Suicidality among clients in a network of coordinated specialty care (CSC) programs for first-episode psychosis: Rates, changes in rates, and their predictors.

BACKGROUND: People experiencing their first episode of psychosis have high risk of suicide, and programs specializing in early psychosis have not always achieved reduced risk. The present study analyzes patterns of suicide ideation, self-harm, and suicide attempts within the Connection Learning Healthcare System of 23 early psychosis programs in Pennsylvania and Maryland that follow the Coordinated Specialty Care treatment model. METHOD: People with first episode psychosis (n = 1101) were assessed at admission and every six months using a standardized battery that included self-reported past-month ideation and clinician-reported past-six-month ideation, self-harm, and suicide attempts. RESULTS: At admission, there were 28 % rates of self-reported past-month suicide ideation and 52 % rates clinician-reported past-six-month suicide ideation, 23 % rate of clinician-reported self-harm, and 15 % rate of attempts. After the first six months of treatment there were significantly lower rates of clinician-reported suicidality (with reductions of at least 77 %), and after the first year of treatment there was significantly lower self-reported ideation (with approximately 54 % reporting lower past-month ideation). Changes were not accounted for by differential early discharge. A range of psychosocial variables predicted within- and between-subject variability in suicidality. Social and role functioning, depressive symptom severity, and a sense of recovery were significant within-subject predictors of all four measures of suicidality. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to admission, we observed substantially lower rates of suicidality within the first year of treatment for clients with first episode psychosis in Coordinated Specialty Care. Reductions were predicted by some of the variables targeted by the treatment model.

Tobacco smoking and nicotine vaping in persons with first episode psychosis.

Tobacco smoking is highly prevalent in persons with psychosis and is the leading cause of preventable mortality in this population. Less is known about tobacco smoking in persons with first episode psychosis (FEP) and there have been no estimates about the prevalence of nicotine vaping in FEP. This study reports rates of tobacco smoking and nicotine vaping in young people with FEP enrolled in Coordinated Specialty Care programs in Pennsylvania and Maryland. Using data collected from 2021 to 2023, we examined lifetime and recent smoking and vaping and compared smokers and vapers to nonusers on symptoms, functioning, and substance use. The sample included 445 participants aged 13-35 with recent psychosis onset. Assessments were collected by program staff. Overall, 28 % of participants engaged in either smoking or vaping within 30 days of the admission assessment. Smokers and vapers were disproportionately male, cannabis users, and had lower negative symptom severity than non-smokers. Vapers had higher role and social functioning. Both smoking and vaping were related to a longer time from psychosis onset to program enrollment. We compare these findings to previous studies and suggest steps for addressing smoking and vaping in this vulnerable population.

Pennsylvania coordinated specialty care programs for first-episode psychosis: 6- and 12-month outcomes.

AIM: Pennsylvania (PA) first-episode psychosis (FEP) program evaluation is a statewide initiative, supported by the PA Office of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services (PA-OMHSAS) and administered by PA Early Intervention Center/Heads Up, which evaluates fidelity and outcomes of PA Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) programs. Programs participate in standard computerized measures of CSC outcomes using centralized informatics. The aims of the current report are to describe implementation of this core battery for program evaluation in PA and to present 6- and 12-month outcomes. METHODS: Participants (n = 697) from nine PA CSC programs completed the core battery at admission. The battery was re-administered at 6- and 12-month follow-up, and data were analysed for individuals (n = 230) who had completed 12-months of treatment. Domains assessed via clinician report and/or self-report included symptoms, role and social functioning, self-perceived recovery and service utilization. RESULTS: PA FEP CSC participants showed improvement over time in several domains, including decreased symptoms, higher role and social functioning, decreased hospitalizations, and improved self-perception of recovery, quality of life, and services satisfaction. Trends towards improvements were observed for participant happiness, hopelessness, and school-enrolment. Nearly all improvements were observed at 6-month follow-up, with earlier gains maintained at 12-months. CONCLUSIONS: PA FEP CSC programs demonstrate the ability to assess and improve critical outcomes of coordinated specialty care in PA. Improved outcomes by 12 months in treatment provides evidence of an effective treatment model and supports the continuation of these programs in pursuit of our goal of reducing schizophrenia disease burden on individuals and society.