Ischemia-guided vs routine non-culprit vessel angioplasty for patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease: the IAEA SPECT STEMI trial.

BACKGROUND: In patients with multi-vessel disease presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the efficacy and safety of ischemia-guided, vs routine non-culprit vessel angioplasty has not been adequately studied. METHODS: We conducted an international, randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing ischemia-guided non-culprit vessel angioplasty to routine non-culprit vessel angioplasty, following primary PCI for STEMI. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in percent ischemic myocardium at follow-up stress MPI. All MPI images were processed and analyzed at a central core lab, blinded to treatment allocation. RESULTS: In all, 109 patients were enrolled from nine countries. In the ischemia-guided arm, 25/48 (47%) patients underwent non-culprit vessel PCI following stress MPI. In the routine non-culprit PCI arm, 43/56 (77%) patients underwent angioplasty (86% within 6 weeks of randomization). The median percentage of ischemic myocardium on follow-up imaging (mean 16.5 months) was low, and identical (2.9%) in both arms (difference 0.13%, 95%CI - 1.3%-1.6%, P < .0001; non-inferiority margin 5%). CONCLUSION: A strategy of ischemia-guided non-culprit PCI resulted in low ischemia burden, and was non-inferior to a strategy of routine non-culprit vessel PCI in reducing ischemia burden. Selective non-culprit PCI following STEMI offers the potential for cost-savings, and may be particularly relevant to low-resource settings. (CTRI/2018/08/015384).

Outcomes of a Modified Technique for Deflation of Distal Radial Artery Occlusion Device on Radial Artery Patency After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Objective: This study aimed to compare two protocols of deflation with increased intervals versus late deflation with smaller intervals for distal radial artery occlusion device (DROAD) removal to assess for radial artery occlusion (RAO). Methods: All patients who underwent PCI with distal radial access were enrolled in the study. The DROAD was applied using an occlusive hemostasis method. Patients were assigned to either protocol 1 or protocol 2 at the primary physician's discretion. Protocol 1 involved the removal of 2 ml of air starting 1 h after the sheath removal and then the removal of 2 ml every 30 min until the band came off. Protocol 2 involved the removal of 4 ml of air 2 h after the sheath removal and then a further 4 ml of air every 15 min until the band came off. Results: A total of 446 patients were enrolled in this study (mean age; 61 ± 6 (Group 1) and 60 ± 5 (Group 2); females 45.83% (Group 1) and 46.34% (Group 2)). The baseline characteristics were the same, including mean hemostasis time (256 ± 25 min (Group 1) and 254 ± 28 min (Group 2), P-value = 0.611). Primary and secondary endpoints did not reach significance in either group (RAO; 21 (8.71) Group 1 and 18 (8.78) Group 2 (P-value = 0.932)). Age (OR (95%CI): 1.07 (0.57-1.45); P-value = 0.031), female gender (OR (95%CI): 1.42 (0.93-1.74); P-value = 0.012), distal artery diameter (OR (95%CI): 0.57 (0.21-0.93); P-value = 0.005), procedure time (OR (95%CI): 2.64 (0.95-4.32); P-value = 0.001), and sheath size (OR (95%CI): 2.47 (1.43-3.76); P-value = 0.044) were predictors of RAO in our cohort. Conclusion: This investigation shows no difference in the incidence of RAO with the standard versus accelerated deflation protocol after PCI. However, local vascular complications, including hematoma were increased with the accelerated protocol.

Comparison of Invasive Coronary Angiography Versus Computed Tomography Angiography to Assess Mehran Classification of In-Stent Restenosis in Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

The Mehran classification is used to determine the presence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and characterization of its subtypes in invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The utility of computed tomography angiography (CTA) for the assessment of Mehran classification is unknown. We aimed to compare the agreement and reproducibility of Mehran classification between ICA and CTA and evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of both imaging methods. Consecutive patients who had ISR on ICA preceded with CTA before intervention were enrolled in our study. Modified Mehran's classification was employed by CTA and ICA to classify ISR into 4 subtypes: focal (type I [A, B, C]), intra-stent (type II [A, B, C]), proliferative (type III [A, B, C]), and total occlusion (type IV). Agreement between ISR classification and main vessel lesion length, reference vessel diameter, and bifurcation angles were compared. A total of 405 patients with 431 bifurcation percutaneous coronary interventions with ISR were included in this investigation. The total agreement between CTA and ICA for assessment of Mehran class was poor (kappa = 0.168). Proliferative ISR (25% vs 10%, p = 0.012) and total occlusions (24% vs 5%, p <0.001) were reclassified more often between ICA and CTA, respectively. CTA assessment of lesion length was significantly longer than that of ICA measurements in all subtypes of ISR (32.15 ± 5.23 vs 27.41 ± 3.63, p = 0.004). Receiver operating characteristic curve expressed CTA to be more sensitive and specific than ICA in diagnosing ISR. In conclusion, Mehran classification was significantly affected by imaging modality, and CTA results were more reproducible than ICA. Therefore, CTA evaluation of ISR may facilitate treatment options and generate a sound plan before the procedure.

A comparative study of Terumo radial Band® and PreludeSYNC hemostasis compression device after transradial coronary catheterization.

OBJECTIVE: Novel hemostasis strategies, including PreludeSYNC DISTAL, Merit Medical Systems, Inc. South Jordan, UT, USA (PSD) radial compression device for distal radial artery (DRA) access, have been described for radial access protocols. This study aimed to compare the safety profile of PSD and Terumo radial (TR) Band®. METHODS: This prospective interventional study was conducted on patients who underwent coronary interventions via either the DRA or forearm radial artery (FRA). Patients with an arterial diameter of <2 mm, requiring dialysis, with unstable acute coronary syndrome, failed radial cannulation, and sheath insertion were excluded. PSD and TR Band® were used for hemostasis after DRA and FRA access, respectively. The time to hemostasis and complications, including minor/major hematoma, radial artery occlusion (RAO), and neurological symptoms (after 20 days) were recorded. The mean and standard deviation were calculated for age and hemostasis duration. Frequency and percentages were calculated for categorical variables. Independent t-test and Chi-squared test were performed to determine the significance of the differences between the two groups. A p-value of <0.05 was significant. RESULTS: Of 139 participants, TR Band® and PSD were used in 76 and 63 patients, respectively. The mean age of the participants was 58.70±10.00 years, and the majority of the patients were men (67.60%). The hemostasis time of both devices was similar (p>0.490). Compared with PSD, TR Band® had more complications (52.63% vs. 23.81%; p=0.020), particularly RAO [odds ratio (OR), 3.17; p=0.018] and neurological problems (OR, 5.33; p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Although, PSD seems safer in patients with coronary interventions, the device should further be explored in crossover trials for the two access types to determine the overall safety profile.

Outcome of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor on anxiety and depression in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction vs. heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Objective: In patients with heart failure (HF), anxiety and depression are commonly observed and confer an adverse outcome. The first-in-class member of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), sacubitril/valsartan has been demonstrated to improve functional class and decrease mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and reduce the readmission of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, its effects on anxiety and depression levels remain unknown.Methods: Sacubitril/valsartan was started on 764 symptomatic patients with HFrEF and HFpEF who were receiving guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Patients were evaluated using Hamilton's depression rating scale (HDRS) and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) for their levels of depression and anxiety before and after treatment at a six-month follow-up.Results: A significant reduction in HADS and HDRS scores was observed in patients with HFrEF (9.7 ± 1.3 to 6.4 ± 0.7, p = 0.032 and 19.2 ± 2.2 to 8.9 ± 1.6, p < 0.001, respectively) compared with HFpEF (p = 0.161 and 0.273, respectively). The six-minute walk test (6-MWT) significantly increased HFrEF from 195 ± 68 to 321 ± 97 (p < 0.001). There was an overall improvement in the functional class of all patients.Conclusion: Patients with HFrEF have the additional advantage of using sacubitril/valsartan in the form of decreased anxiety and depression symptoms in addition to an improvement in functional class. However, patients with HFpEF did not exhibit significant improvement in their psychological scores.

One-year outcome and survival analysis of deferred ventricular septal repair in cardiogenic shock supported with mechanical circulatory support.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of deferred surgical repair of ventricular septal rupture (VSR) post-myocardial infarction (MI) with cardiogenic shock remains limited to case reports. Our study aimed to investigate the outcomes and survival analysis following mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients after VSR who develop cardiogenic shock. METHODS: We analyzed 27 patients with post-MI VSR and cardiogenic shock who received deferred surgical repair while stabilized on MCS between January 2018 and March 2020. After normality test adjustments, continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). These were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Student's t-test. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. To identify predictors of operative mortality, univariate analysis of clinical characteristics and interventions followed by logistic regression was carried out. P-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: All patients had preoperative MCS. Emergency repair was avoided in all the patients. The mean age of the participants was 64.96 with the majority being males (74.1%). On average, the mean time from MI to VSR repair was 18.85 days. Delayed revascularization was associated with increased mortality (OR 17.500, 95% CI 2.365-129.506, P = 0.005). Other factors associated with increased mortality were ejection fraction (EF), three-vessel disease, Killip class, early surgery, and prolonged use of inotropes. The operative mortality was 11% with an overall mortality of 33.3%. The one-year survival rate was 66.7%. CONCLUSION: The use of MCS in adjunct to a deferred surgical approach shows an improved survival outcome of patients with VSR complicated by cardiogenic shock. Further investigations are required regarding the optimal time for MCS and surgical repair.

COVID-19 Associated Pneumonia and Pleural Effusion Masquerading as Heart Failure in Rheumatic Heart Disease.

The ongoing outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that began in Wuhan, China, became an international emergency when thousands of people were infected around the world. COVID-19 emerged in Pakistan in April 2020, precipitating a nationwide lockdown. While some countries are now recovering from the pandemic, its peak is not estimated to occur in Pakistan until August 2020. We present a case of rheumatic heart disease with fever, myalgia and an unusual radiological finding of the virus. LEARNING POINTS: Unusual radiological findings are being seen in COVID-19 patients.Pleural effusion in a mildly symptomatic patient is a rare presentation of the disease.Early aggressive treatment can produce dramatic improvement in COVID-19 pneumonia.

Comparison of Mean Fluoroscopic Time and Mean Contrast Volume Used in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography by the Transfemoral Versus Transradial Route.

Introduction The prolonged fluoroscopic time during coronary angiography results in a higher radiation dose delivered to patients. Similarly, a higher contrast volume used is associated with higher rates of contrast-induced nephropathy. This study was designed to identify the better technique in terms of lesser fluoroscopic time and volume of contrast used during the procedure. Objective To compare mean fluoroscopic time and mean contrast volume used in patients undergoing coronary angiography through the transfemoral versus transradial route. Methods A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at the department of cardiology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS) Islamabad between June 2017 and December 2017. Ninety (n=90) patients planned for coronary angiography between 30 and 70 years of age were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to Group A (transfemoral route group) and Group B (transradial route group). Fluoroscopic time (minutes) and contrast volume (milliliters) used were measured in each patient. Results The mean contrast volume used in Group A was 70.4 ml (SD=8.7) and in Group B, it was 90.1 ml (SD=9.8) (P<0.001). The mean fluoroscopic time in Group A was 5.1 min (SD=1.2), and in group B, it was 8.6 min (SD=1.2) (P<0.001). Similar trends were noted when data were stratified with respect to age and gender. Conclusion The mean fluoroscopic time and the mean contrast volume were significantly less in patients where coronary angiography was performed through the transfemoral route than through the transradial route in this study.