Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 59(3)2021 02 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33268536

RESUMO

In this multisite study, Vitek 2 AST-Gram-Negative Ceftazidime/Avibactam test results for 1,073 isolates (866 Enterobacterales and 207 Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were compared to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution (BMD) reference method. The results were analyzed for essential agreement (EA), category agreement (CA), major error rates, and very major error rates following FDA/ISO performance criteria using the FDA-recognized CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints (sensitive [S], ≤8/4 µg/ml; resistant [R], ≥16/4 µg/ml). The overall EA was 94.5% (1,014/1,073) and CA was 98.7% (1,059/1,073). No very major errors were reported. The major error rate was 1.4% (14/998). Out of 14 major errors, 9 were within EA. Based on the EA and lack of an intermediate category for ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), the adjusted major error rate for FDA criteria was 0.5% (5/998). The performance for ISO criteria after error resolutions included EA of 94.5% (1,014/1,073), CA of 98.9% (1,061/1,073), major error of 1.2% (12/998), and no very major error. Vitek 2 met the ISO and FDA criteria of ≥95% reproducibility and ≥95% quality control (QC) results within acceptable ranges for QC organisms. Vitek 2 overall performance for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa met or exceeded the FDA and ISO performance criteria; thus, it is a reliable alternative to the BMD reference method for routine CZA susceptibility testing.


Assuntos
Ceftazidima , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Compostos Azabicíclicos , Ceftazidima/farmacologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Enterobacteriaceae , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 57(11): 5266-70, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23939887

RESUMO

Nontoxigenic Clostridium difficile (NTCD) has been shown to prevent fatal C. difficile infection in the hamster model when hamsters are challenged with standard toxigenic C. difficile strains. The purpose of this study was to determine if NTCD can prevent C. difficile infection in the hamster model when hamsters are challenged with restriction endonuclease analysis group BI C. difficile strains. Groups of 10 hamsters were given oral clindamycin, followed on day 2 by 10(6) CFU of spores of NTCD strain M3 or T7, and were challenged on day 5 with 100 CFU of spores of BI1 or BI6. To conserve animals, results for control hamsters challenged with BI1 or BI6 from the present study and controls from previous identical experiments were combined for statistical comparisons. NTCD strains M3 and T7 achieved 100% colonization and were 100% protective against challenge with BI1 (P ≤ 0.001). M3 colonized 9/10 hamsters and protected against BI6 challenge in the colonized hamsters (P = 0.0003). T7 colonized 10/10 hamsters, but following BI6 challenge, cocolonization occurred in 5 hamsters, 4 of which died, for protection of 6/10 animals (P = 0.02). NTCD colonization provides protection against challenge with toxigenic BI group strains. M3 is more effective than T7 in preventing C. difficile infection caused by the BI6 epidemic strain. Prevention of C. difficile infection caused by the epidemic BI6 strain may be more challenging than that of infections caused by historic BI1 and non-BI C. difficile strains.


Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile/imunologia , Proteção Cruzada , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/prevenção & controle , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/veterinária , Imunidade Heteróloga , Esporos Bacterianos/imunologia , Imunidade Adaptativa , Animais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Clindamicina/farmacologia , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Clostridioides difficile/patogenicidade , Cricetinae , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/imunologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/microbiologia , Masculino , Mesocricetus , Esporos Bacterianos/efeitos dos fármacos , Esporos Bacterianos/patogenicidade
3.
Anaerobe ; 15(6): 230-3, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19737618

RESUMO

Clostridium difficile is a widely distributed pathogen with multiple strain types as determined by restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) and by PCR ribotyping, two well-characterized typing systems. In this study, REA typing was performed on 894C. difficile isolates from patients enrolled from 16 countries on three continents in two large, recently conducted clinical treatment trials of C. difficile infection. REA group BI (Ribotype 027) isolates were the most common strains identified and were widely distributed throughout North America, but restricted to three of thirteen countries in Europe. REA group J (Ribotype 001) isolates were the most common strains identified in Europe and non-specific REA groups (historically less frequent) were the most common strains identified in Australia. REA groups BI, J, G and CF correlated with specific PCR ribotypes whereas more than one ribotype was found within REA groups Y, BK, and K. International surveillance of C. difficile strains is important to document the changing epidemiology of this enteric pathogen that continues to cause healthcare facility outbreaks and sporadic infections in other settings.


Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile/classificação , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Enzimas de Restrição do DNA , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/epidemiologia , Ribotipagem , Austrália/epidemiologia , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/microbiologia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Humanos , América do Norte/epidemiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Proibitinas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA