Morbidity and mortality of elderly patients with pancreaticobiliary disease according to age and comprehensive geriatric assessment: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to analyze the influence of age and comprehensive geriatric evaluation on clinical results of pancreaticobiliary disease management in elderly patients. METHODS: A prospective observational study has been undertaken, including 140 elderly patients (over 75 years) with benign pancreaticobiliary disease. Patients were divided according to age in the following groups: group 1: 75-79 years old; group 2: 80-84 years old; group 3: 85 years and older. They underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment with different scales: Barthel Index, Pfeiffer Index, Charlson Index, and Fragility scale, at admission and had been follow-up 90 days after hospital discharge to analyze its influence on morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 140 patients have been included (group 1=51; group 2=43 and group 3=46). Most of them, 52 cases (37.8%), had acute cholecystitis, followed by 29 cases of acute cholangitis (20.2%) and acute pancreatitis with 25 cases (17.9%). Significant differences has been observed on complications in different age groups (p=0.033). Especially in patients with a Barthel Index result ≤60, which suggests that these less functional patients had more severe complications after their treatment (p=0.037). The mortality rate was 7.1% (10 patients). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found between age, morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with pancreaticobiliary disease. Comprehensive geriatric scales showed some utility in their association with specific complications.

Anterior intercostal artery perforator flap in immediate breast reconstruction: Anatomical study and clinical application.

BACKGROUND: Although the use of lateral intercostal artery perforator (ICAP) flaps for immediate breast reconstruction has been widely described, data on the use of the anterior ICAP (AICAP) flaps for this indication are limited. In this context, we describe the results of anatomical study and our clinical experience with AICAP flaps for breast reconstruction. METHODS: In this study, the location and characteristics of the AICAPs were dissected in 12 female adult formalin-preserved hemitrunks and two fresh-frozen cadavers. Fourteen patients (mean BMI 23) underwent partial breast resection for a quadrant breast cancer followed by breast reconstruction with an intercostal perforator flap. The mean resection size was 6 × 5 × 5.5 cm (range 3-8 × 3.5-7 × 4-8 cm).The main outcome measures were pre-operative and postradiotherapy health-related quality of life assessed with the BREAST-Q reconstruction survey. RESULTS: According to anatomical study, at least one perforator was found in each third of hemitrunks dissected. The mean of perforator size was in diameter 0.42 ± 0.05 mm and in length 3.1 ± 0.36 cm. In clinical outcomes, the mean of flap size was 16 × 5 × 3 cm (range 14-19 × 3-8 × 2-5 cm). The mean surgical time was 120 min (range 109-125 min). Only one partial flap failure was detected. No postoperative changes in breast size were observed, although soft tissue changes were observed in four patients after radiotherapy. The mean BREAST-Q scores changes were 0 in satisfaction with the breast, 5 in satisfaction with outcome, 0 in psychosocial well-being, 6.15 in sexual well being, and 34.69 in physical well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this anatomical and clinical study, we found AICAP flap has a consistent vascularization with good perforators. And moreover, it is suitable for partial breast reconstruction (quadrantectomy) and does not appear to negatively impact patient satisfaction.

Introduction of Flexible Cyanoacrylates in Sutureless Gastric Closure.

Background Clinical effectiveness and safety of biological and synthetic adhesives in digestive closures have been evaluated. Their use is becoming more prevalent, as rigidity and inflexibility are its more remarkable weaknesses. However, little is known about their role in gastric and anastomotic closures. Moreover, usefulness of novel flexible types of synthetic adhesives as n-butyl-cyanoacrylate has not been assessed yet. Materials and Methods One centimeter long gastrotomy was performed in 24 male Wistar rats, which were divided depending on the type of closure method employed: manual USP 5/0 silk interrupted suture versus sutureless closure with Histoacryl Flexible (n-butyl-cyanoacrylate with softener) or Histoacryl Double Component (n-butyl-cyanoacrylate with softener and hardener). Microscopic evaluation of the suture viability and integrity was performed, and adhesion formation during the cicatrization process were assessed. During an 8-week follow-up clinical and histopathological aspects as well as hematologic and inflammatory biomarkers were studied. Results No differences among groups where found in any of the clinical, analytical, or histopathological issues assessed except for a higher incidence rate of adhesions in the Histoacryl Double Component group when compared with hand-sewn suture group (P = .04). Our results support experimental studies in large mammals (pigs) for further study of sutureless hollow viscera closure.

Microfracture-coagulation for the real robotic liver parenchymal transection.

The use of the robotic approach in liver surgery is exponentially increasing. Although technically the robot introduces several innovative features, the instruments linked with the traditional laparoscopic approach for the liver parenchymal transection are not available, which may result in multiple technical variants that may bias the comparative analysis between the different series worldwide. A real robotic approach, minimally efficient for the liver parenchymal transection, with no requirement of external tool, available for the already existing platforms, and applicable to any type of liver resection, counting on the selective use of the plugged bipolar forceps and the monopolar scissors, or "microfracture-coagulation" (MFC) transection method, is described in detail. The relevant aspects of the technique, its indications and methodological basis are discussed.

Robotic liver surgery: A new reality. Descriptive analysis of 220 cases of minimally invasive liver surgery in 182 patients.

INTRODUCTION: The level of recommendation of the robotic approach in liver surgery is controversial. The objective of the study is to carry out a single-center retrospective descriptive analysis of the short-term results of the robotic and laparoscopic approach in liver surgery during the same period. METHODS: Descriptive analysis of the short-term results of the robotic and laparoscopic approach on 220 resections in 182 patients undergoing minimally invasive liver surgery. RESULTS: Between April 2018 and June 2022, a total of 92 robotic liver resections (RLR) were performed in 83 patients and 128 laparoscopic (LLR) in 99 patients. The LLR group showed a higher proportion of major surgery (P < .001) and multiple resections (P = .002). The two groups were similar in anatomical resections (RLR 64.1% vs. LLR 56.3%). In the LLS group, the average operating time was 212 min (SD 52.1). Blood loss was 276.5 mL (100-1000) and conversion 12.1%. Mean hospital stay was 5.7 (SD 4.9) days. Morbidity was 27.3% and 2% mortality. In the RLS group, the mean operative time was 217 min (SD 53.6), blood loss 169.5 mL (100.900), and conversion 2.5%. Mean hospital stay was 4.1 (SD 2.1) days. Morbidity was 15%, with no mortality. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive liver surgery is a safe technique, and in particular, RLS allows liver resections to be performed safely and reproducibly; it appears to be a non-inferior technique to LLS, but randomized studies are needed to determine the minimally invasive approach of choice in liver surgery.

Laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: the choice and the future.

INTRODUCTION: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is currently well established as a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedure, using either a laparoscopic (LDP) or robotic (RDP) approach. METHODS: Out of 83 DP performed between January 2018 and March 2022, 57 cases (68.7%) were performed using MIS: 35 LDP and 22 RDP (da Vinci Xi). We have assessed the experience with the two techniques and analyzed the value of the robotic approach. Cases of conversion have been examined in detail. RESULTS: The mean operative times for LDP and RDP were 201.2 (SD 47.8) and 247.54 (SD 35.8) minutes, respectively (P = NS). No differences were observed in length of hospital stay or conversion rate: 6 (5-34) vs. 5.6 (5-22) days, and 4 (11.4%) vs. 3 (13.6%) cases, respectively (P = NS). The readmission rate was 3/35 patients (11.4%) treated with LDP and 6/22 (27.3%) cases of RDP (P = NS). There were no differences in morbidity (Dindo-Clavien ≥ III) between the two groups. Mortality was one case in the robotic group (a patient with early conversion due to vascular involvement). The rate of R0 resection was greater and statistically significant in the RDP group (77.1% vs. 90.9%) (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is a safe and feasible procedure in selected patients. Surgical planning and stepwise implementation based on prior experience help surgeons successfully perform technically demanding procedures. RDP could be the approach of choice in distal pancreatectomy, and it is not inferior to LDP.

Venous resection in pancreatic oncologic surgery: Different techniques for different situations.

INTRODUCTION: To report the clinical results of patients with malignant pancreatic lesions who underwent oncological surgery with vascular resection. The type of intervention performed, types of vascular reconstruction, the pathological anatomy results, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and survival at 3 and 5 years were analyzed. METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional and comparative analysis. We include 41 patients with malignant pancreatic lesions who underwent surgery with vascular resection due to vascular involvement, from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS: The most performed surgery was pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure) using median laparotomy, in 35 out of the 41 patients (85%). One of the cases in the series was performed laparoscopically. Type 1 reconstruction (simple suture) was performed in 11 (27%) patients, type 2 in 4 (10%) cases, type 3 (end-to-end) in 23 (56%) cases, and type 4 reconstruction by autologous graft in 3 (7%) cases. The mean length of the resected venous segment was 21 (11-46) mm, and mean surgical time was 290 (220-360) minutes. 90% (37/41) were pancreatic adenocarcinoma. 83% were considered R0, and there was involvement in the resected vascular section in 41% of the cases. Four patients had Clavien Dindo morbidity >3, and there were no cases of postoperative mortality. Survival at 3 years was 48% and at 5 years 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The aggressive surgical treatment with venous resection in pancreatic malignant lesions to ensure R0 and its vascular reconstruction is a feasible technique, with an acceptable morbid-mortality rate and overall survival.

Augmented reality in hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery: a technology at your fingertips.

Augmented reality is a technology that opens new possibilities in surgery. We present our experience in a hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery unit in terms of preoperative planning, intraoperative support and teaching. For surgical planning, we have used 3D CT and MRI reconstructions to evaluate complex cases, which has made the interpretation of the anatomy more precise and the planning of the technique simpler. At an intraoperative level, it provides for remote holographic connection between specialists, the substitution of physical elements for virtual elements, and the use of virtual consultation models and surgical guides. In teaching, new lessons include sharing live video of surgery with the support of virtual elements for a better student understanding. As the experience has been satisfactory, augmented reality could be applied in the future to improve the results of hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery.

Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Simplifying time and dose.

BACKGROUND: This article aims to analyze and to simplify the optimal dose and time of intravenous indocyanine green (ICG) administration to achieve the identification of the cystic duct and the common bile duct (CBD). METHODS: A consecutive series of 146 patients was prospectively analyzed and divided into three groups according to the time of ICG administration: at induction of anesthesia group (20-30 min); hours before group (between 2 and 6 h); and the day before group (≥6 h); and two groups according to the dose of ICG: 1 cc (2.5 mg) or weight-based dose (0.05 mg/kg). RESULTS: The CBD was better visualized in the at induction of anesthesia group (85.4%), in the hours before group (97.1%) (p = 0.002) and in the 1cc group (p = 0.011). When we analyzed the 1 cc group (n = 126) a greater visualization of the CBD was observed in the at induction of anesthesia group (86.7%) and in the hours before group (97.1%) (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Due to its simplicity and reproducibility, we suggest a dose of 2.5 mg administered 2-6 h before the procedure is the optimal. However, ICG administered 30 min prior to the surgery is enough for adequate visualization of biliary structures.

Challenge and future of liver and pancreatic robotic surgery. Analysis of 64 cases in a specialized unit.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic surgery has proven effective in certain surgical procedures. However, in liver and pancreatic surgery (HBP) its use is still rare. The initial experience in HBP robotic surgery of a specialized unit of a tertiary hospital is presented. METHOD: The results of patients undergoing robotic HBP surgery between April 2018 and October 2020 have been prospectively studied. The data analyzed correspond to demographic data, surgical techniques performed, associated morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: 64 patients were operated, corresponding to 35 hepatectomies (major [6.7%], anatomic [52.9%], limited [34.4%], cystectomies [3%] and marsupialization [3%]), 29 pancreatectomies (distal [48.2%], central [6.9%], cephalic [13.8%], enucleations [24.1%], ampullectomies [3.5%] and duodenal resections [3.5%]). In liver surgery the mean operative time was 204.4 min (100-265 min), the median postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo scale was one (1-4), the mean blood losses 166.7 mL (100-300 mL), there was no conversion and the mean postoperative stay was four days (2-14 days). In pancreatic surgery, the mean operative time was 243.8 min (125-460 min), the median of postoperative complications was two (1-4), blood loss of 202.3 mL (100-500 mL) associated to a conversion rate 17.8% and an average stay of seven days (3-23 days). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic HBP surgery is safe and feasible. It is suggested that its use facilitates parenchymal sparing surgery, access to posterior liver segments and anastomosis in pancreatic reconstruction compared to laparoscopic surgery.

Highs and lows in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is not widely accepted, and its use is controversial. Only correct patient selection and appropriate training of groups experienced in pancreatic surgery and laparoscopy will be able to establish its role and its hypothetical advantages. METHODS: Out of 138 pancreatic surgeries performed in a two-year period (2017-2019), 23 were laparoscopic PD. We evaluate its efficacy and safety compared to 31 open PD. RESULTS: There were no cases of B/C pancreatic or biliary fistula, nor any cases of delayed gastric emptying in the laparoscopic group, but hemorrhage required one reoperation. The conversion rate was 21% (five cases): one due to bleeding, and the remainder for non-progression. The converted patients showed no differences compared to those completed by laparoscopy. There were no differences between laparoscopic and open PD in surgical time, postoperative complications, reintervention rate, readmissions or mortality. R0 resection in tumor cases was 85% for laparoscopy and 69% in open surgery without statistical significance. The postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic PD group (eight vs. 15 days). CONCLUSIONS: In a selected group, laparoscopic PD can be safely and effectively performed if carried out by groups who are experts in pancreatic surgery and advanced laparoscopy. The technique has the same postoperative results as open surgery and is oncologically adequate, with less hospital stay. Proper patient selection, a step-by-step program and a lax and early conversion prevents serious operating accidents.

Challenge and future of liver and pancreatic robotic surgery. Analysis of 64 cases in a specialized unit. / Desafío y futuro de la cirugía robótica hepática y pancreática. Análisis de 64 casos en una unidad especializada.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic surgery has proven effective in certain surgical procedures. However, in liver and pancreatic surgery (HBP) its use is still rare. The initial experience in HBP robotic surgery of a specialized unit of a tertiary hospital is presented. METHOD: The results of patients undergoing robotic HBP surgery between April 2018 and October 2020 have been prospectively studied. The data analyzed correspond to demographic data, surgical techniques performed, associated morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: 64 patients were operated, corresponding to 35 hepatectomies (major [6.7%], anatomic [52.9%], limited [34.4%], cystectomies [3%] and marsupialization [3%]), 29 pancreatectomies (distal [48.2%], central [6.9%], cephalic [13.8%], enucleations [24.1%], ampullectomies [3.5%] and duodenal resections [3.5%]). In liver surgery the mean operative time was 204.4 minutes (100-265 min), the median postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo scale was one (1-4), the mean blood losses 166.7 mL (100-300 mL), there was no conversion and the mean postoperative stay was four days (2-14 days). In pancreatic surgery, the mean operative time was 243.8 minutes (125-460 min), the median of postoperative complications was two (1-4), blood loss of 202.3 mL (100-500 mL) associated to a conversion rate 17.8% and an average stay of seven days (3-23 days). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic HBP surgery is safe and feasible. It is suggested that its use facilitates parenchymal sparing surgery, access to posterior liver segments and anastomosis in pancreatic reconstruction compared to laparoscopic surgery.

Highs and lows in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. / Luces y sombras de la duodenopancreatectomía cefálica laparoscópica.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is not widely accepted, and its use is controversial. Only correct patient selection and appropriate training of groups experienced in pancreatic surgery and laparoscopy will be able to establish its role and its hypothetical advantages METHODS: Out of 138 pancreatic surgeries performed in a two-year period (2017-2019), 23 were laparoscopic PD. We evaluate its efficacy and safety compared to 31 open PD. RESULTS: There were no cases of B/C pancreatic or biliary fistula, nor any cases of delayed gastric emptying in the laparoscopic group, but hemorrhage required one reoperation. The conversion rate was 21% (five cases): one due to bleeding, and the remainder for non-progression. The converted patients showed no differences compared to those completed by laparoscopy. There were no differences between laparoscopic and open PD in surgical time, postoperative complications, reintervention rate, readmissions or mortality. R0 resection in tumor cases was 85% for laparoscopy and 69% in open surgery without statistical significance. The postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic PD group (eight vs. 15 days). CONCLUSIONS: In a selected group, laparoscopic PD can be safely and effectively performed if carried out by groups who are experts in pancreatic surgery and advanced laparoscopy. The technique has the same postoperative results as open surgery and is oncologically adequate, with less hospital stay. Proper patient selection, a step-by-step program and a lax and early conversion prevents serious operating accidents.

Pneumoendoscopic single port approach to breast cancer. How we do it?

Endoscopic procedures have not become the gold standard in breast surgery. In order to improve today's outcomes we have developed a pilot study in the Breast Pathology Unit of Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol. A surgical procedure was performed creating a pneumoendoscopic cavity by using a Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (Single port) approach with a follow up of four years. Four patients underwent pneumoendoscopic single-port breast surgery receiving skin-sparing quadrantectomy and axillary surgery requiring lymphadenectomy in all of them. All patients had immediate reconstruction with a Latisimus Dorsi flap. No perioperative complications appeared. Mean operative time was 290 min (range 240-315 min) and mean hospital stay was 3,2 days. Surgical margins of all cases were pathologically negative and all patients were disease free after four years of monitoring. All patients were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome in the immediate postoperative and during the follow up. Although all innovative techniques generate hesitation on their beginnings and are liable to improve, we believe that pneumoendoscopic single-port breast surgery can be suitable for breast cancer, offering better cosmetic outcomes with oncological safety.

Clinical Feasibility of Large Gastrotomy Closure Using a Flexible Tissue Glue Based on N-Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate: Experimental Study in Pigs.

BACKGROUND: The use of synthetic adhesives such as cyanoacrylates has been established previously for a wide range of clinical indications. However, more research is necessary to evaluate their use in digestive closures or anastomosis. New chemical formulations developed to achieve more flexibility of synthetic adhesives (i.e., based on n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate) could be an alternative to achieve this purpose. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using flexible cyanoacrylate adhesives for large gastric incision closure in an animal model. METHODS: Twelve farm pigs were divided in two groups depending on the type of closure method applied. In all cases, extra-large seven centimeters gastrostomies were performed. Braided absorbable hand-sewn interrupted suture versus n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate with softener closure were compared during a 3-week follow-up period. Histopathological aspects, hematologic and inflammatory biomarkers, and endoluminal pressure tolerated until leakage were assessed. The time spent on both closing procedures was compared. RESULTS: No differences between the two groups were found in any of the histopathological and inflammatory variables evaluated. The glued group tolerated a significantly higher pressure than the manual suture group. A reduction of surgery time was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that flexible cyanoacrylates could be a feasible alternative to improve the clinical outcome of the closure of hollow viscera through more efficient sutureless procedures.

Desafío y futuro de la cirugía robótica hepática y pancreática. Análisis de 64 casos en una unidad especializada / Challenge and future of liver and pancreatic robotic surgery. Analysis of 64 cases in a specialized unit

Introducción: La cirugía robótica ha demostrado su eficacia en ciertos procedimientos quirúrgicos. Sin embargo, en cirugía hepática y pancreática (HBP) su uso es todavía poco frecuente. Se presenta la experiencia inicial en cirugía robótica HBP de una unidad especializada en un hospital de tercer nivel. Método: Se han estudiado en forma prospectiva los resultados de los pacientes intervenidos de cirugía HBP robótica entre abril de 2018 y octubre de 2020. Los datos analizados corresponden a datos demográficos, técnicas quirúrgicas realizadas y morbimortalidad asociada. Resultados Se intervinieron 64 pacientes, sometidos a 35 hepatectomías (mayores [6,7%], anatómicas [52,9%], limitadas [34,4%], quistectomías [3%] y marsupializaciones [3%]) y 29 pancreatectomías/resecciones duodenales (distales [48,2%], centrales [6,9%], cefálicas [13,8%], enucleaciones [24,1%], ampulectomías [3,5%] y resecciones duodenales [3,5%]).En cirugía hepática el tiempo operatorio medio fue de 204,4 minutos (100-265 min), la mediana de complicaciones postoperatorias según la escala de Clavien-Dindo fue de uno (1-4), las pérdidas hemáticas medias de 166,7 mL (100-300 mL), no existió conversión y la estancia postoperatoria media de cuatro días (2-14 días).En cirugía pancreática el tiempo operatorio medio fue de 243,8 minutos (125-460 min), la mediana de complicaciones postoperatorias de dos (1-4), las pérdidas hemáticas de 202,3 mL (100-500 mL) asociadas a una tasa de conversión del 17,8% y una estancia media de siete días (3-23 días). Conclusiones: La cirugía robótica HBP es segura y factible. Se sugiere que su uso facilita la cirugía conservadora de parénquima, el acceso a segmentos posteriores hepáticos y la realización de anastomosis en la reconstrucción pancreática respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica (AU)

Introduction: Robotic surgery has proven effective in certain surgical procedures. However, in liver and pancreatic surgery (HBP) its use is still rare. The initial experience in HBP robotic surgery of a specialized unit of a tertiary hospital is presented. results of patients undergoing robotic HBP surgery between April 2018 and October 2020 have been prospectively studied. The data analyzed correspond to demographic data, surgical techniques performed, associated morbidity and mortality.Results64 patients were operated, corresponding to 35 hepatectomies (major [6.7%], anatomic [52.9%], limited [34.4%], cystectomies [3%] and marsupialization [3%]), 29 pancreatectomies (distal [48.2%], central [6.9%], cephalic [13.8%], enucleations [24.1%], ampullectomies [3.5%] and duodenal resections [3.5%]).In liver surgery the mean operative time was 204.4 minutes (100-265 min), the median postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo scale was one (1-4), the mean blood losses 166.7 mL (100-300 mL), there was no conversion and the mean postoperative stay was four days (2-14 days).In pancreatic surgery, the mean operative time was 243.8 minutes (125-460 min), the median of postoperative complications was two (1-4), blood loss of 202.3 mL (100-500 mL) associated to a conversion rate 17.8% and an average stay of seven days (3-23 days).Conclusions: Robotic HBP surgery is safe and feasible. It is suggested that its use facilitates parenchymal sparing surgery, access to posterior liver segments and anastomosis in pancreatic reconstruction compared to laparoscopic surgery (AU)

Luces y sombras de la duodenopancreatectomía cefálica laparoscópica / Highs and lows in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Introducción: La duodenopancreatectomía (DPC) laparoscópica no es ampliamente aceptada y su uso es controvertido. Únicamente una correcta selección de los pacientes y un aprendizaje adecuado por grupos con experiencia en cirugía pancreática y laparoscopia podrán establecer cuál es su papel y sus hipotéticas ventajas. Métodos: De 138 cirugías pancreáticas realizadas en un periodo de dos años (2017-2019) se realizaron 23 DPC laparoscópicas, incluyendo patología benigna y maligna. Se valora la eficacia y seguridad y se compara con 31 DPC abiertas en el mismo periodo. Resultados: No hubo casos de fístula pancreática B/C, biliar, ni retraso en vaciamiento gástrico en el grupo laparoscópico, pero apareció una hemorragia que obligó a una reintervención. El índice de conversión fue del 21% (cinco casos), uno por hemorragia y el resto por no progresión. Los convertidos no mostraron diferencias frente a los que se completó por laparoscopia. No existieron diferencias entre la DPC laparoscópica y abierta en tiempo quirúrgico, complicaciones postoperatorias, índice de reintervenciones, reingresos ni mortalidad. La resección R0 en los casos tumores fue del 85% por laparoscopia y del 69% en cirugía abierta sin significación estadística. La estancia postoperatoria fue inferior en el grupo DPC laparoscópica, ocho vs. 15 días. Conclusiones: En un grupo seleccionado, la DPC laparoscópica puede realizarse de forma segura y eficaz si se realiza por grupos expertos en cirugía pancreática y en laparoscopia avanzada. Obtiene los mismos resultados que la cirugía abierta en el postoperatorio y es oncológicamente adecuada con menor estancia hospitalaria. Una selección adecuada de los pacientes, un programa establecido por pasos con una conversión laxa y precoz evita accidentes operatorios graves. (AU)

Introduction: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is not widely accepted, and its use is controversial. Only correct patient selection and appropriate training of groups experienced in pancreatic surgery and laparoscopy will be able to establish its role and its hypothetical advantages Methods: Out of 138 pancreatic surgeries performed in a two-year period (2017-2019), 23 were laparoscopic PD. We evaluate its efficacy and safety compared to 31 open PD. Results: There were no cases of B/C pancreatic or biliary fistula, nor any cases of delayed gastric emptying in the laparoscopic group, but hemorrhage required one reoperation. The conversion rate was 21% (five cases): one due to bleeding, and the remainder for non-progression. The converted patients showed no differences compared to those completed by laparoscopy. There were no differences between laparoscopic and open PD in surgical time, postoperative complications, reintervention rate, readmissions or mortality. R0 resection in tumor cases was 85% for laparoscopy and 69% in open surgery without statistical significance. The postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic PD group (eight vs. 15 days). Conclusions: In a selected group, laparoscopic PD can be safely and effectively performed if carried out by groups who are experts in pancreatic surgery and advanced laparoscopy. The technique has the same postoperative results as open surgery and is oncologically adequate, with less hospital stay. Proper patient selection, a step-by-step program and a lax and early conversion prevents serious operating accidents. (AU)

Adrenohepatic fusion: Adhesion or invasion in primary virilizant giant adrenal carcinoma? Implications for surgical resection. Two case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Adrenohepatic fusion means union between the adrenal gland and the liver, intermingling its parenchymas. It is not possible to identify this condition by image tests. Its presence implies radical and multidisciplinar approach. PRESENTATION OF CASES: We report two female cases of 45 and 50 years old with clinical virilization and palpable mass on the abdominal right upper quadrant corresponding to adrenocortical carcinoma with hepatic fusion. The contrast-enhanced tomography showed an indistinguishable mass involving the liver and the right adrenal gland. In the first case, the patient had a two-time operation, the former removing only the adrenal carcinoma, and the second performing a radical surgery after an early relapse. In the second case, a radical right en bloc adrenohepatectomy was performed. Both cases were pathologically reported as liver-infiltrating adrenal carcinoma. Only in the second case the surgery was radical effective as first intention to treat, with 3 years of disease-free survival. DISCUSSION: ACC is a rare entity with poor prognosis. The major indicators of malignancy are tumour diameter over 6cm, local invasion or metastasis, secretion of corticosteroids, virilization and hypertension and hypokalaemia. The parenchymal fusion of the adrenal cortical layer can be misdiagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma with adhesion with the Glisson capsule. AHF in such cases may be misinterpreted during surgery, what may impair its resectability, and therefore the survival. The surgical treatment must be performed en bloc, often using liver vascular control. Postoperative treatment must be offered immediately after surgery. CONCLUSION: We report two consecutive rare cases of adrenohepatic fusion in giant right adrenocortical carcinoma, not detectable by imaging, what has important implications for the surgical decision-making. As radical surgery is the best choice to offer a curative treatment, it has to be performed by a multidisciplinary well-assembled team, counting with endocrine and liver surgeons, and transplant surgeons in case of vena cava involvement, in order to maximize the disease-free survival.