Development of an Education Material Targeting Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Amputation due to Severe Limb Ischemia-A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is associated with a high risk of amputation, yet patients undergoing amputation due to CLTI have little knowledge of the amputation process and the rehabilitation that awaits. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate information material for patients undergoing amputation. METHODS: Nine participants were included in the study. Two focus group interviews were performed with seven patients who had undergone lower extremity amputation due to CLTI within the past 2 y. Additionally, two individual interviews were carried out. A semistructured interview guide was used, and the interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative content analysis with a deductive approach. RESULTS: Three themes were identified as essential for the design of the written information: Perspectives on design and formatting, Providing information to enhance participation in care, and Accessibility to information and support. The prototyped information leaflet was perceived as acceptable, useable, relevant, and comprehensible by the participants. CONCLUSIONS: For patients to actively engage in their care, it is vital that their information needs are met and that they are provided with psychosocial support when needed. Written and oral information should be provided by a trusted healthcare professional.

eHealth tool for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: development and initial evaluation.

RATIONALE: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a prevalent condition among elderly men and may require surgical repair. Recent technical advances offer new opportunities to provide patients and next of kin with tailored and individualised information. eHealth tools have proven useful in other patient cohorts, but there are currently no validated educational eHealth tools for patients with AAA. AIM: Our aim was to develop and evaluate an eHealth tool for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm using a participatory design process. METHOD: Patients, healthcare professionals and a technical team were involved in the development of the eHealth tool. The tool was assessed for content and usability through questionnaires, validated instruments and focus group interviews. Readability was assessed using Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). Interview data were analysed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Factual content and illustrations were accurate and in line with current information routine. Readability assessments produced a mean FRE score of 42.2 (±3,7) and mean FKGL of 10 (±1), implying that the eHealth tool may be difficult to comprehend for certain users. However, participants in the focus group interviews found the tool to be understandable, relevant and easy to use. CONCLUSION: The developed eHealth tool is acceptable, understandable and usable for the potential end-users. Further evaluation of the usability of the tool and effect on outcome in clinical care is warranted. This is the first educational eHealth tool for patients with AAA and has potential to contribute to improved communication and quality of care for AAA patients.

Anxiety and disease awareness in individuals with heredity for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: The psychological consequences of being aware of an increased risk of developing abdominal aortic aneurysm as a first-degree relative of a person with abdominal aortic aneurysm are hitherto unexplored. This study investigates the awareness of heritability and anxiety in male and female adult offspring of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients compared to controls. Health-related quality of life among participants with aortic pathology was compared to participants with normal aortic diameters. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional point prevalence study based on the participants examined in the Detecting Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in First Degree Relatives Trial (DAAAD; 752 adult offspring, 756 matched controls), 2020-2022. Questionnaires about health-related quality of life and study-specific questions regarding awareness of heritability were collected prior to the aortic ultrasound. RESULTS: Attendance rate was higher among individuals with heredity compared to controls (67% vs. 52%, p < 0.001). Of 1508 adult offspring examined, 65% reported having a close relative with abdominal aortic aneurysm (6% in controls). Female adult offspring reported higher awareness of heritability than controls (38% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), as did males (32% vs. 8%, p < 0.001). A slight majority of participants with awareness reported anxiety (54% of female offspring; 51% of male). There were no measured differences in health-related quality of life between the groups when standard health-related quality of life instruments were used. CONCLUSION: The higher-than-expected proportion of adult offspring with awareness of heritability and anxiety about such risk indicates that we fail to communicate risk to this group appropriately via the current channels of information within the healthcare system. This calls for the development of dedicated strategies for improved communication of abdominal aortic aneurysm risk to patients and their next of kin.

Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in first-degree relatives: detecting AAA in adult offspring of AAA patients.

BACKGROUND: First-degree relatives of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) may have an increased risk of developing the disease. The primary aim was to report the prevalence of AAA in adult male and female offspring of patients with AAA. The secondary aim was to explore the efficiency of a registry-based detection route, and the third aim was to report contemporary prevalence in the population. METHODS: Adult offspring of individuals with AAA and matched controls were identified through national registries. The examination included questionnaires and ultrasound examinations of the infrarenal aorta. Aortic pathology was defined as an aortic diameter ≥25 mm, AAA ≥30 mm. RESULTS: The participation rate among male and female adult offspring was 64% (350/543) and 69% (402/583), respectively. A lower participation rate was found in male and female controls (51% and 52%). No difference in prevalence of AAA was observed between male adult offspring and controls (0.9%, c.i. 0.2 to 2.3%) or in the female population (prevalence of 0.2% in adult offspring and controls). Aortic pathology and previously diagnosed AAA were detected in 5.3% (c.i. 3.3 to 8.0%) of male adult offspring and 2.3% (c.i. 1.1 to 4.2%) in controls. Aortic pathology was more prevalent among adult offspring of females with AAA. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AAA in the general population is low, but aortic pathology is notably higher among male first-degree relatives. Increased awareness should be directed towards individuals with a possible hereditary predisposition, particularly offspring of females with AAA and older smokers. Risk factor-based targeted screening of adult offspring of patients with AAA after registry-based detection should be further explored. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT4623268.

Feasibility of alcohol interventions in cardiology: a qualitative study of clinician perspectives in Sweden.

AIMS: This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing alcohol screening and brief interventions (SBI) in cardiology services. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a qualitative study. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 clinical cardiology staff (doctors, nurses, and assistant nurses) of varying experience levels and from various clinical settings (high-dependency unit, ward, and outpatient clinic), in three regions of Sweden. Reflexive thematic analysis was used, with deductive coding applying the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation (COM-B) theoretical framework. A total of 41 barriers and facilitators were identified, including 12 related to capability, 9 to opportunity, and 20 to motivation. Four themes were developed: (i) uncharted territory, where clinicians expressed a need to address alcohol use but lacked knowledge and a roadmap for implementing SBI; (ii) cardiology as a cardiovascular specialty, where tasks were prioritized according to established roles; (iii) alcohol stigma, where alcohol was reported to be a sensitive topic that staff avoid discussing with patients; and (iv) window of opportunity, where staff expressed potential for implementing SBI in routine cardiology care. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that opportunities exist for early identification and follow-up of hazardous alcohol use within routine cardiology care. Several barriers, including low knowledge, stigma, a lack of ownership, and a greater focus on other risk factors, must be addressed prior to the implementation of SBI in cardiology. To meet current clinical guidelines, there is a need to increase awareness and to improve pathways to addiction care. In addition, there may be a need for clinicians dedicated to alcohol interventions within cardiology services. REGISTRATION: OSF (osf.io/hx3ts).

Experiences of participating in an eHealth intervention for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: A qualitative study.

AIMS: To explore patients' experiences of an eHealth tool and tailored psychosocial support throughout the care trajectory of AAA repair. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study. METHODS: Individual in-depth interviews were performed with twelve patients participating in an intervention study in conjunction with AAA surgery. Data were collected from March to December 2019. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach. RESULTS: The patients' familiarity with and attitude to eHealth influenced their use of the eHealth tool. The interpersonal relationship with health care staff affected patients' ability to submit themselves. The preoperative information, including the eHealth tool, may result in an overwhelming amount of information, causing anxiety and leading patients to refrain from information, partly due to the timing of the information. Psychosocial support offered continuity and reassurance, and enabled the patients to elaborate on existential matters. CONCLUSION: The design of eHealth services in AAA care would benefit from a consideration of patients' attitude to eHealth and familiarity with modern technology. To increase patients' accessibility to health care services, their preference for technology use and type of contact should be verified and respected. Psychosocial support should be offered with continuity to alleviate patients' emotional burden. Adjustment to patients' mental state and learning needs may forestall anxiety. IMPACT: This study highlights factors that affect the acceptability of eHealth services in AAA patients. These findings can guide future design and implementation of mobile health interventions in surgical care.

Evaluating feasibility of using national registries for identification, invitation, and ultrasound examination of persons with hereditary risk for aneurysm disease-detecting abdominal aortic aneurysms in first degree relatives (adult offspring) to AAA patients (DAAAD).

BACKGROUND: Sweden and the UK invite all 65-year-old men to a population-based ultrasound-based screening program to detect abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). First-degree relatives of patients with AAA are reported to have an increased risk to develop AAA, both women and men, but are not invited to screening. The "Detecting AAA in First Degree Relatives to AAA patients" (DAAAD) was designed to detect the true prevalence in adult offspring to AAA patients and to evaluate if national registries could be used for identification of index persons and their adult children with a high risk for the disease. The aim of this study is to summarize the design and methodology for this registry-based study. METHODS: The study is based on a registry-based extraction and identification of a risk group in the population with a subsequent identification of their adult offspring. The targeted risk group suffers a heredity for a potentially lethal disease, AAA (n = 750) and matched control group without heredity for AAA is also identified and invited (n = 750). The participation rate in the population-based AAA screening program for men is 75% regionally. This population is younger and have a lower prevalence. A participation rate of 65% is considered clinically adequate. For the DAAAD study, a stratified analysis of the primary outcome, prevalence, will be performed for women and men separately. Two other planned projects are based on the material: firstly, evaluation of the anxiety for disease and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and, secondly, the cost-effectiveness of the study. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, this feasibility study will be instrumental in supporting the development of a possible new model to invite persons with high risk to develop hereditary rare diseases. To our knowledge, this is a unique, safe, and most likely to be a cost-efficient model to invite targeted risk groups for selected screening. If the study design and the results are shown to be cost-effective at the detected participation rate and prevalence, it should be further evaluated and adopted to a national screening program. The model also invites both women and men, which is unique for this specific patient group, considering that all population-based screening programs only include men. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at the website of Clinical Trials. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier, NCT4623268.

A large proportion of patients with small ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms are women and have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVE: In a population-based cohort of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs), our aim was to investigate clinical, morphological and biomechanical features in patients with small rAAAs. METHODS: All patients admitted to an emergency department in Stockholm and Gotland, a region with a population of 2.1 million, between 2009-2013 with a CT-verified rupture (n = 192) were included, and morphological measurements were performed. Patients with small rAAAs, maximal diameter (Dmax) ≤ 60 mm were selected (n = 27), and matched 2:1 by Dmax, sex and age to intact AAA (iAAAs). For these patients, morphology including volume and finite element analysis-derived biomechanics were assessed. RESULTS: The mean Dmax for all rAAAs was 80.8 mm (SD = 18.9 mm), women had smaller Dmax at rupture (73.4 ± 18.4 mm vs 83.1 ± 18.5 mm, p = 0.003), and smaller neck and iliac diameters compared to men. Aortic size index (ASI) was similar between men and women (4.1 ± 3.1 cm/m2 vs 3.8 ± 1.0 cm/m2). Fourteen percent of all patients ruptured at Dmax ≤ 60 mm, and a higher proportion of women compared to men ruptured at Dmax ≤ 60 mm: 27% (12/45) vs. 10% (15/147), p = 0.005. Also, a higher proportion of patients with a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ruptured at Dmax ≤ 60 mm (34.6% vs 14.6%, p = 0.026). Supra-renal aortic size index (14.0, IQR 13.3-15.3 vs 12.8, IQR = 11.4-14.0) and peak wall rupture index (PWRI, 0.35 ± 0.08 vs 0.43 ± 0.11, p = 0.016) were higher for small rAAAs compared to matched iAAAs. Aortic size index, peak wall stress and aneurysm volume did not differ. CONCLUSION: More than one tenth of ruptures occur at smaller diameters, women continuously suffer an even higher risk of presenting with smaller diameters, and this must be considered in surveillance programs. The increased supra-renal aortic size index and PWRI are potential markers for rupture risk, and patients under surveillance with these markers may benefit from increased attention, and potentially from timely repair.

Perceived learning needs of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) should receive adequate information about the disease, treatment options, and self-care. Patients' learning needs should be acknowledged. The aim was to describe the perceived learning needs in patients with AAA. A secondary aim was to explore their experience of methods for patient education. METHODS: Three focus group interviews were conducted with 14 patients treated with open or endovascular repair of AAA. The interviews embraced initial diagnosis, surgical treatment, and follow-up from a learning perspective and were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Three categories and 10 subcategories emerged. The health care staff failed to meet the participants' individual learning needs. Participants relied on other pathways to obtain knowledge, such as the internet or anecdotal information from friends and family. Learning needs pertained to risks and complications with surgery, self-care, and rupture risk. The participants were reluctant to ask questions due to a stressful environment. They requested accessible written information, along with a professional contact person for coordination and support during the care pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AAA describe unmet learning needs in regard to risks and complications with the disease and surgical treatment but also disease management and lifestyle factors. Education material should be consistent, individualized and easily accessible for patients and next of kin. Additional psychosocial support is warranted. Adjusting information to patients' needs may improve patient satisfaction.