RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: During the 2017-2018 cholera outbreak in Kinshasa, many patients initially reported to primary healthcare centers (HCs) before being transferred to the nearest cholera treatment centers. This study aims to assess the level of preparedness of HCs in responding to cholera outbreaks. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional survey. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional survey in 180 of 374 primary HCs in Kinshasa. We collected data on 14 cholera preparedness criteria and described their prevalence among HCs. We used logistic regression to assess the association between each preparedness criteria and previous reporting of cholera cases by HCs. RESULTS: The median number of preparedness criteria met by HCs was 5 [range: 0-11]. Five percent (n = 9) of HCs [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3%-9.3%] met at least 10 criteria. HCs that previously reported ≥3 cholera cases were less likely to meet the criteria for 'presence of an isolation unit' (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.12; 95% CI [0.03-0.61]) and 'availability of sufficient quantity of chlorine' (aOR: 0.13; 95% CI [0.02-0.64]). CONCLUSIONS: Despite past experience of cholera cases, health facilities in Kinshasa exhibit a low level of cholera preparedness. There is a need to prioritize the reinforcement of the preparedness of primary HCs to prevent future cholera outbreaks.
Assuntos
Cólera/epidemiologia , Cólera/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Estudos Transversais , República Democrática do Congo/epidemiologia , HumanosRESUMO
The WHO African region is characterised by the largest infectious disease burden in the world. We conducted a retrospective descriptive analysis using records of all infectious disease outbreaks formally reported to the WHO in 2018 by Member States of the African region. We analysed the spatio-temporal distribution, the notification delay as well as the morbidity and mortality associated with these outbreaks. In 2018, 96 new disease outbreaks were reported across 36 of the 47 Member States. The most commonly reported disease outbreak was cholera which accounted for 20.8% (n = 20) of all events, followed by measles (n = 11, 11.5%) and Yellow fever (n = 7, 7.3%). About a quarter of the outbreaks (n = 23) were reported following signals detected through media monitoring conducted at the WHO regional office for Africa. The median delay between the disease onset and WHO notification was 16 days (range: 0-184). A total of 107 167 people were directly affected including 1221 deaths (mean case fatality ratio (CFR): 1.14% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07%-1.20%)). The highest CFR was observed for diseases targeted for eradication or elimination: 3.45% (95% CI 0.89%-10.45%). The African region remains prone to outbreaks of infectious diseases. It is therefore critical that Member States improve their capacities to rapidly detect, report and respond to public health events.
Assuntos
Cólera/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Febre Amarela/epidemiologia , África/epidemiologia , Humanos , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Estudos Retrospectivos , Organização Mundial da SaúdeRESUMO
This systematic review aimed at investigating the role that biosecurity can have in preventing or controlling colibacillosis in broiler production. Primary studies with natural or experimental exposure to avian pathogenic Escherichia coli, evaluating any biosecurity measure to prevent or control colibacillosis in broiler chickens with at least one of the following outcomes: feed conversion ratio (FCR), condemnations at slaughter, and mortality due to colibacillosis, were included. A systematic search was carried out in 4 databases according to the Cochrane handbook and reported following the PRISMA 2020 directions. Studies (n = 3,886) were screened in a 2-phase process and data matching the inclusion criteria were extracted. Risk of bias assessment was performed. Four studies reporting biosecurity measures to prevent or control colibacillosis in broiler production were included. In all studies, only disinfection during either the pre-hatching period (n = 3) or the post-hatching period (n = 1) was evaluated as biosecurity measure in broiler production, as well as its effect on FCR (n = 2) and mortality (n = 4) due to colibacillosis. No studies with effects on condemnations at slaughter were found. Due to the heterogeneity of studies in regard to interventions and outcomes, meta-analysis was not carried out. The limited findings of this systematic review do not provide a comprehensive evidence to statistically evaluate the efficacy of biosecurity to prevent or control colibacillosis in broiler production. The scarcity of evidence found suggests that further and deeper investigations on the topic are needed, considering the variety of interventions related to biosecurity.