Catch bond interaction between cell-surface sulfatase Sulf1 and glycosaminoglycans.

In biological adhesion, the biophysical mechanism of specific biomolecular interaction can be divided in slip and catch bonds, respectively. Conceptually, slip bonds exhibit a reduced bond lifetime under increased external force and catch bonds, in contrast, exhibit an increased lifetime (for a certain force interval). Since 2003, a handful of biological systems have been identified to display catch bond properties. Upon investigating the specific interaction between the unique hydrophilic domain (HD) of the human cell-surface sulfatase Sulf1 against its physiological glycosaminoglycan (GAG) target heparan sulfate (HS) by single molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS), we found clear evidence of catch bond behavior in this system. The HD, ∼320 amino acids long with dominant positive charge, and its interaction with sulfated GAG-polymers were quantitatively investigated using atomic force microscopy (AFM) based force clamp spectroscopy (FCS) and dynamic force spectroscopy (DFS). In FCS experiments, we found that the catch bond character of HD against GAGs could be attributed to the GAG 6-O-sulfation site whereas only slip bond interaction can be observed in a GAG system where this site is explicitly lacking. We interpreted the binding data within the theoretical framework of a two state two path model, where two slip bonds are coupled forming a double-well interaction potential with an energy difference of ΔE ≈ 9 kBT and a compliance length of Δx ≈ 3.2 nm. Additional DFS experiments support this assumption and allow identification of these two coupled slip-bond states that behave consistently within the Kramers-Bell-Evans model of force-mediated dissociation.

Cooperation of binding sites at the hydrophilic domain of cell-surface sulfatase Sulf1 allows for dynamic interaction of the enzyme with its substrate heparan sulfate.

BACKGROUND: Sulf1 is a cell-surface sulfatase removing internal 6-O-sulfate groups from heparan sulfate (HS) chains. Thereby it modulates the activity of HS-dependent growth factors. For HS interaction Sulf1 employs a unique hydrophilic domain (HD). METHODS: Affinity-chromatography, AFM-single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) and immunofluorescence on living cells were used to analyze specificity, kinetics and structural basis of this interaction. RESULTS: Full-length Sulf1 interacts broadly with sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) showing, however, higher affinity toward HS and heparin than toward chondroitin sulfate or dermatan sulfate. Strong interaction depends on the presence of Sulf1-substrate groups, as Sulf1 bound significantly weaker to HS after enzymatic 6-O-desulfation by Sulf1 pretreatment, hence suggesting autoregulation of Sulf1/substrate association. In contrast, HD alone exhibited outstanding specificity toward HS and did not interact with chondroitin sulfate, dermatan sulfate or 6-O-desulfated HS. Dynamic SMFS revealed an off-rate of 0.04/s, i.e., ~500-fold higher than determined by surface plasmon resonance. SMFS allowed resolving the dynamics of single dissociation events in each force-distance curve. HD subdomain constructs revealed heparin interaction sites in the inner and C-terminal regions of HD. CONCLUSIONS: Specific substrate binding of Sulf1 is mediated by HD and involves at least two separate HS-binding sites. Surface plasmon resonance KD-values reflect a high avidity resulting from multivalent HD/heparin interaction. While this ensures stable cell-surface HS association, the dynamic cooperation of binding sites at HD and also the catalytic domain enables processive action of Sulf1 along or across HS chains. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: HD confers a novel and highly dynamic mode of protein interaction with HS.