Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Med ; 12(3): 3543-3554, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36029153

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adherence to cancer screening is important for cancer survivors because they are at high risk of subsequent cancer diagnoses or recurrence. We assessed adherence to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer-(CRC)-screening guidelines and evaluated demographic disparities among a population-based sample of survivors. METHODS: A representative sample of Utah survivors diagnosed from 2012-2018 with any reportable invasive cancer was selected from central cancer registry records for a survey about survivorship needs. We estimated the proportion of eligible survivors adhering to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force screening guidelines and calculated risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Analyses were age-adjusted and weighted to account for sample design and nonresponse. RESULTS: And 1421 survivors completed the survey (57.2% response rate). Screening adherence was 74.4% for breast, 69.4% for cervical, and 79.7% for CRC. Rural residents were more likely to adhere to breast cancer screening than urban residents (86.1% vs. 72.7%; adjusted RR = 1.19, CI = 1.05, 1.36). Higher educational attainment was associated with increased adherence to cervical and colorectal cancer screening. Younger age was associated with greater adherence to cervical cancer screening (p = 0.006) but lower adherence to CRC screening (p = 0.003). CRC screening adherence was lower among the uninsured and those without a primary care provider (45.6%) compared to those with a regular provider (83.0%; adjusted RR = 0.57, CI = 0.42, 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Surveys based on samples from central cancer registries can provide population estimates to inform cancer control. Findings demonstrate work is needed to ensure all Utah cancer survivors obtain recommended cancer screenings. Efforts should focus particularly on increasing uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening and reducing demographic disparities in CRC screening. PRECIS: Despite high risk for subsequent cancer diagnosis, Utah cancer survivors are not all obtaining recommended breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings. This presents a significant healthcare gap.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Utah , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28478077

RESUMO

We developed a simultaneous determination method for 37 veterinary drugs in two chicken processed foods (deep-fried chicken and non-fried chicken cutlet) and muscle via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The veterinary drugs belong to 7 different classes, including 4 antifolics, 4 benzimidazoles, 5 macrolides, 7 polyethers, 2 quinolones, 7 sulfonamides, and 8 other classes. The samples were extracted with ethyl acetate followed by acetonitrile with salt and buffers extraction. The two-step extraction enabled analyte extraction from highly lipid samples. The clean-up procedure, a solid-supported liquid extraction clean-up using a diatomaceous earth mini-cartridge, eliminated lipid co-extraction. The prepared sample matrix did not have an effect on the 36 analytes. The method was validated in accordance with the requirements of Japanese validation guidelines. Almost all targeted veterinary drugs successfully satisfied the guideline criteria in the three types of food matrices. The method exhibited recoveries of 70-105%, and the precision of repeatability and within-laboratory reproducibility ranged from 1 to 11% and 1 to 15%, respectively. The limits of quantification were estimated to range from 0.2 to 1.0µg/kg. Applying this method to samples commercially available in Tokyo, residues were detected in 3 out of 26 deep-fried chickens, 5 out of 20 non-fried chicken cutlets, and 17 out of 39 chicken muscles.


Assuntos
Resíduos de Drogas/análise , Análise de Alimentos/métodos , Extração Líquido-Líquido/métodos , Carne/análise , Drogas Veterinárias/análise , Animais , Galinhas , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Músculos/química , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem
3.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci ; 1044-1045: 142-148, 2017 Feb 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28107701

RESUMO

A simultaneous determination of amantadine, rimantadine, and memantine in processed products (deep-fried chicken, fried chicken, fried quail egg, and grilled chicken) with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was developed. This new method was also applicable for chicken tissue (muscle, liver, and gizzard) and eggs. The chromatographic separation was performed on a Kinetex® XB-C18 core-shell technology column using a mobile phase of acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid in a 10mmol/L ammonium formate solution, resulting in the complete separation of isomers (rimantadine and memantine) and any other obstructive peaks from the sample matrices. Sample preparation was performed by a modified QuEChERS method using acetonitrile and a 0.1% acetic acid extraction solution and cleaned using an Oasis® MCX cartridge. The sample matrix had no effect on the identification of the compounds. For quantification, an external solvent calibration curve was used. This new method exhibited good accuracy ranging from 79.9% to 91.5%. The relative standard deviation of repeatability (RSDr) ranged from 1.2% to 3.6% and the relative standard deviation of within-laboratory reproducibility (RSDWR) ranged from 1.3% to 6.0%. These standard deviations satisfied the criteria for Japanese validation guidelines. The limit of quantification (LOQ) was 1.0µg/kg for all samples. Analyte residues were not detected in 55 samples using the validated method.


Assuntos
Adamantano/análise , Cromatografia Líquida/métodos , Ovos/análise , Carne/análise , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem/métodos , Adamantano/química , Adamantano/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Galinhas , Modelos Lineares , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA