Short-term outcomes after heart transplantation using donor hearts preserved with ex vivo perfusion.

The standard Conventional Cold Storage (CCS) during heart transplantation procurement is associated with time-dependent ischemic injury to the graft, which is a significant independent risk factor for post-transplant early morbidity and mortality - especially when cold ischemic time exceeds four hours. Since 2018, Rigshospitalet (Copenhagen, Denmark) has been utilising ex vivo perfusion (Organ Care System, OCS) in selected cases. The objective of this study was to compare the short-term clinical outcomes of patients transplanted with OCS compared to CCS. Methods: This retrospective single-centre study was based on consecutive patients undergoing a heart transplant between January 2018 and April 2021. Patients were selected for the OCS group when the cold ischemic time was expected to exceed four hours. The primary outcome measure was six-month event-free survival. Results: In total, 48 patients were included in the study; nine were transplanted with an OCS heart. The two groups had no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Six-month event-free survival was 77.8% [95% CI: 54.9-100%] in the OCS group and 79.5% [95% CI: 67.8-93.2%] in the CCS group (p = 0.91). While the OCS group had a median out-of-body time that was 183 min longer (p < 0.0001), the cold ischemic time was reduced by 51 min (p = 0.007). Conclusion: In a Scandinavian setting, our data confirms that utilising OCS in heart procurement allows for a longer out-of-body time and a reduced cold ischemic time without negatively affecting safety or early post-transplant outcomes.

Iron Deficiency in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Iron deficiency is a common and independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure. The implications of iron deficiency in patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) are less established. This review recaps data on the prevalence, characteristics and impact of Iron deficiency in the LVAD population. A systematic search yielded eight studies involving 517 LVAD patients, with iron deficiency prevalence ranging from 40% to 82%. IV iron repletion was not associated with adverse events and effectively resolved iron deficiency in most patients. However, the effects of iron deficiency and iron repletion on post-implant survival and exercise capacity remain unknown. Although iron deficiency is highly prevalent in LVAD patients, its true prevalence and adverse effects may be misestimated due to inexact diagnostic criteria. Future randomised controlled trials on IV iron treatment in LVAD patients are warranted to clarify the significance of this common comorbidity.