Common mutation causes cystinosis in the majority of black South African patients.

BACKGROUND: The mutations responsible for cystinosis in South African patients are currently unknown. A pertinent question is whether they are similar to those described elsewhere in the world. METHODS: Children who were being managed for cystinosis in the Western Cape Province of South Africa between 2002 and 2013 were studied. All underwent molecular analysis to detect sequence variations in the cystinosis gene. RESULTS: This cohort study included 20 patients, 13 of whom were Xhosa-speaking black South Africans and seven were Cape Coloureds (mixed race); none were Caucasian. All had nephropathic infantile-type cystinosis with evidence of proximal tubulopathy, with glycosuria and renal phosphate wasting. Diagnosis was confirmed in 19 cases by demonstrating an elevated cystine concentration in leukocytes. Molecular analysis of the cystinosin gene revealed that 19 patients had a G > A mutation in intron 11 (CTNS-c.971-12G > A p.D324AfsX44) which caused an out-of-frame 10-bp insertion. Of these 19 patients, 16 were homozygous for this mutation, which was the most frequent mutation identified in the alleles of the black South African and Cape Coloured patients (96 and 71 %, respectively). CONCLUSION: We recommend that black South African and Cape Coloured patients presenting with cystinosis be tested for CTNS-c.971-12G > A in the first instance, with the possibility of prenatal testing being offered to at-risk families.

Familial transmission of 5p13.2 duplication due to maternal der(X)ins(X;5).

Submicroscopic duplications of 5p13 have been recently reported in several cases, warranting the description of a new clinical entity (Chromosome 5p13 Duplication Syndrome; MIM 613174). These microduplications, while variable in size, all contain at least part of the NIPBL gene. Patients with duplications in this region present with intellectual disability/developmental delay (ID/DD) and dysmorphic facies. In addition, skeletal and brain abnormalities have been variably reported, as well as propensity for obesity in adulthood and hypotonia. We report a family with two affected sons and two affected daughters, each carrying a duplication at 5p13.2 encompassing the 3' portion of SLC1A3 and the 5' portion of NIPBL. Upon confirming the SNP microarray finding by FISH in the proband, it was discovered that the 5p13.2 duplication was located on the short arm of the X chromosome. Further FISH studies on the family demonstrated that all affected children and their mother carried a derivative X chromosome with insertion of material from 5p13.2 into the intermediate region of Xp [der(X)ins(X;5)(p2?2.1;p13.2p13.2)]. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an inherited duplication of 5p13.2 with multiple affected family members. This family underscores the need to confirm array findings by FISH, both in the proband and family members, to discern implications for pathogenicity and more accurately define the recurrence risk.