Two chemoattenuated PfSPZ malaria vaccines induce sterile hepatic immunity.

The global decline in malaria has stalled1, emphasizing the need for vaccines that induce durable sterilizing immunity. Here we optimized regimens for chemoprophylaxis vaccination (CVac), for which aseptic, purified, cryopreserved, infectious Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites (PfSPZ) were inoculated under prophylactic cover with pyrimethamine (PYR) (Sanaria PfSPZ-CVac(PYR)) or chloroquine (CQ) (PfSPZ-CVac(CQ))-which kill liver-stage and blood-stage parasites, respectively-and we assessed vaccine efficacy against homologous (that is, the same strain as the vaccine) and heterologous (a different strain) controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) three months after immunization ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ , NCT02511054 and NCT03083847). We report that a fourfold increase in the dose of PfSPZ-CVac(PYR) from 5.12 × 104 to 2 × 105 PfSPZs transformed a minimal vaccine efficacy (low dose, two out of nine (22.2%) participants protected against homologous CHMI), to a high-level vaccine efficacy with seven out of eight (87.5%) individuals protected against homologous and seven out of nine (77.8%) protected against heterologous CHMI. Increased protection was associated with Vδ2 γδ T cell and antibody responses. At the higher dose, PfSPZ-CVac(CQ) protected six out of six (100%) participants against heterologous CHMI three months after immunization. All homologous (four out of four) and heterologous (eight out of eight) infectivity control participants showed parasitaemia. PfSPZ-CVac(CQ) and PfSPZ-CVac(PYR) induced a durable, sterile vaccine efficacy against a heterologous South American strain of P. falciparum, which has a genome and predicted CD8 T cell immunome that differs more strongly from the African vaccine strain than other analysed African P. falciparum strains.

No Immunological Interference or Safety Concerns When Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Is Coadministered With a Coronavirus Disease 2019 mRNA-1273 Booster Vaccine in Adults Aged 50 Years and Older: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: There is growing consensus that coronavirus disease 2019 booster vaccines may be coadministered with other age-appropriate vaccines. Adding to the limited available data supporting coadministration, especially with adjuvanted vaccines, could enhance vaccine coverage in adults. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, open-label study, eligible adults aged ≥50 years were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive mRNA-1273 (50 µg) booster vaccination and a first dose of recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV1) 2 weeks apart (Seq group) or concomitantly (Coad group). The second RZV dose (RZV2) was administered 2 months post-RZV1 in both groups. Primary objectives were noninferiority of anti-glycoprotein E (gE) and anti-spike protein antibody responses in the Coad group compared to the Seq group. Safety and further immunogenicity assessments were secondary objectives. RESULTS: In total, 273 participants were randomized to the Seq group and 272 to the Coad group. Protocol-specified noninferiority criteria were met. The adjusted geometric mean concentration ratio (Seq/Coad) was 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], .89-1.13) for anti-gE antibodies 1 month post-RZV2, and 1.09 (95% CI, .90-1.32) for anti-spike antibodies 1 month post-mRNA-1273 booster. No clinically relevant differences were observed in overall frequency, intensity, or duration of adverse events between the 2 study groups. Most solicited adverse events were mild/moderate in intensity, each with median duration ≤2.5 days. Administration site pain and myalgia were the most frequently reported in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of mRNA-1273 booster vaccine with RZV in adults aged ≥50 years was immunologically noninferior to sequential administration and had a safety and reactogenicity profile consistent with both vaccines administered sequentially. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT05047770.

No immunological interference or concerns about safety when seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine is co-administered with a COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster vaccine in adults: A randomized trial.

The objective of the study was to assess the safety and immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 COVID-19 booster vaccination when co-administered with an egg-based standard dose seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV). This was a phase 3, randomized, open-label study. Eligible adults aged ≥ 18 years were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive mRNA-1273 (50 µg) booster vaccination and QIV 2 weeks apart (Seq group) or concomitantly (Coad group). Primary objectives were non-inferiority of haemagglutinin inhibition (HI) and anti-Spike protein antibody responses in the Coad compared to Seq group. 497/498 participants were randomized and vaccinated in the Seq/Coad groups, respectively. The adjusted geometric mean titer/concentration ratios (95% confidence intervals) (Seq/Coad) for HI antibodies were 1.02 (0.89-1.18) for A/H1N1, 0.93 (0.82-1.05) for A/H3N2, 1.00 (0.89-1.14] for B/Victoria, and 1.04 (0.93-1.17) for B/Yamagata; and 0.98 (0.84-1.13) for anti-Spike antibodies, thus meeting the protocol-specified non-inferiority criteria. The most frequently reported adverse events in both groups were pain at the injection site and myalgia. The 2 groups were similar in terms of the overall frequency, intensity, and duration of adverse events. In conclusion, co-administration of mRNA-1273 booster vaccine with QIV in adults was immunologically non-inferior to sequential administration. Safety and reactogenicity profiles were similar in both groups (clinicaltrials.gov NCT05047770).

What is the context? Updated booster shots against COVID-19 disease are likely to offer more protection as the virus is changing over time.It is important for doctors, other healthcare providers and patients to know whether COVID-19 booster vaccines can be given at the same time as other vaccines recommended for adults.What is new? The results of our study showed that an mRNA-based COVID-19 booster vaccine could be given at the same time as the seasonal influenza vaccine.When given together, both vaccines led to immune responses and had side effects that were similar to those observed when they were given at separate times.What is the impact? The potential benefits of administering more than 1 vaccine during a healthcare visit include improved coverage and a reduced number of doctor visits needed to receive all vaccines.Co-administration of COVID-19 booster vaccines and influenza vaccines could be an attractive option for patients and healthcare professionals.

Recombinant zoster vaccine in immunocompetent and immunocompromised adults: A review of clinical studies.

Herpes zoster (HZ) is a debilitating vaccine-preventable disease. Impairment of cell-mediated immunity, as observed with aging and immunosuppressive disorders and therapies, increases risk. Recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) is efficacious against HZ in adults aged ≥50 years in different settings, and in immunocompromised adults aged ≥18 years who are at increased risk of developing HZ. RZV is the first and only HZ vaccine approved for use in immunocompromised adults globally, including in Europe and the US. RZV has a clinically acceptable safety profile and elicits robust immune responses in adults aged ≥50 years, and in immunocompromised adults aged ≥18 years who are at increased risk of HZ. Additionally, RZV is efficacious against HZ complications such as post-herpetic neuralgia and HZ-related pain. This review updates knowledge from a randomized controlled trial setting on the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and impact on quality of life of RZV.

What is the context?The varicella zoster virus, which causes chickenpox in childhood, can reactivate in adults and trigger a painful rash called herpes zoster (HZ) or shingles. Almost all adults are at risk of developing HZ as they age or develop risk factors for HZ. Two key studies published in 2015 and 2016 (ZOE-50 and ZOE-70) compared the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) with placebo and showed that RZV could effectively prevent HZ in adults aged ≥50 years and ≥70 years, respectively. Several clinical studies were carried out in subsequent years, assessing how effective and safe RZV is compared with a placebo/control in different populations. Based on these studies, RZV was approved for use in adults aged ≥50 years and those aged ≥18 years at increased risk of HZ (European Union) due to immunodeficiency or immunosuppression caused by known disease or therapy (United States).What is new?We reviewed clinical studies of RZV published between 1 January, 2015 and 31 October, 2022. The evidence shows that RZV is effective and does not cause safety concerns across the studied populations, including adults aged ≥50 years and immunocompromised adults aged ≥18 years who are at increased risk of HZ.What is the impact?The growing amount of knowledge on the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and impact on quality of life of RZV should assist in deciding to vaccinate and in ensuring that the individuals who could benefit the most from RZV have access to vaccination.

The adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine co-administered with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in adults aged ≥50 years: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster (HZ) results from reactivation of latent varicella-zoster virus. Adults at increased risk of HZ (due to immunocompromising conditions or older age) are also at risk of pneumococcal disease, both of which are preventable by vaccination. We evaluated simultaneous versus sequential administration of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) and the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in adults aged ≥50 years. METHODS: In this phase IIIB multinational trial (NCT03439657), participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either the first RZV dose and PCV13 simultaneously followed by the second RZV dose two months later (Co-Ad, N = 449), or at two-month intervals, PCV13, the first RZV dose, and the second RZV dose sequentially (Control, N = 463). Objectives were to demonstrate that immune responses to both vaccines are non-inferior when co-administered compared to sequential administration and to evaluate the safety of their co-administration. RESULTS: The RZV vaccine response rate (VRR) in the Co-Ad group was 99.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 97.6-99.7), meeting the VRR success criterion. Non-inferiority criteria for the Co-Ad versus Control group were also met for anti-glycoprotein E antibodies (adjusted geometric mean concentration Control/Co-Ad ratio 1.07 [95%CI: 0.99-1.16]) and all PCV13 serotypes (adjusted antibody geometric mean titer Control/Co-Ad ratios 1.02 [95%CI: 0.86-1.22] to 1.36 [95%CI: 1.07-1.73]). Upon co-administration, the frequency of solicited local adverse events was consistent with the known safety profile of each individual vaccine, whereas solicited general adverse events were within the same range as for RZV alone. CONCLUSIONS: RZV co-administered with PCV13 had an acceptable safety profile. Humoral immune responses to both vaccines were non-inferior when co-administered compared to sequential administration. These results suggest that adults may benefit from receiving RZV and a PCV at the same healthcare visit.

Long-term Protection Against Herpes Zoster by the Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine: Interim Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety Results up to 10 Years After Initial Vaccination.

Approximately 10 years after vaccination with the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV), an interim analysis of this follow-up study of the ZOE-50/70 trials demonstrated that efficacy against herpes zoster remained high. Moreover, the safety profile remained clinically acceptable, suggesting that the clinical benefit of the RZV in ≥50-year-olds is sustained up to 10 years.

Safety and efficacy of a three-dose regimen of Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite vaccine in adults during an intense malaria transmission season in Mali: a randomised, controlled phase 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: WHO recently approved a partially effective vaccine that reduces clinical malaria in children, but increased vaccine activity is required to pursue malaria elimination. A phase 1 clinical trial was done in Mali, west Africa, to assess the safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of a three-dose regimen of Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite (PfSPZ) Vaccine (a metabolically active, non-replicating, whole malaria sporozoite vaccine) against homologous controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) and natural P falciparum infection. METHODS: We recruited healthy non-pregnant adults aged 18-50 years in Donéguébougou, Mali, and surrounding villages (Banambani, Toubana, Torodo, Sirababougou, Zorokoro) for an open-label, dose-escalation pilot study and, thereafter, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled main trial. Pilot study participants were enrolled on an as-available basis to one group of CHMI infectivity controls and three staggered vaccine groups receiving: one dose of 4·5 × 105, one dose of 9 × 105, or three doses of 1·8 × 106 PfSPZ via direct venous inoculation at approximately 8 week intervals, followed by homologous CHMI 5 weeks later with infectious PfSPZ by direct venous inoculation (PfSPZ Challenge). Main cohort participants were stratified by village and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive three doses of 1·8 × 106 PfSPZ or normal saline at 1, 13, and 19 week intervals using permuted block design by the study statistician. The primary outcome was safety and tolerability of at least one vaccine dose; the secondary outcome was vaccine efficacy against homologous PfSPZ CHMI (pilot study) or against naturally transmitted P falciparum infection (main study) measured by thick blood smear. Combined artesunate and amodiaquine was administered to eliminate pre-existing parasitaemia. Outcomes were analysed by modified intention to treat (mITT; including all participants who received at least one dose of investigational product; safety and vaccine efficacy) and per protocol (vaccine efficacy). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02627456. FINDINGS: Between Dec 20, 2015, and April 30, 2016, we enrolled 56 participants into the pilot study (five received the 4·5 × 105 dose, five received 9 × 105, 30 received 1·8 × 106, 15 were CHMI controls, and one withdrew before vaccination) and 120 participants into the main study cohort with 60 participants assigned PfSPZ Vaccine and 60 placebo in the main study. Adverse events and laboratory abnormalities post-vaccination in all dosing groups were few, mainly mild, and did not differ significantly between vaccine groups (all p>0·05). Unexpected severe transaminitis occured in four participants: one participant in pilot phase that received 1·8 × 106 PfSPZ Vaccine, one participant in main phase that received 1·8 × 106 PfSPZ Vaccine, and two participants in the main phase placebo group. During PfSPZ CHMI, approximately 5 weeks after the third dose of 1·8 × 106 PfSPZ, none of 29 vaccinees and one of 15 controls became positive on thick blood smear; subsequent post-hoc PCR analysis for submicroscopic blood stage infections detected P falciparum parasites in none of the 29 vaccine recipients and eight of 15 controls during CHMI. In the main trial, 32 (58%) of 55 vaccine recipients and 42 (78%) of 54 controls became positive on thick blood smear during 24-week surveillance after vaccination. Vaccine efficacy (1-hazard ratio) was 0·51 per protocol (95% CI 0·20-0·70; log-rank p=0·0042) and 0·39 by mITT (0·04-0·62; p=0·033); vaccine efficacy (1-risk ratio) was 0·24 per-protocol (0·02-0·41; p=0·031) and 0·22 mITT (0·01-0·39; p=0·041). INTERPRETATION: A three-dose regimen of PfSPZ Vaccine was safe, well tolerated, and conferred 51% vaccine efficacy against intense natural P falciparum transmission, similar to 52% vaccine efficacy reported for a five-dose regimen in a previous trial. FUNDING: US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Sanaria. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.