Favorable Remodeling After TEVAR in Uncomplicated Acute and Subacute Type B Aortic Dissection in Comparison to Conservative Treatment: A Midterm Analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the midterm and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) procedure to treat an uncomplicated acute and subacute type B aortic dissection (uATBAD) with high risk for subsequent aortic complications compared with the group of patients who received a conservative treatment protocol during the same period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2019, 35 patients who had TEVAR due to uATBAD and those with conservative procedure (n=18) were included in a retrospective analysis and follow-up study. The primary endpoints were false lumen thrombosis/perfusion, true lumen diameter, and aortic dilatation. The aortic-related mortality, reintervention, and long-term survival were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: In the study period, 53 patients (22 females) with a mean age of 61.1±13 years were included. No 30-day and in-hospital mortality was recorded. Permanent neurological deficits occurred in 2 patients (5.7%). In the TEVAR group (n=35) and in a median follow-up period of 34 months, a significant reduction of maximum aortic and false lumen diameter as well as a significant increase of true lumen diameter were detected (p<0.001 each). Complete false lumen thrombosis increased from 6% preoperatively to 60% at follow-up. The median difference in aortic, false lumen, and true lumen diameter was -5 mm (interquartile range [IQR]=-28 to 8 mm), -11 mm (IQR=-53 to 10 mm), and 7 mm (IQR=-13 to 17 mm), respectively. In 3 patients (8.6%), a reintervention was needed. Two patients (1 aortic-related) died during follow-up. The estimated survival according to Kaplan-Meyer analysis was 94.1% after 3 years and 87.5% after 5 years. Similar to the TEVAR group, no 30-day or in-hospital mortality was recorded in the conservative group. During follow-up, 2 patients died and 5 patients underwent conversion-TEVAR (28%). In a median follow-up period of 26 months (range=150), a significant increase of maximum aortic diameter (p=0.006) and a tendency to augmentation of the false lumen (p=0.06) were noted. No significant reduction of the true lumen was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients at high risk of subsequent aortic complications in uncomplicated acute and subacute type B aortic dissection is safe and is associated with favorable midterm outcomes regarding aortic remodeling. CLINICAL IMPACT: In a retrospective, single center analysis of prospectively collected data with follow-up, we compared 35 patients with high-risk features who recieved TEVAR in acute and sub-acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection to a control-group (n=18). The TEVAR group showed a significant positive remoduling (reduction of max. aortic and false lumen diameter and increase of true lumen diameter (p<0.001 each)) during follow-up with an estimated survival of 94.1% after 3 years and 87.5% after 5 years.

A prospective survey study on the education and awareness about walking exercise amongst inpatients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in Germany.

Background: To determine the adherence to supervised exercise training and underlying reasons for non-adherence amongst patients with inpatient treatment of symptomatic lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Patients and methods: This was a prospective questionnaire-based survey study of all consecutively treated inpatients with treatment for either intermittent claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) surveyed at sixteen participating centres in Germany. Results: A total of 235 patients (median age 70 years) were included, thereof 29.4% females and 34.6% with CLTI. The median time from first PAD diagnosis was 4 years (IQR: 1-8). Only 11.4% have previously participated in any walking exercise programme before the index treatment, thereby 10.0% in the IC subgroup and 12.0% with CLTI. Amongst all patients, 35.6% responded they were appropriately informed about the necessity and benefits of walking exercise programmes by their hospital physicians (25.8% by general practitioners), and 65.3% agreed that adherence to supervised exercise may improve their pain-free walking distance. A total of 24.5% responded they had access to necessary information concerning local walking exercise programmes. Amongst 127 free text comments on the reasons for non-adherence to supervised exercise training, 64% of the comments contained lack of information or consent on such measures. Conclusions: Less than 12% of the patients enrolled in the current study have ever participated in a walking exercise programme during their life course. Although all practice guidelines contain corresponding class I recommendations, especially for patients suffering from IC, most patients responded that they were not appropriately informed about the necessity of exercise training along with the fact that 65% agreed that exercise may increase the pain-free walking distance. Taken all together, these results emphasise that we miss an important opportunity in the patient-physician communication. Efforts should be made to improve acceptance and application of structured walking-exercise for patients with PAD.

Long-Term Outcomes after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using Chimney Grafts for Aortic Arch Pathologies: 10 Years of Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: This study reports the early- and long-term outcomes of the thoracic endovascular aortic repair using the Chimney-Graft technique (ChTEVAR) for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2019, patients who underwent aortic ChTEVAR technique in our institution were included. Early, mid, and long-term outcomes in this group of patients were evaluated. Patient follow-up data were obtained by imaging follow-up that are routinely performed after 3-6 months following initial surgery and then at yearly intervals. RESULTS: Aortic arch repair with a ChTEVAR was performed in 54 patients. The 30-day mortality was 18.5% (n = 10). All-cause 30-day mortality was higher in the subgroup of patients operated urgently (33% vs. 14%) without a significant difference (P = 0.141). Permanent neurological deficit (PND) was observed in 15% (8/54 patients); stroke in 11% (6/54), and paraplegia 4% (2/54). During follow-up the primary and primary-assisted chimney-graft patency was 96.8% and 97.8%, respectively. The multivariate analysis identified the age >70 years and the aortic diameter as independent risk factors for elevated mortality during the follow-up (P = 0.015 and 0.001, respectively). The PND was an independent predictor for 30-day mortality (P = 0.014, hazard ratio 13.5, 95% confidence interval 1.7-106.6). CONCLUSIONS: The ChTEVAR has noninferior results to other open and endovascular aortic arch repair methods with an acceptable long-term survival especially in elective procedures.

[Debate on Infrarenal AAA in Young and Fit Patients ('Fit for Open Repair'): Open Repair is Safe and Long-term Results are Better]. / Debatte infrarenales AAA bei jüngeren Patienten ("fit for open repair"): Der offene Aortenersatz ist sicher und hat ein besseres Langzeitergebnis.

Endovascular aortic repair, initially developed for patients at prohibitively high risk for an open repair, has undergone significant technical evolution and refinement and has emerged as the preferred treatment option for patients with an infrarenal aortic aneurysm. However, analysis of long-term data of the randomised studies revealed inferior results with regards to survival and freedom-from-reintervention after eight years. Open aortic repair has been performed for more than seven decades and especially for the younger patients with few comorbidities, results are excellent. Potential drawbacks of open repair like incisional hernias, erectile dysfunction and quality of life can either be effectively prevented (mesh reinforcement) or actually failed to show a significant difference compared to open repair in recent studies. Therefore, meticulous assessment of patient comorbidites using validated parameters is the key element for decision-making and parameters such as young age, low comorbidity profile, large aneurysm and presence of atopic renal arteries or a dominant inferior mesenteric artery should prompt a recommendation of open repair.

[Pro Endo: No Need for Open Any More... Surveillance is All Important]. / Pro Endo: No Need for Open Any More ... Surveillance is All Important.

Since its first report in 1991, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become an established and preferred treatment modality for many patients. Several randomised controlled trials comparing EVAR and open repair have shown an early survival benefit, lower perioperative morbidity and shorter hospital stay with EVAR. As a result, EVAR has become the most common method of elective repair of BAAs in most vascular centres. Despite its widespread use, there are still subgroups of the patient population for whom the benefit of EVAR has not been clearly demonstrated. The most frequently discussed subgroup in this context is the patient with few risk factors - due to concerns about the durability and need of reinterventions. EVAR can provide durability and long-term survival similar to open repair in these younger patients, as long as the aneurysm anatomy and instructions for use are followed. The evidence on the effects of follow-up on patient survival is currently controversial. With increasing knowledge about the behavior of endoprostheses and factors that influence the complications of the endograft, changes in follow-up protocols have been made. A more patient-specific follow-up strategy and less compliance with a rigorous follow up scheme are required.

Comparison of Two Iliac Branch Devices and Their Midterm Performance in Maintaining Blood Flow to the Internal Iliac Artery.

Purpose: To compare and contrast the midterm outcomes of the E-liac and Zenith (ZBIS) iliac branch devices (IBDs) for the preservation of the internal iliac artery (IIA) in aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation. Materials and Methods: Between January 2014 and December 2018, 84 consecutive patients (median age 74 years; 76 men) were electively treated with the E-liac (n=44) or ZBIS (n=40) IBDs and were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the technical success, patency, need for reintervention, and mortality associated with these devices. Results: Technical success was achieved in 95 of 99 implantations (95.9%) without any statistically significant difference between the groups (93.7% vs 98.0%, p=0.114). During the first 30 days, 3 occlusions in the ZBIS group and 1 in the E-liac group were identified. There was 1 perioperative death in the ZBIS group. The median follow-up was 37 months for the ZBIS group and 28 months for the E-liac group (p=0.657). Six patients from the ZBIS group and 7 from the E-liac group were lost to follow-up. Among the remaining, there were 2 further deaths recorded, 1 in each group. Four further reinterventions in the E-liac group and 2 in the ZBIS group were performed during follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from reintervention were 87.2% (95% CI 82.6% to 90.2%) for the ZBIS group and at 86.0% (95% CI 83.7% to 89.1%) for the E-liac group (p=0.563); the freedom from occlusion estimates were 89.7% (95% CI 85.8% to 94.5%) and 95.3% (95% CI 92% to 98.7%; p=0.317), respectively. Conclusion: The E-liac and the ZBIS IBDs showed equally high technical success, midterm patency, and low reintervention rates.

Prospective Study of the Iliac Branch Device E-liac in Patients with Common Iliac Artery Aneurysms: 12 Month Results.

OBJECTIVES: At 12 months follow up of the PLIANT study, clinical success and efficacy of the E-liac Stent Graft System (JOTEC GmbH, Hechingen, Germany) were evaluated. Clinical success was defined as aneurysm exclusion (no type I, III, IV endoleak) with primary patency of the internal iliac artery (IIA) and external iliac artery (EIA) on the E-liac implantation side. METHODS: In this prospective multicentre European observational study, clinical and morphological data of 45 patients (93% male, mean age 72 y) were prospectively collected in 11 European centres between July 2014 and June 2016. Forty patients underwent an aorto-iliac (three patients bilaterally) treatment and five an isolated iliac treatment. RESULTS: At 12 months follow up, data were available for 42 patients. Overall clinical success at 12 months was 90%, with a survival rate of 100%. Four patients (10%) did not achieve clinical success, one with an internal iliac artery (IIA) occlusion on the E-liac implantation side, one with an infrarenal type Ia endoleak, and two with type Ib endoleaks in IIA. At 12 months the primary patency rate in the internal iliac artery on the iliac side branch implantation side was 98%. Two patients (5%) received E-liac related re-interventions: one caused by an edge stenosis at the distal end of the graft limb in the external iliac artery (EIA) and one caused by thrombo-embolism in the external iliac artery. Thus, for the EIA, primary and secondary patency rates were 98% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The low device related re-intervention rate of 5%, the high survival rate of 100%, and the high primary patency rates of 98% for the IIA and EIA at 12 month follow up demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the E-liac Stent Graft System. Long term 36 month results are awaited to confirm the efficacy and durability.

A Shorter Aortic Arch Sealing Ring (< 10 mm) Distal to the Most Distal Chimney Seems to Be an Additional Important Factor Contributing to a Gutter Endoleak in Aortic Arch TEVAR.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to define the possible anatomical and technical parameter that might predict the occurrence of gutter endoleak or type Ia endoleak (EL Ia) in patients treated with the chimney graft (CG) technique for the brachiocephalic trunk (BCT) and left common carotid artery (LCCA) due to aortic arch pathologies. METHODS: We reviewed our institutional endovascular aortic database of patients, who between 2010 and 2018 had undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with chimney graft technique (ChTEVAR) as a debranching method of the supraaortic arteries. RESULTS: ChTEVAR was performed in 45 patients of whom a chimney in both the LCCA and the BCT was used in 32 patients, only in the LCCA in twelve patients, and only in the BCT in one patient. Eight patients (17.8%) had an EL Ia (based on postoperative computed tomography angiography). No late EL Ia was detected during the follow-up period. All patients with a postoperative EL Ia received 2 CGs with one each for the BCT, and LCCA had either no or a sealing ring distal to the most distal chimney of less than 10 mm versus patients with a longer sealing zone (P = 0.043). Patients with an endoleak did not differ from those without endoleak with respect to stent-graft oversizing, the diameter of the proximal and distal landing zones, or the aortic diameter directly proximal to the pathology. CONCLUSIONS: A sealing ring distal to the most distal chimney of more than 10 mm seems to be associated with a reduced risk of an EL Ia. The relatively few patients and the single-center nature require larger studies to verify the present results.

Prescription rate of anti-atherosclerotic drugs in German nursing homes and its impact on outcome.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is one of the major manifestations of general atherosclerosis and strongly associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Because only few epidemiologic studies are available concerning the prevalence of PAD in inhabitants ≥ 80 years of age, we screened inhabitants of nursing care homes in Germany for PAD and cardiovascular diseases and to assess the one year mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study, screening inhabitants of 42 nursing homes for PAD. Demographic data, comorbidities, cardiovascular risk factors and daily medication were collected. PAD was defined as ankle-brachial index < 0.9. During a follow up period of one year, cardio- and cerebrovascular events and mortality were recorded, as well as the rate of falls and major amputation. RESULTS: 1,329 probands (391 men, 938 women) > 60 years were eligible for further analysis. The mean age was 84.1 years (range 61-107 years) and the prevalence of PAD was 31.5 % . Media sclerosis was found in up to 17 %, and an existing diagnosis of PAD (in case of pathological ABI) and undertreatment was common. Probands with PAD were less likely to be treated according to guideline recommendations (antiplatelet therapy, beta blockers, statins) than probands with coronary artery disease (CAD). The overall one-year mortality was 19.8 % (n = 236), significantly higher than for a gender and age matched German population (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The current study shows a high prevalence of PAD in German nursing care homes. The one year mortality was not significantly different between probands with PAD and those with severe PAD (defined as an ABI of ≤ 0.5), whereas a media sclerosis was associated with an increased risk in probands with CAD in comparison to those without. Use of anti-diabetic agents and aspirin in monotherapy was associated with a reduced one-year mortality risk.

Prevalence of Bovine Aortic Arch Variant in Patients with Aortic Dissection and its Implications in the Outcome of Patients with Acute Type B Aortic Dissection.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: To investigate the prevalence of bovine arch (BA) among patients with type A and B aortic dissection, and to provide insight into the implication of this variation on the outcome of patients with acute or subacute type B aortic dissection (a/sTBAD). METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis includes patients with a/sTBAD admitted between January 2006 and December 2016. Computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) of patients referred because of type A aortic dissection were also re-evaluated with regard to the presence of BA. As a control group, 110 oncological patients who had undergone a chest CTA for disease staging during the study period were enrolled. A total of 154 patients with a/sTBAD and 168 with type A aortic dissection were identified during the study period. RESULTS: An overall prevalence of 17.6% for BA variants was revealed. The comparison between patients with aortic dissection and the control group showed no statistically significant difference in BA prevalence (17.7% vs. 17.3%; p = 1.0). No statistically significant difference in BA prevalence was observed when comparing patients with type A aortic dissection with those with type B aortic dissection (16.6% vs. 18.8%; p = .66). During a median follow-up period of 27.8 months, 30 patients died. The mortality rate among patients presenting a BA variant was 34.5%, whereas among patients without, it was 16.0% (p = .04). Multivariate analysis revealed the presence of a BA as an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted odds ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-9.8). CONCLUSION: The BA should be considered as a predictor of the outcome for patients with type B aortic dissection.

Prevalence of the Computed Tomographic Morphological DISSECT Predictors in Uncomplicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The aim was to analyse the prevalence of computed tomographic (CT) morphological predictors and their influence on early chronic phase aortic diameter expansion in patients with uncomplicated acute Stanford type B aortic dissection (ATBAD). METHODS: This retrospective analysis reviewed the CT imaging of 140 patients admitted with uncomplicated ATBAD to two tertiary centres between March 2003 and April 2016. The prevalence of the following CT-morphological predictors was determined at baseline: primary entry tear (PET) diameter ≥ 10 mm, its location at the concavity of the aortic arch; maximum descending aortic diameter ≥ 40 mm; false lumen (FL) diameter ≥ 22 mm; partial FL thrombosis and a fusiform index (FI) of ≥0.64. Thoracic aortic diameter expansion (ADE) was evaluated in 65 patients treated by best medical therapy (BMT) (median CT follow up 11.6 months). Study end points were predictor prevalence and ADE. RESULTS: A mean ± SD of 2.45 ± 1.35 predictors were registered among all 140 patients; 75.0% of patients showed at least two predictors. In 7.9% of patients, no predictor was found. The prevalence of PET at the arch concavity was 18.6%, PET diameter ≥10 mm in 60.0%, maximal descending aortic diameter ≥40 mm in 51.4%, FL diameter ≥22 mm in 47.9%, partial FL thrombosis in 47.9%, and FI ≥ 0.64 in 20.7%. An ADE ≥5 mm was observed in 38 of 65 patients. Median observed ADE was 5.1 mm (median follow up (FU) 11.6 months, range -3.2-27.4 mm). Regression analysis for multiple predictors showed a basic ADE of 2.5 mm plus 1.9 mm per predictor at the median FU of 11.6 months (2.5 mm ± 1.9; 95% confidence interval CI -0.2-5.2 mm ± 0.7-3.0 mm; p = .003). CONCLUSION: In the majority of patients, at least one of the investigated morphological predictors of disease progression in uncomplicated ATBAD was detected. An ADE ≥5 mm affected 38 of 65 BMT patients. CT based predictors help to define TBAD patients at risk of progression.

Bilateral Endograft Limb Occlusion after Endovascular Aortic Repair: Predictive Factors of Occurrence.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral limb occlusion after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is relatively uncommon. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of bilateral endograft limb occlusion after EVAR and identify potential anatomical predictive factors of occurrence. METHODS: A total of 579 patients underwent elective EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm between January 2010 and December 2015. All patients presenting with unilateral and bilateral occlusions were prospectively analyzed. A group of patients who underwent EVAR but did not present with endograft limb occlusion were matched for sex, age, and commercial type of endograft and were used as controls. RESULTS: Overall, 21 (3.6%) patients were complicated with unilateral endograft limb occlusion, whereas 8 (1.4%) of them presented with sequential (in different time) bilateral limb occlusion. We found that iliac artery angulation ≥60°, iliac perimeter calcification ≥50%, and endograft oversizing in the common iliac artery of more than 15% had the same impact and could equally result in limb occlusion. We coded the variables angle, calcification, and endograft limb oversizing of the common iliac artery with a score from 0 to 2 as follows: (1) 0: angle <60° in both limbs, 1: angle ≥60° in one limb, 2: angle ≥60° in both limbs; (2) 0: calcification <50%: in both limbs, 1: calcification ≥ 50%: in one limb, 2: calcification ≥ 50%: in both limbs; and (3) 0: endograft limb oversizing <15%, 1: endograft limb oversizing ≥15% in one limb, 2: endograft limb oversizing ≥15% in both limbs. A composite variable, consisting of the sum of scoring in variables was analyzed, with a score from 0 to 6. Our study showed that it was the most probable to be in the control group when score in the composite variable was 0-3, it was the most probable to have unilateral limb occlusion when score was 4-5, and finally, it was the most probable to have bilateral limb occlusion when score in the composite variable was equal to 6. CONCLUSIONS: Our study evidenced that the highest probability for bilateral limb occlusion occurred when implantation of a more than 15% oversized endograft in iliac arteries with iliac artery angulation ≥60° and iliac perimeter calcification ≥50% was present in both iliac arteries. It is therefore clear that limb occlusion requires the synergistic effect and interaction of bilateral multiple thrombogenic components in the iliac artery before it is manifested.

Single-center mid-term experience with chimney-graft technique for the preservation of flow to the supra-aortic branches.

Objectives To investigate the feasibility and the mid-term outcomes of the chimney-graft technique for the revascularization of supra-aortic branches in patients with thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch. Methods A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database between January 2010 and July 2016 was performed. Primary endpoints were 30-day and overall mortality. Secondary endpoints were technical success, target vessel patency, stroke/transitory ischemic attack and type I/III endoleak rate. Results A total of 30 patients (80% male, median age 70.0 years) were treated using the chimney-graft technique for the supra-aortic branches. The indication was a degenerative aneurysm in nine patients (32%) and a type B Stanford aortic dissection and a penetrating aortic ulcer in the descending aorta in seven patients (23%), respectively. In six patients (20.0%), the indication was an type Ia endoleak after previous endovascular thoracic repair, whereas a pseudoaneurysm after previous open repair of the descending aorta was the indication in one patient (3%). Twenty-three patients (77%) were treated electively, five (17%) emergently and two (7%) urgently because of free rupture. Technical success was achieved in 90% of patients. The 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 17% (5/30). A retrograde dissection was presented in five patients. Four patients experienced a cerebrovascular event. Eight patients had type Ia endoleak and 10 had type II. During the median follow-up of 16 months (range: 0-56), four further patients died: one in respiratory insufficiency, one due to a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, one in meningitis and the last one for unknown reason. The chimney-graft patency was 100%. According to the Kaplan-Meier curve, the estimated survival at one year was 66 ± 9%. Conclusions The chimney-graft technique, despite a technically demanding strategy, is a useful tool as bailout procedure in our armamentarium for high-risk patients, unsuitable for open or hybrid repair.

Prospective study of the E-liac Stent Graft System in patients with common iliac artery aneurysms: 30-Day results.

OBJECTIVES: To study the safety and feasibility of the E-liac Stent Graft System® in patients with aorto/iliac aneurysms. METHODS: A prospective multicentric European registry of patients receiving the E-liac Stent Graft System® was conducted. Endpoints of the study included the technical success as well as periprocedural events and 30-day endoleaks, reinterventions, internal and external iliac artery patency and mortality. RESULTS: Between July 2014 and June 2016, a total of 45 patients (93% men, mean age 72 years, range 53-90 years) were enrolled at 11 sites in four European countries. Five patients received an isolated iliac treatment. Thirty-seven patients were treated with a combination of an abdominal stent graft and a unilateral E-liac and three in combination with bilateral E-liac. All E-liac Stent Grafts (48) were implanted in the intended position and the internal iliac arteries were successfully bridged. Two patients did not receive clinical success, due to endoleak type Ia of the aortic stent graft. At 30-day follow-up, clinical success rate was 96%. Three successful endovascular reinterventions were performed within the 30-day follow-up: one due to a type Ia endoleak in the common iliac artery, one due to type Ia endoleak of the aortic stent graft, and one due to bilateral lower limb claudication provoked by stent graft limb stenosis. At 30-day, a 100% survival rate and complete absence of pelvic or buttock ischemia/claudication were reported. Primary patency at 30 days was 100% for the internal iliac artery and 98% for the external iliac artery with an assisted patency of 100% in the latter. CONCLUSIONS: The high clinical success rate, low rates of device-related reinterventions (2%), and excellent patency rate demonstrate the safety and feasibility of the E-liac Stent Graft System. Long-term results are awaited to state efficacy and durability. Clinical Trials.gov. Identifier no. NCT02209194.

A current systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of chimney graft technology in aortic arch diseases.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide a review of the literature on the use of chimney graft (CG) technique in treating arterial diseases of the aortic arch and to extrapolate conclusions by summarizing the reported outcomes in a meta-analysis. METHODS: An extensive electronic search was made using PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct Databases, and the Cochrane Library. Included in this meta-analysis were all papers published up to February 2016 on endovascular chimney technique in the arch vessels with or without adjunct extra-anatomic debranching, in any language, providing data about at least one of the essential outcomes: early and late type I endoleak, 30-day mortality rate, development of perioperative stroke, patency, and retrograde aortic dissection. RESULTS: Of the 478 reports yielded by the electronic search, a total of 11 publications (on 373 patients and 387 CGs) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. The overall estimated proportion of technical success was 91.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.4%-94.0%). Of the 373 patients, 26 (7%) experienced a type Ia endoleak in the perioperative period. The overall estimated proportion of early type Ia endoleak was 9.4% (95% CI, 6.5%-13.4%). Among the 10 studies that provided data, a retrograde type A dissection was observed in 2 of 351 patients, resulting in an overall estimated proportion of 1.8% (95% CI, 0.8%-4.0%). The pooled 30-day mortality rate was 7.9% (95% CI, 4.6%-13.2%). The pooled estimation for reintervention was 10.6% (95% CI, 5%-21%); for major stroke, 2.6% (95% CI, 1.3%-5.0%); for early patency, 97.9% (95% CI, 95.8%-99%); and for late patency, 92.9% (95% CI, 87.3%-96%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of aortic diseases involving the aortic arch poses a great challenge. The CG technique has been applied as an alternative treatment option. This meta-analysis shows that endovascular repair of aortic arch disease using a CG technique in the aortic arch vessels is technically feasible and effective but not without major risk of complications.

A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing treatment modalities for de novo superficial femoral artery occlusive lesions.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions remains challenging. We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aiming to explore the efficacy of treatment modalities for SFA "de novo" lesions. METHODS: Eleven treatments for SFA occlusive disease were recognized. We used primary patency and binary restenosis at 12-month follow-up as proxies of efficacy for the treatment of SFA lesions. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies (66 study arms; 4659 patients) were deemed eligible. In terms of primary patency, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were statistically significantly higher in drug-eluting stent (DES; OR, 10.05; 95% CI, 3.22-31.39), femoropopliteal bypass surgery (BPS; OR, 7.15; 95% CI, 2.27-22.51), covered stent (CS; OR, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.33-9.53), and nitinol stent (NS; OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.42-5.51) compared with balloon angioplasty (BA). The rank order from higher to lower primary patency in the multidimensional scaling was DES, BPS, NS, CS, drug-coated balloon, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with brachytherapy, stainless steel stent, cryoplasty (CR), and BA. Combination therapy of NS with CR and drug-coated balloon were the two most effective treatments, followed by NS, CS, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with brachytherapy, cutting balloon, stainless steel stent, BA, and CR in terms of multidimensional scaling values for binary restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: DES has shown encouraging results in terms of primary patency for SFA lesions, whereas BPS still maintains its role as a principal intervention. On the contrary, BA and CR appear to be less effective treatment options.

Acute Early Carotid Stent Thrombosis: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Acute early carotid stent thrombosis (AcuteCST) is a rare complication after carotid artery stenting (CAS). The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence, causes, and optimal management of AcuteCST. METHODS: Medical records of all patients undergoing CAS between 2008 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The time of thrombosis, grade of stenosis, lesion side, preprocedural and postprocedural anticoagulants, causes, symptoms, treatment, recanalization, and outcome were reviewed. RESULTS: Overall, 674 patients were treated with CAS. Four cases of AcuteCST were identified (0.59%). In the first patient, the stent thrombosis was attributed to dissection caused by filter deployment within a distal internal carotid artery with 360° coiling. Notably, in 3 of the 4 cases of thrombosis a second overlapping stent had been deployed. In total, 41 patients of the cohort under investigation underwent overlapping stent deployment. The use of a second overlapping stent as a bail-out procedure due to dissection or malposition or due to long lesions was correlated with increased rate of thrombosis (3/41 [7.3%] vs. 1/633 [0.002%]). In 2 patients, carotid stents were thrombosed within 2 hr of the procedure. Endovascular thrombus aspiration and subsequent eversion carotid endarterectomy with stent explantation in the first patient and intrathrombus urokinase administration with thromboaspiration and additional stent placement in the second patient were followed. In the other 2 patients having their carotid stents thrombosed 3 and 4 days after the procedure, treatment with low weight molecular heparin and antiplatelet regimens was followed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of overlapping stents in the carotid artery is a predisposing factor for AcuteCST. Prognostic factors of this potentially devastating complication are the initial clinical presentation expressing the grade of ischemic brain damage, the accurate and timely recognition of the thrombosis, and the prompt restoration of oxygenated blood flow into the viable tissue at risk of infarction.

Changes in Arterial Stiffness and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide Levels after Endovascular Repair of Descending Thoracic Aorta.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist concerning the biomechanical and central hemodynamic changes induced by endograft implantation in the descending thoracic aorta. The aim of this prospective ongoing study was to evaluate changes in arterial stiffness, assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV; m/sec), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; pg/mL) levels in patients undergoing endovascular repair of descending thoracic aorta (thoracic endovascular aortic repair [TEVAR]). METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with thoracic aorta pathology who underwent elective TEVAR were included in the study. Blood samples were obtained preoperatively, 24 hr, 48 hr, and 6 months postoperatively, and serum levels of NT-proBNP were measured. PWV was determined before and 6 months after TEVAR. One-way analysis of variance by ranks was used to test the alterations in PWV (from baseline to 6 months) and NT-proBNP (along the 4 phases of evaluation). Post hoc analyses were appropriately performed. RESULTS: We recorded an increase in values of NT-proBNP from baseline (median = 96.1, interquartile range [IQR] = 82.7-117.9) to 24 hr postoperative (median = 201.6, IQR = 82.8-425.9), 48 hr postoperative (median = 317.0, IQR = 102.5-1,479.5), and 6 months postoperative (median = 144, IQR = 82.8-276.4). The Kruskal-Wallis H test showed a statistically significant increase (x2(3) = 11.17, P = 0.01) in NT-proBNP from baseline (rank mean = 22.19) toward the postoperative time points of evaluation (24 hr postoperative: 35.17 [change: +12.9, P = 0.02]; 48 hr postoperative: 42.64 [change: +20.5, P < 0.001]; 6 month postoperative: 34.91 [change: +12.7, P = 0.03]). An increase in PWV values was recorded from baseline (median = 11.9, IQR = 10.0-13.5) to 6 months postoperatively (median = 13.9, IQR = 11.9-16.4). That change achieved statistically significant level [x2(1) = 4.86, P = 0.03], with an increase in mean rank PWV (+7.5). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of thoracic stent grafts may be associated with considerable increase of both arterial stiffness and NT-proBNP serum levels along time. Those results may indicate an adverse cardiac impact of TEVAR. However, the early and long-term effects of TEVAR on cardiovascular outcomes require further investigation.

A multicenter 12-month experience with a new iliac side-branched device for revascularization of hypogastric arteries.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the 1-year safety and efficacy of a new iliac side-branched device (IBD) for revascularization of the hypogastric arteries. METHODS: Patients receiving the E-liac (Jotec GmbH, Hechingen, Germany) side-branched device at six German vascular centers either as a stand-alone procedure or in combination with abdominal aortic aneurysm exclusion were included in a prospectively created data bank. Collected data were analyzed for baseline characteristics, procedural events, and clinical follow-up; variables included endoleaks, reinterventions, and internal iliac artery (IIA) patency. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and January 2015, a total of 70 patients (69 men [98.6%]) with a median age of 74 years (range, 51-87 years) were consecutively treated; 66 patients had aneurysmatic disease of the iliac arteries, 2 patients had a para-anastomotic aneurysm after aortobi-iliac reconstruction, and another 2 patients had a type Ib endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. A total of 82 IIAs were revascularized, 12 bilaterally. Technical success was achieved in 100% (82/82) of the revascularized IIAs. All IBDs were patent at the end of the procedure. No instances of myocardial infarction, stroke, conversion to open repair, mesenteric or spinal cord infarction, or buttock necrosis were observed. There was one perioperative death (1.4%) in a 70-year-old patient with intraoperative gastrointestinal bleeding leading to multiple organ failure, which resulted in the patient's death on the fifth postoperative day. Within 30 days, one symptomatic occlusion of a treated common iliac artery (CIA) was observed. In two other patients, an asymptomatic kinking of the CIA segment of the IBD was revealed in the predischarge follow-up duplex ultrasound examination and corrected with relining. Median follow-up was 12 months (range, 6-16 months). One patient was lost during the follow-up period. Survival at 1 year was 98.5% with all IIAs remaining patent, whereas two CIA and two external iliac artery limb occlusions occurred. According to life-table analysis, the freedom from occlusion in a patient was 92% at 1 year, and freedom from type I endoleak was 87% at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: This first ever 1-year study reports the results with the new E-liac device and shows that it can be safely applied for the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysmatic disease with low reintervention rates and high patency rates. Long-term data are needed to confirm the durability of the device.

External Validation of Risk Stratification Models Predicting the Immediate Mortality After Open Repair of Ruptured AAA.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative risk stratification of the immediate postoperative death after surgery may be helpful for the decision-making for patients with ruptured AAAs (rAAs). The purpose of this study was to apply and validate the Glasgow aneurysm score (GAS) and the Hardman Index (HI) in predicting 30-day/in-hospital mortality in open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular repair (rEVAR) of rAAAs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively created database including all patients with a rAAA referred to our Institution between August 1998 and December 2014. Primary outcome was 30-day/in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors. The receiver-operator characteristic curve was used to determine the value of the HI and GAS in predicting 30-day/in-hospital death. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients (130 patients received OSR, 20 patients rEVAR) were included in our analysis. The 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 34.0 % for the entire cohort: 36.15 % for OSR group and 20.0 % for rEVAR group (p 0.210). A multivariate analysis in the OSR group evidenced that unconsciousness was a statistically significant [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 8.00] predictor of 30-day/in-hospital mortality. The mean GAS was 86.9 ± 16.1 for the OSR group and 88.1 ± 11.2 for the rEVAR group (p 0.773). The AUC for GAS was 0.805 among OSR patients and 0.975 among rEVAR patients. The mean HI in the OSR group was 1.11 ± 1.0 and the AUC for HI was 0.82. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair of rAAAs is still associated with a considerable mortality rate. We confirmed the great discriminative ability of GAS in patients with rAAAs treated with OSR. With regard to HI, this scoring system could accurately predict early mortality after OSR in our cohort but failed to identify patients at highest risk for postoperative mortality.