Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 31(5): 1107-1117, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32238473

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinically significant CKD following surgery for kidney cancer is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but identifying patients at increased CKD risk remains difficult. Simple methods to stratify risk of clinically significant CKD after nephrectomy are needed. METHODS: To develop a tool for stratifying patients' risk of CKD arising after surgery for kidney cancer, we tested models in a population-based cohort of 699 patients with kidney cancer in Queensland, Australia (2012-2013). We validated these models in a population-based cohort of 423 patients from Victoria, Australia, and in patient cohorts from single centers in Queensland, Scotland, and England. Eligible patients had two functioning kidneys and a preoperative eGFR ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The main outcome was incident eGFR <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at 12 months postnephrectomy. We used prespecified predictors-age ≥65 years old, diabetes mellitus, preoperative eGFR, and nephrectomy type (partial/radical)-to fit logistic regression models and grouped patients according to degree of risk of clinically significant CKD (negligible, low, moderate, or high risk). RESULTS: Absolute risks of stage 3b or higher CKD were <2%, 3% to 14%, 21% to 26%, and 46% to 69% across the four strata of negligible, low, moderate, and high risk, respectively. The negative predictive value of the negligible risk category was 98.9% for clinically significant CKD. The c statistic for this score ranged from 0.84 to 0.88 across derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our simple scoring system can reproducibly stratify postnephrectomy CKD risk on the basis of readily available parameters. This clinical tool's quantitative assessment of CKD risk may be weighed against other considerations when planning management of kidney tumors and help inform shared decision making between clinicians and patients.


Assuntos
Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/etiologia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
Med J Aust ; 207(3): 127-133, 2017 Aug 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28764630

RESUMO

Increased early and incidental detection, improved surgical techniques and technological advancement mean that the management of renal mass lesions is constantly evolving. The treatment of choice for renal mass lesions has historically been radical nephrectomy. Partial nephrectomy is now recommended for localised renal masses, owing to favourable renal functional outcomes. Ablative renal surgery confers a significant risk of chronic kidney disease. There are few studies assessing long term outcomes of nephrectomy on renal outcomes, and virtually no studies assessing long term outcomes for less invasive therapies such as ablation. Unless a renal mass is clearly benign on imaging, management decisions will be made with an assumption of malignancy. The content of this review applies to both benign and malignant renal mass lesions. We advocate for improved strategies for kidney function assessment and risk stratification, early targeted referral, and regular screening for chronic kidney disease for all patients after surgery.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Ablação por Cateter , Creatinina/sangue , Gerenciamento Clínico , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Rim/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Programas de Rastreamento , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
4.
Electrophoresis ; 34(11): 1663-9, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23417432

RESUMO

The present study was aimed at the identification of proteins that are differentially expressed in the urine of patients with prostate cancer (PCa), those with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and age-matched healthy male control subjects. Using a combination of 2DE and MS/MS, significantly lower expression of urinary saposin B and two different fragments of inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor light chain (ITIL) was demonstrated in the PCa patients compared to the controls. However, only one of the ITIL fragments was significantly different between the PCa and BPH patients. When image analysis was performed on urinary proteins that were transferred onto NC membranes and detected using a lectin that binds to O-glycans, a truncated fragment of inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 4 was the sole protein found to be significantly enhanced in the PCa patients compared to the controls. Together, these urinary peptide fragments might be useful complementary biomarkers to indicate PCa as well as to distinguish it from BPH, although further epidemiological evidence on the specificity and sensitivity of the protein candidates is required.


Assuntos
alfa-Globulinas/urina , Biomarcadores Tumorais/urina , Hiperplasia Prostática/urina , Neoplasias da Próstata/urina , Saposinas/urina , Idoso , alfa-Globulinas/análise , Sequência de Aminoácidos , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Eletroforese em Gel Bidimensional , Glicosilação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Próstata/patologia , Hiperplasia Prostática/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Saposinas/análise , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem
5.
Electrophoresis ; 33(12): 1855-62, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22740474

RESUMO

Diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is currently much reliant on the invasive and time-consuming transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate gland, particularly in light of the inefficient use of prostate-specific antigen as its biomarker. In the present study, we have profiled the sera of patients with PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) using the gel- and lectin-based proteomics methods and demonstrated the significant differential expression of apolipoprotein AII, complement C3 beta chain fragment, inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 4 fragment, transthyretin, alpha-1-antitrypsin, and high molecular weight kininogen (light chain) between the two groups of patients' samples. Our data are suggestive of the potential use of the serum proteins as complementary biomarkers to effectively discriminate PCa from BPH, although this requires further extensive validation on clinically representative populations.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Hiperplasia Prostática/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Proteômica/métodos , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/química , Proteínas Sanguíneas/análise , Proteínas Sanguíneas/química , Proteínas Sanguíneas/metabolismo , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Eletroforese em Gel Bidimensional , Glicoproteínas/sangue , Glicoproteínas/química , Glicoproteínas/metabolismo , Humanos , Lectinas/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA