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/uso terapêutico , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Neutropenia/prevenção & controle , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Ann Oncol ; 14(5): 693-8, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12702521

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Alkylating agents and topoisomerase-II inhibitors have been associated with the occurrence of secondary leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Conversely, data on the occurrence of second solid malignancies in this setting are scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluates the occurrence of second hematological and solid malignancies in the context of a prospective multicenter phase III trial comparing epirubicin-cyclophosphamide at intermediate doses (EC), or at full doses (HEC), with classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in 777 patients with early breast cancer. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 73 months, the following 8-year actuarial rates of second solid primaries were observed: CMF 5.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5% to 9.5%], EC 4.1% (95% CI 0.1% to 8.1%), and HEC 7.2% (95% CI 3.2% to 11.2%) (P = 0.79 by log rank test). Three secondary acute myeloid leukemias (AML) were reported, all in the HEC arm (incidence = 1.2%, 95% CI 0.0% to 2.5%), which by a three arm comparison allows us to conclude that HEC is statistically different (borderline significance) from CMF and EC (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HEC, as delivered in this trial, cannot be recommended in clinical practice because of the lack of superiority over classic CMF and because of the increased risk of AML observed in this arm. Prolongation of conventional anthracycline-based treatment beyond the current standard of four to six cycles is not recommended in clinical practice.


Assuntos
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Bélgica , Neoplasias da Mama/secundário , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalos de Confiança , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Ciclofosfamida/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide/induzido quimicamente , Leucemia Mieloide/patologia , Linfonodos/patologia , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA