Adherence and Persistence to Antiplatelet Therapy in Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Danish Population Based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Adherence to antiplatelet therapy is recommended but unexplored in patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Therefore, this study aimed to determine adherence and persistence to antiplatelet therapy in patients with PAD, defined as intermittent claudication and chronic limb threatening ischaemia. DESIGN: Population based nationwide cohort study. METHODS: This study included all Danish citizens aged ≥ 40 years with a first inpatient or outpatient diagnosis of symptomatic PAD between 2010 - 2017, and who had at least one prescription claim for aspirin and/or clopidogrel within 90 days after diagnosis. Adherence was determined by the proportion of days covered (PDC) during the first year after diagnosis. Persistence was defined as no treatment gap ≥ 30 days between prescription renewals over three year follow up. RESULTS: A total of 39 687 patients were eligible for inclusion, of whom 23 279 (58.7%) claimed a prescription for aspirin and/or clopidogrel within 90 days of diagnosis. Among these, 12 898 (55.4%) were prevalent users, while the remainder comprised new users who initiated the therapy after the index PAD diagnosis. The mean PDC was 74.5% (SD 35.0%) for prevalent users and 60.5% (SD 30.5%) for new users. Adherence increased with age and number of concomitant drugs. The overall one year cumulative incidence treatment discontinuation was 13.0% (95% CI 12.5 - 13.4%) overall, 17.2% (CI 16.6 - 17.9%) for prevalent users, and 7.9% (CI 7.4 - 8.4%) for new users. At three year follow up, the cumulative incidence of discontinuation was 31.5% (CI 30.9 - 32.2%) overall, 44.6% (CI 43.7 - 45.4%) for prevalent users, and 14.6% (CI 13.9 - 15.3) for new users. CONCLUSION: Less than 60% of patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic PAD claimed a prescription for antiplatelet therapy within 90 days of diagnosis, and both adherence and persistence were moderate during the first year after diagnosis. These findings underscore the importance of efforts to improve the initiation and continuation of antiplatelet therapy in patients with PAD.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - Disease or a Defect - Patients' Perceptions of Aortic Aneurysm in the Presence of Multimorbidity.

OBJECTIVES: Abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with substantial comorbidity and significant long-term mortality. Reduction of cardiovascular risk factors and smoking cessation improves prognosis, but implementation of recommendations is suboptimal. Patient's disease-awareness and level of multimorbidity are important factors affecting treatment- adherence. This study explored the perception of disease in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms and multimorbidity. METHODS: In a qualitative design we assessed patients' perception of aortic aneurysms in the presence of multimorbidity and cardiovascular risk factors. We conducted a workshop including patients from the aneurysm ultrasound-surveillance-program at a tertiary vascular department. Data from the workshop were analyzed using a qualitative exploratory design with an inductive approach. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and multimorbidity participated in the workshop. Three categories describing the patient's perception of disease emerged from the analysis. (1) Abdominal aortic aneurysm is not a disease; it is a defect, (2) Someone else is in control, (3) Abdominal aortic aneurysm is an isolated condition. CONCLUSION: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms and multimorbidity did not perceive their aneurysm as a disease, but merely as a bodily defect. Growth and rupture of the aneurysm were the main concerns related to the condition, and the participants relied solely on the health professionals to control this by regular ultrasound-surveillance. Consequently, the participants did not perceive abdominal aortic aneurysm as a motivation for cardiovascular risk factor modification by optimization in medication or smoking-cessation.

Frequency of cancer in patients operated on for acute peripheral arterial thrombosis and the impact on prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about acute peripheral arterial thrombosis in patients with concomitant cancer. Small studies suggest that revascularization in this patient group is associated with thrombosis and increased risk of amputation and death. We investigated the frequency of cancer in patients operated on for acute peripheral arterial thrombosis and the long-term risk of amputation, mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke in a national cohort. METHODS: This was a prospective case/noncase study comprising all Danish citizens undergoing vascular surgery for acute arterial thrombosis from 1986 to 2012 with up to 26 years of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 7840 patients were treated surgically for acute arterial thrombosis; 2384 (30.4%) were previously diagnosed with cancer or developed cancer during the observation period. Risk of amputation was not significantly different in patients with or without cancer, except in patients with cancer diagnosed <24 months before acute limb ischemia (hazard ratio, 2.0). Mortality was significantly greater in all patients having or developing cancer within 24 months after surgery (hazard ratio, 1.2-2.2). The frequencies of myocardial infarction and stroke were similar to those among patients without cancer. CONCLUSIONS: One of five patients operated on for acute limb ischemia has a diagnosis of cancer, and a further 3.4% will develop cancer within 24 months. The data further show that patients with acute limb ischemia and concomitant cancer can be successfully revascularized and that the majority of these patients preserve their limb. Cancer should therefore not contravene interventional treatment.