RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The meta-analysis of chemotherapy for nasopharynx carcinoma (MAC-NPC) collaborative group previously showed that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to concomitant chemoradiotherapy had the highest survival benefit of the studied treatment regimens in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Due to the publication of new trials on induction chemotherapy, we updated the network meta-analysis. METHODS: For this individual patient data network meta-analysis, trials of radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma that completed accrual before Dec 31, 2016, were identified and updated individual patient data were obtained. Both general databases (eg, PubMed and Web of Science) and Chinese medical literature databases were searched. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. A frequentist network meta-analysis approach with a two-step random effect stratified by trial based on hazard ratio Peto estimator was used. Global Cochran Q statistic was used to assess homogeneity and consistency, and p score to rank treatments, with higher scores indicating higher benefit therapies. Treatments were grouped into the following categories: radiotherapy alone, induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, induction chemotherapy without taxanes followed by chemoradiotherapy, induction chemotherapy with taxanes followed by chemoradiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42016042524. FINDINGS: The network comprised 28 trials and included 8214 patients (6133 [74·7%] were men, 2073 [25·2%] were women, and eight [0·1%] had missing data) enrolled between Jan 1, 1988, and Dec 31, 2016. Median follow-up was 7·6 years (IQR 6·2-13·3). There was no evidence of heterogeneity (p=0·18), and inconsistency was borderline (p=0·10). The three treatments with the highest benefit for overall survival were induction chemotherapy with taxanes followed by chemoradiotherapy (hazard ratio 0·75; 95% CI 0·59-0·96; p score 92%), induction chemotherapy without taxanes followed by chemoradiotherapy (0·81; 0·69-0·95; p score 87%), and chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (0·88; 0·75-1·04; p score 72%), compared with concomitant chemoradiotherapy (p score 46%). INTERPRETATION: The inclusion of new trials modified the conclusion of the previous network meta-analysis. In this updated network meta-analysis, the addition of either induction chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy to chemoradiotherapy improved overall survival over chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. FUNDING: Institut National du Cancer and Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.
Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/tratamento farmacológico , Metanálise em Rede , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia de Indução , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , NasofaringeRESUMO
Angiosarcoma (AS) is a rare disease with a dismal prognosis. The treatment landscape and prognostic factors for advanced AS, including locally advanced, unresectable, and metastatic disease remain elusive. The Asian Sarcoma Consortium is an international collaborative effort to understand the sarcoma treatment landscape in Asia. We undertook a retrospective chart review of AS patients seen in 8 sarcoma academic centers across Asia. Patients with complete clinical, treatment, and follow-up data were enrolled. Overall, 276 advanced AS patients were included into this study; 84 (30%) of the patients had metachronous metastatic AS. The median age was 67 y; primary sites of AS was cutaneous in 55% and visceral in 45% of patients. In total, 143 (52%) patients received at least 1 line of systemic chemotherapy. The most common first-line chemotherapy regimen used was paclitaxel (47.6%) followed by liposomal doxorubicin (19.6%). The median overall survival (OS) was 7.8 mo. Significant prognostic factors for OS included age > 65 (hazard ratio (HR) 1.54, P = .006), male gender (HR 1.39, P = .02), and a cutaneous primary AS site (HR 0.63, P = .004). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for first-line chemotherapy was 3.4 mo. PFS for single vs combination or paclitaxel vs liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy regimens were comparable. This study provides an insight into the treatment patterns and prognostic factors of advanced AS patients in Asia. Prognosis of advanced AS remains poor. Data from this study serve as a benchmark for future clinical study design.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Hemangiossarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ásia/epidemiologia , Doxorrubicina/análogos & derivados , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Hemangiossarcoma/diagnóstico , Hemangiossarcoma/mortalidade , Hemangiossarcoma/secundário , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Prognóstico , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A current recommendation for the treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is conventional fractionated radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent cisplatin followed by adjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF). This randomized NPC-0501 trial evaluated the therapeutic effect of changing to an induction-concurrent sequence or accelerated-fractionation sequence, and/or replacing 5-fluorouracil with capecitabine (X). METHODS: Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer stage III to stage IVB NPC initially were randomly allocated to 1 of 6 treatment arms (6-arm full-randomization cohort). The protocol was amended in 2009 to permit centers to opt out of randomization regarding fractionation (3-arm chemotherapy cohort). RESULTS: A total of 803 patients were accrued (1 of whom was nonevaluable) from 2006 to 2012. Based on the overall comparisons, neither changing the chemotherapy sequence nor accelerated fractionation improved treatment outcome. However, secondary analyses demonstrated that when adjusted for RT parameters and other significant factors, the induction-concurrent sequence, especially the induction-PX regimen, achieved significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Efficacy varied among different RT groups: although no impact was observed in the accelerated-fractionation group and the 3-arm chemotherapy cohort, a comparison of the induction-concurrent versus concurrent-adjuvant sequence in the conventional-fractionation group demonstrated a significant benefit in PFS (78% vs 62% at 5 years; P = .015) and a marginal benefit in overall survival (84% vs 72%; P = .042) after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Comparison of the induction-PX versus the adjuvant-PF regimen demonstrated better PFS (78% vs 62%; P = .027) without an increase in overall late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: For patients irradiated using conventional fractionation, changing the chemotherapy sequence from a concurrent-adjuvant to an induction-concurrent sequence, particularly using induction cisplatin and capecitabine, potentially could improve efficacy without an adverse impact on late toxicity. However, further validation is needed for confirmation of these findings.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/radioterapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Capecitabina/administração & dosagem , Capecitabina/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cancer outcomes vary widely among different countries. However, comparisons of cost-effectiveness and cost-efficiency of different systems are complex because the incidences of different cancers vary across countries and their chances of cure also differ substantially. We aim to propose a new standardized method for global comparison and to explore its relationship with economic indicators. METHODS: Cancer statistics from all 184 countries and 27 cancers listed in GLOBOCAN 2012 were analyzed. The complement of age-standardized mortality/incidence ratio [1 - (ASM/ASI)] was taken as the proxy relative survival (RS). Accounting for various country-specific cancer patterns, the cancer site-standardized proxy RS (proxy SS-RS) of individual countries were calculated by weighting the proportion of specific cancer sites as compared with the global pattern of incidence. Economic indicators of different countries listed by the World Bank were correlated with corresponding proxy SS-RS. RESULTS: Substantial variation in site-specific survival and new case distribution supported the use of proxy SS-RS, which ranged from 0.124 to 0.622 (median 0.359). The median total health expenditure per capita (HEpc) increased from US$44 for countries with proxy SS-RS < 0.25, to US$4643 for countries with proxy SS-RS ≥0.55. Results from logarithmic regression model showed exponential increase in total HEpc for better outcome. The expenditure varied widely among different strata, with the widest difference observed among countries with SS-RS ≥0.55 (total HEpc US$1412-$9361). CONCLUSIONS: Similar to age-standardization, cancer site-standardization adjusted for variation in pattern of cancer incidence provides the best available and feasible strategies for comparing cancer survivals across countries globally. Furthermore, cancer outcome correlated significantly with economic indicators and the amount of HEpc escalated exponentially. Our findings call for more in-depth studies applying cancer-site standardization to provide essential data for sharing of experience and urgent actions by policy makers to develop comprehensive and financially sustainable cancer plan for greater equity.
Assuntos
Saúde Global/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Concurrent-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) became a recommended treatment for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with the first report of a significant survival benefit from the Intergroup 0099 study. However, data on late toxicities are lacking. Previous reports from the current NPC-9901 trial have raised concerns about a failure to improve overall survival (OS) because of an inadequate impact on distant control and increases in toxicities/noncancer deaths. Validation of the long-term therapeutic ratio is needed. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized trial, patients with nonkeratinizing NPC (stage T1-4/N2-3/M0) were randomly assigned to radiotherapy alone (176 patients) or to CRT (172 patients) with concurrent cisplatin followed by adjuvant cisplatin plus fluorouracil. RESULTS: The early findings of significant improvements in tumor control were maintained: the CRT group achieved significantly higher 10-year overall failure-free (62% vs 50%; P = .01) and progression-free survival rates (56% vs 42%; P = .006) because of superior locoregional control (87% vs 74%; P = .003), whereas the impact on distant control remained insignificant (68% vs 65%; P = .24). The initial differences in toxicities diminished with longer follow-up: 52% versus 47% at 10 years for late toxicities (P = .20), 4.1% versus 2.8% for deaths due to treatment toxicity, and 15.1% versus 13.1% for deaths due to incidental/unknown causes. The OS rate for the CRT group reached statistical superiority at 10 years (62% vs 49%; P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results have confirmed that CRT can significantly improve OS without excessive late toxicities for patients with regionally advanced NPC. However, more potent therapy is needed for improving distant control, especially for patients with stage IVA/B disease. Cancer 2017;123:4147-4157. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Assuntos
Carcinoma/mortalidade , Carcinoma/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante/mortalidade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma/patologia , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/mortalidade , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esquema de Medicação , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a human malignancy that is closely associated with Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV). Early diagnosis of NPC will greatly improve the overall survival. However, current EBV DNA marker detection still lacks the predictive value to perform well in high-risk populations for early detection of NPC. Since aberrant promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) is widely considered to be an important epigenetic change in early carcinogenesis, this study identified a panel of methylation markers for early detection of NPC and also assessed the clinical usefulness of these markers with noninvasive plasma specimens instead of biopsies. MS-HRM assays were carried out to assess the methylation status of a selected panel of four TSGs (RASSF1A, WIF1, DAPK1 and RARß2) in biopsies, NP brushings and cell-free plasma from NPC patients. High-risk and cancer-free groups were used as controls. DNA methylation panel showed higher sensitivity and specificity than EBV DNA marker in cell-free plasma from NPC patients at early Stages (I and II) and in addition to the EBV DNA marker, MS-HRM test for plasma and NP brushing DNA methylation significantly increased the detection rate at all NPC stages as well as local recurrence, using this selected four-gene panel (p<0.05). MS-HRM assay on a selected gene panel has great potential to become a noninvasive and complementary test for NPC early and recurrent detection in combination with the EBV DNA test to increase the sensitivity for NPC detection at an early stage.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Metilação de DNA , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/diagnóstico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma/sangue , Carcinoma/genética , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Epigênese Genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/sangue , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/genética , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/genética , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas , Curva ROC , Temperatura de TransiçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A current recommendation for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is conventional fractionated radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin plus adjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF). In this randomized trial, the authors evaluated the potential therapeutic benefit from changing to an induction-concurrent chemotherapy sequence, replacing fluorouracil with oral capecitabine, and/or using accelerated rather than conventional radiotherapy fractionation. METHODS: Patients with stage III through IVB, nonkeratinizing NPC were randomly allocated to 1 of 6 treatment arms. The protocol was amended in 2009 to permit confining randomization to the conventional fractionation arms. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival and safety. RESULTS: In total, 803 patients were accrued, and 706 patients were randomly allocated to all 6 treatment arms. Comparisons of induction PF versus adjuvant PF did not indicate a significant improvement. Unadjusted comparisons of induction cisplatin and capecitabine (PX) versus adjuvant PF indicated a favorable trend in progression-free survival for the conventional fractionation arm (P = .045); analyses that were adjusted for other significant factors and fractionation reflected a significant reduction in the hazards of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.80) and death (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25-0.70). Unadjusted comparisons of induction sequences versus adjuvant sequences did not reach statistical significance, but adjusted comparisons indicated favorable improvements by induction sequence. Comparisons of induction PX versus induction PF revealed fewer toxicities (neutropenia and electrolyte disturbance), unadjusted comparisons of efficacy were statistically insignificant, but adjusted analyses indicated that induction PX had a lower hazard of death (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.97). Changing the fractionation from conventional to accelerated did not achieve any benefit but incurred higher toxicities (acute mucositis and dehydration). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results indicate that the benefit of changing to an induction-concurrent sequence remains uncertain; replacing fluorouracil with oral capecitabine warrants further validation in view of its convenience, favorable toxicity profile, and favorable trends in efficacy; and accelerated fractionation is not recommended for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC who receive chemoradiotherapy.
Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fluoruracila/análogos & derivados , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Capecitabina , Carcinoma , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/efeitos adversos , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) gene has been linked with sensitivity to platinum and radiation. The authors hypothesized that the ERCC1 genotype for the SNPs cytosine-to-thymine substitution at codon 118 (C118T) and cytosine-to-adenine substitution at codon 8092 (C8092A) is prognostic in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who receive either radiotherapy (RT) or cisplatin plus RT. METHODS: The authors tested their hypothesis using biomarker screening samples from the Hong Kong NPC Study Group 0502 trial, which was a prospective, multicenter clinical trial that used post-RT plasma Epstein-Bar virus (EBV) DNA (pEBV) levels to screen patients with high-risk NPC for adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: ERCC1 SNPs were analyzed in 576 consecutive patients who were screened by pEBV. In the total biomarker population, there was no significant association of ERCC1 C118T or C8092A genotype with relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS). There also was no correlation between ERCC1 genotype and ERCC1 protein or messenger RNA expression in a subset of patients who had available paired biopsies. Post-RT pEBV status was the only independent prognosticator for RFS and OS in multivariate analyses. However, there was a significant interaction between ERCC1 C118T genotype and post-RT pEBV status (RFS, P = .0106; OS, P = .0067). The ERCC1 C118T genotype was significantly associated with both RFS (hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.61; P = .024) and OS (hazard ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-4.40; P = .0106) in the post-RT pEBV-negative population, but not in the pEBV-positive population. CONCLUSIONS: The current results prospectively validate pEBV as the most significant prognostic biomarker in NPC that can be used to select high-risk patients for adjuvant therapy. The ERCC1 C118T genotype may help to identify a favorable subgroup (approximately 7%) of pEBV-negative patients with NPC who have an excellent prognosis and can be spared the toxicities of further therapy.
Assuntos
DNA Viral/sangue , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/genética , Endonucleases/genética , Herpesvirus Humano 4/isolamento & purificação , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/virologia , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Given the existing uncertainty regarding the effectiveness and safety of switching from low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CAT), we conducted a comprehensive population-based cohort study utilizing electronic health database in Hong Kong. A total of 4356 patients with CAT between 2010 and 2022 were included, with 1700 (39.0%) patients switching to DOAC treatment. Compared to continuous LMWH treatment, switching to DOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of hospitalization due to venous thromboembolism (HR: 0.49 [95% CI = 0.35-0.68]) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.67 [95% CI = 0.61-0.74]), with no significant difference in major bleeding (HR: 1.04 [95% CI = 0.83-1.31]) within six months. These findings provide reassurance regarding the effectiveness and safety of switching from LMWH to DOACs among patients with CAT, including vulnerable patient groups.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Hemorragia , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular , Neoplasias , Trombose Venosa , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/administração & dosagem , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/efeitos adversos , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Hong Kong/epidemiologia , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Resultado do Tratamento , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Substituição de Medicamentos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE. To determine the effectiveness and toxicity of docetaxel for Chinese patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer in a local Hong Kong hospital. DESIGN. Case series. SETTING. A tertiary cancer centre in Hong Kong. PATIENTS. In all, 39 castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients were treated with 3-weekly docetaxel at 75 mg/m(2) and prednisolone 10 mg daily between January 2006 and December 2011 in Queen Elizabeth Hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES. Prostate-specific antigen control rate, pain control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and complication rates. RESULTS. The prostate-specific antigen response rate was 36%, and 27 (69%) of the patients had improved pain control after chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival was 7.8 (95% confidence interval, 4.9-10.8) months, 13.0 (95% confidence interval, 9.6-16.3) months, and 12.2 (95% confidence interval, 9.3-15.1) months, respectively. The grade 3 anaemia and thrombocytopenia rates were 5%, and the neutropenic fever rate was 8%. CONCLUSIONS. Chemotherapy with docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) given once every 3 weeks together with daily prednisolone is well tolerated in Chinese and can offer good symptom palliation in suitable patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Institutos de Câncer , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Docetaxel , Hong Kong , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Prednisolona/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The standard of care for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer is surgical cytoreduction plus platinum-based chemotherapy; however, recurrent disease frequently occurs after treatment. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors as first-line maintenance therapy have been demonstrated to significantly reduce the risk of disease progression or death in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have a complete or partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Niraparib is the only PARP inhibitor that offers a significant progression-free survival benefit compared with placebo in this patient population regardless of the homologous recombination status. However, predictive factors for treatment responses and approaches to dose optimization remain to be investigated. In this study, two Chinese patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer exhibited long-term responses to niraparib treatment, and hematological toxicity was successfully managed by dose adjustment. The literature on clinical trials and real-world experience on the efficacy, tolerability, and dose individualization of niraparib treatment in Western and Chinese patients was also reviewed. Future research is warranted to identify the characteristics of 'long responders' to niraparib treatment.
Assuntos
Indazóis , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Feminino , Humanos , Povo Asiático , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Indazóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Piperidinas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Importance: Postradiation oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is a common secondary malignant neoplasm affecting survivors of head and neck cancer who underwent radiotherapy. The clinical, pathologic, and immune-related features of postradiation OCSCC are poorly characterized, and treatment options are limited because of surgical difficulty and high morbidity associated with reirradiation. Objective: To determine whether postradiation OCSCC has distinctive clinical, pathologic, and immune-related features compared with demographic-matched sporadic OCSCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective matched cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary oncology center in Hong Kong. Participants included consecutive patients with OCSCC diagnosed between 2000 and 2020. Patients with postradiation OCSCC were matched with patients with sporadic OCSCC using age, year of diagnosis, sex, and anatomic subsites. Data analysis was performed from July to December 2022. Exposure: Head and neck irradiation involving the oral cavity before the diagnosis of OCSCC. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were relapse pattern, survival, and causes of death. Pathologic features; immunohistochemical staining for programmed death-ligand 1, PD-1, MSH6, PMS2, FOXP3, and Ki67; and mRNA expression of 31 immune-related genes were also analyzed. Results: A total of 173 patients, 60 with postradiation OCSCC (median [IQR] age, 63.8 [53.0-71.7] years; 43 men [71.7%]) and 113 with sporadic OCSCC (median [IQR] age, 64.4 [52.8-70.6] years; 83 men [73.5%]), were included. Patients with postradiation OCSCC had a higher proportion of N0 disease than those with sporadic OCSCC (50 patients [83.3%] vs 56 patients [49.6%]). With a median (IQR) follow-up of 10.2 (1.2-20.5) years, the 10-year relapse-free survival rates were lower in patients with postradiation OCSCC than sporadic OCSCC (29.6% [95% CI, 17.1%-43.2%] vs 52.4% [95% CI, 41.8%-62.0%]; P = .04), and the same was true for overall survival (30.5% [95% CI, 17.6%-44.4%] vs 52.3% [95% CI, 41.4%-62.1%]; P = .03). All relapses in patients with postradiation OCSCC were locoregional, whereas 35.2% of relapses (12 of 34 patients) in patients with sporadic OCSCC were distant. Despite similar 10-year disease-specific survival rates between the 2 groups (68.8% [95% CI, 55.8%-81.0%] vs 67.1% [95% CI, 57.5%-76.5%]; P = .91), patients with postradiation OCSCC had excess mortality due to pneumonia and cerebrovascular events. Postradiation OCSCC exhibited more adverse pathologic features (perineural invasion, worse pattern of invasion, and tumor budding), higher PD-1 expression, and higher gene expression of CD4 and TGF-ß compared with sporadic OCSCC. Conclusions and Relevance: This retrospective matched cohort study found distinctive pathologic characteristics and relapse patterns of postradiation OCSCC compared with sporadic OCSCC, which may be attributable to the lack of adjuvant radiotherapy, aggressive biologic phenotype, and different host immune response. Further exploration of the role of immune checkpoint therapy may be justified.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Neoplasias Bucais , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/uso terapêutico , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Neoplasias Bucais/patologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologiaRESUMO
The efficacy of anti-angiogenic agents (AAAs) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to synthesize evidence of their comparative effectiveness for improving overall survival (OS) among EOC patients. We searched six databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their inception to February 2021. We performed an NMA with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95%-confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate comparative effectiveness among different AAAs in chemotherapy-naïve and recurrent EOC. P-score was used to provide an effectiveness hierarchy ranking. Sensitivity NMA was carried out by focusing on studies that reported high-risk chemotherapy-naïve, platinum-resistant, and platinum-sensitive EOC. The primary outcome was OS. We identified 23 RCTs that assessed the effectiveness of AAAs. In recurrent EOC, concurrent use of trebananib (10 mg/kg) with chemotherapy was likely to be the best option (P-score: 0.88, HR 1.67, 95% CI 0.94; 2.94). The NMA indicated that bevacizumab plus chemotherapy followed by maintenance bevacizumab (P-score: 0.99) and pazopanib combined with chemotherapy (P-score: 0.79) both had the highest probability of being the best intervention for improving OS in high-risk chemotherapy-naïve and platinum-resistant EOC, respectively. AAAs may not play a significant clinical role in non-high-risk chemotherapy-naïve and platinum-sensitive EOC.
Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Metanálise em Rede , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib has demonstrated efficacy and a manageable safety profile in combination with endocrine therapy in women with oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in international phase 3 trials. The phase 3 PALOMA-4 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in Asian women with ER+/HER2- ABC. METHODS: Postmenopausal women (n = 340) with no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease were randomised 1:1 to palbociclib (125 mg/d orally; 3 weeks on, 1 week off) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/d orally; continuously) or placebo plus letrozole. The primary end-point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points included tumour response and safety. RESULTS: Median (95% CI) PFS was 21.5 (16.6-24.9) months with palbociclib plus letrozole and 13.9 (13.7-16.6) months with placebo plus letrozole (hazard ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53-0.87]; P = 0.0012). Consistent with the established safety profile, the most common adverse events (AEs) with palbociclib plus letrozole were neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopaenia, and anaemia. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported in 84.5% of patients in the palbociclib arm versus 1.2% in the placebo arm. One serious AE of febrile neutropenia in the palbociclib group was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from PALOMA-4 support the efficacy and safety of first-line palbociclib plus letrozole in postmenopausal Asian women with ER+/HER2- ABC. No new safety concerns of palbociclib plus letrozole were identified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials. gov, NCT02297438.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neutropenia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Quinase 4 Dependente de Ciclina , Feminino , Humanos , Letrozol , Neutropenia/tratamento farmacológico , Piperazinas , Pós-Menopausa , Piridinas , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The current recommendation for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy (IC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, data on the optimal platinum doses for each phase of combined regimens are lacking. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 742 patients with NPC in the NPC-0501 trial treated with CRT plus IC/AC and irradiated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were analyzed. The optimal platinum dose to achieve the best overall survival (OS) in the concurrent and induction/adjuvant phases was studied. RESULTS: Evaluation of the whole series shows the optimal platinum dose was 160 mg/m2 in the concurrent and 260 mg/m2 in the induction/adjuvant phase. Repeating the analyses on 591 patients treated with cisplatin throughout (no replacement by carboplatin) confirmed the same results. The cohort with optimal platinum doses in both phases had better OS than the cohort suboptimal in both phases (stage III: 90% vs. 75%; stage IVA-B: 80% vs. 56%, at 5-year). Multivariable analyses confirmed optimal platinum doses in both phases versus suboptimal dose in each phase are significant independent factors for OS, with HR of 0.61 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.41-0.91] and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.48-0.94), respectively. Treatment sequence was statistically insignificant after adjusting for platinum doses. CONCLUSIONS: Both concurrent and IC/AC are needed for locoregionally advanced NPC, even for patients irradiated by IMRT; the concurrent platinum dosage could be set at ≥160 mg/m2 when coupled with adequate induction/adjuvant dosage at ≥260 mg/m2 (or at least ≥240 mg/m2). To achieve these optimal dosages, IC-CRT at conventional fractionation is favored.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Cisplatino , Fluoruracila , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução/métodos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/etiologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Platina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Radiation-induced hypoglossal nerve palsy is an infrequent but debilitating late complication after definitive radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. D1cc < 74 Gy (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions, EQD2) has been proposed as a potential dose constraint that limits 8-year palsy risk to < 5%. This study sets to perform detailed dosimetric assessments on the applicability of this novel dose constraint in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective single-institution dosimetry study. NPC radiotherapy plans were identified from an institutional database, with an aim to select 10 eligible cases. Bilateral hypoglossal nerves were retrospectively contoured following a standard atlas. Cases with either one, or both, hypoglossal nerves D1cc exceeded 74 Gy EQD2 were included. Dosimetry of hypoglossal nerves, planning target volumes (PTV) and normal structures before and after application of the new hypoglossal nerve constraint were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: Ten NPC cases were replanned. All hypoglossal nerve contours overlapped with high-dose PTV, predominantly at regions of gross nodal diseases. D1cc in 15 out of 20 hypoglossal nerves exceeded 74G y EQD2 at initial plans. All nerves fulfilled the pre-specified constraint of 74Gy EQD2 after re-plan. Median hypoglossal nerve D1cc reduced from 74.8Gy (range, 74.1 to 77.4Gy) to 73.5Gy (range, 72.4 to 74.0Gy) (p < 0.001), corresponded to a projected reduction in 8-year palsy risk from 5%-14% to 3%-5%. PTV V100 was maintained above 95% in all cases. Dose increments in near-maximum (D2) and decrements in near-minimum (D98) were < 1 Gy. Safety dosimetric parameters of standard head and neck organs-at-risk showed no significant changes. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoglossal nerve D1cc < 74 Gy EQD2 is a dosimetrically feasible constraint in definitive radiotherapy for NPC. Tumor target coverage and normal organ dosimetry were not compromised with its usage. Its routine application should be considered in definitive radiotherapy for head and neck cancers.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Nervo Hipoglosso , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/radioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: In REFLECT, lenvatinib demonstrated an effect on overall survival (OS) by confirmation of noninferiority to sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This analysis assessed correlations between serum or tissue biomarkers and efficacy outcomes from REFLECT. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Serum biomarkers (VEGF, ANG2, FGF19, FGF21, and FGF23) were measured by ELISA. Gene expression in tumor tissues was measured by the nCounter PanCancer Pathways Panel. Pharmacodynamic changes in serum biomarker levels from baseline, and associations of clinical outcomes with baseline biomarker levels, were evaluated. RESULTS: Four hundred and seven patients were included in the serum analysis set (lenvatinib n = 279, sorafenib n = 128); 58 patients were included in the gene-expression analysis set (lenvatinib n = 34, sorafenib n = 24). Both treatments were associated with increases in VEGF; only lenvatinib was associated with increases in FGF19 and FGF23 at all time points. Lenvatinib-treated responders had greater increases in FGF19 and FGF23 versus nonresponders at cycle 4, day 1 (FGF19: 55.2% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.014; FGF23: 48.4% vs. 16.4%, P = 0.0022, respectively). Higher baseline VEGF, ANG2, and FGF21 correlated with shorter OS in both treatment groups. OS was longer for lenvatinib than sorafenib [median, 10.9 vs. 6.8 months, respectively; HR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.85; P-interaction = 0.0397] with higher baseline FGF21. In tumor tissue biomarker analysis, VEGF/FGF-enriched groups showed improved OS with lenvatinib versus the intermediate VEGF/FGF group (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.91; P = 0.0253). CONCLUSIONS: Higher baseline levels of VEGF, FGF21, and ANG2 may be prognostic for shorter OS. Higher baseline FGF21 may be predictive for longer OS with lenvatinib compared with sorafenib, but this needs confirmation.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Quinolinas/uso terapêutico , Sorafenibe/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/farmacocinética , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/sangue , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/química , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/sangue , Neoplasias Hepáticas/química , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
PURPOSE: No standard treatment exists for platinum-refractory, recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). This phase II study (NCT02605967) evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) of spartalizumab, an antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, versus chemotherapy, in NPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with nonkeratinizing recurrent/metastatic NPC who progressed on/after platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Spartalizumab was dosed 400 mg once every 4 weeks, and chemotherapy was received per investigator's choice. RESULTS: Patients were randomized to receive either spartalizumab (82 patients) or chemotherapy (40 patients). The most common spartalizumab treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (10.3%) and pruritus (9.3%). Median PFS in the spartalizumab arm was 1.9 months versus 6.6 months in the chemotherapy arm (P = 0.915). The overall response rate in the spartalizumab arm was 17.1% versus 35.0% in the chemotherapy arm. Median duration of response was 10.2 versus 5.7 months in the spartalizumab versus chemotherapy arms, respectively. Median overall survival was 25.2 and 15.5 months in the spartalizumab and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Tumor RNA sequencing showed a correlation between response to spartalizumab and IFNγ, LAG-3, and TIM-3 gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: Spartalizumab demonstrated a safety profile consistent with other anti-PD-1 antibodies. The primary endpoint of median PFS was not met; however, median overall survival and median duration of response were longer with spartalizumab compared with chemotherapy.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Tratamento Farmacológico , Humanos , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although the majority of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients demonstrate favorable outcomes after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, about 8-10% of patients will develop recurrent disease, and genomic alterations (GAs) associated with the recurrence are unclear. METHODS: This study investigated the GAs in the paired primary tumors and recurrent tumors of 7 NPC patients with relapse, as well as the primary tumors of 15 NPC patients without relapse by deep targeted next-generation sequencing on 440 cancer-related genes. RESULTS: BRCA1 and TP53 mutations were significantly enriched in patients with relapse (P = 0.021 and P = 0.023, respectively). Survival analysis revealed that the GAs of TP53, ZNF217, VEGFB, CDKN1B, GNAS, PRDM1, and MEN1 were associated with significantly shorter overall survival. The GAs of the tumor also altered after treatment in the relapsed group, and five genes (CDK4, FGFR3, ALK, BRCA1, and CHEK2) in the recurrent tumors were potentially druggable. CONCLUSIONS: The discovery of GAs associated with recurrence or survival in NPC may serve as potential prognostic gene signatures of high-risk patients. Targeted therapies are available in some of the clinically relevant GAs and may be considered in future clinical trials. Given the limitation of the sample size, validation by a larger cohort is warranted.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , Variação Genética , Genômica , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/genética , Gerenciamento Clínico , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Genômica/métodos , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/mortalidade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/terapia , Prognóstico , RecidivaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Long-term risk of second primary cancer (SPC) after definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the risk, predictive factors and survival impact of SPC in a large territory-wide cohort of NPC survivors in an endemic region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter study, consecutive NPC patients (nâ¯=â¯3166) who underwent definitive IMRT in all six public oncology centers in Hong Kong between 2001 and 2010 were included. SPC risks were quantified by standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and absolute excess risks (AERs) estimated from corresponding age-, sex-, and calendar year-specific population cancer incidence data from the Hong Kong Cancer Registry. Predictive factors and SPC-specific mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up period of 10.8â¯years, 290 cases of SPC were observed with a crude incidence of 9.2%. Cancer risk in NPC survivors was 90% higher than that in general population [SIR, 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.7-2.2], with an AER of 52.1 (95% CI, 36.8-67.3) per 10,000 person-years at risk. Significant excess cancer risks were observed for oral cavity, sarcoma, oropharynx, paranasal sinus, salivary gland, thyroid, skin and lung. Advanced age, smoking, hepatitis B status, and re-irradiation were independent predictive factors. SPC accounted for 9.4% of all deaths among NPC survivors during the study period, and 10-year SPC-specific mortality was 3.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Second cancer risk after IMRT was substantial among NPC patients. SPC impairs long-term survival, and close surveillance is warranted as part of survivorship care.