Patient-reported outcome measures for life participation in peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) endure an ongoing regimen of daily fluid exchanges and are at risk of potentially life-threatening complications and debilitating symptoms that can limit their ability to participate in life activities. The aim of the study was to identify the characteristics, content and psychometric properties of measures for life participation used in research in PD. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to May 2020 for all studies that reported life participation in patients on PD. The characteristics, dimensions of life participation and psychometric properties of these measures were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 301 studies included, 17 (6%) were randomized studies and 284 (94%) were nonrandomized studies. Forty-two different measures were used to assess life participation. Of these, 23 (55%) were used in only one study. Fifteen (36%) measures were specifically designed to assess life participation, while 27 (64%) measures assessed broader constructs, such as quality of life, but included questions on life participation. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form were the most frequently used measures [122 (41%) and 86 (29%) studies, respectively]. Eight (19%) measures had validation data to support their use in patients on PD. CONCLUSIONS: The many measures currently used to assess life participation in patients receiving PD vary in their characteristics, content and validation. Further work to pilot and validate potential measures is required to establish a core patient-reported outcome measure to assess life participation in patients receiving PD.

Perspectives on mental health among patients receiving dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Diminished mental health is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and may contribute to loss of independence and motivation in patients receiving dialysis and their caregivers. Increased understanding of the patient perspective on triggers, impacts and strategies for managing mental health may inform ways to address mental health conditions in this population. METHODS: A secondary thematic analysis was undertaken using data from the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG)-Hemodialysis and SONG-Peritoneal Dialysis projects. We extracted and analysed data on the perceived causes, meaning, impact and management of mental health in patients receiving dialysis from 26 focus groups (in six countries), multinational Delphi surveys and consensus workshops. RESULTS: A total of 644 patients and caregivers participated. We identified five themes: bound to dialysis (forced into isolation, enslaved to a machine, stress of relentless planning and grieving the loss of a normal life), underrecognized and ignored (missed by health practitioners, need for mental health support), an uncertain future (dreading complications, coming to terms with mortality), developing self-reliance (vulnerability in being solely responsible for dialysis, sustaining motivation for dialysis, necessity for self-vigilance and taking charge to regulate emotions) and responding to a lifestyle overhaul (guilt of burdening family, controlling symptoms for overall mental wellness, protecting independence and trying to feel grateful). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving dialysis and their caregivers endure mental and emotional distress attributed to the burden of dialysis, lifestyle restrictions, the constant threat of death and symptom burden, which can impair motivation for self-management. Increased attention to monitoring and management of mental health in this population is needed.

A Core Outcome Set for Trials in Glomerular Disease: A Report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Glomerular Disease (SONG-GD) Stakeholder Workshops.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Outcomes reported in trials in adults with glomerular disease are often selected with minimal patient input, are heterogeneous, and may not be relevant for clinical decision making. The Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Glomerular Disease (SONG-GD) initiative aimed to establish a core outcome set to help ensure that outcomes of critical importance to patients, care partners, and clinicians are consistently reported. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: We convened two 1.5-hour workshops in Melbourne, Australia, and Washington, DC, United States. Attendees were identified purposively with 50 patients/care partners and 88 health professionals from 19 countries; 51% were female. Patients and care partners were from the United States, Australia, and Canada, and had experience of a glomerular disease with systemic features (n=9), kidney-limited nephrotic disease (n=9), or other kidney-limited glomerular disease (n=8). Attendees reviewed the results of the SONG-GD Delphi survey and aims of the workshop and then discussed potential core outcomes and their implementation in trials among moderated breakout groups of eight to 12 people from diverse backgrounds. Transcripts of discussions were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Three themes were identified that supported the proposed core outcomes: limiting disease progression, stability and control, and ensuring universal relevance (i.e., applicable across diverse populations and settings). The fourth theme, preparedness for implementation, included engaging with funders and regulators, establishing reliable and validated measures, and leveraging existing endorsements for patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Workshop themes demonstrated support for kidney function, disease activity, death, life participation, and cardiovascular disease, and these were established as the core outcomes for trials in adults with glomerular disease. Future work is needed to establish the core measures for each domain, with funders and regulators central to the uptake of the core outcome set in trials.

Quality of Life in Caregivers of Patients Randomized to Standard- Versus Extended-Hours Hemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: Caregivers are essential for the health, safety, and independence of many patients and incur financial and personal cost in this role, including increased burden and lower quality of life (QOL) compared to the general population. Extended-hours hemodialysis may be the preference of some patients, but little is known about its effects on caregivers. METHODS: Forty caregivers of participants of the ACTIVE Dialysis trial, who were randomized to 12 months extended (median 24 hours/wk) or standard (12 hours/wk) hemodialysis, were included. Utility-based QOL was measured by EuroQOL-5 Dimension-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) and Short Form-6 Dimensions (SF-6D) and health-related QOL (HRQOL) was measured by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) and the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) at enrolment and then every 3 months until the end of the study. RESULTS: At baseline, utility-based QOL and HRQOL were similar in both groups. At follow-up, caregivers of people randomized to extended-hours dialysis experienced a greater decrease in utility-based QOL measured by EQ-5D-3L compared with caregivers of people randomized to standard hours (-0.18±0.30 vs. -0.02±0.16, P = 0.04). There were no differences between extended- and standard-hours groups in mean change in SF-6D (0.03±0.12 vs. -0.04±0.1, P = 0.8), PCS (-1.2±9.8 vs. -5.6±9.8, P = 0.2), MCS (-4.1±11.2 vs. -0.5±7.1, P = 0.4), and PWI (2.3±17.6 vs. 0.00±20.4, P = 0.9). CONCLUSION: Poorer utility-based QOL, as measured by the EQ-5D-3L, was observed in caregivers of patients receiving extended-hours hemodialysis in this small study. Though the findings are exploratory, the possibility that mode of dialysis delivery negatively impacts on caregivers supports the prioritization of research on burden and impact of service delivery in this population.

Recurrent severe hypophosphatemia following intravenous iron administration.

Hypophosphatemia postintravenous iron is frequent but under-recognized. If prolonged or recurrent, it can cause osteomalacia. The likely mechanisms are direct toxicity to proximal tubular cells causing phosphate wasting, elevated Fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), and reduced 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D). Hypophosphatemia may be severe and persist for months, necessitating phosphate replacement until normalization of serum levels occurs.

Performance of StatSensor Point-of-Care Device for Measuring Creatinine in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Postkidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The StatSensor is a point-of-care device which measures creatinine in capillary whole blood. Previous studies reported an underestimation of the creatinine measurements at high creatinine concentrations and were performed in the prestandardization era for creatinine. OBJECTIVE: This accuracy-based study evaluates the use of this device in kidney-transplanted patients and those with chronic kidney disease (CKD). DESIGN: Cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. SETTING: Nephrology outpatient clinic in an urban tertiary center. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with CKD or a functioning kidney transplant. MEASUREMENTS: Duplicate StatSensor creatinine measurements were performed on capillary whole blood samples collected by direct fingerstick and SAFE-T-FILL collection device. Results were compared with simultaneous venous blood sampling for serum and plasma creatinine measured by an enzymatic method on the Roche Integra 400 mainframe analyzer with traceability to the ID-GC-MS (isotope dilution gas chromatography mass spectrometry) reference method. METHODS: Deming regression, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess accuracy and comparability between capillary whole blood measured by StatSensor and plasma creatinine measured by routine analyzer with traceability to the reference method. Estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) rates were calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation and concordance with Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD stage classification was evaluated. RESULTS: There were 60 participants (mean age = 61.9 ± 15.0 years, 55% men, 33% transplant, mean plasma creatinine = 137 ± 59 µmol/L). Bland-Altman analysis indicated a positive mean bias of 12.7 µmol/L between StatSensor fingerstick creatinine measurement and plasma creatinine. Comparison of eGFR (CKD-EPI) calculated from the StatSensor fingerstick creatinine versus plasma creatinine showed misclassification across all KDIGO CKD stages. Postanalytical correction of the bias did not improve misclassifications. The use of mean of duplicate StatSensor creatinine results did not improve performance compared with the use of singlet results. LIMITATIONS: Single center, limited participant numbers. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that the limiting characteristics of the StatSensor device are not only bias, but also imprecision. The level of imprecision observed may influence clinical decision-making and limit the usefulness of StatSensor as a CKD screening tool. If choosing to utilize it for either screening for or monitoring CKD, it is essential that clinicians understand the limitations of point-of-care devices and apply this knowledge to test interpretation.

CONTEXTE: Le StatSensor est un appareil portatif conçu pour mesurer le taux de créatinine dans le sang capillaire total. Des études antérieures, réalisées avant la standardisation des mesures de la créatinine, ont rapporté une sous-estimation des mesures à des concentrations élevées. OBJECTIF: Cette étude centrée sur la précision a examiné l'utilisation de cet appareil chez des patients transplantés d'un rein et des patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC). TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Étude transversale centrée sur la précision du diagnostic. CADRE: La clinique ambulatoire de néphrologie d'un centre de soins tertiaires en milieu urbain. SUJETS: Des adultes atteints d'IRC ou transplantés avec un rein fonctionnel. MESURES: Les mesures de créatinine par StatSensor ont été effectuées en double sur des échantillons de sang capillaire total prélevés par ponction digitale directe et à l'aide du dispositif de prélèvement SAFE-T-FILL. Ces résultats ont été comparés à un prélèvement veineux simultané pour la mesure des taux de créatinine sérique et plasmatique par la méthode enzymatique avec l'analyseur Integra 400 de Roche avec traçabilité à la méthode de référence ID-GC-MS. MÉTHODOLOGIE: La régression de Deming, le coefficient de corrélation de Pearson et l'analyse de Bland-Altman ont été utilisés pour évaluer la précision et la comparabilité entre les mesures du sang capillaire total par StatSensor et la mesure de créatinine plasmatique obtenue par l'analyseur de routine avec traçabilité à la méthode de référence. Le débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé (DFGe) a été calculé avec l'équation CKD-EPI, puis la concordance avec la classification des stades KDIGO pour l'IRC a été évaluée. RÉSULTATS: L'étude a inclus 60 patients (55 % d'hommes; âge moyen 61,9 ± 15,0 ans) dont 33 % étaient transplantés. Le taux moyen de créatinine plasmatique s'établissait à 137 ± 59 µmol/L. L'analyse de Bland-Altman indique un biais positif moyen de 12,7 µmol/L entre la mesure de créatinine obtenue avec StatSensor par ponction digitale et le taux de créatinine plasmatique. La comparaison entre le DFGe (CKD-EPI) calculé à partir des mesures obtenues par ponction digitale avec StatSensor et de la mesure de créatinine plasmatique a montré une classification erronée à tous les stades KDIGO pour l'IRC. La correction du biais après l'analyse n'a pas amélioré les erreurs de classification. L'utilisation de la moyenne des résultats obtenus par StatSensor sur les échantillons prélevés en double n'a pas amélioré les performances par rapport à l'utilisation de singulets. LIMITES: Étude monocentrique, nombre de participants limité. CONCLUSION: Nos résultats suggèrent que les caractéristiques de limitation du StatSensor ne constituent pas qu'un biais, mais également une imprécision. Ce degré d'imprécision peut influencer la prise de décision clinique et limiter l'utilité du StatSensor comme outil de dépistage de l'IRC. Il est essentiel que les cliniciens soient conscients des limites de ces dispositifs et qu'ils appliquent ces connaissances à l'interprétation des résultats s'ils choisissent de les utiliser pour dépister ou surveiller l'IRC. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'ESSAI: Sans objet, il ne s'agissait pas d'un essai clinique.

Associations Between Peritoneal Glucose Exposure, Glucose Degradation Product Exposure, and Peritoneal Membrane Transport Characteristics in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Secondary Analysis of the balANZ Trial.

BACKGROUND: Glucose is the most commonly used osmotic medium in peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions, and its use has been associated with both local and systemic adverse effects. Previous, single-center, observational cohort studies have reported conflicting findings regarding whether a relationship exists between peritoneal glucose exposure and peritoneal small solute transport rate. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of the balANZ multicenter, multinational, randomized controlled trial of a neutral pH, ultra-low glucose degradation product (biocompatible) versus conventional PD solutions over a 2-year period, the relationship between time varying peritoneal glucose exposure and change in peritoneal solute transport rate, (measured as dialysate to plasma creatinine ratio at 4 hours [D:PCr4h]), was evaluated using multivariable, multilevel linear regression. Baseline peritoneal glucose exposure was also assessed as either a continuous or categorical variable. RESULTS: The study included 165 patients (age 58.1 ± 14.2 years, 55% male, 33% diabetic). Peritoneal glucose exposure increased over time (coefficient 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07 - 1.92 and was not significantly associated with change in D:PCr4h (coefficient 0.00004, 95% CI -0.0001 - 0.0002, p = 0.68). Similar results were found when peritoneal glucose exposure was examined as a baseline continuous or categorical variable. A significant 2-way interaction was observed with PD solution type, whereby a progressive increase in D:PCr4h was seen in the patients receiving conventional PD solution, but not in those receiving biocompatible solution. CONCLUSIONS: Increases in peritoneal solute transport rate in PD patients over time were not associated with peritoneal glucose exposure, although a strong and positive association with PD solution glucose degradation product content was identified. Peritoneal glucose exposure may be a less important consideration than peritoneal glucose degradation product exposure with respect to peritoneal membrane function over time.

Evidence for Biocompatible Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions.

Glucose-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions are the mainstay of therapy for PD patients, yet are accompanied by a number of adverse effects and potential complications. The high glucose content can cause both systemic effects, such as hyperglycaemia, as well as local effects on the peritoneal membrane, which can interfere with its function. In addition, glucose degradation products (GDPs) generated during heat sterilization of the solutions and the acidic pH at which these solutions are kept have been shown to cause peritoneal membrane injury and precipitate inflow pain, respectively. As a result, biocompatible PD solutions, characterized by neutral pH and low GDP concentrations, have been developed. However, the published evidence supporting their use has often been conflicting and of variable methodological quality. This review aims to discuss the relevant literature and up-to-date evidence for the use of biocompatible PD solutions.

Association Between Peritoneal Glucose Exposure and Peritonitis in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: The balANZ Trial.

BACKGROUND: Glucose is the primary osmotic medium used in most peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions, and exposure to glucose has been shown to exert detrimental effects both locally, at the peritoneal membrane, and systemically. Moreover, high dialysate glucose exposure may predispose patients to an increased risk of peritonitis, perhaps as a result of impaired host defences, vascular disease, and damage to the peritoneal membrane. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, multinational, open-label randomized controlled trial of neutral pH, low-glucose degradation product (GDP) versus conventional PD solutions (balANZ trial), the relationship between peritonitis rates of low (< 123.1 g/day) versus high (≥ 123.1 g/day) dialysate glucose exposure was evaluated in 177 incident PD patients over a 2-year study period. RESULTS: Peritonitis rates were 0.44 episodes per patient-year in the low-glucose exposure group and 0.31 episodes per patient-year in the high-glucose exposure group, (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.69, p = 0.09). There was no significant association between dialysate glucose exposure and peritonitis-free survival on univariable analysis (high glucose exposure hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40 - 1.08) or on multivariable analysis (adjusted HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.39 - 1.05). Moreover, there was no relationship between peritoneal glucose exposure and type of organism causing peritonitis. Physician-rated severity of first peritonitis episodes was similar between groups, as was rate and duration of hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study did not identify an association between peritoneal dialysate glucose exposure and peritonitis occurrence, severity, hospitalization, or outcomes. A further large-scale, prospective, randomized controlled trial evaluating patient-level outcomes is merited.

Relapsing thrombotic microangiopathy and intravenous sustained-release oxycodone.

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) associated with injecting sustained-release oxymorphone, an opioid intended for oral use, has previously been reported. We report a case of TMA secondary to intravenous use of sustained-release oxycodone, and the first case to demonstrate relapsing disease due to persistent intravenous opioid use. In cases such as these, TMA is suspected to be due to a polyethylene oxide (PEO) coating found on these drugs, and the disease is likely due to a directly toxic effect of PEO to endothelial cells. We hypothesize that there are unidentified genetic predispositions causing some persons to be susceptible to developing this disease.

Recent Clinical Trials of Pharmacologic Cardiovascular Interventions in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: An Update.

As a consequence of both traditional and non-traditional risk factors, cardiovascular disease is over-represented, and the leading cause of mortality, among patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Whilst recommendations for reducing cardiovascular risk in the general population exist, their applicability to the CKD population is questionable due to the exclusion of CKD patients from the majority of contemporary cardiovascular interventional studies. The aim of this review is to critically evaluate the literature regarding pharmacologic cardiovascular interventions in patients with CKD, with an emphasis on studies published since our 2008 review. Interventions discussed include erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (TREAT, U.S. Normal Hematocrit, CHOIR, CREATE, Palmer meta-analysis); statins (SHARP, AURORA, PPP, 4D, ALERT); Fibrates (VA-HIT); Folic Acid (ASFAST, US FOLIC acid trial, HOST); Antihypertensive Agents, Including Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, Beta-blockers and Combination therapy (Cice et al, FOSDIAL, Agarwal et al, ONTARGET); sevelamer (DCOR); Cinacalcet (ADVANCE, EVOLVE, Cunningham meta-analysis); Anti-oxidants (SPACE, HOPE, ATIC); Aspirin (HOT study re-analysis); vitamin D analogues (PRIMO); and multidisciplinary intervention (LANDMARK). Unfortunately, there remains a paucity of evidence in this area and a large number of methodologically poor quality studies with negative results. It is possible that these interventions do not have the same positive effect in CKD patients due to differences in the pathogenesis driving cardiovascular disease burden, such as altered bone metabolism and calcific vascular disease. Further well-designed studies with appropriately selected study populations and patient level outcomes are required. Until such time, physicians must consider on an individual patient basis the appropriateness of these interventions.