Laparoscopy experience in East, Central, and Southern Africa: insights from operative case volume analysis.

BACKGROUND: With the primary objective of addressing the disparity in global surgical care access, the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) trains surgeons. While sufficient operative experience is crucial for surgical training, the extent of utilization of minimally invasive techniques during COSECSA training remains understudied. METHODS: We conducted an extensive review of COSECSA general surgery trainees' operative case logs from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, focusing on the utilization of minimally invasive surgical procedures. Our primary objective was to determine the prevalence of laparoscopic procedures and compare this to open procedures. We analyzed the distribution of laparoscopic cases across common indications such as cholecystectomy, appendicitis, and hernia operations. Additionally, we examined the impact of trainee autonomy, country development index, and hospital type on laparoscopy utilization. RESULTS: Among 68,659 total cases, only 616 (0.9%) were laparoscopic procedures. Notably, 34 cases were conducted during trainee external rotations in countries like the United Kingdom, Germany, and India. Gallbladder and appendix pathologies were most frequent among the 582 recorded laparoscopic cases performed in Africa. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy accounted for 29% (276 of 975 cases), laparoscopic appendectomy for 3% (76 of 2548 cases), and laparoscopic hernia repairs for 0.5% (26 of 5620 cases). Trainees self-reported lower autonomy for laparoscopic (22.5%) than open cases (61.5%). Laparoscopy usage was more prevalent in upper-middle-income (2.7%) and lower-middle-income countries (0.8%) compared with lower-income countries (0.5%) (p < 0.001). Private (1.6%) and faith-based hospitals (1.5%) showed greater laparoscopy utilization than public hospitals (0.5%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the relatively low utilization of minimally invasive techniques in surgical training within the ECSA region. Laparoscopic cases remain a minority, with variations observed based on specific diagnoses. The findings suggest a need to enhance exposure to minimally invasive procedures to ensure well-rounded training and proficiency in these techniques.

Implementation of a Smartphone-Based Platform for Operative Feedback at Tenwek Hospital in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: The SIMPL operative feedback tool is used in many U.S. surgical residency programs. However, the challenges of implementation and benefits of the web-based platform in low- and middle-income countries are unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate implementation of SIMPL in a general surgery residency training program in Kenya. METHODS: SIMPL was pilot tested at Tenwek Hospital from January through December 2021. Participant perspectives of SIMPL were elicited through a survey and semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey data. Inductive qualitative content analysis of interview responses was performed by two independent researchers. RESULTS: Fourteen residents and six faculty (100% response rate) were included in the study and completed over 600 operative assessments. All respondents reported numerical evaluations and dictated feedback were useful. Respondents felt that SIMPL was easy to use, improved quality and frequency of feedback, helped refine surgical skills, and increased resident autonomy. Barriers to use included participants forgetting to complete evaluations, junior residents not submitting evaluations when minimally involved in cases, and technological challenges. Suggestions for improvement included expansion of SIMPL to surgical subspecialties and allowing senior residents to provide feedback to juniors. All respondents wanted to continue using SIMPL, and 90% recommended use at other programs. CONCLUSION: Residents and faculty at Tenwek Hospital believed SIMPL were a positive addition to their training program. There were a few barriers to use and suggestions for improvement specific to the training environment in Kenya, but this study demonstrates it is feasible to use SIMPL in settings outside the U.S. with the appropriate resources.

Operative Case Volumes and Variation for General Surgery Training in East, Central, and Southern Africa.

BACKGROUND: Operative experience is a necessary part of surgical training. The College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA), which oversees general surgery training programs in the region, has implemented guidelines for the minimum necessary case volumes upon completion of two (Membership) and five (Fellowship) years of surgical training. We aimed to review trainee experience to determine whether guidelines are being met and examine the variation of cases between countries. METHODS: Operative procedures were categorized from a cohort of COSECSA general surgery trainees and compared to the guideline minimum case volumes for Membership and Fellowship levels. The primary and secondary outcomes were total observed case volumes and cases within defined categories. Variations by country and development indices were explored. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-four trainees performed 69,283 unique procedures related to general surgery training. The review included 70 accredited hospitals and sixteen countries within Africa. Eighty percent of MCS trainees met the guideline minimum of 200 overall cases; however, numerous trainees did not meet the guideline minimum for each procedure. All FCS trainees met the volume target for total cases and orthopedics; however, many did not meet the guideline minimums for other categories, especially breast, head and neck, urology, and vascular surgery. The operative experience of trainees varied significantly by location and national income level. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical trainees in East, Central, and Southern Africa have diverse operative training experience. Most trainees fulfill the overall case volume requirements; however, further exploration of how to meet the demands of specific categories and procedures is necessary.

Treatment outcomes of esophageal cancer in Eastern Africa: protocol of a multi-center, prospective, observational, open cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality in Eastern Africa. The majority of patients with ESCC in Eastern Africa present with advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. Several palliative interventions for ESCC are currently in use within the region, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy with and without chemotherapy, and esophageal stenting with self-expandable metallic stents; however, the comparative effectiveness of these interventions in a low resource setting has yet to be examined. METHODS: This prospective, observational, multi-center, open cohort study aims to describe the therapeutic landscape of ESCC in Eastern Africa and investigate the outcomes of different treatment strategies within the region. The 4.5-year study will recruit at a total of six sites in Kenya, Malawi and Tanzania (Ocean Road Cancer Institute and Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center in Moshi, Tanzania; Tenwek Hospital in Bomet, Kenya; Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital in Eldoret, Kenya; and Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi). Treatment outcomes that will be evaluated include overall survival, quality of life (QOL) and safety. All patients (≥18 years old) who present to participating sites with a histopathologically-confirmed or presumptive clinical diagnosis of ESCC based on endoscopy or barium swallow will be recruited to participate. Key clinical and treatment-related data including standardized QOL metrics will be collected at study enrollment, 1 month following treatment, 3 months following treatment, and thereafter at 3-month intervals until death. Vital status and QOL data will be collected through mobile phone outreach. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first study to prospectively compare ESCC treatment strategies in Eastern Africa, and the first to investigate QOL benefits associated with different treatments in sub-Saharan Africa. Findings from this study will help define optimal management strategies for ESCC in Eastern Africa and other resource-limited settings and will serve as a benchmark for future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov database on December 15, 2021,  NCT05177393 .

Optimal management of esophageal cancer in Africa: A systemic review of treatment strategies.

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality in Africa. Despite the high burden of disease, optimal management strategies for EC in resource-constrained settings have yet to be established. This systematic review evaluates the literature on treatments for EC throughout Africa and compares the efficacy and safety of varying treatment strategies in this context (PROSPERO CRD42017071546). PubMed, Embase and African Index Medicus were searched for studies published on treatment strategies for EC in Africa from 1980 to 2020. Searches were supplemented by examining bibliographies of included studies and relevant conference proceedings. Methodological quality/risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Forty-six studies were included. Case series constituted the majority of studies: 13 were case series reporting on outcomes of esophagectomies, 17 on palliative luminal or surgical interventions, four on radiotherapy and three on concurrent chemoradiation. Nine randomized controlled trials were identified, of which four prospectively compared different treatment modalities (one investigating radiotherapy vs chemoradiation, three evaluating rigid plastic stents vs other treatments). This review summarizes the research on EC treatments in Africa published over the last four decades and outlines critical gaps in knowledge related to management in this context. Areas in need of further research include (a) evaluation of the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced disease; (b) strategies to improve long-term survival in patients treated with definitive chemoradiation; and (c) the comparative effectiveness of modern palliative interventions, focusing on quality of life and survival as outcome measures.

Establishment of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) program in rural Kenya: a review of patient and trainee outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a leading modality for treatment of biliary and pancreatic disease but is not widely available in sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to assess the development and outcomes of an ERCP service in southwestern Kenya, including case volumes, success rates, infrastructure, and training. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all ERCPs performed at Tenwek Hospital in Bomet, Kenya between January 1, 2011 and March 31, 2020. RESULTS: In total 277 ERCP procedures were attempted during the study period. The commonest indication was obstructive jaundice: 91 patients (32.9%) had malignancy and 85 (30.7%) had choledocholithiasis. Overall clinical success rate was 76.1% and was the highest in patients with biliary stones (81.2%) and lowest in those with tumors (73.5%) (p = 0.094). Procedure-related adverse events occurred in 11.9%, including post-ERCP pancreatitis in 3.6%, with a procedure-related mortality rate of 1.4%. Annual case volumes increased, and mean procedure duration decreased from 162 to 115 min (p = 0.0007) over time. A previously- rained endoscopist initially performed all cases; two staff endoscopists were trained in ERCP during the study period, performing 130 and 89 ERCPs during training, with clinical success rates of 84% and 74% during their subsequent independent practice. CONCLUSION: An ERCP service can be successfully developed at a rural African hospital, with acceptable success and adverse event rates. Biliary obstruction due to stones or tumors are the most common findings. While a previously trained endoscopist should initiate and champion the service, staff endoscopists can be successfully trained despite limited case volumes.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy experience of surgical trainees throughout rural Africa.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) is not routinely accessible in many parts of rural Africa. As surgical training expands and technology progresses, the capacity to deliver endoscopic care to patients improves. We aimed to describe the current burden of gastrointestinal (GI) disease undergoing GIE by examining the experience of surgical training related to GIE. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on GIE procedures performed by trainees with complete case logs during 5-year general surgery training at Pan-African Academy of Christian Surgeons (PAACS) sites. Cases were classified according to diagnosis and/or indication, anatomic location, intervention, adverse events, and outcomes. Comparisons were performed by institutional location and case volumes. Analysis was performed for trainee self-reported autonomy by post-graduate year and case volume experience. RESULTS: Twenty trainees performed a total of 2181 endoscopic procedures. More upper endoscopies (N = 1,853) were performed than lower endoscopies (N = 325). Of all procedures, 546 (26.7%) involved a cancer or mass, 267 (12.2%) involved a report of blood loss, and 452 (20.7%) reported pain as a component of the diagnosis. Interventions beyond biopsy were reported in 555 (25%) procedures. Esophageal indications predominated the upper endoscopies, particularly esophageal cancer. Trainees in high-volume centers and in East Africa performed more interventional endoscopy and procedures focused on esophageal cancer. Procedure logs documented adverse events in 39 cases (1.8% of all procedures), including 16 patients (0.8%) who died within 30 days of the procedure. Self-reported autonomy improved with both increased endoscopy experience and post-graduate year. CONCLUSIONS: GIE is an appropriate component of general surgery residency training in Africa, and adequate training can be provided, particularly in upper GI endoscopy, and includes a wide variety of endoscopic therapeutic interventions.

Cecal volvulus in rural Kenya: delayed presentation contributes to high mortality.

BACKGROUND: Cecal volvulus, which is a torsion involving the cecum, terminal ileum, and ascending colon around its own mesentery, results in a closed-loop obstruction. It is a rare reported cause of adult intestinal obstruction. This study aimed to review the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes at a rural, resource-limited referral center. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients with a diagnosis of cecal volvulus between January 1st, 2009 and December 31st, 2019 at Tenwek Hospital in Bomet, Kenya. The outcome of survival was compared by the time to presentation. Mortality was also compared with prior reports of intestinal obstruction at our institution. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were identified with a mean age of 52 years and a mean symptom duration of 5 days. All patients presented with abdominal pain and distension. Seven patients (54%) presented with perforation, gangrene, or gross peritoneal contamination. Identified risk factors were Ladds bands with malrotation, adhesions, and a sigmoid tumor. Procedures included primary resection and anastomosis (7), damage control (3) with anastomosis on second-look in 2 of these, simple surgical detorsion (1), and surgical detorsion and cecopexy (2). There were four mortalities (31%), of which all had delayed presentation with perforation and fecal contamination. Delays to presentation were associated with mortality (p = 0.03). Cecal volvulus resulted in increased perioperative mortality compared to all intestinal obstructions presenting to the institution (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Cecal volvulus carries a high risk of mortality. A high index of suspicion and early consideration in the differential diagnosis of intestinal obstruction should be considered to reduce the mortality associated with the delay in preoperative diagnosis.

Assessing Post-operative Pain with Self-reports via the Jerrycan Pain Scale in Rural Kenya.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative pain management is an essential component to improving patient outcomes. Measurement and description of pain are challenging and vary in different contexts. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of self-reporting via visual analogue scales using the Jerrycan visual analogue scale in the assessment of post-operative pain and to validate the use of this novel scale compared to standard pain scales. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and forty-one inpatients who underwent surgical procedures were prospectively assessed for post-operative pain over a 12-month period from February 2016 to January 2017. Participants included patients who underwent general surgery, orthopedic and obstetrics/gynecology procedures. On post-operative day one, four scales were assessed: Verbal scale, Hands scale, Faces scale and Jerrycan scale, each ranging from 0-5. Scores for each scale were recorded, and agreements between scales were calculated using kappa values and Spearman's rank coefficients. RESULTS: The mean age was 34.8 years and more female subjects were evaluated (68%). The majority received spinal anesthesia (61%). The mean pain score was 2.5 for all scales. The Jerrycan (0.50) and Faces scales (0.43) had moderate agreements with the Verbal scale. Participants preferred the Jerrycan Pain Scale. CONCLUSION: The Jerrycan pain scale had comparable scores and reasonable agreement with 3 other pain scales among a cohort of post-operative patients. Patient preference and ease of use of the Jerrycan scale may impact assessment and management of pain in a rural African setting. This scale may be adapted for use in similar resource settings for post-operative pain management.

Curative Surgery Improves Survival for Colorectal Cancer in Rural Kenya.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in low- and middle-income countries. Surgical care is essential for the treatment. Many patients do not have access to curative surgery for colorectal cancer in rural Kenya. To better understand the impact of surgical care on colorectal cancer in a resource-limited setting, we compared the experience of patients undergoing operations to those who did not. METHODS: All patients with histologically confirmed CRC at Tenwek Hospital from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2017, were reviewed. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from records when available. The exposure was either curative operation, palliative operation, or no operation. The primary outcome was survival at 5 years, assessed with Cox proportional hazard analysis after propensity-score matching for age, sex, tumor site, time period, and stage. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-five patients were identified on chart review. Survival information was available for 150 patients with a median follow-up of 319 days. Fifty-two percent had colon cancer and 48% had rectal cancer. At diagnosis, the mean age was 55.4 years (SD: 16.7) and the male to female ratio was 1.1:1. Thirty-nine percent underwent curative operations, 25% palliative operations, and 36% no operations. One-year survival was estimated to be 98% for curative surgery, 73% for palliative surgery, and 83% for no surgery (p = 0.0005). On crude analysis, 5-year survival improved with curative operation in comparison to no operation with a hazard ratio of 0.30 (CI: 0.14-0.64) (p = 0.002). After propensity matching, the hazard ratio for curative operation versus no operation remained significant, 0.34 (CI: 0.14-0.80) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Curative surgery improves survival in our resource-limited environment. Although various factors contribute to the use of surgical treatment, the survival advantage persists after adjusted analysis. Barriers exist for access to prompt surgical evaluation and treatment. Surgical care should be a priority to address the increasing burden of CRC in resource-limited settings.

Operative Case Volume Minimums Necessary for Surgical Training Throughout Rural Africa.

BACKGROUND: Resident operative case volumes are an important aspect of surgical education, and minimums are required in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) programs. Minimum operative case volumes for training do not exist in rural Africa. Our objective was to determine the optimal minimum operative case volume necessary for general surgery training in rural Africa. METHODS: A cross-sectional census electronic survey was conducted among faculty (N = 24) and graduates (N = 56) of Pan-African Academy of Christian Surgeons training programs. Three equally weighted exposures (median minimum case volume suggested by participants, operative experience of prior graduates, and comparisons with ACGME minimums), adjusted from responses to targeted questions, were utilized to construct an optimal minimum operative case volume for training. RESULTS: Sixty-four surgeons were contacted and 40 (13 faculty, 24 graduates, and 3 graduates who became faculty) participated. All participants thought operative case minimums were necessary, and the majority (98%) felt current training adequately prepared surgeons for their setting. Constructed optimal case volumes included 1000 major cases with fewer required cases than ACGME in abdomen, breast, thoracic, vascular, endoscopy, and laparoscopy and more required cases than ACGME for alimentary tract, endocrine, operative trauma, skin and soft tissue, pediatric, and plastic surgery. Other categories (gynecology, orthopedics, and urology) were deemed necessary for surgical training, with regional differences. Prior graduates satisfied the overall, but not category-specific, proposed minimums. CONCLUSIONS: The surveyed surgeons highlighted the need for diverse surgical training with minimum exposures. They described increased need for cases reflecting regional variations with a desire for more experience in categories less common at their institutions.

Cross sectional study of serum selenium concentration and esophageal squamous dysplasia in western Kenya.

BACKGROUND: Low serum selenium status has been associated with increased risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). East Africa is a region of high ESCC incidence and is known to have low soil selenium levels, but this association has not previously been evaluated. In this study we assessed the association of serum selenium concentration and the prevalence of esophageal squamous dysplasia (ESD), the precursor lesion of ESCC, in a cross-sectional study of subjects from Bomet, Kenya. METHODS: 294 asymptomatic adult residents of Bomet, Kenya completed questionnaires and underwent endoscopy with Lugol's iodine staining and biopsy for detection of ESD. Serum selenium concentrations were measured by instrumental neutron activation analysis. Odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (95% CI) for associations between serum selenium and ESD were calculated using unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean serum selenium concentration was 85.5 (±28.3) µg/L. Forty-two ESD cases were identified (14% of those screened), including 5 (12%) in selenium quartile 1 (Q1), 5 (12%) in Q2, 15 (36%) in Q3, and 17 (40%) in Q4. Higher serum selenium was associated with prevalence of ESD (Q4 vs Q1: OR: 3.03; 95% CI: 1.05-8.74) and this association remained after adjusting for potential confounders (Q4 vs Q1: OR: 3.87; 95% CI: 1.06-14.19). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the association of serum selenium concentration and esophageal squamous dysplasia in an African population at high risk for ESCC. We found a positive association between higher serum selenium concentration and prevalence of ESD, an association contrary to our original hypothesis. Further work is needed to better understand the role of selenium in the etiology of ESCC in this region, and to develop effective ESCC prevention and control strategies.

Esophageal Squamous Dysplasia is Common in Asymptomatic Kenyans: A Prospective, Community-Based, Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVES: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is endemic in east Africa and is a leading cause of cancer death among Kenyans. The asymptomatic precursor lesion of ESCC is esophageal squamous dysplasia (ESD). We aimed to determine the prevalence of ESD in asymptomatic adult residents of southwestern Kenya. METHODS: In this prospective, community-based, cross-sectional study, 305 asymptomatic adult residents completed questionnaires and underwent video endoscopy with Lugol's iodine chromoendoscopy and mucosal biopsy for detection of ESD. RESULTS: Study procedures were well tolerated, and there were no adverse events. The overall prevalence of ESD was 14.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 10-19%), including 11.5% with low-grade dysplasia and 2.9% with high-grade dysplasia. The prevalence of ESD was >20% among men aged >50 years and women aged >60 years. Residence location was significantly associated with ESD (Zone A adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.37, 95% CI: 1.06-5.30 and Zone B adjusted OR 2.72, 95% CI: 1.12-6.57, compared with Zone C). Iodine chromoendoscopy with biopsy of unstained lesions was more sensitive than white-light endoscopy or random mucosal biopsy for detection of ESD and had 67% sensitivity and 70% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: ESD is common among asymptomatic residents of southwestern Kenya and is especially prevalent in persons aged >50 years and those living in particular local regions. Lugol's iodine chromoendoscopy is necessary for detection of most ESD but has only moderate sensitivity and specificity in this setting. Screening for ESD is warranted in this high-risk population, and endoscopic screening of Kenyans is feasible, safe, and acceptable, but more accurate and less invasive screening tests are needed.

Randomized Trial of Small-diameter Versus Large-diameter Esophageal Stents for Palliation of Malignant Esophageal Obstruction.

GOALS: To assess the effect of esophageal stent diameter on outcomes of patients with malignant esophageal obstruction. BACKGROUND: Esophageal self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) effectively palliate dysphagia due to malignancy, but the best stent diameter is unknown. STUDY: A prospective randomized trial was conducted at a regional referral hospital. One hundred persons with unresectable esophageal cancer were enrolled, randomized to receive a SEMS of either 18 or 23 mm shaft diameter but identical design, and followed until death. Outcome measurements were dysphagia score, adverse events, endoscopic reintervention, and survival. RESULTS: The study arms were evenly matched. Dysphagia resolved after stent placement in 95% in both groups. After 6 months the cumulative incidence of recurrent dysphagia was 38% (95% CI 18%-53%) versus 47% (26%-63%) in the small-diameter versus large-diameter groups, respectively (P=0.23). The cumulative incidence of adverse events was 57% in both groups at 6 months, with trends toward more frequent gastrointestinal bleeding and esophago-respiratory fistula in the large-diameter group, and more frequent stent migration, stent occlusion, and endoscopic reintervention in the small-diameter group. There was a trend toward longer survival in the small-diameter group (median survival, 5.9 vs. 3 mo; P=0.10). Higher initial performance status score and female gender were associated with improved survival. Limitations include enrollment of only 100 (of a planned 200) persons and incomplete follow-up of some participants. CONCLUSIONS: Small-diameter and large-diameter esophageal SEMS provided similar palliation of dysphagia due to esophageal cancer. The overall incidence of adverse events was not affected by stent diameter, but there was a trend toward longer survival with small-diameter stents (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01894763).

Trainee autonomy and surgical outcomes after emergency gastrointestinal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Operative meaningful trainee autonomy is an essential component of surgical training. Reduced trainee autonomy is frequently attributed to patient safety concerns, but this has not been examined within Kenya. We aimed to assess whether meaningful trainee autonomy was associated with a change in patient outcomes. METHODS: We investigated whether meaningful trainee autonomy was associated with a change in severe postoperative complications and all-cause in-hospital mortality in a previously described cohort undergoing emergency gastrointestinal operations. Each operation was reviewed to determine the presence of meaningful autonomy, defined as "supervision only" from faculty. Comparisons were made between faculty-led cases and cases with meaningful trainee autonomy. Multilevel logistic regression models were created for the outcomes of mortality and complications with the exposure of meaningful trainee autonomy, accounting for fixed effects of the Africa Surgical Outcomes Study Risk Score and random effects of discharge diagnoses. RESULTS: After excluding laparoscopy (N = 28) and missing data (N = 3), 451 operations were studied, and 343 (76.1%) had meaningful trainee autonomy. Faculty were more involved in operations with older age, cancer, prior complications, and higher risk scores. On unadjusted analysis, meaningful trainee autonomy was associated with mortality odds of 0.32 (95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.58) compared with faculty-led operations. Similarly, the odds of developing complications were 0.52 (95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.84) with meaningful trainee autonomy compared with faculty-led operations. When adjusting for Africa Surgical Outcomes Study Score and clustering discharge diagnoses, the odds of mortality (odds ratio 0.58; 95% confidence interval: 0.27-1.2) and complication (odds ratio 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.47-1.5) were not significant. CONCLUSION: Our findings support that increasing trainee autonomy does not change patient outcomes in selected emergency gastrointestinal operations. Further, trainees and faculty appropriately discern patients at higher risk of complications and mortality, and the selective granting of trainee autonomy does not affect patient safety.