Optimizing heat inactivation for SARS-CoV-2 at 95 °C and its implications: A standardized approach.

Background: Standardized and validated heat inactivation procedure for Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are not available. For heat inactivation, various protocols were reported to prepare External Quality Assessment Programme (EQAP) samples without direct comparison between different durations. Objective: To assess the heat inactivation procedures against SARS-CoV-2. The efficacy of the optimized condition was reflected by the results from laboratories testing the EQAP samples. Study design: The SARS-CoV-2 strain was exposed to 95 °C in a water bath for three different time intervals, 5 min, 10 min and 15 min, respectively. The efficacy of inactivation was confirmed by the absence of cytopathic effects and decreasing viral load in 3 successive cell line passages. The viral stock inactivated by the optimal time interval was dispatched to EQAP participants and the result returned were analyzed. Results: All of the three conditions were capable of inactivating the SARS-CoV-2 of viral load at around cycle threshold value of 10. When the 95 °C 10 min condition was chosen to prepare SARS-CoV-2 EQAP samples, they showed sufficient homogeneity and stability. High degree of consensus was observed among EQAP participants in all samples dispatched. Conclusions: The conditions evaluated in the present study could be helpful for laboratories in preparing SARS-CoV-2 EQAP samples.

Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in combined nasal-and-throat swabs collected from COVID-19 individuals under the Universal Community Testing Programme in Hong Kong.

BACKGROUND: Combined nasal-and-throat swabs (CNTS) is less invasive and easy to execute. CNTS also induces lower risk to healthcare workers upon collection. However, there is a lack of data on viral load assessment for population-wide testing. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed if CNTS is suitable as an alternative specimen type for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We assessed the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in CNTS collected from COVID-19 individuals through the 2-week period of the Universal Community Testing Programme (UCTP) conducted in Hong Kong. In addition, we compared viral loads of SARS-CoV-2 for the paired CNTS and non-CNTS specimens among these individuals. RESULTS: This UCTP identified 48 COVID-19 individuals from nearly 2 million specimens collected. The viral loads of SARS-CoV-2 varied widely, cycle threshold values Ct 16.28-36.94, among symptoms and asymptomatic individuals. The viral loads for the paired CNTS and non-CNTS specimens were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that CNTS could be a specimen of choice for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.

Coxsackievirus B3-associated aseptic meningitis: an emerging infection in Hong Kong.

Enterovirus (EV) infection is a common disease of childhood and associated not uncommonly with aseptic meningitis. In the summer of 2008, laboratory surveillance has detected increased number of coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) associated aseptic meningitis in Hong Kong, constituting 11.6% of those infected. This study analyzed the epidemiology, circulating pattern, and clinical presentations of CVB3 in Hong Kong over the last 10 years with reference to the circulation of EV in the locality. Enteroviruses (EV) were isolated from respiratory, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), stool, and vesicular samples using human rhabdomyosarcoma, human laryngeal carcinoma (HEp2-C), human lung fibroblast (MRC-5), and African green monkey kidney (Vero) cell lines. Virus isolates were identified and characterized by indirect immunofluorescence (IF) using monoclonal antibodies (mAB), neutralization test as well as partial VP1 sequencing. Different from previous years, IF test result showed that majority of the isolates from 2008 were untypeable by the mAB suggesting antigenic change. Sequence analysis revealed that these isolates were clustered with recent isolate from Fuyang, China. Review of data from 1999 to 2008 showed increased activity of CVB3 in the years 2005 and 2008, and isolates in these 2 years displayed an amino acid change from threonine to alanine at codon 277 of the VP1 gene, which may be associated with central nervous system (CNS) disease.

Oseltamivir- and amantadine-resistant influenza viruses A (H1N1).

Surveillance of amantadine and oseltamivir resistance among influenza viruses was begun in Hong Kong in 2006. In 2008, while both A/Brisbane/59/2007-like and A/Hong Kong/2652/2006-like viruses (H1N1) were cocirculating, we detected amantadine and oseltamivir resistance among A/Hong Kong/2652/2006-like viruses (H1N1), caused by genetic reassortment or spontaneous mutation.

Performance of laboratory diagnostics for the detection of influenza A(H1N1)v virus as correlated with the time after symptom onset and viral load.

BACKGROUND: To diagnose influenza A(H1N1)v virus infection, accurate and rapid detection are important. However, there is scanty data on the performance of various laboratory diagnostics. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of rapid antigen test (RAT), viral culture and RT-PCR for the detection of influenza A(H1N1)v virus and to correlate their performance with the time after symptom onset and viral load. STUDY DESIGN: From May 1, 2009 to June 25, 2009, respiratory samples were collected from 5740 individuals suspected of having influenza A(H1N1)v infection. The performance of viral culture and RT-PCR were investigated and correlated with the time after symptom onset. The sensitivity of RAT ESPLINE influenza A & B-N (Fujirebio Inc, Tokyo) was evaluated using a subset of 60 samples from patients diagnosed as having influenza A(H1N1)v infection. RESULTS: Using respiratory samples from 587 patients diagnosed with influenza A(H1N1)v infection, comparison of laboratory diagnostics showed viral culture and RT-PCR gave comparable results with overall sensitivity of 93.9% and 98.1%, respectively. For RAT, when testing a subset of 60 samples collected < or =3 days following symptom onset, the sensitivity was 62%. CONCLUSIONS: Although viral shedding is prolonged and of higher titre in influenza A(H1N1)v infection, RAT showed a low sensitivity of 62% among patients presenting < or =3 days after symptom onset. Viral culture showed comparable performance with RT-PCR and with sensitivity better than that documented for seasonal influenza.