Hazard of Failed Nonoperative Management for Symptomatic Accessory Navicular in Children and Adolescents: A Population-Based Case-Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The accessory navicular (AN) is an idiopathic condition of the foot present in 4% to 21% of the population. Most ANs remain asymptomatic, but children and adolescents who develop symptoms can have remarkably reduced quality of life. Although many respond to conservative measures, surgery is occasionally needed. Our purpose was to determine factors associated with the failure of nonoperative management. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective case-cohort study included patients up to age 19 years presenting between 2000 and 2021 with symptomatic AN and treated with standard-of-care. All 298 surgical cases, indicating failed nonoperative treatment, were included. For the subcohort, 299 patients were randomly sampled from all eligible patients, regardless of treatment. Baseline characteristics were summarized for the surgical cases and subcohort. Proportional hazards assumptions were checked and stratification implemented when necessary. Marginal structural proportional hazard modeling was used to estimate hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals via inverse probability and LinYing weighting methods. RESULTS: The 298 surgical cases failed nonoperative management at a median of 5.2 months (IQR, 2.0-11.6 mo). In the subcohort, 86 failures of nonoperative management and 213 nonfailures constituted a 28.8% surgery rate. In both cohorts, nearly all patients played sports. Univariate proportional hazard modeling found older age (P=0.02) and activity limitation (P<0.001) at presentation, female sex (P=0.002), higher BMI (P=0.01), AN on the right (P<0.001), and bone marrow edema of the AN (P<0.001) and navicular body (P<0.001) on MRI were associated with increased hazard of nonoperative failure. Nearly all of the surgical cohort reported improvement in pain (278/296, 94%) and returned to their primary sport (236/253, 93%) after surgery. Most also experienced full resolution of symptoms (187/281, 67%). CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic AN predominantly affects female athletes, leading to surgery in 28.8% of our subcohort. Conservative treatment may be less successful-and therefore surgery could be more strongly considered-in older age, activity limitation at presentation, female sex, higher BMI, right-sided AN, and bone marrow edema on MRI. Surgery is effective for symptomatic and functional improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-cohort-Level III.

The Effect of Prosthetic Joint Infection on Work Status and Quality of Life: A Multicenter, International Study.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and subsequent revision surgeries may affect patients' social and physical health, ability to complete daily activities, and disability status. This study sought to determine how PJI affects patients' quality of life through patient-reported outcome measures with minimum 1-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients who suffered PJI following primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) from 2012 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients met Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for acute or chronic PJI, underwent revision TJA surgery, and had at least 1 year of follow-up. Patients were surveyed regarding how PJI affected their work and disability status, as well as their mental and physical health. Outcome measures were compared between acute and chronic PJIs. In total, 318 patients (48.4% total knee arthroplasty and 51.6% total hip arthroplasty) met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Following surgical treatment for knee and hip PJI, a substantial proportion of patients reported that they were unable to negotiate stairs (20.5%), had worse physical health (39.6%), and suffered worse mental health (25.2%). A high proportion of patients reported worse quality of life (38.5%) and social satisfaction (35.3%) following PJI. Worse reported patient-reported outcome measures including patients' ability to complete daily physical activities were found among patients undergoing treatment for chronic PJI, and also, 23% of patients regretted their initial decision to pursue primary TJA. CONCLUSIONS: A PJI negatively affects patients' ability to carry out everyday activities. This patient population is prone to report challenges overcoming disability and returning to work. Patients should be adequately educated regarding the risk of PJI to decrease later potential regrets. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series (IV).

See, seek, support: a policy framework to uplift first-generation low-income medical professionals.

The First-Generation and/or Low-Income (FGLI) identity is not readily visible, encapsulating those who are the first in their families to complete a 4-year college degree and/or those living near or below the poverty line. In the backdrop of unprecedented levels of socioeconomic inequality in a country where household income predicts educational attainment, we explore the current state of U.S. society regarding socioeconomic status and health care. We describe challenges in diversifying the health care workforce and present a multi-pronged policy approach for visibilizing, recruiting, supporting, and retaining FGLI trainees in medicine, with the promise of improving the quality of health care delivery altogether. Through this work, we aim to render the field of medicine more equitable for trainees, physicians, and patients alike.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Multidisciplinary Care Delivery to Children with Cerebral Palsy and Other Neuromuscular Complex Chronic Conditions.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented challenges in the care of children with cerebral palsy (CP) and other neuromuscular complex chronic conditions (NCCCs). The purpose of this study is to explore the direct impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare delivery. From May to August 2020, medical professionals caring for CP and NCCC patients across multiple countries and disciplines completed a self-administered cross-sectional survey comparing practices before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the 79 healthcare workers from eight countries who participated-predominantly pediatric orthopedic surgeons (32%), pediatricians (30%), and pediatric physiatrists (23%)-most of them felt that caring for NCCC patients during the pandemic presented unique difficulties, and they reported a significant decrease in the in-person NCCC clinic volume (p < 0.001), multidisciplinary appointments (p < 0.001), surgical cases (p = 0.008), and botulinum toxin/phenol injections. Most providers affirmed that institutional guidelines for perioperative emergent/urgent and elective procedures, workplace settings, and technology were modified to accommodate the ongoing public health crisis. The usage of telemedicine significantly increased for NCCC patient visits (p < 0.001). During the COVID-19 pandemic, many children with NCCCs lost access to routine, multidisciplinary care. Telemedicine became an integral part of communication and management. In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic and with the threat of future healthcare disruptions, these data lay the foundation for trending the evolution of healthcare delivery and accelerating best practice guidelines for children with CP and NCCCs.